ShamrockPride
Footballguy
My mistake at any point I meant. BUT SURE!So you're saying there is a chance?Dunno if it was posted in here but teams 0-325 since 2000 when trailing 31+ at the half.
My mistake at any point I meant. BUT SURE!So you're saying there is a chance?Dunno if it was posted in here but teams 0-325 since 2000 when trailing 31+ at the half.
It's a "3 score game" now after the XP. Not sure how going for 2 helps at this stage.So you're saying there is a chance?Dunno if it was posted in here but teams 0-325 since 2000 when trailing 31+ at the half.
17How many times are they going to play this fake Pixies song Nissan commercial today?
Depending on what happens in this drive, it could get very interesting.Game so boring commentators not even talking about anymore.
Effed that quick strike up.If Seattle get's a fast score.....game could really get interesting.
Yea, that was strange.. Let Baldwin go deep no cover.. Lucky Wilson misses.. Then leave Kearse completely uncovered for a 1st down.. Agree with others that we've seen this from the Panthers many times this year vs Packers, Giants, etc..Defense getting sloppy 2nd half...per usual.
Someone woke seattle up.
this seems right to me.Should have gone for two that time. Went from "down 3 scores" to "still down 3 scores" with Lockett's TD.
You only go for 2 when you absolutely must.Should have gone for two that time. Went from "down 3 scores" to "still down 3 scores" with Lockett's TD.
Part of it is game flow. Seattle has a lot of momentum and there is still a lot of time left. I don't think it's horrible to kick the extra point there and I'm usually in favor of coaches being more aggressive.this seems right to me.Should have gone for two that time. Went from "down 3 scores" to "still down 3 scores" with Lockett's TD.
how would the momentum be if you were suddenly in a 2-score game? no good?Part of it is game flow. Seattle has a lot of momentum and there is still a lot of time left. I don't think it's horrible to kick the extra point there and I'm usually in favor of coaches being more aggressive.this seems right to me.Should have gone for two that time. Went from "down 3 scores" to "still down 3 scores" with Lockett's TD.
I'm not convinced Seattle has enough time for FOUR successful scoring drives. Which is what Carroll commits to by not going for 2.Part of it is game flow. Seattle has a lot of momentum and there is still a lot of time left. I don't think it's horrible to kick the extra point there and I'm usually in favor of coaches being more aggressive.this seems right to me.Should have gone for two that time. Went from "down 3 scores" to "still down 3 scores" with Lockett's TD.
Carolina better get at least 3 here because you just know that when the 4th quarter hits, Wilson will have something up his sleeve.Big first down. Milk that clock and score (a TD) and it is game set and match.
Yeah it's probably the right call to go for 2 but Carroll is probably thinking 2 tds and a FG sends it to OT. Plenty of time remaining for all of that. But yes I think going for 2 is the right move.how would the momentum be if you were suddenly in a 2-score game? no good?Part of it is game flow. Seattle has a lot of momentum and there is still a lot of time left. I don't think it's horrible to kick the extra point there and I'm usually in favor of coaches being more aggressive.this seems right to me.Should have gone for two that time. Went from "down 3 scores" to "still down 3 scores" with Lockett's TD.
Why would they need 4 successful drives when they're only down by 17?I'm not convinced Seattle has enough time for FOUR successful scoring drives. Which is what Carroll commits to by not going for 2.Part of it is game flow. Seattle has a lot of momentum and there is still a lot of time left. I don't think it's horrible to kick the extra point there and I'm usually in favor of coaches being more aggressive.this seems right to me.Should have gone for two that time. Went from "down 3 scores" to "still down 3 scores" with Lockett's TD.