What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Shark Pool Mock Draft - V2.0. 3 rounds! (1 Viewer)

47. Minnesota Reggie Smith

Defense wins championships and Smith can come in and play safety or corner for the Vikes.

48. Atlanta (Andy Dufresne)

49. Philadelphia (Jeff Pasquino)

50. Arizona (Getinthemix)

51. Washington (John Madden's Lunchbox)

52. Tampa Bay (mjohnell)

53. Pittsburgh (Evilgrin72)

54. Tennessee (scrumptrulescent)

55. Seattle (Buddy Ball 2k3)

56. Green Bay (Almas_4th_child)

57. Miami (gatorman)

58. Jacksonville (Mr. Brownstone)

59. Indianapolis (FUBAR)

60. Green Bay (Almas_4th_child)

61. Dallas (LarryAllen'sJockstrap)

62. New England (Chaos Commish)

63. New York Giants (footballman_696969)
Good draft or the Vikings. Boring but good. With the run on OTs in the 1st I don't know what the Vikes would do. Almost BPA in the 2nd round. He would likely sit behind Sharper for a year or two but we need backups at safety. His 4.65 40 at his pro day wasn't great.
 
Good draft or the Vikings. Boring but good. With the run on OTs in the 1st I don't know what the Vikes would do. Almost BPA in the 2nd round. He would likely sit behind Sharper for a year or two but we need backups at safety. His 4.65 40 at his pro day wasn't great.
Something fishy about that Oklahoma pro day.I'd love Smith in the 2nd.
 
2nd Round

32. Miami (gatorman) -- Brian Brohm QB, Louiville.

33. St. Louis (blackjacks) - Dan Connor, LB - PSU

34. Atlanta (Andy Dufresne) - Chad Henne, QB - Michigan

35. Kansas City (RBM) - DeSean Jackson, WR

36. New York Jets (KellysHeroes) - Jerod Mayo, LB - Tennesse

37. Atlanta (Andy Dufresne) - Curtis Lofton, LB - Oklahoma

38. Baltimore (Chaos Commish) - Justin King, CB - PSU

39. San Fransisco (Andy Dufresne) - Chilo Rachal, OG - USC

40. New Orleans (Kirby) - Pat Sims, DT - Auburn

41. Buffalo (Mr. Peterson) - Early Doucet, WR - LSU

42. Denver (Almas_4th_child) - Felix Jones, RB - Arkansas

43. Carolina (travdogg) - Joe Flacco, QB - Deleware

44. Chicago (Deranged Hermit) - Mario Manningham, WR

45. Detroit (FUBAR) - Carl Nicks, OT

46. Cincinnati (yellowdog) - Xavier Adibi, LB

47. Minnesota (footballman_696969) - Reggie Smith, DB

48. Atlanta (Andy Dufresne) - Anthony Collins, OT - Kansas

49. Philadelphia (Jeff Pasquino) - DaJuan Morgan, S, NC State

50. Arizona (kirby) - Trevor Laws, DE - Notre Dame

51. Washington (John Madden's Lunchbox) - Lawrence Jackson DE

52. Tampa Bay (mjohnell) - Tracy Porter, CB - Indiana

53. Pittsburgh (Evilgrin72)- Dre Moore, DT, Maryland

54. Tennessee (scrumptrulescent) - Dustin Keller, TE, Purdue

Very tough decision here for Tennessee, they were deciding about going in 3 possible directions. The Titans decided they feel better about getting an impact TE here than they do about the WR talent on the board. Keller is one of the most athletic TE's in this draft and Tennessee could have some interesting offensive packages in 2008 with Crumpler and Keller on the field at the same time.

55. Seattle (Buddy Ball 2k3)

56. Green Bay (Almas_4th_child)

57. Miami (gatorman)

58. Jacksonville (Mr. Brownstone)

59. Indianapolis (FUBAR)

60. Green Bay (Almas_4th_child)

61. Dallas (LarryAllen'sJockstrap)

62. New England (Chaos Commish)

63. New York Giants (footballman_696969)

 
2nd Round

32. Miami (gatorman) -- Brian Brohm QB, Louiville.

33. St. Louis (blackjacks) - Dan Connor, LB - PSU

34. Atlanta (Andy Dufresne) - Chad Henne, QB - Michigan

35. Kansas City (RBM) - DeSean Jackson, WR

36. New York Jets (KellysHeroes) - Jerod Mayo, LB - Tennesse

37. Atlanta (Andy Dufresne) - Curtis Lofton, LB - Oklahoma

38. Baltimore (Chaos Commish) - Justin King, CB - PSU

39. San Fransisco (Andy Dufresne) - Chilo Rachal, OG - USC

40. New Orleans (Kirby) - Pat Sims, DT - Auburn

41. Buffalo (Mr. Peterson) - Early Doucet, WR - LSU

42. Denver (Almas_4th_child) - Felix Jones, RB - Arkansas

43. Carolina (travdogg) - Joe Flacco, QB - Deleware

44. Chicago (Deranged Hermit) - Mario Manningham, WR

45. Detroit (FUBAR) - Carl Nicks, OT

46. Cincinnati (yellowdog) - Xavier Adibi, LB

47. Minnesota (footballman_696969) - Reggie Smith, DB

48. Atlanta (Andy Dufresne) - Anthony Collins, OT - Kansas

49. Philadelphia (Jeff Pasquino) - DaJuan Morgan, S, NC State

50. Arizona (kirby) - Trevor Laws, DE - Notre Dame

51. Washington (John Madden's Lunchbox) - Lawrence Jackson DE

52. Tampa Bay (mjohnell) - Tracy Porter, CB - Indiana

53. Pittsburgh (Evilgrin72)- Dre Moore, DT, Maryland

54. Tennessee (scrumptrulescent) - Dustin Keller, TE, Purdue

55. Seattle (Buddy Ball 2k3) - Martellus Bennett, TE - Texas A&M - The Hawks were looking to get a DT here but are not interested in reaching at this point when their #1 rated TE is still on the board. Bennett is the most complete TE in this draft. He had over 65 knockdown blocks and at 6'6" he will be a great target in the middle of the field. At this point the Hawks would be thrilled to get their #1 over all WR and TE.

56. Green Bay (Almas_4th_child)

57. Miami (gatorman)

58. Jacksonville (Mr. Brownstone)

59. Indianapolis (FUBAR)

60. Green Bay (Almas_4th_child)

61. Dallas (LarryAllen'sJockstrap)

62. New England (Chaos Commish)

63. New York Giants (footballman_696969)
 
Does Tenn really go TE?

Don't they have bigger needs somewhere else?

They have Crumpler and Scaife (and Troupe IIRC) - TE doesn't scream "need".

 
DaJuan Morgan, S, NC State

This might be better than going Philips / WR in the 1st / 2nd.

I did want to see what level of talent was available here if the Eagles went WR in the first.
I agree. Phillips is overrated. I'd rather have Sweed/Morgan. Nice job.
:lmao: Now if it really goes down this way, I'll enjoy April 26th.
You and me both! He is still a bit young and raw and he can sit behind one of the best in the business.
 
2nd Round

32. Miami (gatorman) -- Brian Brohm QB, Louiville.

33. St. Louis (blackjacks) - Dan Connor, LB - PSU

34. Atlanta (Andy Dufresne) - Chad Henne, QB - Michigan

35. Kansas City (RBM) - DeSean Jackson, WR

36. New York Jets (KellysHeroes) - Jerod Mayo, LB - Tennesse

37. Atlanta (Andy Dufresne) - Curtis Lofton, LB - Oklahoma

38. Baltimore (Chaos Commish) - Justin King, CB - PSU

39. San Fransisco (Andy Dufresne) - Chilo Rachal, OG - USC

40. New Orleans (Kirby) - Pat Sims, DT - Auburn

41. Buffalo (Mr. Peterson) - Early Doucet, WR - LSU

42. Denver (Almas_4th_child) - Felix Jones, RB - Arkansas

43. Carolina (travdogg) - Joe Flacco, QB - Deleware

44. Chicago (Deranged Hermit) - Mario Manningham, WR

45. Detroit (FUBAR) - Carl Nicks, OT

46. Cincinnati (yellowdog) - Xavier Adibi, LB

47. Minnesota (footballman_696969) - Reggie Smith, DB

48. Atlanta (Andy Dufresne) - Anthony Collins, OT - Kansas

49. Philadelphia (Jeff Pasquino) - DaJuan Morgan, S, NC State

50. Arizona (kirby) - Trevor Laws, DE - Notre Dame

51. Washington (John Madden's Lunchbox) - Lawrence Jackson DE

52. Tampa Bay (mjohnell) - Tracy Porter, CB - Indiana

53. Pittsburgh (Evilgrin72)- Dre Moore, DT, Maryland

54. Tennessee (scrumptrulescent) - Dustin Keller, TE, Purdue

55. Seattle (Buddy Ball 2k3) - Martellus Bennett, TE - Texas A&M -

56. Green Bay (Almas_4th_child) - Chris Johnson RB ECU

With two TE's come off the board right in front of them...they decide to go with an immediate impact guy. At the very least Chris Johnson will be one heck of a returner for GB(sorry Koren Robinson....your just not good enough). This is a wake up call to Ryan Grant about that extension he wants and competition for Brandon Jackson for 3rd down back. You can never have enough good RB's.

57. Miami (gatorman)

58. Jacksonville (Mr. Brownstone)

59. Indianapolis (FUBAR)

60. Green Bay (Almas_4th_child)

61. Dallas (LarryAllen'sJockstrap)

62. New England (Chaos Commish)

63. New York Giants (footballman_696969)

 
Love the Green Bay Pick. Immediate impact in ST and he could be moved all over the place on the field....in the backfield, spread out wide, in the slot. He's a weapon.

Great unconventional pick Alma. :popcorn:

 
Does Tenn really go TE?Don't they have bigger needs somewhere else?They have Crumpler and Scaife (and Troupe IIRC) - TE doesn't scream "need".
Do teams always draft what they need? Sometimes it's better to make strong areas stronger than weak areas less weak.Crumpler is breaking down and Scaife is just average. I would say the Titans passing game needs all the help it can get.
 
Does Tenn really go TE?Don't they have bigger needs somewhere else?They have Crumpler and Scaife (and Troupe IIRC) - TE doesn't scream "need".
Do teams always draft what they need? Sometimes it's better to make strong areas stronger than weak areas less weak.Crumpler is breaking down and Scaife is just average. I would say the Titans passing game needs all the help it can get.
Hey - it's a valid question..... if you disagree and are picking based solely on talent value, then I can see the pick. However, if I have bigger needs, I may look in another direction if I'm the GM of a team that made the playoffs last year and might want to try to get better for the current season.
 
Does Tenn really go TE?Don't they have bigger needs somewhere else?They have Crumpler and Scaife (and Troupe IIRC) - TE doesn't scream "need".
Do teams always draft what they need? Sometimes it's better to make strong areas stronger than weak areas less weak.Crumpler is breaking down and Scaife is just average. I would say the Titans passing game needs all the help it can get.
Hey - it's a valid question..... if you disagree and are picking based solely on talent value, then I can see the pick. However, if I have bigger needs, I may look in another direction if I'm the GM of a team that made the playoffs last year and might want to try to get better for the current season.
I wasn't deriding the validity or your question. I was just giving a counterpoint. Sorry if it came off snarky.Yes the Titans have other needs. But as much as the like the TE spot, adding depth with talent like that isn't beyond possibility.
 
Does Tenn really go TE?

Don't they have bigger needs somewhere else?

They have Crumpler and Scaife (and Troupe IIRC) - TE doesn't scream "need".
Do teams always draft what they need? Sometimes it's better to make strong areas stronger than weak areas less weak.Crumpler is breaking down and Scaife is just average. I would say the Titans passing game needs all the help it can get.
Hey - it's a valid question..... if you disagree and are picking based solely on talent value, then I can see the pick. However, if I have bigger needs, I may look in another direction if I'm the GM of a team that made the playoffs last year and might want to try to get better for the current season.
Are you saying that Dustin Keller could not make this team better in 2008?I've read a few sites that state TE is on their needs list.

 
Does Tenn really go TE?Don't they have bigger needs somewhere else?They have Crumpler and Scaife (and Troupe IIRC) - TE doesn't scream "need".
Do teams always draft what they need? Sometimes it's better to make strong areas stronger than weak areas less weak.Crumpler is breaking down and Scaife is just average. I would say the Titans passing game needs all the help it can get.
Hey - it's a valid question..... if you disagree and are picking based solely on talent value, then I can see the pick. However, if I have bigger needs, I may look in another direction if I'm the GM of a team that made the playoffs last year and might want to try to get better for the current season.
I wasn't deriding the validity or your question. I was just giving a counterpoint. Sorry if it came off snarky.Yes the Titans have other needs. But as much as the like the TE spot, adding depth with talent like that isn't beyond possibility.
No prob, Andy.It just struck me as an odd choice.
 
Does Tenn really go TE?Don't they have bigger needs somewhere else?They have Crumpler and Scaife (and Troupe IIRC) - TE doesn't scream "need".
Do teams always draft what they need? Sometimes it's better to make strong areas stronger than weak areas less weak.Crumpler is breaking down and Scaife is just average. I would say the Titans passing game needs all the help it can get.
Hey - it's a valid question..... if you disagree and are picking based solely on talent value, then I can see the pick. However, if I have bigger needs, I may look in another direction if I'm the GM of a team that made the playoffs last year and might want to try to get better for the current season.
I wasn't deriding the validity or your question. I was just giving a counterpoint. Sorry if it came off snarky.Yes the Titans have other needs. But as much as the like the TE spot, adding depth with talent like that isn't beyond possibility.
No prob, Andy.It just struck me as an odd choice.
Excuse me if I choose not to do the cookie cutter style mock where my team falls in line picking based solely on needs from the top of their list down. I don't see the choice as odd at all. Maybe I can just see the big picture better than others.
 
57. Miami (gatorman) - John Carlson, TE - Notre Dame

Parcells loves his TEs and Carlson is in the Bavaro/Witten type mold. Getting what may be the top all around TE available in the 3rd would be a great move.

 
57. Miami (gatorman) - John Carlson, TE - Notre Dame

Parcells loves his TEs and Carlson is in the Bavaro/Witten type mold. Getting what may be the top all around TE available in the 3rd would be a great move.
Only problem with Carlson is that almost every linebacker in the NFL will be able to keep up with him with ease.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
57. Miami (gatorman) - John Carlson, TE - Notre DameParcells loves his TEs and Carlson is in the Bavaro/Witten type mold. Getting what may be the top all around TE available in the 3rd would be a great move.
Sorry. Internet issues at home and a busy start to my day here. I think the phins are actually targeting him at some point in any case.
 
57. Miami (gatorman) - John Carlson, TE - Notre DameParcells loves his TEs and Carlson is in the Bavaro/Witten type mold. Getting what may be the top all around TE available in the 3rd would be a great move.
Only problem with Carlson is that almost every linebacker in the NFL will be able to keep up with him with ease.
I can see where you'd say that if you go by the combine numbers. But his pro day numbers showed much more athleticism.He ran a 4.88 at the combine but a 4.72 at his pro day. Add in 21 reps and a 35.5 vertical and he's plenty athletic enough to take on linebackers.Plus, the Dolphins need his blocking ability, which is superior to the other WRs-turned-TEs that are available.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does Tenn really go TE?Don't they have bigger needs somewhere else?They have Crumpler and Scaife (and Troupe IIRC) - TE doesn't scream "need".
Do teams always draft what they need? Sometimes it's better to make strong areas stronger than weak areas less weak.Crumpler is breaking down and Scaife is just average. I would say the Titans passing game needs all the help it can get.
Hey - it's a valid question..... if you disagree and are picking based solely on talent value, then I can see the pick. However, if I have bigger needs, I may look in another direction if I'm the GM of a team that made the playoffs last year and might want to try to get better for the current season.
I wasn't deriding the validity or your question. I was just giving a counterpoint. Sorry if it came off snarky.Yes the Titans have other needs. But as much as the like the TE spot, adding depth with talent like that isn't beyond possibility.
No prob, Andy.It just struck me as an odd choice.
Excuse me if I choose not to do the cookie cutter style mock where my team falls in line picking based solely on needs from the top of their list down. I don't see the choice as odd at all. Maybe I can just see the big picture better than others.
Wow, someone's defensive.
 
57. Miami (gatorman) - John Carlson, TE - Notre DameParcells loves his TEs and Carlson is in the Bavaro/Witten type mold. Getting what may be the top all around TE available in the 3rd would be a great move.
Only problem with Carlson is that almost every linebacker in the NFL will be able to keep up with him with ease.
I can see where you'd say that if you go by the combine numbers. But his pro day numbers showed much more athleticism.He ran a 4.88 at the combine but a 4.72 at his pro day. Add in 21 reps and a 35.5 vertical and he's plenty athletic enough to take on linebackers.Plus, the Dolphins need his blocking ability, which is superior to the other WRs-turned-TEs that are available.
He also ran a 5.02 at the combine. I am not one to put too much stock into "pro day" work outs. At the combine everyone runs on the same surface under the same pressure etc etc and he was extremely disappointing in that situation. He will have to face quite a few 3-4 defenses in that division (if he is on the dolphins) and that comes with some very athletic LB's and I think that spells trouble for Carlson.
 
57. Miami (gatorman) - John Carlson, TE - Notre DameParcells loves his TEs and Carlson is in the Bavaro/Witten type mold. Getting what may be the top all around TE available in the 3rd would be a great move.
Only problem with Carlson is that almost every linebacker in the NFL will be able to keep up with him with ease.
I can see where you'd say that if you go by the combine numbers. But his pro day numbers showed much more athleticism.He ran a 4.88 at the combine but a 4.72 at his pro day. Add in 21 reps and a 35.5 vertical and he's plenty athletic enough to take on linebackers.Plus, the Dolphins need his blocking ability, which is superior to the other WRs-turned-TEs that are available.
He also ran a 5.02 at the combine. I am not one to put too much stock into "pro day" work outs. At the combine everyone runs on the same surface under the same pressure etc etc and he was extremely disappointing in that situation. He will have to face quite a few 3-4 defenses in that division (if he is on the dolphins) and that comes with some very athletic LB's and I think that spells trouble for Carlson.
He was apparently very ill when he participated at the combine. Whether you choose to believe that story or not is up to you.I think the Combine is overrated and I think most GMs think the same thing.
 
Does Tenn really go TE?Don't they have bigger needs somewhere else?They have Crumpler and Scaife (and Troupe IIRC) - TE doesn't scream "need".
Do teams always draft what they need? Sometimes it's better to make strong areas stronger than weak areas less weak.Crumpler is breaking down and Scaife is just average. I would say the Titans passing game needs all the help it can get.
Hey - it's a valid question..... if you disagree and are picking based solely on talent value, then I can see the pick. However, if I have bigger needs, I may look in another direction if I'm the GM of a team that made the playoffs last year and might want to try to get better for the current season.
I wasn't deriding the validity or your question. I was just giving a counterpoint. Sorry if it came off snarky.Yes the Titans have other needs. But as much as the like the TE spot, adding depth with talent like that isn't beyond possibility.
No prob, Andy.It just struck me as an odd choice.
Excuse me if I choose not to do the cookie cutter style mock where my team falls in line picking based solely on needs from the top of their list down. I don't see the choice as odd at all. Maybe I can just see the big picture better than others.
Wow, someone's defensive.
True. I come off as defensive. You are coming off a bit elitist to me.Keller is a WR in a TE's body. He can create mismatches with other teams defenses that any of the wr's on the board can not. WR, DT, DE, and DB are probably Tennessee's needs with WR being the biggest. They really need a franchise #1 WR. Is there one in this draft that blows anyone away and is an obvious franchise NFL WR? I'd say no.
 
57. Miami (gatorman) - John Carlson, TE - Notre DameParcells loves his TEs and Carlson is in the Bavaro/Witten type mold. Getting what may be the top all around TE available in the 3rd would be a great move.
Only problem with Carlson is that almost every linebacker in the NFL will be able to keep up with him with ease.
I can see where you'd say that if you go by the combine numbers. But his pro day numbers showed much more athleticism.He ran a 4.88 at the combine but a 4.72 at his pro day. Add in 21 reps and a 35.5 vertical and he's plenty athletic enough to take on linebackers. I just think its a bit early for Carlson at this point. Plus, the Dolphins need his blocking ability, which is superior to the other WRs-turned-TEs that are available.
He also ran a 5.02 at the combine. I am not one to put too much stock into "pro day" work outs. At the combine everyone runs on the same surface under the same pressure etc etc and he was extremely disappointing in that situation. He will have to face quite a few 3-4 defenses in that division (if he is on the dolphins) and that comes with some very athletic LB's and I think that spells trouble for Carlson.
He was apparently very ill when he participated at the combine. Whether you choose to believe that story or not is up to you.I think the Combine is overrated and I think most GMs think the same thing.
I think the combine can over rate players, but I do not think the combine is over rated. There is a difference to me. That being said I would rather see the Phins go after Brad Cottam out of Tennessee.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
2nd Round32. Miami (gatorman) -- Brian Brohm QB, Louiville. 33. St. Louis (blackjacks) - Dan Connor, LB - PSU34. Atlanta (Andy Dufresne) - Chad Henne, QB - Michigan35. Kansas City (RBM) - DeSean Jackson, WR36. New York Jets (KellysHeroes) - Jerod Mayo, LB - Tennesse37. Atlanta (Andy Dufresne) - Curtis Lofton, LB - Oklahoma38. Baltimore (Chaos Commish) - Justin King, CB - PSU39. San Fransisco (Andy Dufresne) - Chilo Rachal, OG - USC40. New Orleans (Kirby) - Pat Sims, DT - Auburn41. Buffalo (Mr. Peterson) - Early Doucet, WR - LSU42. Denver (Almas_4th_child) - Felix Jones, RB - Arkansas43. Carolina (travdogg) - Joe Flacco, QB - Deleware44. Chicago (Deranged Hermit) - Mario Manningham, WR45. Detroit (FUBAR) - Carl Nicks, OT46. Cincinnati (yellowdog) - Xavier Adibi, LB47. Minnesota (footballman_696969) - Reggie Smith, DB48. Atlanta (Andy Dufresne) - Anthony Collins, OT - Kansas 49. Philadelphia (Jeff Pasquino) - DaJuan Morgan, S, NC State50. Arizona (kirby) - Trevor Laws, DE - Notre Dame51. Washington (John Madden's Lunchbox) - Lawrence Jackson DE52. Tampa Bay (mjohnell) - Tracy Porter, CB - Indiana53. Pittsburgh (Evilgrin72)- Dre Moore, DT, Maryland54. Tennessee (scrumptrulescent) - Dustin Keller, TE, Purdue 55. Seattle (Buddy Ball 2k3) - Martellus Bennett, TE - Texas A&M - 56. Green Bay (Almas_4th_child) - Chris Johnson RB ECU57. Miami (gatorman) - John Carlson, TE - Notre Dame58. Jacksonville (Mr. Brownstone) - Brandon Flowers, CB - Virginia Tech59. Indianapolis (FUBAR)60. Green Bay (Almas_4th_child)61. Dallas (LarryAllen'sJockstrap)62. New England (Chaos Commish)63. New York Giants (footballman_696969)
 
can we get the list updated?

It took me a few minutes to see who was taken.

pick will be made in a few minutes. Just deciding between 3 players, one a "need", the other seems better value, but will be wildly unpopular.

 
As a Colts fan I think DE seems to be the biggest need and there seems to be a bunch of undersized-quick pass rushers available..

2nd RB would probably be tied with Oline for 2nd need

 
As a Colts fan I think DE seems to be the biggest need and there seems to be a bunch of undersized-quick pass rushers available..2nd RB would probably be tied with Oline for 2nd need
I would think a WR or another CB or another DT are all bigger needs than another RB.
 
As a Colts fan I think DE seems to be the biggest need and there seems to be a bunch of undersized-quick pass rushers available..

2nd RB would probably be tied with Oline for 2nd need
I would think a WR or another CB or another DT are all bigger needs than another RB.
Sorry about the delay. Got called away for work. I tried to explain that I was Bill Polian, but they weren't buying it.59. Colts:

Jason Jones, DE Eastern Michigan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As a Colts fan I think DE seems to be the biggest need and there seems to be a bunch of undersized-quick pass rushers available..2nd RB would probably be tied with Oline for 2nd need
I would think a WR or another CB or another DT are all bigger needs than another RB.
I don't. Kenton Keith is not good. Especially considering the backs that remain available.I like the Jones pick, though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
60- Green Bay - Fred Davis TE USC

This is another good value pick. They need another guy to replace Bubba Franks and will open up the middle even more.

 
As a Colts fan I think DE seems to be the biggest need and there seems to be a bunch of undersized-quick pass rushers available..2nd RB would probably be tied with Oline for 2nd need
I would think a WR or another CB or another DT are all bigger needs than another RB.
I don't. Kenton Keith is not good. Especially considering the backs that remain available.
This is what I was referring to with the "wildly unpopular" pick. Maybe I was wrong, but I stick with Jones.
 
As a Colts fan I think DE seems to be the biggest need and there seems to be a bunch of undersized-quick pass rushers available..

2nd RB would probably be tied with Oline for 2nd need
I would think a WR or another CB or another DT are all bigger needs than another RB.
Sorry about the delay. Got called away for work. I tried to explain that I was Bill Polian, but they weren't buying it.59. Colts:

Jason Jones, DE Eastern Michigan
Good Pick, he seems to be a guy that fits the DE mold they look for
 
As a Colts fan I think DE seems to be the biggest need and there seems to be a bunch of undersized-quick pass rushers available..2nd RB would probably be tied with Oline for 2nd need
I would think a WR or another CB or another DT are all bigger needs than another RB.
I don't. Kenton Keith is not good. Especially considering the backs that remain available.
This is what I was referring to with the "wildly unpopular" pick. Maybe I was wrong, but I stick with Jones.
Jones is a guy that a lot of people will say "Who?" when he's drafted in the 2nd. But he's proven he belongs. And Indy's DE depth was exposed when Freeney went down.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top