What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Steve McNair - Ravens - Titans (1 Viewer)

Chaos Commish

Footballguy
Just saw that scrolling under the Laker game.

Ravens | Team agrees to deal parameters for McNairFri, 5 May 2006 16:53:32 -0700Adam Schefter, of the NFL Network, reports the Tennessee Titans and Baltimore Ravens have agreed to trade parameters that would bring Titans QB Steve McNair to Baltimore. The only remaining aspect is for the Titans to officially sign off on the deal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's the likeihood of this being anything other than picks?

Conditional picks even.

 
Just because they "agree to terms", doesn't mean he is a Raven.

Harrington "agreed to terms" with the Dolphins - yet he's still a Lion.

 
It was already reported earlier in multiple sources that McNair had agreed to contract terms with the Ravens. But what the initial post says is that the Ravens and Titans had agreed on trade parameters. It's the first report of that.

Adam Schefter, of the NFL Network, reports the Tennessee Titans and Baltimore Ravens have agreed to trade parameters that would bring Titans QB Steve McNair to Baltimore. The only remaining aspect is for the Titans to officially sign off on the deal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What does this say about Boller? I thought he made some strides last year. I don't think the Ravens are Bowl bound with him next year, but McNair would clearly be a stop gap. Is Boller still viewed as the future of the franchise? I'd think the answer is no if they are brining in a crusty vet to take the reigns from him.

 
What does this say about Boller? I thought he made some strides last year. I don't think the Ravens are Bowl bound with him next year, but McNair would clearly be a stop gap. Is Boller still viewed as the future of the franchise? I'd think the answer is no if they are brining in a crusty vet to take the reigns from him.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If they're truly planning to pay McNair an $11 million signing bonus, I'd have to think they have given up on Boller as a starting QB. But we'll see on that.
 
What does this say about Boller? I thought he made some strides last year. I don't think the Ravens are Bowl bound with him next year, but McNair would clearly be a stop gap. Is Boller still viewed as the future of the franchise? I'd think the answer is no if they are brining in a crusty vet to take the reigns from him.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If they're truly planning to pay McNair an $11 million signing bonus, I'd have to think they have given up on Boller as a starting QB. But we'll see on that.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Boller has 2 years left on his contract at reasonable prices for a backup ($1.6m this year, $800k next year) I'm not sure if there are any big roster bonuses and such in addition to that, but I don't think so. The only way he will stay in Baltimore is if McNair suffers a LONG term injury and Boller comes in and "Pulls a Brees". By this, I mean he would have to look very good for an extended period of time (at least 12 games), he'd probably have to go deep in the playoffs, and most importantly he couldn't have any really bad games (e.g., week 10, 14, or 17, 2005). If that happens, there's a chance they make him a decent offer to extend him and keep him around. Otherwise he's no more than backup material for the next two years. He has so much negative baggage around here, it will be hard to sell resigning him regardless of what happens over the next two years unless he really carries the team for a long period of time.I wouldn't be surprised to see him dangled as trade bait at the end of this year while they can still get something for him, particularly if he subs in a few games this season and doesn't look too bad doing it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What does this say about Boller? I thought he made some strides last year. I don't think the Ravens are Bowl bound with him next year, but McNair would clearly be a stop gap. Is Boller still viewed as the future of the franchise? I'd think the answer is no if they are brining in a crusty vet to take the reigns from him.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If they're truly planning to pay McNair an $11 million signing bonus, I'd have to think they have given up on Boller as a starting QB. But we'll see on that.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would have thought you'd think different on Boller.It's obvious that Baltimore doesn't think they can win now with him, but how much longer does McNair have in the league? it's entirely possible that Boller is better off in the long run after this. It doesn't happen often, but sometimes a young QB can learn from a veteran and be better off for the experience. I won't make the leap of faith comparison, but let's just say he wouldn't be the first.

 
What does this say about Boller? I thought he made some strides last year. I don't think the Ravens are Bowl bound with him next year, but McNair would clearly be a stop gap. Is Boller still viewed as the future of the franchise? I'd think the answer is no if they are brining in a crusty vet to take the reigns from him.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If they're truly planning to pay McNair an $11 million signing bonus, I'd have to think they have given up on Boller as a starting QB. But we'll see on that.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
what it says is what they've known all along, but couldn't do squat about....that is, Boller needs some time to develope, to allow the game to slow down around him someI liken his situation to a Gannon or BJohnson....these guys spent several years in semi-starters role, and were avg QB's...( for example, Gannon completion % mid-upper 50's for 10 yrs, when throwing at least 100+ attempts)...

...until they hooked up w/Gruden---then BAM---Pro Bowler's!!

Boller has enough skill to hang around the league for awhile after his days are over here (and they will be, rest assured)...under the right guy, he might catch lightening in the bottle for a couple seasons, otherwise, just another guy that can throw it thru the side of a barn---IF he hits it!

regarding the post title---the worst kept secrect around here was that Plan A, B and C regarding the "experienced vet QB to be brought in for competition" was always going to be McNair

I don't know how or why---but there were absolutey NO talks w/others FA QB's this offseason, because the front office was convinced SMcN would be available and there would be no other jobs available...

...as far as the compensation "aggreed to" between Balt and Tenn---who knows?

there is a hearing 5/16, IIRC, where it is to be determined if Tenn's actions make McNair a FA---I don't think the Ravens want to allow that to happen, as he is fair game at that point

however, they are one of the few teams w/cap space to take the deal McNair has w/Tenn currently ($1Mb + $9M salary---vs Baltimore offer of $11M sign bonus and 3 yr deal avg $10M)...I see the trade happening "11th hour", as Tenn wants to get "something" and the Ravens don't want to allow McNair to hit the open market...

...can you imagine IF Brooks tore a hammy or sprung an ACL this week?

we'll see who blinks...

Bal offered a 5th...

Tenn wants a 4th...

stayed tuned!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What does this say about Boller? I thought he made some strides last year. I don't think the Ravens are Bowl bound with him next year, but McNair would clearly be a stop gap. Is Boller still viewed as the future of the franchise? I'd think the answer is no if they are brining in a crusty vet to take the reigns from him.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If they're truly planning to pay McNair an $11 million signing bonus, I'd have to think they have given up on Boller as a starting QB. But we'll see on that.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would have thought you'd think different on Boller.It's obvious that Baltimore doesn't think they can win now with him, but how much longer does McNair have in the league? it's entirely possible that Boller is better off in the long run after this. It doesn't happen often, but sometimes a young QB can learn from a veteran and be better off for the experience. I won't make the leap of faith comparison, but let's just say he wouldn't be the first.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
11 million is a lot of money - for Baltimore's sake you would hope they get more than one year's worth of play for that money (particularly if it is two years of 8 games each...)
 
What does this say about Boller? I thought he made some strides last year. I don't think the Ravens are Bowl bound with him next year, but McNair would clearly be a stop gap. Is Boller still viewed as the future of the franchise? I'd think the answer is no if they are brining in a crusty vet to take the reigns from him.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If they're truly planning to pay McNair an $11 million signing bonus, I'd have to think they have given up on Boller as a starting QB. But we'll see on that.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would have thought you'd think different on Boller.It's obvious that Baltimore doesn't think they can win now with him, but how much longer does McNair have in the league? it's entirely possible that Boller is better off in the long run after this. It doesn't happen often, but sometimes a young QB can learn from a veteran and be better off for the experience. I won't make the leap of faith comparison, but let's just say he wouldn't be the first.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm not assessing on talent, but on Baltimore's actions. Frankly, I don't think Baltimore is better off with McNair at the helm; McNair is 6-12 as a starter in the past two years, with stats only marginally better than Boller's 2005. Boller is on the rise and McNair is on the decline. But I don't see why they'd pay an $11 million signing bonus to any QB they didn't expect to be their starter for several years. If they were going after McNair on the cheap, I could see an open competition, and they certainly need a better backup than they've had up until now. But that's starter's money.

 
---snip---

I would have thought you'd think different on Boller.

It's obvious that Baltimore doesn't think they can win now with him, but how much longer does McNair have in the league? it's entirely possible that Boller is better off in the long run after this. It doesn't happen often, but sometimes a young QB can learn from a veteran and be better off for the experience. I won't make the leap of faith comparison, but let's just say he wouldn't be the first.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think I agree, it kinda reminds me of Harrington / Garcia last year - people around Detroit were saying that Garcia could mentor Harrington and teach him the ropes and be better for taking a backup role for the season. Obviously the injury in preseason to Garcia kinda messed all that up, and Mooch didn't help at all rushing Garcia back. But, when Harrington came back after being benched for a couple weeks, he did seem more relaxed and a little better out on the field. Makes you wonder what woulda happened if the season had played out as Mooch planned without the Garcia injury.Harrington didn't turn into a superstar, and Boller probably won't either, but IF (big IF) McNair does mentor Boller and help him grow, sometimes being able to see someone else do something and then explain it is better than all the time the coaches tell you to do something.

 
What does this say about Boller? I thought he made some strides last year. I don't think the Ravens are Bowl bound with him next year, but McNair would clearly be a stop gap. Is Boller still viewed as the future of the franchise? I'd think the answer is no if they are brining in a crusty vet to take the reigns from him.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If they're truly planning to pay McNair an $11 million signing bonus, I'd have to think they have given up on Boller as a starting QB. But we'll see on that.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would have thought you'd think different on Boller.It's obvious that Baltimore doesn't think they can win now with him, but how much longer does McNair have in the league? it's entirely possible that Boller is better off in the long run after this. It doesn't happen often, but sometimes a young QB can learn from a veteran and be better off for the experience. I won't make the leap of faith comparison, but let's just say he wouldn't be the first.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm not assessing on talent, but on Baltimore's actions. Frankly, I don't think Baltimore is better off with McNair at the helm; McNair is 6-12 as a starter in the past two years, with stats only marginally better than Boller's 2005. Boller is on the rise and McNair is on the decline. But I don't see why they'd pay an $11 million signing bonus to any QB they didn't expect to be their starter for several years. If they were going after McNair on the cheap, I could see an open competition, and they certainly need a better backup than they've had up until now. But that's starter's money.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
There were only a few starters with a lower YPA than Boller last year - Orton, Carr, Losman, Bollinger, Frerotte and Harrington. McNair wasn't much higher but at least he threw more TD's than INT's and had a higher passing percentage.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What does this say about Boller? I thought he made some strides last year. I don't think the Ravens are Bowl bound with him next year, but McNair would clearly be a stop gap. Is Boller still viewed as the future of the franchise? I'd think the answer is no if they are brining in a crusty vet to take the reigns from him.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If they're truly planning to pay McNair an $11 million signing bonus, I'd have to think they have given up on Boller as a starting QB. But we'll see on that.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would have thought you'd think different on Boller.It's obvious that Baltimore doesn't think they can win now with him, but how much longer does McNair have in the league? it's entirely possible that Boller is better off in the long run after this. It doesn't happen often, but sometimes a young QB can learn from a veteran and be better off for the experience. I won't make the leap of faith comparison, but let's just say he wouldn't be the first.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm not assessing on talent, but on Baltimore's actions. Frankly, I don't think Baltimore is better off with McNair at the helm; McNair is 6-12 as a starter in the past two years, with stats only marginally better than Boller's 2005. Boller is on the rise and McNair is on the decline. But I don't see why they'd pay an $11 million signing bonus to any QB they didn't expect to be their starter for several years. If they were going after McNair on the cheap, I could see an open competition, and they certainly need a better backup than they've had up until now. But that's starter's money.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
There were only a few starters with a lower YPA than Boller last year - Orton, Carr, Losman, Bollinger, Frerotte and Harrington. McNair wasn't much higher but at least he threw more TD's than INT's and had a higher passing percentage.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
...in the games he played.
 
There were only a few starters with a lower YPA than Boller last year - Orton, Carr, Losman, Bollinger, Frerotte and Harrington.  McNair wasn't much higher but at least he threw more TD's than INT's and had a higher passing percentage.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If you discard game 1 (when Boller got injured) and game 10 (his first game back from injury), Boller was 137/237 (57.0%) for 1516 yards (6.4 ypa, 217 yards per game) with 11 TD and 8 INT. Those numbers are comparable to McNair's.
 
There were only a few starters with a lower YPA than Boller last year - Orton, Carr, Losman, Bollinger, Frerotte and Harrington.  McNair wasn't much higher but at least he threw more TD's than INT's and had a higher passing percentage.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If you discard game 1 (when Boller got injured) and game 10 (his first game back from injury), Boller was 137/237 (57.0%) for 1516 yards (6.4 ypa, 217 yards per game) with 11 TD and 8 INT. Those numbers are comparable to McNair's.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
:lmao: What, I guess he knew he was going to hurt his foot with 5 minutes left in the 3rd quarter week 1, so that explains why he couldn't get them into the endzone, and threw that 1st half pick. He was just thinking about how much it was going to hurt his feelings when some of the crowd cheered his injury later that evening! Of course you shouldn't count his stats that game!And week 10, you know EVERYBODY averages 4.33 YPA and throws three picks (and no TDs) when they say they are healthy enough to play after an injury. There's no need to include a game like that.

Come on! I'm sure if you try hard enough you can think of a reason to exclude week 17 against Cleveland (hungover from a New Years Eve party? Trying to improve draft position?) too. Then his numbers look even better!! 122/201 (60.1%) for 1365yds (6.7ypa!!!) with 11 TD and only 5 INTs.

Or maybe to make things fair we should eliminate the two games McNair played before he missed a game with injury. That would give him 282/450 (62.7%) for 3093 yds (6.87 YPA) with 16 tds to 7 INTs, which again gives numbers Boller hasn't approached in his entire career.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I pray the Kyle Boller experiment is NOT over.

He's my favorite Raven...hope he stays there for at least 4 more years...

 
What, I guess he knew he was going to hurt his foot with 5 minutes left in the 3rd quarter week 1, so that explains why he couldn't get them into the endzone, and threw that 1st half pick.  He was just thinking about how much it was going to hurt his feelings when some of the crowd cheered his injury later that evening!  Of course you shouldn't count his stats that game!

And week 10, you know EVERYBODY averages 4.33 YPA and throws three picks (and no TDs) when they say they are healthy enough to play after an injury.  There's no need to include a game like that.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I realize there are problems with taking statistics selectively, but please note that game 1 was his first game with two new starting wide receivers. You also can't compare his and McNair's ability to come in and start at QB after an injury; Boller had less than two years' game experience at the time, while McNair is in his 11th season and has lots of experience dealing with injuries. So while I think there are issues with ignoring two games, I think it's better to do that than to ignore his last seven games, which is what you are doing. Boller clearly showed significant improvement in the last half of 2005, and if he played at that level in 2006, he would be in the top half of the league.

 
What?  You mean the Titans holding out this long resulted in getting the 4th round pick they wanted?

SHOCKING ;)
So, is it a definite done deal? Or does anyone know yet?
POSTED 1:25 p.m. EDT; UPDATED 1:37 p.m. EDT, June 7, 2006

TITANS FINALLY SHIP McNAIR TO BALTIMORE

Profootballtalk.com has learned that the Tennessee Titans finally have reached an agreement with the Baltimore Ravens to trade quarterback Steve McNair, NFL co-MVP in 2003.

The Ravens get McNair, and the Titans get Baltimore's fourth-round pick in 2007.

We received initial word regarding the trade from an anonymous tipster, and we confirmed it by tapping into our ever-growing network of league sources. We anticipate that, very soon, every other news organization will be running with the story, and we figure no one will mention that it was first reported right here.

But like getting ball deep in a hot bath, we're used to it.

The trade brings to a conclusion weeks of rancor between the Titans and McNair, which have included a decision by the team to bar McNair from the facility, a grievance resulting in a ruling that he can't be barred, and a looming battle regarding the team's failure to comply with the outcome of the arbitration.

At its core, the fight was about McNair's contract. The team wasn't going to pay him $9 million in salary in 2006, and McNair wasn't going to reduce his total compensation to $6 million, as the team had requested.

Instead, he'll earn $12 million this year in Baltimore, where he presumably becomes the starting quarterback, relegating former first-rounder Kyle Boller to No. 2 on the depth chart. The other quarterbacks under contract are Brian St. Pierre and Drew Olson.

Meanwhile, the Titans will carry more than $14 million in dead money this year as a result of past payments made to McNair. He'll be off of the books in 2007.

The move gives the Titans $9 million in cap room, which will allow them to sign their draft picks and either add some free agents or extend the contracts of some of their younger players
I suppose we can wait for ESPN to steal this story and post it on their website, but yes, seems to be a done deal.
 
Just a rumor on PFT so far.

They've broken stories before, but have also whiffed on more than one occasion.

I'd wait on reliable confirmation, before believing it.

 
Baltimore Radio (1570 AM) is reporting the deal for a 4th as well. No link at this time.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Baltimore Radio (1570 AM) is reporting the deal for a 4th as well. No link at this time.
Looking like PFT broke another story.Their track record is getting better & better if true. :thumbup:

 
And this was on kffl from this morning:

"The Tennessee Titans released a statement giving permission for QB Steve McNair to take a physical with the Baltimore Ravens. The statement says, "We have granted permission to Baltimore to give Steve McNair a physical, which we expect to take place in the next 24 hours. Upon passing a physical, final trade terms will be agreed upon."

Doesn't make anything definite, but adds support to the rumor of the trade being finalized.

 
What?  You mean the Titans holding out this long resulted in getting the 4th round pick they wanted?

SHOCKING ;)
So, is it a definite done deal? Or does anyone know yet?
Well they gave a 4th up for the great Kevin Johnson a few years back, which the Jags used to select Ernest Wilford I believe, so apparently that round doesn't hold much value to Newsomoe and co. :D
 
Looks like a done deal. Here's the comment that is on the Titan's website (titansonline.com)

Titans statement regarding Steve McNair

STATEMENT FROM THE TENNESSEE TITANS

“We have granted permission to Baltimore to give Steve McNair a physical, which we expect to take place in the next 24 hours. Upon passing a physical, final trade terms will be agreed upon.”

Here's a link to the story on the Ravens site:

http://www.baltimoreravens.com/news/article.jsp?id=10276

 
Just because they "agree to terms", doesn't mean he is a Raven.

Harrington "agreed to terms" with the Dolphins - yet he's still a Lion.
Since when is he still a Lion.He has been practicing with the Phins for at least two weeks now.

 
Just because they "agree to terms", doesn't mean he is a Raven.

Harrington "agreed to terms" with the Dolphins - yet he's still a Lion.
Since when is he still a Lion.He has been practicing with the Phins for at least two weeks now.
Note the date of the post you quoted was a month ago.
 
I think this boosts Todd Heap's value. McNair is used to having a good tight end ala Frank Wycheck. He should have no trouble finding Heap on the field.

 
i don't think there's any doubt you bump up all of the Ravens except for Boller (obvious), but what about the Titans?? The last word is that they (ownership) wanted VY to start, but I can't believe they have ability to call the starters over Fisher.

i predict Volek to start, at least the first half of the season, but you know there will be pressure to see what VY can do, especially if Volek falters. i would have to downgrade all of the Titan offense. Without McNair they are going to be in close competition with the Texans.

-orphan

 
this also give McNair potential for better numbers than is he were still playing for the Titans. He has a more solid running game, a better line to protect him and very very solid receivers in Mason (his old favorite), Clayton (a potential star) and Heap- who is a top 3 TE. With the defense this team has and the scoring potential, the RAvens should be a playoff team this season and their offense will no lnger be something to avoid in fantasy drafts.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top