ChicagoArch
Footballguy
I don't like carrying a lot of CBs on my roster. So I thought it could be useful to start a thread about streaming CBs. Nickel corners are usually available on waiver wires, even in very deep leagues. It's just hitting them on matchups where they will get enough snaps to put together some production. Also, it's going to be a struggle at work today because of the game last night, so I need a side project to keep me moving...
I looked at the average number of WRs each team has played for each snap on the year. This will tell us which teams are most likely to face nickel or dime defenses. Doing it for the year will put the emphasis on personnel and OC rather than game script. We'll see if this works.
1. GB 3.18
2. NYJ 3.06
3. NYG 2.98
4. JAX 2.85
5. ARI 2.84
6. SF 2.83
7. DET 2.78
8. DEN 2.76
9. MIA 2.75
10. OAK 2.68
11. CIN 2.64
12. CLE 2.64
13. HOU 2.64
14. NO 2.60
15. CHI 2.56
16. SEA 2.56
17. LA 2.53
18. PHI 2.53
19. DAL 2.51
20. PIT 2.50
21. WAS 2.50
22. BAL 2.43
23. IND 2.43
24. KC 2.42
25. MIN 2.42
26. TB 2.42
27. SD 2.40
28. TEN 2.40
29. CAR 2.39
30. BUF 2.38
31. NE 2.32
32. ATL 2.27
The Packer's number is obviously inflated by not having any healthy RBs the last couple weeks. Just looking at the first 6 weeks when Eddie Lacy was healthy, their number becomes 2.88, still top 3. I also think the Broncos are inflated a bit because of Virgil Green's absence so I'm going to skip them for now to see if they drop. Saints were a surprise being middle of the pack. Apparently, they've been playing more 2 WR/2 TE sets. 'Skins were a surprise as well considering their receiving corp and the amount of work Crowder has been getting. There's a definite gap between 9 and 10 so I'll look at the top 9, skipping Denver.
I looked at the average number of WRs each team has played for each snap on the year. This will tell us which teams are most likely to face nickel or dime defenses. Doing it for the year will put the emphasis on personnel and OC rather than game script. We'll see if this works.
1. GB 3.18
2. NYJ 3.06
3. NYG 2.98
4. JAX 2.85
5. ARI 2.84
6. SF 2.83
7. DET 2.78
8. DEN 2.76
9. MIA 2.75
10. OAK 2.68
11. CIN 2.64
12. CLE 2.64
13. HOU 2.64
14. NO 2.60
15. CHI 2.56
16. SEA 2.56
17. LA 2.53
18. PHI 2.53
19. DAL 2.51
20. PIT 2.50
21. WAS 2.50
22. BAL 2.43
23. IND 2.43
24. KC 2.42
25. MIN 2.42
26. TB 2.42
27. SD 2.40
28. TEN 2.40
29. CAR 2.39
30. BUF 2.38
31. NE 2.32
32. ATL 2.27
The Packer's number is obviously inflated by not having any healthy RBs the last couple weeks. Just looking at the first 6 weeks when Eddie Lacy was healthy, their number becomes 2.88, still top 3. I also think the Broncos are inflated a bit because of Virgil Green's absence so I'm going to skip them for now to see if they drop. Saints were a surprise being middle of the pack. Apparently, they've been playing more 2 WR/2 TE sets. 'Skins were a surprise as well considering their receiving corp and the amount of work Crowder has been getting. There's a definite gap between 9 and 10 so I'll look at the top 9, skipping Denver.