And if Slaton's production remains consistent, he probably IS top 15 at that split.coolnerd said:The split is going to be slaton 60-65 to Green 40-35 if they are both healthy. If you look at the Lions statline that is the ideal mix that Houston is attempting each game.
Do you know how few running backs get a 70/30 split?Unless the Texans active depth chart consists of only one RB, named Steve Slaton, he will very rarely see much more than 60% of the carries. If it isn't Green, Moats will get some. And Slaton will still put up good/great numbers.green gets hurt too easily, if I were a slaton owner I wouldn't worry too muchI'd guess 70/30
Except maybe this week vs the Vikings.. tough matchup for him unless MIN overplays the pass.Do you know how few running backs get a 70/30 split?Unless the Texans active depth chart consists of only one RB, named Steve Slaton, he will very rarely see much more than 60% of the carries. If it isn't Green, Moats will get some. And Slaton will still put up good/great numbers.green gets hurt too easily, if I were a slaton owner I wouldn't worry too muchI'd guess 70/30
Tough matchup to be sure; but the Vikings are still giving up a rushing TD about every game. Slaton gets the GL opportunities and gets involved in the passing game too. He'll still be a good start.Except maybe this week vs the Vikings.. tough matchup for him unless MIN overplays the pass.Do you know how few running backs get a 70/30 split?Unless the Texans active depth chart consists of only one RB, named Steve Slaton, he will very rarely see much more than 60% of the carries. If it isn't Green, Moats will get some. And Slaton will still put up good/great numbers.green gets hurt too easily, if I were a slaton owner I wouldn't worry too muchI'd guess 70/30
The OP or original Q consisted of 2 RBs not 3.Between the two mentioned, due to Green's often injuries, that's what I'd guess.If you want to switch the Q to the Texans complete backfield, that's cool but that wasn't how I understood the OP.How would you split just Green and Slaton?Do you know how few running backs get a 70/30 split?Unless the Texans active depth chart consists of only one RB, named Steve Slaton, he will very rarely see much more than 60% of the carries. If it isn't Green, Moats will get some. And Slaton will still put up good/great numbers.green gets hurt too easily, if I were a slaton owner I wouldn't worry too muchI'd guess 70/30
I don't get why everyone's freaking out about Ahman Green's carries. Slaton has never been carrying the full load, he's just sharing with Green instead of Taylor or Brown.
Not counting QB runs, Slaton has received (FP includes points from receiving):
Week 3: 75% FP: 18.4
Week 4: 55% FP: 17.6
Week 5: 57% FP: 21.6 Green returns this week for 12 carries
Week 6: 65% FP: 6.1
Week 7: 54% FP: 14.9
Week 8: 56% FP: 12.6
All of which makes him good for the #3 RB in that span - and only 2 yards behind LT for #2 (albeit several RBs had a bye in there).
Slaton isn't a feature back, but he doesn't need to be. RB15 may even be a bit conservative, but Houston has a tough schedule coming up.
Ahman Green doesn't scare me Slaton is getting around the same amount of touches he's been getting all year. I just thought he would be a big part of the passing game like he was against the Jags. Maybe because the Texans have been up in a lot of games they don't need to dump it off to Slaton. I'm hoping his WRS #'s will improve when the schedule gets tougher.I don't get why everyone's freaking out about Ahman Green's carries. Slaton has never been carrying the full load, he's just sharing with Green instead of Taylor or Brown.
Not counting QB runs, Slaton has received (FP includes points from receiving):
Week 3: 75% FP: 18.4
Week 4: 55% FP: 17.6
Week 5: 57% FP: 21.6 Green returns this week for 12 carries
Week 6: 65% FP: 6.1
Week 7: 54% FP: 14.9
Week 8: 56% FP: 12.6
All of which makes him good for the #3 RB in that span - and only 2 yards behind LT for #2 (albeit several RBs had a bye in there).
Slaton isn't a feature back, but he doesn't need to be. RB15 may even be a bit conservative, but Houston has a tough schedule coming up.
The Texans are not needing to dump off because Johnson, Walter and Daniels are playing well. oOne of the three seems to be open when ever they go back to pass. If the better competition covers those three better then Slaton will be more involved in the passing offense.Ahman Green doesn't scare me Slaton is getting around the same amount of touches he's been getting all year. I just thought he would be a big part of the passing game like he was against the Jags. Maybe because the Texans have been up in a lot of games they don't need to dump it off to Slaton. I'm hoping his WRS #'s will improve when the schedule gets tougher.I don't get why everyone's freaking out about Ahman Green's carries. Slaton has never been carrying the full load, he's just sharing with Green instead of Taylor or Brown.
Not counting QB runs, Slaton has received (FP includes points from receiving):
Week 3: 75% FP: 18.4
Week 4: 55% FP: 17.6
Week 5: 57% FP: 21.6 Green returns this week for 12 carries
Week 6: 65% FP: 6.1
Week 7: 54% FP: 14.9
Week 8: 56% FP: 12.6
All of which makes him good for the #3 RB in that span - and only 2 yards behind LT for #2 (albeit several RBs had a bye in there).
Slaton isn't a feature back, but he doesn't need to be. RB15 may even be a bit conservative, but Houston has a tough schedule coming up.
You maybe right....Fresh Legs and all. He hit that corner fast in a mutha.But the reason i added him, didnt have nothing to do with that. The texans have the great Gibbs here now, and even before him we always had a decent running oline.Green health is another factor, and when i saw them IR C.Taylor, and promote Moats i wanted to add him then. It only takes one injury to green for him to get a timeshare of the carries. And look now....Green had the injury. So who knows what Moat does with his opportunity. I think he in a nice run system though.Moats wasn't all that impressive during his time in PHI, on the limited action he did see. You were probably just seeing fresh legs. Though it is his 4th year now, maybe he needed to get out from behind Westbrook.
Moats WILL get carries. Kubiak has already said that Slaton is on a "touch-count" and whether it's Green or Moats if Green can't go, they will still go with a 2 back system. Moats COULD take advatage of it and bury Green, who already has 1 foot in the proverbial football grave. And fresh legs at this point in the season (with Slaton possibly hitting the rookie wall and slowing down) is a good thing for Moats. Kubiak said he liked what he saw with his limited time last week. I better just stop now before I talk myself into spending 5 bucks on a transaction for him haha.You maybe right....Fresh Legs and all. He hit that corner fast in a mutha.But the reason i added him, didnt have nothing to do with that. The texans have the great Gibbs here now, and even before him we always had a decent running oline.Green health is another factor, and when i saw them IR C.Taylor, and promote Moats i wanted to add him then. It only takes one injury to green for him to get a timeshare of the carries. And look now....Green had the injury. So who knows what Moat does with his opportunity. I think he in a nice run system though.Moats wasn't all that impressive during his time in PHI, on the limited action he did see. You were probably just seeing fresh legs. Though it is his 4th year now, maybe he needed to get out from behind Westbrook.
I'm fine with this as long as he re-emerged in weeks 14-16, got a couple of decent matchups on the playoff sched.lyon812 said:From Rotoworld: Texans coach Gary Kubiak said Steve Slaton was given fewer carries in Week 10 because the running back was "worn down.""I would hope that him not playing as many reps this week gets him back to full speed, but the kid needed a break," Kubiak said. "He’s played a lot of football in a short period of time. I expect him to bounce right back." Slaton may share more carries with Ahman Green and Ryan Moats as he becomes accustomed to the grind of the NFL season.
For a worn-down guy, he still managed to rip off a 58-yard td catch & run (which was negated by a penalty).