What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Successful Strategy to Start Two RBs From Same Team? (2 Viewers)

BuffaloWings

Footballguy
In general, can starting two RBs from the same team in your fantasy lineup be a good and successful strategy? For example, Bradshaw as RB2 and Andre Brown as Flex. Or does that generally give you less points than choosing one and finding someone from another team to start?

 
I wouldn't do it unless I had no other choice. If I owned both, I would roll with whoever is expected to get more work of the two and go with another option for my RB2.

 
I don't think it's a successful strategy, but I did successfully pull it off during Chris Johnson's rookie season when I had him and Lendale White. Stewart and Deangelo worked well for some people a few years ago as well.

It's probably something that will work occasionally if things work perfectly, but if you're having to start two running backs from the same team, it's probably a losing battle more often than not.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes.

If said running backs are Marshall Faulk and Trung Canidate or Priest Holmest and Larry Johnson.

Otherwise, not except for extreme, extreme circumstances.

 
I don't think it's a successful strategy, but I did successfully pull it off during Chris Johnson's rookie season when I had him and Lendale White. Stewart and Deangelo worked well for some people a few years ago as well.It's probably something that will work occasionally if things work perfectly, but if you're having to start two running backs from the same team, it's probably a losing battle more often than not.
Yeah, it's more of a special case when you have a team that is really dominant on the ground. Jones/Charles for KC in 2010, Jacobs/Ward for NYG in 2008 are some other examples.
 
In general, can starting two RBs from the same team in your fantasy lineup be a good and successful strategy? For example, Bradshaw as RB2 and Andre Brown as Flex. Or does that generally give you less points than choosing one and finding someone from another team to start?
It can work if:1. The offense is run heavy2. The defense has a poor run defense3. Your other RB options are hurt, on bye, or Chris Johnson I've done it in the past starting J. Stew and D. Will (before Cam Newton era) with some success. You just have to pick your spots. Wouldn't do it for an entire season though.
 
I wouldn't do it unless I had no other choice. If I owned both, I would roll with whoever is expected to get more work of the two and go with another option for my RB2.
I agree.I did successfully pull it off for a 3 or 4 week period with Ray Rice and McGahee at a stretch when they were splitting carries and two of my starting RB's were injured.McGahee was getting 12-15 carries for about 100 yards and a TD per game while rice was getting 7-12 carries for 80 yards and 3-6 passes for another 50 yards per game Usually with 1 or 2 TD mixed in there.It worked out well for me on that short term basis, but I would not recommend going down that road if you dont have to. I've seen that strategy backfire far more often than I've seen it work.
 
I may be running with that strategy when Jackson and Spiller are on the field and healthy. Spiller was not getting many carries and he was still ripping off 125+ yard games. They will have different roles as I see Jackson becoming the closer.

 
Um, if you dont have a better alternative, sure.

I dont think Brown is gonna get as many touches as people are expecting.

 
Um, if you dont have a better alternative, sure.I dont think Brown is gonna get as many touches as people are expecting.
I actually think it could go the other way. Bradshaw has a disc issue in his neck. Depending on whether it is bulging or herniated, this could be a devastating injury to Bradshaw.Edit to add: this is a guy who is paid to run into people with his head.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Um, if you dont have a better alternative, sure.I dont think Brown is gonna get as many touches as people are expecting.
I actually think it could go the other way. Bradshaw has a disc issue in his neck. Depending on whether it is bulging or herniated, this could be a devastating injury to Bradshaw.Edit to add: this is a guy who is paid to run into people with his head.
It could just as easily go the other way.But Bradshaw gets first shot, and is a better back in almost every regard.
 
forte bush would actualy be pretty money
The problem is, unless it is a uber dynamic backfield that is hugely productive, when you start two RBs from the same team there is a real risk of the run game getting shut down and/or TDs going to the passing game (or the one rushing TD being a qb sneak or the fullback) and then you get what, 90-12 total yards (or less) and no TDs - from BOTH of your starting RB spots? Heck, get one TD between the two and its still a rough go. You really limit the upside while mitigating only a bit of the risk. All the while still leaving yourself open to a lot of risk.
 
Ward/Jacobs

R.Brown/R.Williams

Williams/Stewart

F.Taylor/MJD

Jones/Charles

I don't see any of the above type deals playing out this year. I thought it could be Charles/Hillis. I think it's usually best when each back compliments the other. Bradshaw and Brown are too similar IMO.

Some other possible duos if this wasn't such a passing league..

Bush/Thomas

Sproles/Ingram

Mathews/Battle

Martin/Blount

S.Jackson/Richardson

Gore/Hunter

Too bad it's near impossible for an offense to provide enough reps for two RBs in today's game, it's usually fun to watch. Foster/Tate is the closest, mostly because HOU's gameplan calls for it.

 
It can work but it won't work with Bradshaw and Brown. For this year I think it can work with Foster/Tate, Forte/Bush. Spiller/ Jackson maybe and Turner/Rodgers as a long shot.

 
Foster and Tate for me this week. Starting Tate over DWill. Tennessee defense is the key here for me. Otherwise it would be too risky to start them with confidence. You just never know what you're going to get. Still don't even this week but the odds are better than normal that they both will succeed this week.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes.If said running backs are Marshall Faulk and Trung Canidate or Priest Holmest and Larry Johnson.Otherwise, not except for extreme, extreme circumstances.
Trung Canidate ? Didn't he only have one good week in his entire career ?
Yea but the other guy is Marshall Faulk.
Understood, but what advantage is there to start Canidate ?
Trash talk. "I started Trung Candidate also just to give you a chance and still beat you."
 
Might be forced to go with Foster and Tate.SJax is banged up and plays the stingy Seattle D, and Donald Brown is on BYE.
Foster/Tate is a safe play on any given week as an rb1/flex. Bradshaw / Brown would the other tandem to roll with if necesary.
I'd only start both with a particularly good matchup, or if I was so injury or bye-week depleted I had no other choice.In games where Foster was healthy, Tate has only put up worthwhile fantasy starter numbers about 1 time in each 3 or 4 games.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top