Seneca Wallace Top 10 ranking this week? (1 Viewer)

[ronron2]

Seneca Wallace is ranked at around the 10th QBs this week in the prelim rankings. I don't see it. Am I missing something?

 

[joetrow]

I would probably have trouble finding 10 QB's I like LESS than Wallace, so maybe mid 20s is where I would rank him. Chicago's D isnt a pushover, I dont see it either.

 

[Hooper31]

From John Morgan of www.fieldgulls.com.

Note: In my opinion Morgan knows this team better than any other person not on the Seahawks playroll, and he analyzes the game well to boot.

http://www.fieldgulls.com/2009/9/23/105247...hawks-questions

4. What should Bears fans fear most about the Seahawks?

The passing game. Deion Branch is set to return this week, and that makes Seattle a very deep passing offense even without a superstar receiver. Seattle was able to create something similar in 2007, when it had Branch, Bobby Engram, Nate Burleson and D.J. Hackett. Hackett wasn't a star by any stretch, but Seattle created favorable matchups by spreading the field and targeting the weakest defensive back. Hackett caught nine receptions for 136 yards and schooled Pierson Prioleau. The Seahawks are much more talented and deep this season, replacing Marcus Pollard with young world beater John Carlson, Engram with T.J. Houshmandzadeh and Hackett with burner Deon Butler. Housh regularly plays out of the slot and that creates mismatches. When teams adjust by putting their top corner in as a nickelback or by double covering Houshmandzadeh, offensive coordinator Greg Knapp doesn't hesitate to challenge deep on the outside. Chicago is sketchy in the secondary and their safeties are especially inexperienced, so if I were a Bears fan, I would fear the Seahawks ability to spread the field and create mismatches with their wide receivers.

 

[Clev4ever]

I would probably have trouble finding 10 QB's I like LESS than Wallace, so maybe mid 20s is where I would rank him. Chicago's D isnt a pushover, I dont see it either.

Seneca Wallace plays for Cleveland.Cleveland plays Baltimore. Not Chicago

 

[Banger]

I would probably have trouble finding 10 QB's I like LESS than Wallace, so maybe mid 20s is where I would rank him. Chicago's D isnt a pushover, I dont see it either.

Seneca Wallace plays for Cleveland.Cleveland plays Baltimore. Not Chicago

the thread was from last year.

 

[MG345]

From John Morgan of www.fieldgulls.com. Note: In my opinion Morgan knows this team better than any other person not on the Seahawks playroll, and he analyzes the game well to boot.

John Morgan and the whole Field Gulls site is a joke.

 

[Clev4ever]

I would probably have trouble finding 10 QB's I like LESS than Wallace, so maybe mid 20s is where I would rank him. Chicago's D isnt a pushover, I dont see it either.

Seneca Wallace plays for Cleveland.Cleveland plays Baltimore. Not Chicago

the thread was from last year.

LOL!! I see that now. HAHAHAHA

 

[TommyGilmore]

FYI, Wallace was the #21 quarterback in Week 3 of 2009 (when this thread was created).

 

[Sabertooth]

I see what you did there.

 

[Nate]

I would probably have trouble finding 10 QB's I like LESS than Wallace, so maybe mid 20s is where I would rank him. Chicago's D isnt a pushover, I dont see it either.

Seneca Wallace plays for Cleveland.Cleveland plays Baltimore. Not Chicago

Wow.