What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Should This Trade Have Been Vetoed? (1 Viewer)

I

Interseptopus

Footballguy
Owner A gave up P. Manning (on his bench)

Owner B gave up D. Anderson and Graham (graham would start for him if healthy)

Owner A expressed that he made a mistake in accepting the trade, even though it asks you multiple times if you want to make the trade. This came after a few people pointed out that he lost on this deal. It was vetoed

Thoughts?

 
Doctor DR said:
Owner A gave up P. Manning (on his bench)Owner B gave up D. Anderson and Graham (graham would start for him if healthy)Owner A expressed that he made a mistake in accepting the trade, even though it asks you multiple times if you want to make the trade. This came after a few people pointed out that he lost on this deal. It was vetoedThoughts?
Click to expand...
Of course it should not have been vetoed but so what?? If you are in a league that ALLOWS VETO of trades than what is the point of complaining about whether or no you agree with it?? You made the choice to be in this league right? You're complaining about something that you KNEW could happen anyways based on the setup of the league. :goodposting:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As is the case with 10000000000000 percent of these questions, no, it should not have been vetoed.

 
Did he know that Anderson was no longer the starter?

Did you purposely offer the trade, hoping he didnt know that?

 
Doctor DR said:
Owner A gave up P. Manning (on his bench)Owner B gave up D. Anderson and Graham (graham would start for him if healthy)Owner A expressed that he made a mistake in accepting the trade, even though it asks you multiple times if you want to make the trade. This came after a few people pointed out that he lost on this deal. It was vetoedThoughts?
Click to expand...
No!There's no collusion. If he took on Anderson after he got benched, the trade is even worse. Still, it's toolish to say you made a mistake after you accepted it.
 
Doctor DR said:
Owner A gave up P. Manning (on his bench)Owner B gave up D. Anderson and Graham (graham would start for him if healthy)Owner A expressed that he made a mistake in accepting the trade, even though it asks you multiple times if you want to make the trade. This came after a few people pointed out that he lost on this deal. It was vetoedThoughts?
Click to expand...
last I checked, stupidity IS NOT an acceptable reason to reverse a trade...dummy will think twice next timetrade stands
 
I'm not sure what Anonymous Bob will do with all this clutter!!!

:loco: :loco: :loco: :loco:

Thanks for the responses, keep em comin

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The "debate" is irrelevant. They can arguie all day about who wins and loses a trade and it just doesn't matter anyways. Trading is BASED on opinions and if they can't handle that mail them some boxes of kleenex. :loco:

The fact that people participate in online leagues where all trades can be vetoed is one thing.....the fact they than COMPLAIN when they DO get vetoed is just hilarious to me.

 
CMU37484 said:
The "debate" is irrelevant. They can arguie all day about who wins and loses a trade and it just doesn't matter anyways. Trading is BASED on opinions and if they can't handle that mail them some boxes of kleenex. :loco: The fact that people participate in online leagues where all trades can be vetoed is one thing.....the fact they than COMPLAIN when they DO get vetoed is just hilarious to me.
Click to expand...
:loco:
 
Perfect Tommy said:
A premium QB for a crappy TE and a roster filler is not reasonable. He said he made a mistake. Just reverse it. Be a sport.
Click to expand...
Granted it doesn't specify, but I was assuming E Graham. If that's the case, I don't think the trade is extremely lopsided. I think you could get more for Manning, but maybe he tried and couldn't... Definitely not veto-worthy considering the info provided (Manning being Team A's #2 QB & Graham being a starter for Team B if healthy).
 
Does Deangelo Hall go back to the Raiders if Al Davis says Oops, I clicked the wrong button?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Judge Smails
  • Poll
Would you veto this trade?
Replies
34
Views
1K
beef
beef
K
The Big 5 QBs
Replies
44
Views
1K
Snotbubbles
Snotbubbles
EBF
2024 Rookie Thoughts
Replies
24
Views
2K
dipandglide
dipandglide

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top