The grounds is interstate commerce. I'm not saying I agree, but I'm saying there is a clause in the Consitution that would give them room to intervene. That said, I think's it foolish. This grandstanding is playing to his home state, where football is an institution. He's playing it smart. He know's he'll never get enought Senators to come along for the ride, but he can say he tried. Think of the tax revenue generated by the NFL. Do you honestly think the US Senate is going to strip their Anti Trust exemption, which is a cornerstone of any professional sports league? The ability to sell the collaborative product is essential. The Senate will not kill the goose that laid the golden egg.And as a follow-up, please cite the constitutionality of such an congressional involvement.What is it that you want to see happen as a result of this "investigation" at my expense? How is it going to make my life or the lives of my fellow Americans better?I have no problem with what Senator Arlen Specter is suggesting. Outside investigators should have stepped in the moment it became known that Roger Goodell destroyed the incriminating evidence. Roger Goodell is very much caught in a conflict of interest and only a truly impartial outside investigation will get to the bottom of this. I applaud Senator Specter for his tenacity and refusal to accept what Roger Goodell says at face value. If the NFL wants anti-trust law exemption they'll happily abide with Congress. If not, then I'll look forward to the USFL starting up again soon.