What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Steelers (2007) (2 Viewers)

Godsbrother is right. Is PFT using a dart board or a ouija board in all this conjecture? They seem as fickle as a high school cheerleader. I thought Florio and company were a little more plugged into Pittsburgh than all this waffling. Maybe the Powers That Be have truly yet to make up their minds on the choice.

 
Godsbrother is right. Is PFT using a dart board or a ouija board in all this conjecture? They seem as fickle as a high school cheerleader. I thought Florio and company were a little more plugged into Pittsburgh than all this waffling. Maybe the Powers That Be have truly yet to make up their minds on the choice.
At least they aren't still throwing Wannstedt's name out there. :lmao:
 
FWIW...

Pirates on verge of getting LaRoche

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

By Dejan Kovacevic, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Adam LaRoche ... on the verge of joining the Pirates.

The Pirates have reached agreement with the Atlanta Braves to acquire first baseman Adam LaRoche in exchange for closer Mike Gonzalez and another player, though that player's identity is not yet known.

A team official confirmed that LaRoche, 27, who batted .285 with 32 home runs and 90 RBIS last season, will join the Pirates, pending a physical. For his career, LaRoche has a .274 average, 65 home runs and 213 RBIs in 400 games.

The Pirates have been trying to land LaRoche for two months.

 
The Pirates probably sweetened the deal by throwing in Jason Bay.

Imagine if David Littlefield were the Steelers GM.

 
PITTSBURGH -- The search for Bill Cowher's successor continued on Wednesday.

Pittsburgh Steelers assistant Russ Grimm met behind closed doors with the Black and Gold brass on the city's South Side.

Wednesday marked Grimm's second interview with the Rooneys and general manager Kevin Colbert.

"I'm excited about it," said Grimm. "I'm confident in my ability to run this football team. The Steelers are built from the ownership and community, whether it's me that fills in this spot or somebody else, I think this football team is going to be successful. Just simply for the fact the way it's been built."

Grimm's interview was a little over six hours long. In fact, the meeting broke for lunch in the middle.

The team's assistant head coach is the lone in-house candidate in contention now that Ken Whisenhunt has been hired to coach the Arizona Cardinals.

Grimm is one of three finalists for the post, including Minnesota Vikings defense coordinator Mike Tomlin and the Chicago Bears' defense coordinator Ron Rivera.

But the team will have to wait until the Bears' season is over to invite Rivera back for a second interview. NFL rules prohibit the team from speaking with Rivera until Chicago is eliminated from the playoffs.

If Chicago wins Sunday's NFC title game, the Steelers would have to wait until next month.
If it was Grimms gig, something would have transpired today after that meeting.Rivera is the guess, but the team may not be willing to wait 20 more days and then have Rivera not accept the offer.

 
Here are uncut videos of both Grimm and Tomlin:

Grimm: http://kdka.com/video/?id=23913@kdka.dayport.com

Tomlin: http://www.wpxi.com/video/index.html# (click on sports then Tomlin's uncut video)

Who would you choose?
Tomlin seems to have more passion and fire for the game, while Grimm comes across as overly cautious. Of the two, I'd have to say I'm more impressed by Tomlin.
I'd have to agree... I definitely would go with Tomlin. Everyone knows when asked why you want the job, you focus on what you can do for the organization and not what the organization can do for you. When Grimm was asked a similar question, he said he feels this is a good opportunity for him. I like Tomlin. I think he will bring change to the Steelers but that's not a bad thing. I don't want to see a complete overhaul but let's shake a few things up.
 
Tomlin, 34, is NFL's rising coaching star

Thursday, January 18, 2007

By Gerry Dulac, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

When the Tampa Bay Buccaneers were looking for a secondary coach to replace Herman Edwards in 2001, coach Tony Dungy brought in more than a dozen candidates to interview for the position. Most had experience coaching in the National Football League. But not all of them.

The last person to interview for the position was Mike Tomlin, a 29-year-old assistant coach from the University of Cincinnati. Not only had Tomlin never coached in the NFL but he also had only six years as an assistant coach in college.

None of that mattered to the Buccaneers.

"When we met him, we all kind of looked at each other," said Monte Kiffin, Tampa Bay's longtime defensive coordinator. "You could feel the room come alive. When we put him on a plane and sent him home, we all said, 'That's our guy.' John Lynch was sitting in the room with us, he's been to four Pro Bowls, and he told me later, 'I can't believe this guy. He's awesome.' "

"Half the players were older than him," said Detroit Lions coach Rod Marinelli, who was Tampa Bay's defensive line coach at the time. "But the decision wasn't even close."

And so began the meteoric ascent of Mike Tomlin, one of three finalists to replace Bill Cowher as head coach of the Steelers.

His star is rising so fast that those who know him believe he will be an NFL head coach soon, if not this year, almost certainly by 2008. Included in that group of admirers are the members of the Rooney family who, in this instance, matter most -- team chairman Dan Rooney and president Art Rooney II.

Tomlin bowled them over in his first interview last week, just as he seems to do with everyone who comes in contact with him. He was the first of the three finalists to have a second interview with the Steelers.

"To me, the No. 1 thing you want, if you're running an organization, is someone with character and integrity and a family guy at the very top of your club," Marinelli said yesterday from his office in Detroit. "You see that with Tony Dungy and Herm Edwards, and he has the same character. There are no character flaws. That's all you want. Now you add in something else like his football knowledge and you got something special."

Tomlin, 34, spent five seasons with the Buccaneers before leaving last year to become defensive coordinator for the Minnesota Vikings. After just one season with the Vikings, he is on the fast track to becoming a head coach, despite his tender age and limited experience.

The Vikings ranked eighth in total defense last season and led the NFL in rush defense. Like the Steelers, they did not allow a 100-yard rusher in 2006. They were the only NFL teams to accomplish that feat. In a Dec. 10 game against Marinelli's Detroit team, the Vikings held the Lions to minus-3 yards rushing, the lowest total by an NFL team in the past 45 years.

"One of the things you noticed right away was he was eager to learn and how much confidence he has in what he's doing," Marinelli said. "That comes from intelligence. He's an extremely, extremely bright guy. That confidence allows you to be demanding. He has all those skills. Soon as someone meets him, they come away with that impression."

Age doesn't seem to be a problem for Tomlin.

He is the same age as Cowher and Chuck Noll when they were hired by the Steelers. But he is also young enough that one of the players in the Vikings' secondary -- safety Darren Sharper -- was his teammate at William & Mary.

When Cowher was hired by the Steelers in 1992, he was the same age as right tackle Tunch Ilkin.

"He has great people skills, great relationships with his players," Kiffin said. "But there's a fine line in there where you're going to let them know you're going to do it my way. He can do that."

Tomlin was a three-year starter at William & Mary and finished his career with 101 catches, 2,053 yards and 20 touchdowns. As a wide receiver, he was a speed player who could outrun and outjump Division I-AA defenders.

But he never played professional football, opting to become a coach a year after graduation.

"When he told me he wanted to pursue coaching, I said great, coaching needs people like you," William & Mary coach Jimmye Laycock said yesterday.

"I'm not surprised he's in this position. Mike is a genuine good person who happens to be a good football coach."

"I had a lot of respect for him, which is hard for me to say being a defensive player and him being a wide receiver," said Jason Miller, a Canonsburg native who was a linebacker at William & Mary when Tomlin was a wide receiver. "Linebackers don't have a lot of respect for offensive players. But he wouldn't take any nonsense from any defensive back."

Added Miller: "He was always a motivator on the sideline and in the locker room. He never let people get down. What I enjoyed about him, he always had a joke or a smile on his face. He took things light-hearted ... until he gets on the field."

Tomlin spent one season at Virginia Military Institute in 1995, another as a graduate assistant at the University of Memphis and two years as wide receivers coach at Arkansas State. At Memphis and Arkansas State, he worked with Steelers linebackers coach Keith Butler.

When he went to Cincinnati in 1999, Tomlin switched sides of the ball, leaving the offense and becoming the Bearcats' secondary coach. Along the way, he gained admirers with his defensive knowledge, displaying an understanding not usually befitting a former wide receiver.

"Tony Dungy was a quarterback who was a mastermind in defense," Marinelli said. "I was an offensive lineman who became a defensive line coach. You see that happen a lot. Players trust him. That's why he's special."

And that's why he's seemingly on a fast track to becoming a head coach in the NFL, perhaps with the Steelers.

"It's not necessarily what you do from an X's and O's standpoint, but how you do it, what playing winning football is all about, not just inside the white lines but outside the white lines," Tomlin said.

"Coaches, in a lot of ways, whether you're a head coach, a coordinator or a position coach, are somewhat of a life coach. You have to be prepared to do the things that come with the job. If you're going to instruct men inside the white lines, you have to understand what outside the white lines affects what they do."
 
I still like Grimm more. He seems to have a much better repertoire and wealth of knowledge compared to Tomlin.

Tomlin is def. an impact type coach but I doubt his intelligence. His Defense was 31st against the pass last year. With the Steelers already suspect secondary, how can they be assured Tomlins coaching won't lead to the same or worse problems.

I wanna hear what Rivera is all about.

Until then, Grimm is a logical choice. I don't believe Tomlin is at this point.

 
Really liked Tomlin in that interview over Grimm. Nice to see Tomlin has experience coaching offense as well as defense.

 
Tomlin looked better from two videos; but the Steelers aren't going to make their decission based on the two clips.

Grimm was way more low key than I expected (living in FL I hadn't seen him speak before) and almost looked uncomfortable and ready to get outta there.

Re: the Vikings 31st ranked pass defense... the Steelers oline played poorly at times this year... is that a knock against Grimm?

Finally, I trust the Rooney's to make the right decission.

 
On a different subject -- what are y'all's thoughts about the Steelers taking a running back on the first day? I wasn't all that impressed with Davenport in the areas I thought would be his strengths -- as a short yardage back and running inside the tackles. I think the Steelers will bring him to camp because the price is right, but I would be very pleased if we grab a guy like Michael Bush in the 2nd-3rd or Tony Hunt in the 3rd-4th as a compliment to FWP. Bush projects more like a Bettis (good foot speed, nice moves for a big man, proven ability on the goal line and in short yardage) while Hunt seems more like Verron Haynes (good fundamentals, solid blocker, good receiver out of the backfield) but I think either of these guys would be a good fit for the team and would be worth spending an early (but not a first round) pick on.

 
Drafting an RB early is an interesting consideration.

Look at the 4 remaining playoff teams. Each has 2 guys who share the load:

Indy---Addai & Rhodes

Chi---Benson and Jones

NO----Deuce and Bush

NE----Dillon and Maroney

While those situations drive fantasy owners crazy, it doesn't matter to coaches trying to win games by keeping RBs fresh with the shared load. Maybe Willie Parker should have a better complement than Davenport.

 
The Steelers two biggest needs are o-line and a pass rushing OLB (if they stick with the 3-4) or DE (if they move to 4-3). That doesn't necessarily mean we have to use the #1 pick an offensive lineman or pass rusher but they had better address both, especially the o-line.

There were games this past season where the run-blocking was abysmal and Ben was getting killed pretty much all season. On the other side of the ball Haggans and Porter just did not generate anywhere close to the kind of pass rush needed.

Parker ran for 1400 yards and 16 TDs. If you want a RB to compliment him then sign Davenport or Duckett and grab someone in the 3rd or 4th round. There is usally pretty good value RBs in that round (i.e Chester Taylor, Frank Gore).

 
The Steelers two biggest needs are o-line and a pass rushing OLB (if they stick with the 3-4) or DE (if they move to 4-3). That doesn't necessarily mean we have to use the #1 pick an offensive lineman or pass rusher but they had better address both, especially the o-line.There were games this past season where the run-blocking was abysmal and Ben was getting killed pretty much all season. On the other side of the ball Haggans and Porter just did not generate anywhere close to the kind of pass rush needed.Parker ran for 1400 yards and 16 TDs. If you want a RB to compliment him then sign Davenport or Duckett and grab someone in the 3rd or 4th round. There is usally pretty good value RBs in that round (i.e Chester Taylor, Frank Gore).
:thumbup: Couldn't agree more.
 
On a different subject -- what are y'all's thoughts about the Steelers taking a running back on the first day? I wasn't all that impressed with Davenport in the areas I thought would be his strengths -- as a short yardage back and running inside the tackles. I think the Steelers will bring him to camp because the price is right, but I would be very pleased if we grab a guy like Michael Bush in the 2nd-3rd or Tony Hunt in the 3rd-4th as a compliment to FWP. Bush projects more like a Bettis (good foot speed, nice moves for a big man, proven ability on the goal line and in short yardage) while Hunt seems more like Verron Haynes (good fundamentals, solid blocker, good receiver out of the backfield) but I think either of these guys would be a good fit for the team and would be worth spending an early (but not a first round) pick on.
I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if they draft a power back. NFL Draft Countdown's 2 round mock posted today has them taking Marshawn Lynch in round 1 as a BPA pick. This, I just don't see. What is he going to bring to the offense that Parker doesn't? He's a little bigger, but Parker has become a much better between-the-tackles runner and Lynch, like Parker, is known as a game breaking back. Doesn't seem like a fit with the few miles FWP has on him.I could see Gaines Adams or Quentin Moses if either is available, perhaps Dwayne Jarrett, Levi Brown, or a CB going to Pittsburgh in round 1.
 
On a different subject -- what are y'all's thoughts about the Steelers taking a running back on the first day? I wasn't all that impressed with Davenport in the areas I thought would be his strengths -- as a short yardage back and running inside the tackles. I think the Steelers will bring him to camp because the price is right, but I would be very pleased if we grab a guy like Michael Bush in the 2nd-3rd or Tony Hunt in the 3rd-4th as a compliment to FWP. Bush projects more like a Bettis (good foot speed, nice moves for a big man, proven ability on the goal line and in short yardage) while Hunt seems more like Verron Haynes (good fundamentals, solid blocker, good receiver out of the backfield) but I think either of these guys would be a good fit for the team and would be worth spending an early (but not a first round) pick on.
Maybe later in the draft... however, there are some pretty good FAs that can fill this role. Duckett, Shipp, etc.BUT THE FIRST ROUND? BRING ON THE POZ! :banned: Natural Born Steeler!
 
I still like Grimm more. He seems to have a much better repertoire and wealth of knowledge compared to Tomlin.

Tomlin is def. an impact type coach but I doubt his intelligence. His Defense was 31st against the pass last year. With the Steelers already suspect secondary, how can they be assured Tomlins coaching won't lead to the same or worse problems.

I wanna hear what Rivera is all about.

Until then, Grimm is a logical choice. I don't believe Tomlin is at this point.
You doubt his intelligence? He went to William and Mary. They don't accept average students. A few facts about W&M. :thumbdown:
 
QUOTE(Iron Mike Tomczak @ Jan 18 2007, 11:44 AM)

I still like Grimm more. He seems to have a much better repertoire and wealth of knowledge compared to Tomlin.

Tomlin is def. an impact type coach but I doubt his intelligence. His Defense was 31st against the pass last year. With the Steelers already suspect secondary, how can they be assured Tomlins coaching won't lead to the same or worse problems.

I wanna hear what Rivera is all about.

Until then, Grimm is a logical choice. I don't believe Tomlin is at this point.



You doubt his intelligence? He went to William and Mary. They don't accept average students. A few facts about W&M.

His education in college doesnt amount to a hill of beans. I'm talking football know how, defensive and offensive formations, blocking and tackling technique, QB experience/knowledge. Overall knowledge of the scheme currently used by the Steelers. Grimm knows all of this, he was originally a QB before converting to line. He is a hall of fame candidate for his Washington Redskins glory in the 1980s. He is an established coach, and has been with the team so has a chemistry with the players. This same team with Grimms guidence won a superbowl Last season.

And you want to bring in some unproven young coach who coached the TERRIBLE Vikings?

Go to Minnesota with that attitude, Ill keep the winner here in Pittsburgh!

 
QUOTE(Iron Mike Tomczak @ Jan 18 2007, 11:44 AM)

I still like Grimm more. He seems to have a much better repertoire and wealth of knowledge compared to Tomlin.

Tomlin is def. an impact type coach but I doubt his intelligence. His Defense was 31st against the pass last year. With the Steelers already suspect secondary, how can they be assured Tomlins coaching won't lead to the same or worse problems.

I wanna hear what Rivera is all about.

Until then, Grimm is a logical choice. I don't believe Tomlin is at this point.



You doubt his intelligence? He went to William and Mary. They don't accept average students. A few facts about W&M.

His education in college doesnt amount to a hill of beans. I'm talking football know how, defensive and offensive formations, blocking and tackling technique, QB experience/knowledge. Overall knowledge of the scheme currently used by the Steelers. Grimm knows all of this, he was originally a QB before converting to line. He is a hall of fame candidate for his Washington Redskins glory in the 1980s. He is an established coach, and has been with the team so has a chemistry with the players. This same team with Grimms guidence won a superbowl Last season.

And you want to bring in some unproven young coach who coached the TERRIBLE Vikings?

Go to Minnesota with that attitude, Ill keep the winner here in Pittsburgh!
I'm sure his football knowledge is quite good as well. You don't get the accolades he's getting from former bosses without a high degree of knowledge and talent. Tomlin played on both sides of the ball through high school. Was a receiver in college. and has coached on both sides of the ball. I'd say his overall knowledge of the game is quite good. As for the Vikings, he wasn't the head coach. The offense was horrible, putting the D on the field, and in bad spots, way too often. The D line had injuries and the defensive ends leftover never got a pass rush. That left the secondary exposed and trying to cover wideouts for way too long. You want to bring in an unproven coach who's resume' includes the swinging door that was the Oline of the Steelers? Grimm is obviously not a hot commodity. He had 1 interview this year. And they didn't bother to bring him in for a second. If he ends up with the job, I'll be ok with it. But I have my doubts in his ability.

 
Grimm is back in talks today. 2 days in a row. He's the man and we get an announcement sometime late today or Friday.

OR..

If not, all signs are pointing to Chicago.... :(

Personally, I like Grimm at this point.

 
Grimm is back in talks today. 2 days in a row. He's the man and we get an announcement sometime late today or Friday.OR..If not, all signs are pointing to Chicago.... :( Personally, I like Grimm at this point.
If true, they must be working on a contract.
 
I've had a gut feeling since a day or two after Cowher stepped down that Grimm was going to be the guy. Go get 'em, Russ !

 
I still like Grimm more. He seems to have a much better repertoire and wealth of knowledge compared to Tomlin.Tomlin is def. an impact type coach but I doubt his intelligence. His Defense was 31st against the pass last year. With the Steelers already suspect secondary, how can they be assured Tomlins coaching won't lead to the same or worse problems.I wanna hear what Rivera is all about.Until then, Grimm is a logical choice. I don't believe Tomlin is at this point.
I was concerned about Tomlin's coordinator's skill as well with the Vikings worst ranked pass defense. However, after further thought I'm more comfortable with Tomlin in this regard. The Vikes D were so dominant against the run that opposing offenses never really made the running game a major part of their gameplan, so they passed 35-40 times or more (avg 37.4 pass attempts against, most in NFL), hence more passing yardage given up. Looking at their pass D under the surface, the Vikings D allowed only 15 TD's vs the pass and had 21 INT's, both top 5 in the NFL. When you add in the fact that the Vikes had a subpar offense, the logical conclusion I came to is that the passing yardage given up was much more a reflection of their dominant run defense than any flaws defending the pass. Simply put, the Vikes had a very good defense this past year and Tomlin deserves credit for that.
 
Grimm is back in talks today. 2 days in a row. He's the man and we get an announcement sometime late today or Friday.

OR..

If not, all signs are pointing to Chicago.... :thumbup:

Personally, I like Grimm at this point.
If true, they must be working on a contract.
Are you stating the above as fact that he is in talks with the Rooney's again today OR are you only pointing out that potential scenario?
 
pfalvey said:
3C said:
nightshift said:
Grimm is back in talks today. 2 days in a row. He's the man and we get an announcement sometime late today or Friday.

OR..

If not, all signs are pointing to Chicago.... :lmao:

Personally, I like Grimm at this point.
If true, they must be working on a contract.
Are you stating the above as fact that he is in talks with the Rooney's again today OR are you only pointing out that potential scenario?
Sorry no link. Local radio sports talk.
 
Don't get me wrong I don't think Tomlin is a bad coach or a bad guy. In fact I respect what hes about after listening in to his interview comments. I just don't think hes the right fit for the job. Hes still wet behind the ears in my book, not saying that he is an amateur by any means. Hell, I believe the Vikings were in the playoff hunt just as long if not longer than the Steelers were last year.

Its just that from what Ive heard from Logan and Porter and some of the O line, they like Grimm alot. They see him as a players coach and said he gets more fired up than Ken Whisenhunt did. Grimm didnt look fired up in his interview, but after 6+ hours of delegation with the Roonys I would be alil spent too. Hes a big guy too so he was probly alil pooped out. But I dont think he lacks any desire to exceed nor the fire or authority to command a team. I think if anything his answers to the questions were a bit Over confident, not complacent.

Both coaches understand what the Steelers are all about, and I wouldnt gripe over either one. Grimm is just a more solid candidate in my opinion.

 
NFL Network just stated the Rooney's will interview Ron Rivera for a second time following the Bear's season. Looks like we'll have to wait.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
NFL Network just stated the Rooney's will interview Ron Rivera for a second time following the Bear's season. Looks like we'll have to wait.
Old news. Lots of speculation that an announcement will be made this weekend.
 
NFL Network just stated the Rooney's will interview Ron Rivera for a second time following the Bear's season. Looks like we'll have to wait.
Old news. Lots of speculation that an announcement will be made this weekend.
I don't think so. They'll wait until this weekend just to see what happens to the Bears. If the Bears lose, they're definitely going to bring Rivera in for a second interview.
 
NFL Network just stated the Rooney's will interview Ron Rivera for a second time following the Bear's season. Looks like we'll have to wait.
Old news. Lots of speculation that an announcement will be made this weekend.
I don't think so. They'll wait until this weekend just to see what happens to the Bears. If the Bears lose, they're definitely going to bring Rivera in for a second interview.
Geaux Saints!
 
NFL Network just stated the Rooney's will interview Ron Rivera for a second time following the Bear's season. Looks like we'll have to wait.
Old news. Lots of speculation that an announcement will be made this weekend.
I don't think so. They'll wait until this weekend just to see what happens to the Bears. If the Bears lose, they're definitely going to bring Rivera in for a second interview.
Geaux Saints!
Not necessarily. There is no need to rush this process. I like Rivera probably more than Tomlin simply because he has some Pittsburgh ties. If the Bears banged up D shuts down that Saints' O and wins the game, that is just another plus for Rivera and makes the wait that much more worth the it.As long as Parcells stays in Dallas, the only coaching competition is Oakland and Miami, and at this point I dont think any of the 3 final candidates are still being considered for those jobs (although maybe Miami is waiting on Rivera as well?)ETA: What am I talking about . . . Rivera doesnt have Pittsburgh ties.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Geaux Saints!
Not necessarily. There is no need to rush this process. I like Rivera probably more than Tomlin simply because he has some Pittsburgh ties. If the Bears banged up D shuts down that Saints' O and wins the game, that is just another plus for Rivera and makes the wait that much more worth the it.
I agree that there is no need to rush the process (and I don't think the Steelers will do that), but if the Bears lose this week the decission will theoretically come 2 weeks earlier than if they win. That seems like a good thing to me.Also, I don't think how the Bears defense performs this Sunday will have any impact on the decision to hire him as a head coach because I think the Rooney's are looking more at the big picture that what happens in one game. That's why I said earlier in this thread that the Vikings pass defense or the poor play of the Steelers oline this year wasn't a negative reflection on either of the other candidates.
 
Geaux Saints!
Not necessarily. There is no need to rush this process. I like Rivera probably more than Tomlin simply because he has some Pittsburgh ties. If the Bears banged up D shuts down that Saints' O and wins the game, that is just another plus for Rivera and makes the wait that much more worth the it.
I agree that there is no need to rush the process (and I don't think the Steelers will do that), but if the Bears lose this week the decission will theoretically come 2 weeks earlier than if they win. That seems like a good thing to me.Also, I don't think how the Bears defense performs this Sunday will have any impact on the decision to hire him as a head coach because I think the Rooney's are looking more at the big picture that what happens in one game. That's why I said earlier in this thread that the Vikings pass defense or the poor play of the Steelers oline this year wasn't a negative reflection on either of the other candidates.
I'm talking more public perception. Being that either coach will have limited input on personel being that there will be the same Dir. of Football Operations and scouts etc., I dont think waiting an extra 2 weeks is an issue. I think the Rooneys gave a list of a "final 3" and therefore they will not sign either Grimm or Tomlin prior to Rivera's second interview, regardless of when that may be.

 
I dont think waiting an extra 2 weeks is an issue. I think the Rooneys gave a list of a "final 3" and therefore they will not sign either Grimm or Tomlin prior to Rivera's second interview, regardless of when that may be.
I think we are essentially in agreement. I don't think waiting is a mistake if the Bears win, I'd just rather not wait.
 
I won't retract the low end search remark. They met the Rooney rule and talked to a couple of their assistants. Big whoop. Whether it's Rivera or Grimm, they'll be among the lowest paid HCs in the NFL.
I don't see why you equate what a coach is paid with being a quality head coach. Spurrier and Saban were among the higher paid coaches in the league and you see how that turned out. As I said before you seem to have a pretty low opinion of the Rooneys.
Maybe you hit it squarely. The Rooneys had a long time to prepare for Cowher's departure and they conducted a pretty limited search, almost obligatory. And it sounds like names such as Gailey and Mike Sherman were thrown in there as a ploy to squeeze Whisenhunt and Grimm and to circumvent whatever their agent was trying to finagle.It's true that Saban and Spurrier were high-salaried busts. Those teams were trying to sell tickets and get a buzz going about their teams. But if a team hires a lower-salaried guy, it makes more sense if there is some rationale or strategy involved. The Jets getting Mangini away from their rival NE is an example. Of course, his salary is about to increase. This is why the Steelers are missing the boat by not talking to some top AFC coordinator. Isn't that why they went with Cowher over Wannstedt, after all? They said Cowher was more familiar with the AFC.It seems moot if Grimm gets the job.
I don't think it makes much of a difference which conference the coordinator is from. Even if you believe that then which AFC coordinators are superior to Grimm and Whis? The only two I can think of that might be better are Cam Cameron and Buddy Ryan whose teams were just eliminated from the playoffs.I could be wrong but I am pretty sure that none of the other teams looking for head coaches brought in any coordinators/assistants from the AFC to interview other than Whisenhunt and Grimm.
Cam Cameron and Brian Schottenheimer earned interviews. I think Norm Chow was considered by Arizona. It seems odd that, with the Steelers' long-time regard for Marty Schottenheimer, the Rooneys wouldn't at least speak with his son, a guy who did a great job for the Jets with no marquee RB and a weak-armed QB. When they did the search in 1992, they brought in men like Gilbride, Mike Riley, and others just to pick their brains even if those fellows weren't serious considerations. They also tried to arrange interviews with Dennis Green and Mike Holmgren back then. And yes, if the Powers That Be (who some on this thread seem to think of as infallible) check a map, they'll see it wouldn't take long to fly Rex Ryan in for a conversation. I forgot who originally said it, but owners hire the coaches they feel comfortable with, and Grimm is clearly a Pittsburgh guy. So, if it ain't broke (if you consider 8-8 unbroken), don't think outside the box. :tinfoilhat:
What if Rivera, Tomlin and Grimm all turn out to be solid NFL coaches for the next 20 years? How will you look back on this coaching interviewing process. They may be the equivalent of Holmgren, Denny Green and Wandstadt 20 years from now you may be bragging about how great their list of candidates were and what great foresite they had. But you are trying to pass judgement on candidates who have yet to be a head coach. It's like saying don't draft Reggie Bush, you should have just signed Edge James. Why go for an unproven NFL player over a solid all pro veteran. How do you ever become a head coach in the NFL if some team isn't the first to hire them that way?How would you have viewed interviewing Mangini and Payton last offseason? You probably would have been crying for Pete Carrol back then too cause there was not much fanfair for these guys. But they turned out to be great hires.Cowher was a well known assistant of Marty, well so is Grimm an assistant head coach to future hall of famer Cowher, Rivera played under Ditka and is an assistant under a coach leading his team to the NFC Championship game (L. Smith) and he spent time under Andy Reid from the Bill Walsh family tree who shows every year to be one of the great minds in football. Then you have Tomlin who spent time with a great coach in Dungy who is from the Chuck Knoll family tree.
 
Interesting quote from Rivera:

"I grew up playing rough, tough, physical football," said Rivera. "You beat up your opponent, you got after them. I believe in running the football. As a defensive coach, I want to attack. Those are some of the characteristics that I believe the Rooneys are looking for."
No announcement as of 1:30 pm ET Friday. Lookin' like Rivera is still in the hunt.
 
Being a long time Viking fan, and reading most of the comments here on the coaching front, I'd rather the Wolf's can Childress now and promote Tomlin to HC for the Vikings, rather than lose him this year or for sure next year. To me the Steelers would have signed Grimm a while ago if he was the man. Less change would take place with Grimm took over the team. With Tomlin or Rivera taking over, besides them bringing in their own people, they'd change the Defense to something that they are more familar with, the 4-3. I don't see Tomlin being young a disadvantage for him to get this job, since Cowher was a kid when he took over the Steelers as well.

 
Washington Observer's Dale Lolley:

http://www.o-ronline.net/weblog/football/

Saturday, January 20, 2007

Updated odds

Updated coaching odds:

Russ Grimm (2-1) Grimm is still the favorite. The Steelers denied Arizona the opportunity to speak to wide receivers coach Bruce Arians this week. If Grimm gets the job, Arians would be his offensive coordiantor.

Mike Tomlin (6-1) At 34, Tomlin is the youngest of the Steelers' three finalists. He has impressed with his demeanor and public personna. But he's also only been a coordinator for one year. Is he ready yet?

Ron Rivera (8-1) If the Bears beat New Orleans Sunday, Rivera's chances may get even worse since the Steelers would have to wait two more weeks to talk to him. They are patient, but will they be that patient. If the Bears lose and their defense looks bad, it could also affect how he is viewed. It's almost a no-win situation.
At this point with only the Raiders left to choose a coach I wouldn't be at all suprised if the Steelers wait the two weeks (if needed) to interview Rivera.
 
FWIW, Chris Landry (Fox football analyst/guru) thinks it'll be Grimm. He's about as tuned in and trustworthy as they come. But it was just an opinion.

 
SteelerMurf said:
I won't retract the low end search remark. They met the Rooney rule and talked to a couple of their assistants. Big whoop. Whether it's Rivera or Grimm, they'll be among the lowest paid HCs in the NFL.
I don't see why you equate what a coach is paid with being a quality head coach. Spurrier and Saban were among the higher paid coaches in the league and you see how that turned out. As I said before you seem to have a pretty low opinion of the Rooneys.
Maybe you hit it squarely. The Rooneys had a long time to prepare for Cowher's departure and they conducted a pretty limited search, almost obligatory. And it sounds like names such as Gailey and Mike Sherman were thrown in there as a ploy to squeeze Whisenhunt and Grimm and to circumvent whatever their agent was trying to finagle.It's true that Saban and Spurrier were high-salaried busts. Those teams were trying to sell tickets and get a buzz going about their teams. But if a team hires a lower-salaried guy, it makes more sense if there is some rationale or strategy involved. The Jets getting Mangini away from their rival NE is an example. Of course, his salary is about to increase. This is why the Steelers are missing the boat by not talking to some top AFC coordinator. Isn't that why they went with Cowher over Wannstedt, after all? They said Cowher was more familiar with the AFC.It seems moot if Grimm gets the job.
I don't think it makes much of a difference which conference the coordinator is from. Even if you believe that then which AFC coordinators are superior to Grimm and Whis? The only two I can think of that might be better are Cam Cameron and Buddy Ryan whose teams were just eliminated from the playoffs.I could be wrong but I am pretty sure that none of the other teams looking for head coaches brought in any coordinators/assistants from the AFC to interview other than Whisenhunt and Grimm.
Cam Cameron and Brian Schottenheimer earned interviews. I think Norm Chow was considered by Arizona. It seems odd that, with the Steelers' long-time regard for Marty Schottenheimer, the Rooneys wouldn't at least speak with his son, a guy who did a great job for the Jets with no marquee RB and a weak-armed QB. When they did the search in 1992, they brought in men like Gilbride, Mike Riley, and others just to pick their brains even if those fellows weren't serious considerations. They also tried to arrange interviews with Dennis Green and Mike Holmgren back then. And yes, if the Powers That Be (who some on this thread seem to think of as infallible) check a map, they'll see it wouldn't take long to fly Rex Ryan in for a conversation. I forgot who originally said it, but owners hire the coaches they feel comfortable with, and Grimm is clearly a Pittsburgh guy. So, if it ain't broke (if you consider 8-8 unbroken), don't think outside the box. :football:
What if Rivera, Tomlin and Grimm all turn out to be solid NFL coaches for the next 20 years? How will you look back on this coaching interviewing process. They may be the equivalent of Holmgren, Denny Green and Wandstadt 20 years from now you may be bragging about how great their list of candidates were and what great foresite they had. But you are trying to pass judgement on candidates who have yet to be a head coach. It's like saying don't draft Reggie Bush, you should have just signed Edge James. Why go for an unproven NFL player over a solid all pro veteran. How do you ever become a head coach in the NFL if some team isn't the first to hire them that way?How would you have viewed interviewing Mangini and Payton last offseason? You probably would have been crying for Pete Carrol back then too cause there was not much fanfair for these guys. But they turned out to be great hires.Cowher was a well known assistant of Marty, well so is Grimm an assistant head coach to future hall of famer Cowher, Rivera played under Ditka and is an assistant under a coach leading his team to the NFC Championship game (L. Smith) and he spent time under Andy Reid from the Bill Walsh family tree who shows every year to be one of the great minds in football. Then you have Tomlin who spent time with a great coach in Dungy who is from the Chuck Knoll family tree.
I understand your counterpoints and some are valid to me. What is evident here is that all of us are intensely interested and hopeful that the Steelers make the best decision. The pool seriously considered in the search has just been small, in my estimation, and that the Steelers tend to think within a methodical and predictable framework----the assistant bred from an organization they know, the guy they'd like to succeed so he can stick around for a long time. That probably should be every team's basic blueprint. It's just a little disconcerting that we seem to swear by this formula as if nothing else can work. The Steelers head coaching job is one of the best in pro sports. Don't the fans deserve a fairly inclusive search to reflect that? Instead, of the 12 teams in the playoffs this year, the Steelers met with only 1 assistant from that field---Rivera. Casting a broader net would have hurt nothing. We've been conditioned to believe the Rooneys have the magic touch though it's been an essentially modest search. And I didn't "cry" for Pete Carroll; I only said there were plenty of big fish to be found and threw his name out as an example. The league has changed since Noll and Cowher were hired, so I'm not sure a single model of pursuit is still ideal. That's why I was glad Gailey's name came into it, although briefly. It showed that the process could be more diversified. And I believe he was endorsed by that Cowher guy you mentioned who is bound for the Hall of Fame. Where's the harm in talking to someone who's been a winner as a head coach?Yes, it's possible Rivera and the others could be tomorrow's stars. Looking back at my posts, I never bad-mouthed the finalists, except to say Tomlin's pedigree and achievements are dubious. But let's not overrate family trees when it comes to NFL success. Daves Campo and Wannstedt, along with Butch Davis, came from the Jimmy Johnson family tree. As to both Mangini and Payton, there actually WAS fanfare about their talents and their hires were not startling. They were key men under Parcells and Belichick. They were not obscure. Your analogy with Reggie Bush is operable if you're comparing him to Mangini and Payton. Bush was not obscure, either.In any event, since they've "narrowed" (redundant from the start) the search to 3, I am hoping for Rivera, whose mindset is that he likes a team where the defense beats people up. Sounds good to me.
 
I'm a fan of Tomlin, but part of me wonders will he change too much? Troy Polamalu is IMO the best safety in the game and plays a huge part on our defense, changes what opposing offenses do and all that.. will he still make such a big impact in Tomlin's defense? Polamalu's only weakness is that he can occassionally lack great coverage skills, and in a cover 2 scheme he may not be very effective. Personally, I think we need Polamalu's influence on the defensive side because I believe without him as the wild card, the defense' play will suffer a let down because Troy's influence hides the flaws of some of our other players.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Now SI.com changed their story that the announcement is expected to come sometime within the next two days...

Mike Tomlin, defensive coordinator for the Minnesota Vikings, has been chosen as the Pittsburgh Steelers' new head coach, SI.com has learned.

The official announcement is expected to come sometime in the next two days.

Tomlin, 34, impressed the Steelers during the interview process with his organization skills, intelligence and grasp of the game, according to a source familiar with the coaching search.

He would succeed Bill Cowher, who resigned Jan. 5 after 15 seasons as the Steelers' coach.

Tomlin beat out Russ Grimm, 47, a Steelers assistant for six seasons and their assistant head coach for three, who had been considered the front-runner. The other finalist for the job was Chicago Bears defensive coordinator Ron Rivera.

Before joining the Vikings a year ago, Tomlin had spent five years as a defensive coach with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Before that, he was a college assistant at Cincinnati, Arkansas State, Memphis and Virginia Military Institute.

Tomlin would become only the third Steelers head coach in 38 years and the NFL's sixth African-American head coach.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top