Gonna watch some preseason games first.Just curous where you all would rank Favre now that he is a JET? And what is the "shark" move? Most likely he was drafted as a flier in the very late rounds (re-draft leagues that already drafted). Is it best to move him now? Wait? Ride the Favre bus all seaon?![]()
Depends on who your current top QB is. Favre could be very valuable in a QBBC situation as the Jets play Miami (only once though, 2nd game is week 17) ARI, Cin, Oak, Den, STL and San Fran. If you already have a top 5 guy w/o much injury risk I would trade him sooner, rather than later as the buzz will probably make him overvalued and a few picks in his first preseason game could kill that.Just curous where you all would rank Favre now that he is a JET? And what is the "shark" move? Most likely he was drafted as a flier in the very late rounds (re-draft leagues that already drafted). Is it best to move him now? Wait? Ride the Favre bus all seaon?![]()
I agree. It's not just playbook, he now has 3 weeks to get comfortable with guys he has never played with, even in probowls. Check downs and audibles will be nil for the most part, so it will probably be a half a season before Favre bears fruit as a viable starter. Also, Coles and COtchery are not big YAC guys if I remember correctly.I'd put favre right behind garrard. He is a top QB2 at this point who could pay real dividends in the playoffs (fantasy, not NFL)I seem to agree with everyone else who has posted. Favre had a great year last year but for the few seasons before that he was more of a QB in that 10-15 range. He now has to learn a new offense in short order and develop chemistry with his new receivers. I think right now it would be safest to project his numbers not based on last season but what he had done for the few seasons before that.
In a redraft - somewhere between 1st and 3rd.
All I can say to that is... Wow. Hass especially. Hass has been a year in year out solid performer... top 10 in fact, who is in the same offense (with a lot of passing), with recievers he knows. Cutler and Rivers are crapshoots, though I'd be shocked if Favre by seasons end has better numbers than Cutler.Now... Favre. Favre looked cooked after the 05 & 06 seasons. He experienced a revival last year, but how much of that was due to the exceptional talent he had around him last year? Here he is, late 30's, new team, new offense, new recievers, and late to camp... and you figure he's better than all 3 of those guys? That's pretty bold.Got him ranked 9th now ahead of guys like Cutler, Hasslebeck, and Rivers.
If Cutler had Marshall all season then Id rank him higher than Favre but those 2-3 games missed are going to hurt cuz the other receivers on Denver suck. I'm really down on Hass this year. He had a great year last year cuz they couldnt run the ball so they went to the run and shoot offense. Since then they lost Hackett & Branch (so he doesnt have the same WRs) and added Jones & Duckett. So I think they will do a ton more running. I know Favre had average seasons before last year but IMO the Jets have just as much talent on offense as the Packers did last year. Coles and Cotchery are just as good as Driver and Jennings, Jones is just as good as Grant, and the OLines are both good. This is a good offensive squad that was missing one thing and that was a QB. Ill give you that it may take him some time to get acclimated to the team but once he starts slinging the ball he'll be fine.All I can say to that is... Wow. Hass especially. Hass has been a year in year out solid performer... top 10 in fact, who is in the same offense (with a lot of passing), with recievers he knows. Cutler and Rivers are crapshoots, though I'd be shocked if Favre by seasons end has better numbers than Cutler.Now... Favre. Favre looked cooked after the 05 & 06 seasons. He experienced a revival last year, but how much of that was due to the exceptional talent he had around him last year? Here he is, late 30's, new team, new offense, new recievers, and late to camp... and you figure he's better than all 3 of those guys? That's pretty bold.Got him ranked 9th now ahead of guys like Cutler, Hasslebeck, and Rivers.
i bet on 2005/2006 FavreThe problem is which Favre are you going to get...the 2005/2006 Favre, or the 2007 Favre? It's no certainty that you get last year's Favre.
I'm going to be doing my rankings today sometime and I'll likely have Favre between 15 and 20, in the middle of the starting QBs.
Naah. Back then he only had Driver after Jennings was hurt. NYJ have better weapons.i bet on 2005/2006 FavreThe problem is which Favre are you going to get...the 2005/2006 Favre, or the 2007 Favre? It's no certainty that you get last year's Favre.
I'm going to be doing my rankings today sometime and I'll likely have Favre between 15 and 20, in the middle of the starting QBs.
It's going to depend on his rapport with Cotchery, Coles, Keller and the improvement of the line. In '05/'06 Favre had absolute garbage at the TE/WR position outside of Driver and their line was bad. His line and wr's s/b better in '08 with the Jets than it was in either '05/'06 so the answer IMO is somewhere between '06 and '07 something like 3800 - 21 - 17.Anthony Borbely said:The problem is which Favre are you going to get...the 2005/2006 Favre, or the 2007 Favre? It's no certainty that you get last year's Favre.I'm going to be doing my rankings today sometime and I'll likely have Favre between 15 and 20, in the middle of the starting QBs.
Both of these posts are about where I fall on Favre. I don't think it's going to turn out to be as glorious as many may think. Unless he were to really, really fall in drafts, I wouldn't really give him a second look. Somebody else is going to grab him, probably too early, long before then anyway. Another thing to consider: Lambeau Field had it's own conditions to deal with, but those swirling winds at Giants Stadium presents it's own battle altogether.I know Favre has a strong arm, but he still gets careless at times and those winds could present further problems. It may sound miniscule, but if that were the case, it wouldn't have been such a hot topic over the years among QBs, kickers, punters, and even coaches. Chase (or anybody else), what have you got on Favre's history of playing in Giants Stadium?Gatorman said:I agree. It's not just playbook, he now has 3 weeks to get comfortable with guys he has never played with, even in probowls. Check downs and audibles will be nil for the most part, so it will probably be a half a season before Favre bears fruit as a viable starter. Also, Coles and COtchery are not big YAC guys if I remember correctly.I'd put favre right behind garrard. He is a top QB2 at this point who could pay real dividends in the playoffs (fantasy, not NFL)Warhogs said:I seem to agree with everyone else who has posted. Favre had a great year last year but for the few seasons before that he was more of a QB in that 10-15 range. He now has to learn a new offense in short order and develop chemistry with his new receivers. I think right now it would be safest to project his numbers not based on last season but what he had done for the few seasons before that.
Favre's numbers at Giants stadium (regular season only):Both of these posts are about where I fall on Favre. I don't think it's going to turn out to be as glorious as many may think. Unless he were to really, really fall in drafts, I wouldn't really give him a second look. Somebody else is going to grab him, probably too early, long before then anyway. Another thing to consider: Lambeau Field had it's own conditions to deal with, but those swirling winds at Giants Stadium presents it's own battle altogether.Gatorman said:I agree. It's not just playbook, he now has 3 weeks to get comfortable with guys he has never played with, even in probowls. Check downs and audibles will be nil for the most part, so it will probably be a half a season before Favre bears fruit as a viable starter. Also, Coles and COtchery are not big YAC guys if I remember correctly.I'd put favre right behind garrard. He is a top QB2 at this point who could pay real dividends in the playoffs (fantasy, not NFL)Warhogs said:I seem to agree with everyone else who has posted. Favre had a great year last year but for the few seasons before that he was more of a QB in that 10-15 range. He now has to learn a new offense in short order and develop chemistry with his new receivers. I think right now it would be safest to project his numbers not based on last season but what he had done for the few seasons before that.
I know Favre has a strong arm, but he still gets careless at times and those winds could present further problems.
Chase (or anybody else), what have you got on Favre's history of playing in Giants Stadium?
I think that's fair to say, but Farve also has a better chance to play all 16 games, where many who fall into that area don't.I find it VERY unlikely that Farve plays 16 games as a Jet and STILL fillinishes 15-20 which is in the bottom half of the league for the most part, not top half. I just don't see that.Anthony Borbely said:The problem is which Favre are you going to get...the 2005/2006 Favre, or the 2007 Favre? It's no certainty that you get last year's Favre.I'm going to be doing my rankings today sometime and I'll likely have Favre between 15 and 20, in the middle of the starting QBs.
Certainly respectable, but I'm still leery.Favre's numbers at Giants stadium (regular season only):Both of these posts are about where I fall on Favre. I don't think it's going to turn out to be as glorious as many may think. Unless he were to really, really fall in drafts, I wouldn't really give him a second look. Somebody else is going to grab him, probably too early, long before then anyway. Another thing to consider: Lambeau Field had it's own conditions to deal with, but those swirling winds at Giants Stadium presents it's own battle altogether.Gatorman said:I agree. It's not just playbook, he now has 3 weeks to get comfortable with guys he has never played with, even in probowls. Check downs and audibles will be nil for the most part, so it will probably be a half a season before Favre bears fruit as a viable starter. Also, Coles and COtchery are not big YAC guys if I remember correctly.I'd put favre right behind garrard. He is a top QB2 at this point who could pay real dividends in the playoffs (fantasy, not NFL)Warhogs said:I seem to agree with everyone else who has posted. Favre had a great year last year but for the few seasons before that he was more of a QB in that 10-15 range. He now has to learn a new offense in short order and develop chemistry with his new receivers. I think right now it would be safest to project his numbers not based on last season but what he had done for the few seasons before that.
I know Favre has a strong arm, but he still gets careless at times and those winds could present further problems.
Chase (or anybody else), what have you got on Favre's history of playing in Giants Stadium?
4 games played (3 vs. Giants, 1 vs. Jets)
81 completions
134 attempts
60.4% completion rate
1,040 yards (260 per game)
8 TDs (2 per game)
2 INTs (0.5 per game)
90.1 fantasy points
22.5 per game
We get .5 per comp in my dynasty league and he was the fifth-ranked QB last year. I think he's a lock for top ten with the line and receivers the Jets have, with another top-5 finish a remote possibility.ETA: HE was ranked 7th in the same league in 2006barista said:He's more than a flier now. If you get points for completions he's higher but in other leagues right around Delhomme, Bulger, Garrard... lots of talent in that area but some "unknowables" as Rummy used to say.
Me too. At least early on it's 2005/2006.Young 8 said:i bet on 2005/2006 FavreAnthony Borbely said:The problem is which Favre are you going to get...the 2005/2006 Favre, or the 2007 Favre? It's no certainty that you get last year's Favre.
I'm going to be doing my rankings today sometime and I'll likely have Favre between 15 and 20, in the middle of the starting QBs.
Finally, someone I agree with. I'll rank him ahead of Eli and Rivers for upside purposes but I think he is a rather large risk - even greater than Bulger, Delhomme, Schaub, etc. Him and Rodgers are side by side on my board at 15 and 16.Anthony Borbely said:The problem is which Favre are you going to get...the 2005/2006 Favre, or the 2007 Favre? It's no certainty that you get last year's Favre.I'm going to be doing my rankings today sometime and I'll likely have Favre between 15 and 20, in the middle of the starting QBs.
Good work, Jason.I just thought it was something to consider that may have been getting overlooked in this whole thing.Here are some thoughts on why you shouldn't worry about the conditions at Giants stadium:
http://blog.footballguys.com/2008/08/07/br...giants-stadium/
Indeed it did! [note the blog post has been edited to say so]...Good work, Jason.I just thought it was something to consider that may have been getting overlooked in this whole thing.Here are some thoughts on why you shouldn't worry about the conditions at Giants stadium:
http://blog.footballguys.com/2008/08/07/br...giants-stadium/
Just curious, did my mentioning of this lead you to doing that write-up? (Being that it's dated today)
Well that's cool. Appreciate the kudos!Indeed it did! [note the blog post has been edited to say so]...Good work, Jason.I just thought it was something to consider that may have been getting overlooked in this whole thing.Here are some thoughts on why you shouldn't worry about the conditions at Giants stadium:
http://blog.footballguys.com/2008/08/07/br...giants-stadium/
Just curious, did my mentioning of this lead you to doing that write-up? (Being that it's dated today)
Bulger may be close, Cutler should put up better numbers, Anderson may, McNabb, Hasselbeck...For all the talk about how terrible Favre was in 05, he was third in passing yardage. The 29 ints v 20 TDs are what killed his fantasy value, 6 more than he threw at any point in his career and 8 more than he threw since 2000. I think Brett is practically a lock for top 10. Who are you going to put ahead of him beyond Brady, Peyton, Romo, Brees, Palmer, Roeth? Eli? Garrard? Even if all these QBs surpass him he's still ninth. If BUlger has a resurgence he's tenth.
That's right about were I would put his numbers. The Jets Qb's attempted 510 passes last season. I feel safe in thinking that with Favre they might throw it at least two more times a game which would push Brett to 542 attempts. Pennington averaged 6.8 YPA while Clemens was 6.1. I'm going to assume Brett passes them both and I feel save thinking he should come in around 7 YPA which would be him to about 3800 yards.TD's are tough to predict but considering how considering how few rushing TD's the Jets had last year I think they will lean on Favre a little more in the red zone than most teams which should help his TD's. My guess was 24 to go along with 18 ints.So in total 3800 yards, 24 TD's, 18 Ints. Borderline QB1 numbers but all things being equal I'd put him over someone with similar projections based on his history of good health.I'm going to say 3800 26 TDs and 19 INTs. That should be enough for close to top ten.
rodgers.For all the talk about how terrible Favre was in 05, he was third in passing yardage. The 29 ints v 20 TDs are what killed his fantasy value, 6 more than he threw at any point in his career and 8 more than he threw since 2000. I think Brett is practically a lock for top 10. Who are you going to put ahead of him beyond Brady, Peyton, Romo, Brees, Palmer, Roeth? Eli? Garrard? Even if all these QBs surpass him he's still ninth. If BUlger has a resurgence he's tenth.
At this point I'd say 12th-15th. His weapons aren't as good and he'll have to learn a new offense for the 1st time in his career. I wouldn't want him as my weekly starter (and I've probably snagged him as my starter the last 3 years).
I'd take Favre over Rodgers. I have serious doubts about Rodgers ability to even finish the season given the injury problems that he's had.rodgers.For all the talk about how terrible Favre was in 05, he was third in passing yardage. The 29 ints v 20 TDs are what killed his fantasy value, 6 more than he threw at any point in his career and 8 more than he threw since 2000. I think Brett is practically a lock for top 10. Who are you going to put ahead of him beyond Brady, Peyton, Romo, Brees, Palmer, Roeth? Eli? Garrard? Even if all these QBs surpass him he's still ninth. If BUlger has a resurgence he's tenth.
Hes only thrown more INTs than TDs 3 times in his career, 1993, 1999, & 2005. I think Ill go with the majority of his career to project his #s.For those predicting as such, why do you think that Favre will throw for more TD's than INT's given all of the transition he's made and is making to a new team? Isn't there a pretty clear pattern in his career than when there's chaos around him, and not a steady hand to keep him playing within himself, that he throws a LOT of INT's?
I think people are making too much of his difficulty of transition, and I don't get the "less talent" argument. Favre went into last year with only one truly proven wideout, no one at TE, and a group of RBs with 0 combined starts between them. Despite these very shaky preseason prospects he went on to have one of his best seasons in years. In the Jets, he goes in with two proven wideouts, a veteran RB and a very fast COP back, a rookie TE drawing rave reviews, and a beefed-up O-Line. Also, I think the guy is going to have a lot to prove to the world and his former team. He'll be motivated like never before. I would not be shocked to see him put up a season more similar to 07 than 05/06 (which weren't bad anyway).For those predicting as such, why do you think that Favre will throw for more TD's than INT's given all of the transition he's made and is making to a new team? Isn't there a pretty clear pattern in his career than when there's chaos around him, and not a steady hand to keep him playing within himself, that he throws a LOT of INT's?