What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Straight Truth about Society and Civilization (1 Viewer)

That is the definition of a racist idea.   
You have no clue what you are talking about.  Culture is derived from many things, religion and race being two of the most significant components.

It's actually kind of scary how far gone liberals are.  Completely lost generation - a write-off.  It reminds me of the famous Huffington Post picture of their editors meeting - claiming that this is what diversity looks like.  http://www.aim.org/on-target-blog/huffington-post-editor-sees-diversity-feminist-picture-ridiculed-on-twitter/

 
You have no clue what you are talking about.  Culture is derived from many things, religion and race being two of the most significant components.
But that's not what the OP said.

Culture is an emergent property of the people that comprise it, who themselves are properties of their genes and of the predispositions and beliefs and behaviors and temperaments and aptitudes with which they are endowed by their genes.
He felt compelled to add "of their genes" and "by their genes" to this bullet.  Those six words are the key to why it's racist.  Culture is no longer learned and influenceable but rather is ingrained and immutable.  If you accept that premise, you can use it to justify anything up to and including genocide.

 
But that's not what the OP said.

He felt compelled to add "of their genes" and "by their genes" to this bullet.  Those six words are the key to why it's racist.  Culture is no longer learned and influenceable but rather is ingrained and immutable.  If you accept that premise, you can use it to justify anything up to and including genocide.
Big fan Eephus!  :thumbup:

 
But that's not what the OP said.

He felt compelled to add "of their genes" and "by their genes" to this bullet.  Those six words are the key to why it's racist.  Culture is no longer learned and influenceable but rather is ingrained and immutable.  If you accept that premise, you can use it to justify anything up to and including genocide.
FWIW, I was not responding to the OP.  But your point is spot on.  "Genes" have nothing to do with it, and I'd call that a stupid and racist idea.

 
I think a lot of the disagreement stems from the many different views of what "culture" includes. There is a dictionary definition sure, but people still have their own views.

 
Tough topic to discuss, especially in today's climate.  Sad thing is that years ago this topic was debated on a regular basis when I studied international relations in college.  In today's age if you even question the efficacy of multi-culturalism you are immediately branded a racist xenophobe and the discourse usually comes to a grinding halt.  There are a lot of good articles being written overseas about the clash of cultures taking place in Western Europe.  The only place I see those articles being discussed is at Breitbart.  Very sad that we've come to the point in this country where reasoned discussions on such an important topic can't take place.
Eh, great topic, lousy site in the OP.

- eta - btw I have seen many great articles on this issue, I've probably posted a few, but they may not be from sites you read.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You don't think culture is directly derived from race as a key component?  Sorry, that isn't a racist idea at all.  It dominated socioligical discourse all of last century.  Read Monihan's report in the 60's on blacks in the US.

It's only a racist concept today because liberals have made it such.
You badly misunderstand Moynihan. He never wrote anything like what you're representing here. 

 
You badly misunderstand Moynihan. He never wrote anything like what you're representing here. 
Have you read the report yet Tim?  Because if I remember correctly when we debated this a few years ago, you said that you hadn't read it but had read about it.

The whole focus of Moynihan's report was on black culture, how and why it evolved to its current state, and where he saw it going.  He was branded a racist by many in his own party, but time has proven him to be 100% correct.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Eh, great topic, lousy site in the OP.

- eta - btw I have seen many great articles on this issue, I've probably posted a few, but they may not be from sites you read.
I read a lot of different sites Sid.  I go out of my way to listen to all sides to guard against confirmation bias.

Hopefully we can have more dialogue on this.  Based on what I've seen today though, I highly doubt it.  Too much hate and bigotry with many on the Left in here.

 
I read a lot of different sites Sid.  I go out of my way to listen to all sides to guard against confirmation bias.

Hopefully we can have more dialogue on this.  Based on what I've seen today though, I highly doubt it.  Too much hate and bigotry with many on the Left in here.
Do we really need to have a dialogue about whether or not people of different races can share cultural values/ideas?  Didn't realize this was a left/right issue.

The OP is unequivocally racist.  He just needs to take his dose of shame and go away.

 
Do we really need to have a dialogue about whether or not people of different races can share cultural values/ideas?  Didn't realize this was a left/right issue.

The OP is unequivocally racist.  He just needs to take his dose of shame and go away.
We do need to have a discussion about whether or not different cultures can make for a sustained, effective country.  Does multi-culturalism work?  To be honest the track record of this in world history isn't that great.  Do you think multiculturalism is a strength in this country?  As we have become more and more multicultural the last 50 years are we better off as a society?  Or are we becoming more vulnerable and more fractured?

I haven't even stated my opinion on these questions.  I've just pointed out the difficulties in today's climate of even having such a discussion.  Very sad that these discussions can't be had anymore in this country.

 
Have you read the report yet Tim?  Because if I remember correctly when we debated this a few years ago, you said that you hadn't read it but had read about it.

The whole focus of Moynihan's report was on black culture, how and why it evolved to its current state, and where he saw it going.  He was branded a racist by many in his own party, but time has proven him to be 100% correct.
Yes, I've read it. I've also read the Playboy interview with Moynihan from 1974 where he discusses certain regrets he has with it.

Moynihan gave lots of reasons for black culture, as he perceived it: most of them based on historical trends. Not once did he suggest a racial or genetic factor to that culture, so your use of his study to support your above statement is simply wrong.

 
We do need to have a discussion about whether or not different cultures can make for a sustained, effective country.  Does multi-culturalism work?  To be honest the track record of this in world history isn't that great.  Do you think multiculturalism is a strength in this country?  As we have become more and more multicultural the last 50 years are we better off as a society?  Or are we becoming more vulnerable and more fractured?

I haven't even stated my opinion on these questions.  I've just pointed out the difficulties in today's climate of even having such a discussion.  Very sad that these discussions can't be had anymore in this country.
These aren't the questions raised in the OP.  If you'd like to discuss them, I suggest you start a new thread as to avoid the stench of the the OP.

 
These aren't the questions raised in the OP.  If you'd like to discuss them, I suggest you start a new thread as to avoid the stench of the the OP.
Point taken.  I didn't like the tie-in to genetics and made that known.  But to be honest, I'd like to at least allow the OP to provide additional context on this.  It's the immediate dismissal of debate that really has me concerned these days.

Do you have any thoughts on multiculturalism?  Would love to start talking about it, stench be damned.

 
I guess it depends on how "race" is defined, but wouldn't different human races need to exist genetically to begin with for it to be important?
why do you hate science?
Does race exist?

Thus, given current scientific data, biological races do not exist among modern humans today, and they have never existed in the past. ... Thus, the concept of human races is real. It is not a biological reality, however, but a cultural one. Race is not a part of our biology, but it is definitely a part of our culture.  Nov 8, 2014

 
You guys do know there is only one race of humans right? The amount of melanin in your skin doesn't make you a different race. And you also know that no matter who you are standing next to, no matter what color they are or where they come from if you go back far enough you are related to them right?

That's the straight scientific truth. Now you can create all these ridiculous made up wedges based on pigmentation to put between people but that's all they are. Made up.

 
If your post warranted any reply at all, mockery and derision would be about the extent of it.

I dabbled in some of this thinking in my Limbaugh-listening days, but none of it squared with my real life experiences and I discarded it. I can only hope the same happens for you or failing that, that you don't reproduce.
too late

 
You guys do know there is only one race of humans right? The amount of melanin in your skin doesn't make you a different race. And you also know that no matter who you are standing next to, no matter what color they are or where they come from if you go back far enough you are related to them right?

That's the straight scientific truth. Now you can create all these ridiculous made up wedges based on pigmentation to put between people but that's all they are. Made up.
Extra melanin lives matter!  :rant:  

 
I think a "clash of culture" discussion is worth having.  However, the OP very clearly states that culture is a function of race, and therefore clash of culture = clash of race.  The very first point is that Society is a racial construct (as opposed to a cultural construct). 

No, this article is full-bore racist propaganda.  You can defend it if you like, but if you do you will be (correctly) branded a racist.  and you know what, it's not sad.  I think it's great that we, as a society, can call a duck a duck.
Still not racist.

 
But that's not what the OP said.

He felt compelled to add "of their genes" and "by their genes" to this bullet.  Those six words are the key to why it's racist.  Culture is no longer learned and influenceable but rather is ingrained and immutable.  If you accept that premise, you can use it to justify anything up to and including genocide.
That's just silly.

 
Do we really need to have a dialogue about whether or not people of different races can share cultural values/ideas?  Didn't realize this was a left/right issue.

The OP is unequivocally racist.  He just needs to take his dose of shame and go away.
Point and shriek doesn't work anymore.  Sorry.

 
We do need to have a discussion about whether or not different cultures can make for a sustained, effective country.  Does multi-culturalism work?  To be honest the track record of this in world history isn't that great.  Do you think multiculturalism is a strength in this country?  As we have become more and more multicultural the last 50 years are we better off as a society?  Or are we becoming more vulnerable and more fractured?
Culture definitely matters.  But the OP is going way, way further than that by drawing a direct connection between culture and race.  That's the part that's unwarranted and racist.

Just look at white Europeans for example.  That group is directly responsible for the creation of western liberalism (in the classic sense) which is very clearly a better culture than that of, say, modern day Saudi Arabia or modern North Korea.  White Europeans are also the ones responsible for Nazism and Marxism.  It's easy to find examples of "white" societies that are free and vibrant, and also some that are despotic and backwards.  That should be sufficient to show that race clearly isn't the determining factor here.

 
I read a lot of different sites Sid.  I go out of my way to listen to all sides to guard against confirmation bias.

Hopefully we can have more dialogue on this.  Based on what I've seen today though, I highly doubt it.  Too much hate and bigotry with many on the Left in here.
:lmao:  Knew you'd throw this crap out

 
Social concepts of "race" get in the way in these kinds of discussions. What people should be really be discussing is the propensity for reptile-bain us-vs-them categorization -- or tribalism -- in humans.

Skin color and genetic tendencies have nothing to do with tribalism. Human societies will stratify and will find lines of division absent a checking societal force. Peoples who broadly look alike have historically had no problem digging deep and finding divisions over which to go to battle. The Troubles in Ireland. Tensions between Greeks, Turks, and Armenians. Tutsi and Hutu in Botswana. Korea. And on and on it goes, as it has since time immemorial.

The arch-question is "Can we limit the damage tribalism can cause in a modern society? And if so, how?" I have to admit ... it's hard to shake off the notion that the worst effects of tribalism are just the overhead that a diverse and free society must pay.  Akin to how human society will almost certainly never be free of violence, murder, mendacity, and such.

 
We do need to have a discussion about whether or not different cultures can make for a sustained, effective country.  Does multi-culturalism work?  To be honest the track record of this in world history isn't that great.  Do you think multiculturalism is a strength in this country?  As we have become more and more multicultural the last 50 years are we better off as a society?  Or are we becoming more vulnerable and more fractured?

I haven't even stated my opinion on these questions.  I've just pointed out the difficulties in today's climate of even having such a discussion.  Very sad that these discussions can't be had anymore in this country.
Disagree. The discussion we need to have should be around if the intolerant segment of cretins who reject and label others will ever be able to see beyond simply labeling groups of people, and maybe if more people could get past it, maybe that would make for a more sustained, effective country? 

That's another problem with the argument, why are we implying there's something wrong with the country? I have no problem with the country, or the cultures. In fact, I love it all. So I guess I'm one of the Liberals on the left (that you like to point out with more labeling) who in your opinion is the problem here? I can't see tolerance as the problem in this scenario. 

 
Yes, I've read it. I've also read the Playboy interview with Moynihan from 1974 where he discusses certain regrets he has with it.

Moynihan gave lots of reasons for black culture, as he perceived it: most of them based on historical trends. Not once did he suggest a racial or genetic factor to that culture, so your use of his study to support your above statement is simply wrong.
Wait a minute, he didn't suggest a racial factor to black culture?  Are you hearing yourself?

As to genetics, you haven't listened to a word I've said - because at least twice in here I said - very clearly - that I do not agree with that and view it as racist.

 
Extra melanin lives matter!  :rant:  
This is the best post in the whole thread.  It's hysterical hearing Liberals screaming about how race doesn't matter in one thread, and then screaming about how it is everything in the other threads.  What's sad is I don't even think they realize it.

 
Disagree. The discussion we need to have should be around if the intolerant segment of cretins who reject and label others will ever be able to see beyond simply labeling groups of people, and maybe if more people could get past it, maybe that would make for a more sustained, effective country? 

That's another problem with the argument, why are we implying there's something wrong with the country? I have no problem with the country, or the cultures. In fact, I love it all. So I guess I'm one of the Liberals on the left (that you like to point out with more labeling) who in your opinion is the problem here? I can't see tolerance as the problem in this scenario. 
Who are the intolerant segment of cretins who use race as a wedge?  Liberals?  I've been screaming about that for years.  I have argued ad nauseum in here that America needs to start acting color blind in all cases, and I'm told over and over by Liberals that race always matters.

Your second paragraph certainly highlights one of the greatest aspects of a multicultural society and speaks to the beauty of diversity.  It makes for a more interesting, rich experience.  I grew up in a multicultural (biracial) family and a multicultural town.  Loved it.  I now live in a rural area and I don't like it - mainly because it is too homogeneous.

Milticulturalism also leads to a more creative society in my opinion - diversity of ideas and different ways of viewing the world.  With a well managed immigration system it should also yield a selection of highly motivated people.  The Asian influx in the US in the 80's and 90's yielded some of the best students in the country.  I also believe that a multicultural society allows us to more easily interface with the rest of the world, making for easier international relations and economic transactions.

Those are some of the positives, which we all know.  The next question, which some of you don't have the emotional stability to even broach, is - what are the negatives, and do they outweigh the positives when it comes to long term stability of a country.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The discussion we need to have should be around if the intolerant segment of cretins who reject and label others will ever be able to see beyond simply labeling groups of people, and maybe if more people could get past it ... 
Looking at your quote ... I think in truth, deep down inside, all human beings label and reject others along some line or another. If it's not along society's prevailing racial constructs, it's along some some other construct. It's what we do as Homo sapiens.

Each individual's outward expression of tribalism (or minimization of same) is what essentially counts in society at large, of course. "Getting past it" in the sense of "not feeling tribalism-based feelings" is asking a heck of a lot of people.

 
:lmao:  Knew you'd throw this crap out
If the shoe fits...  It has to be said - many of the Liberals in here have become so bigoted (lookup the word in the dictionary)  that it's embarrassing to witness.  This thread is a prime example.  They are being invited to have a reasoned discussion on the pros and cons of multiculturalism and they are fundamentally incapable of doing it - responding with name calling, one liners "Don't even bother"...

If the shoe fits...

 
A link from a site that promoted the Clintons-connected to-Vince-Foster-murder conspiracy crap?

lol
The photo and the story is out there all over the Internet.  Not sure why you continue to add non-value comments like that.  It matters nothing.  The story and picture are true and highlight the idiocy of some on the Left today - one of the main websites of the Left doesn't even know the true meaning of the word diversity.  I think it comes from the same place as challenging the source rather than accepting that it's  clearly true.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top