What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Seattle at San Francisco (2 Viewers)

Broadcasters bring up a good point. People act like Seattle has our # or something. They've whooped us the last 2 games in Seattle, but when was the last time they won in SF?

 
If that is taunting, then where are the flags on Sherman?
How is that only on whitner??? Lynch was doing the same thing
Depends on what he said or maybe cumulative with the fact that Whitner came in and slapped the ball out of Lynch's hands after the play.
Flag was thrown well after that, but fair point. Impossible to tell what they said
That's why I said cumulative. Maybe one or the other wouldv'e been fine.
I think what you're missing is that only the calls that go against your team are bad, and all the calls that go against the other team are good /norcalhoya

 
Broadcasters bring up a good point. People act like Seattle has our # or something. They've whooped us the last 2 games in Seattle, but when was the last time they won in SF?
It's also the point differential. Seattle lost by 6 early last year, then two blowouts.

 
Broadcasters bring up a good point. People act like Seattle has our # or something. They've whooped us the last 2 games in Seattle, but when was the last time they won in SF?
What people? All I heard all week was how the Seahawks haven't won in Seattle since Sears was still profitable.

 
Broadcasters bring up a good point. People act like Seattle has our # or something. They've whooped us the last 2 games in Seattle, but when was the last time they won in SF?
What people? All I heard all week was how the Seahawks haven't won in Seattle since Sears was still profitable.
A lot of people in the media and on this forum...
Lol @ trying to play the disrespected victim as a favorite against a 1 loss team in December.
 
Broadcasters bring up a good point. People act like Seattle has our # or something. They've whooped us the last 2 games in Seattle, but when was the last time they won in SF?
What people? All I heard all week was how the Seahawks haven't won in Seattle since Sears was still profitable.
A lot of people in the media and on this forum...
Held them to 26 total points in 3 games (Wilson era) and blew them out in the only two Kaep vs Wilson era teams. Wonder why.

 
Been a lot of talk about changes to rules today, but there was a play earlier in this game that still baffles my mind - on the blocked punt, Seattle illegally batted the ball forward, causing SF to recover a good 15-20 yards down field from where the ball was batted. SF had to decline the penalty in order to retain the ball following the blocked punt. Seems ridiculous that a team can benefit from such a blatant penalty - if they don't change that, you have to think they every team would be trying to bat the ball as far as they could on those plays.

 
Broadcasters bring up a good point. People act like Seattle has our # or something. They've whooped us the last 2 games in Seattle, but when was the last time they won in SF?
What people? All I heard all week was how the Seahawks haven't won in Seattle since Sears was still profitable.
A lot of people in the media and on this forum...
Link?
Got better things to do brah, sorry.

 
Ha ha ha ha. Just saw the Kaepernick Beats ad that someone else mentioned earlier. That's about the dumbest, saddest, funniest thing I've seen an athlete endorse. "Haters gonna hate, but I can't hear them with my Dre Beats.". --kisses bicep--

 
Broadcasters bring up a good point. People act like Seattle has our # or something. They've whooped us the last 2 games in Seattle, but when was the last time they won in SF?
What people? All I heard all week was how the Seahawks haven't won in Seattle since Sears was still profitable.
A lot of people in the media and on this forum...
Link?
No link coming, I was making #### up.
:thumbup:

 
Broadcasters bring up a good point. People act like Seattle has our # or something. They've whooped us the last 2 games in Seattle, but when was the last time they won in SF?
What people? All I heard all week was how the Seahawks haven't won in Seattle since Sears was still profitable.
A lot of people in the media and on this forum...
Held them to 26 total points in 3 games (Wilson era) and blew them out in the only two Kaep vs Wilson era teams. Wonder why.
Here's your link doc

 
Broadcasters bring up a good point. People act like Seattle has our # or something. They've whooped us the last 2 games in Seattle, but when was the last time they won in SF?
What people? All I heard all week was how the Seahawks haven't won in Seattle since Sears was still profitable.
A lot of people in the media and on this forum...
Held them to 26 total points in 3 games (Wilson era) and blew them out in the only two Kaep vs Wilson era teams. Wonder why.
Here's your link doc
I was simply offering up reasons for your nonsensical claims.

 
I still don't get how that head injury play wasn't a penalty. Did they change the rule?

Or is it only on turnovers that I'm thinking?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Big difference between Wilson and Kaep: poise
Well Wilson is light years ahead of anyone as a 2nd year QB, maybe as good as anyone ever. I'd say Kaep's poise is very good for a 2nd year QB, I think he's about as good as Luck.

Good stop by Niners there.

 
I still don't get how that head injury play wasn't a penalty. Did they change the rule?

Or is it only on turnovers that I'm thinking?
What penalty and what rule?
The DB went to block/tackle an offensive player who didn't have the ball, which should be an illegal block. I didn't think you could do that, though the play I remember most was actually on an INT. In the SB when Hass dove at the interceptor's legs, he was flagged for an illegal block.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top