What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Target security officer fired after reporting shoplifting (1 Viewer)

bosoxs45

Footballguy
Target security officer fired after reporting shoplifting

Dallas Northington spent nearly eight years working for Target in loss prevention, roaming the stores and scanning the surveillance cameras. In an episode at the Leesburg Target store in May that he said was typical, a man was allegedly captured twice on video shoplifting, and Northington responded as he said he always did: He called the Leesburg police, made a report and provided them the videos of the two incidents.

But the man in the video may have been a Fairfax County sheriff’s deputy, Northington said he soon learned. And within days, two things happened: The deputy retired from the sheriff’s office and Target fired Northington, 29, a married father of two with a third child on the way.

Northington said Target officials told him that he had violated procedure by not filling out the proper paperwork before contacting the police, though he said his office had operated the same way for years. He said he also was told that he had been insubordinate for not seeking approval before calling police, though he said the standard practice was for him to act as needed.

But the man Northington said he and his supervisors identified as a deputy has not yet been charged with a crime though Northington said he had provided the man’s name and two color videos of him in action, his face clearly visible, to Leesburg police on May 27, the date of the second incident.

A Leesburg police spokesman said investigators were still trying to confirm the suspect’s identity. Northington said Leesburg police typically filed similar cases against shoplifters within a few days. He also said a Leesburg police sergeant investigating the case said while watching the surveillance video on May 27 that he recognized the man from a local gym where the two worked out. Store supervisors also knew the man, Northington said.

Northington said he is considering his legal options. “I’m confused and don’t understand why,” Northington said. “I’ve been there for eight years, no issues. I’m just trying to provide for my family, and I just really want to get back to work.”

Molly Snyder, a corporate spokeswoman for Target, said in an e-mail that she would not discuss the details of the case for privacy reasons. But in Northington’s case, she said, “we have conducted a full investigation and don’t believe there is any merit to this individual’s claims.”

Declan Leonard, Northington’s attorney, said he typically represents employers in such disputes, but “when we heard how he was treated by Target, we decided to step in.”

Leonard said Northington “intends to fight Target on this for as long as it takes.”

Northington said that in his role as an assets-protection specialist for Target, he had summoned the Leesburg police numerous times in recent years to investigate shoplifters and had done so without filling out any paperwork or seeking permission from a supervisor.

In the first alleged shoplifting, on May 16, Northington said, he arrived at work and his supervisor said he had noticed the man stick a tube of toothpaste into a bag after already paying for other items. He said the supervisor “didn’t feel comfortable” confronting the man, who the supervisor “thought was some sort of law enforcement.”

Northington said the store manager was contacted and the manager said he knew the man because they had participated in an NCAA March Madness pool together. The staff watched the surveillance video and decided, as they often did, Northington said, to wait for the man to return.

The man who Northington said appeared to be the deputy did not return a call seeking comment. The Washington Post is withholding his name because he has not been charged.

Northington said that when he clocked in on May 27, the supervisor told him the man had returned. That time, according to Northington, video appeared to show the man with a cart full of items at the pharmacy register inside the store but paying just for about half of them while concealing the cart from the cashier. After checking out, Northington said, the man wheeled away and stashed the rest of his merchandise, which Northington could not see, into the bags of purchased items and left.

Again, Northington said, the supervisor said he “didn’t feel comfortable” confronting the man, so the supervisor called Leesburg police and Northington went to the police station to file a report. A Leesburg sergeant then returned to the store, watched the video and said, “I know who that is,” Northington said. He said the sergeant also told him, “This is pretty serious” because the man was allegedly in law enforcement. Leesburg police confirmed that Northington had filed a police report on May 27. The Post did not independently review the video.

Soon after, Northington said, the supervisor told him the man’s full name. Northington said he phoned it in to the Leesburg police. It is unclear how the supervisor knew the man’s name.

On May 30, Northington said, he was called into the store’s personnel office and suspended for two days. The next week, he said, he was terminated for “gross misconduct.” He said he was told he had violated a policy on confidentiality by contacting police without approval, providing the surveillance video to police and not filling out internal paperwork before doing so.

“In my eight years, I’ve never had to call anyone to give out the video or to call police,” Northington said. “I have never seen any policy about contacting law enforcement.”

Lt. Jeff Dube of the Leesburg police confirmed that Northington had served as the complainant in an unknown number of cases with Leesburg police in the past. He said investigators “haven’t positively identified this guy. They’re still doing follow-up investigation.” He said he did not know why the case had taken so long to resolve but said “there might be some extenuating circumstances.”
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What complete and utter horse####.

The media attention is good as corporate Target won't like the black eye and should put pressure on the local morons.

 
Target should applaud the guy for showing discretion due to it being an Officer, waiting for convincing evidence and deciding on options with his supervisor. Sounds like lots of corroborating evidence too from others.

In addition, Target should demand they move on this. We can't have known thieves working for law enforcement. How about a different county takes over the investigation so it's not "one of their own?"

 
My friends wife had her ankle broken at Target by an employee pushing a pallet jack. Within 5 days Target offered her 100K to settle out of court. The agreement was that she was not allowed to speak to any of the local papers about what happened.

Target will quietly make this go away fast rather than drag it out in the papers and news battling a lawsuit.

 
Northington said Target officials told him that he had violated procedure by not filling out the proper paperwork before contacting the police, though he said his office had operated the same way for years. He said he also was told that he had been insubordinate for not seeking approval before calling police, though he said the standard practice was for him to act as needed.
"Excuse me sir, but I'm going to have to ask you to wait over there while I fill out the TPS report in triplicate then circulate it amongst the managers to get them to sign off on me calling the police for you to be arrested for shoplifitng."

 
Jeez. Even the power afforded to a flippin' deputy policeman corrupts absolutely.

Really dude? The first thing you do once you get a badge is use it as an exuse to "legally" shoplift?

 
But Virginia is also an at-will state.
Need some lawyers to chime in, but being an at-will state doesn't mean this kind of thing easily flies. Northington might need pretty solid documentation of prior standard procedures to win a case, though.

 
Northington said Target officials told him that he had violated procedure by not filling out the proper paperwork before contacting the police, though he said his office had operated the same way for years. He said he also was told that he had been insubordinate for not seeking approval before calling police, though he said the standard practice was for him to act as needed.
"Excuse me sir, but I'm going to have to ask you to wait over there while I fill out the TPS report in triplicate then circulate it amongst the managers to get them to sign off on me calling the police for you to be arrested for shoplifitng."
They literally are TPS reports. Target Protection Specialists.

 
If a supervisor made the actual call to the police and Northington just filed the paperwork, how can Target fire him for not following procedure?

 
In the first alleged shoplifting, on May 16, Northington said, he arrived at work and his supervisor said he had noticed the man stick a tube of toothpaste into a bag after already paying for other items. He said the supervisor “didn’t feel comfortable” confronting the man, who the supervisor “thought was some sort of law enforcement.”

Northington said the store manager was contacted and the manager said he knew the man because they had participated in an NCAA March Madness pool together. The staff watched the surveillance video and decided, as they often did, Northington said, to wait for the man to return.

Pretty damning evidence against his superiors. Sound like they got pissed off at him going around them and he was canned. He may be a principled man, but he's also out of a job. I'd probably have let it slide if I was the primary bread winner. Better to relax your principles if you want to put food on the table for your family.

 
In the first alleged shoplifting, on May 16, Northington said, he arrived at work and his supervisor said he had noticed the man stick a tube of toothpaste into a bag after already paying for other items. He said the supervisor didnt feel comfortable confronting the man, who the supervisor thought was some sort of law enforcement.

Northington said the store manager was contacted and the manager said he knew the man because they had participated in an NCAA March Madness pool together. The staff watched the surveillance video and decided, as they often did, Northington said, to wait for the man to return.

Pretty damning evidence against his superiors. Sound like they got pissed off at him going around them and he was canned. He may be a principled man, but he's also out of a job. I'd probably have let it slide if I was the primary bread winner. Better to relax your principles if you want to put food on the table for your family.
Its difficult to say. It doesnt seem like he had any idea that doing what he always did would lead to him being fired. Knowing the types of spineless d-holes Ive worked for at Target et al, Im not surprised by this outcome. What really pisses me off is the police getting away with this petty crap.

 
Jeez. Even the power afforded to a flippin' deputy policeman corrupts absolutely.

Really dude? The first thing you do once you get a badge is use it as an exuse to "legally" shoplift?
Link to where it says he used his power as a deputy to shoplift?

 
Jeez. Even the power afforded to a flippin' deputy policeman corrupts absolutely.

Really dude? The first thing you do once you get a badge is use it as an exuse to "legally" shoplift?
Link to where it says he used his power as a deputy to shoplift?
The article says he was never charged so he clearly got away with shoplifting. Are you saying that there is no proof that it was because he was a deputy?

 
Jeez. Even the power afforded to a flippin' deputy policeman corrupts absolutely.

Really dude? The first thing you do once you get a badge is use it as an exuse to "legally" shoplift?
Link to where it says he used his power as a deputy to shoplift?
I'm taking what's in the article as face value. In my head, the guy shoplifts regularly, but gets bailed out due to his status as a deputy. Can't prove it, but don't really care to prove it for my ow satisfaction.

Others will have their own takeaways and opinions.

 
Not sure what to make of this article. I spent two years working for Target Asset Protection. (granted it was years ago) It's pretty well known in the industry that Target no longer apprehends shoplifters the same way other retailers do. Target has taken the approach of putting their AP agents in Target uniforms and make them play the role of security guard. I'm not 100% certain what it takes to make an actual apprehension. But, I can say with relative certainty, that the agent didn't follow policy 100%.

Every company I've worked for, had very similar steps that needed to be followed, in order to make an apprehension. If the article is accurate, it states they guy already had the items in his cart. He paid for some, and then proceeded to conceal the rest in the bag later. One of those steps is to see the "customer" select the items from the display. Another is to maintain constant surveillance of both the suspect and the items. If he admitted to either of these things, he could be terminated on the spot. It's usually when someone has what's called a "bad stop" or what Target called a "non productive incident" (NPI) They would refer to those steps to determine whether you followed proper procedure. Depending on the severity, you could be fired.

With that said, every person I know that works Loss Prevention has to fill in the blanks to apprehend people. You can't maintain constant surveillance of a person as they move through a 100k square foot store. Since this is an at-will state, it won't take much for Target to find a reason to substantiate the termination.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd lawyer up ASAP and retire early on Target's dime.
Texas is an at-will state, so unless it violates some employment contract, it might be difficult to win.
This is Virginia not Texas
Yeah, my bad. I clicked on the story to see what state and saw "Dallas" and stopped. :bag:

But Virginia is also an at-will state.
Just because you are in an at-will state doesn't absolve you from wrongful termination suits. Just gives you more loopholes.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top