jacobo_moses
Footballguy
I think the Vikings, Rams, and Jaguars are all likely spots for Taylor Price to land.
They're at least willing to cut their losses and move on quickly. Many teams invest far too much in players that clearly aren't working out.The Pats have been swinging and missing on a lot of high picks (first three rounds) the last five years or so...Maroney, Jackson, Wheatley, Butler, Brace, O'Connell, Cunningham, Merriweather, Thomas, Tate and now Price are among the MIA...it's a freakin' miracle they're still contenders...I think it's time the Pats abandon the trade down philosophy with their 75 picks a year and start trading up...maybe that one or two stud instead of dud could mean the difference between just making the playoffs and winning another title...The Price release hurts more for the future than right now...outside of Welker and a somewhat creaky Branch the Pats have zero in the WR department for the future...Price could really have helped this unit going forward (as Tate could have)...it will be interesting to see how they address this in the offseason...One other thing about this release...my guess it leads to a rumor or two of TO or Moss heading to Foxboro...probably won't happen but my guess it will be talked about by the media...
They can swing and miss just as badly by trading up.The Pats have been swinging and missing on a lot of high picks (first three rounds) the last five years or so...Maroney, Jackson, Wheatley, Butler, Brace, O'Connell, Cunningham, Merriweather, Thomas, Tate and now Price are among the MIA...it's a freakin' miracle they're still contenders...I think it's time the Pats abandon the trade down philosophy with their 75 picks a year and start trading up...maybe that one or two stud instead of dud could mean the difference between just making the playoffs and winning another title...The Price release hurts more for the future than right now...outside of Welker and a somewhat creaky Branch the Pats have zero in the WR department for the future...Price could really have helped this unit going forward (as Tate could have)...it will be interesting to see how they address this in the offseason...One other thing about this release...my guess it leads to a rumor or two of TO or Moss heading to Foxboro...probably won't happen but my guess it will be talked about by the media...
This is the same team that picked up Gronkowski, Hernandez, Mayo, McCourty, and Chung through the draft- the Patriots are just like any other team, sometimes you win the lottery, a lot of the time you don't. By continually trading down they just end up acquiring more lottery tickets.The Pats have been swinging and missing on a lot of high picks (first three rounds) the last five years or so...Maroney, Jackson, Wheatley, Butler, Brace, O'Connell, Cunningham, Merriweather, Thomas, Tate and now Price are among the MIA...it's a freakin' miracle they're still contenders...I think it's time the Pats abandon the trade down philosophy with their 75 picks a year and start trading up...maybe that one or two stud instead of dud could mean the difference between just making the playoffs and winning another title...The Price release hurts more for the future than right now...outside of Welker and a somewhat creaky Branch the Pats have zero in the WR department for the future...Price could really have helped this unit going forward (as Tate could have)...it will be interesting to see how they address this in the offseason...One other thing about this release...my guess it leads to a rumor or two of TO or Moss heading to Foxboro...probably won't happen but my guess it will be talked about by the media...
This is right on. It's not the moving that's inherently bad but the subsequent picks. They moved to get Gronkowski; that looks like a pretty good pick. They have flailed badly on WRs and DBs.They can swing and miss just as badly by trading up.The Pats have been swinging and missing on a lot of high picks (first three rounds) the last five years or so...Maroney, Jackson, Wheatley, Butler, Brace, O'Connell, Cunningham, Merriweather, Thomas, Tate and now Price are among the MIA...it's a freakin' miracle they're still contenders...I think it's time the Pats abandon the trade down philosophy with their 75 picks a year and start trading up...maybe that one or two stud instead of dud could mean the difference between just making the playoffs and winning another title...The Price release hurts more for the future than right now...outside of Welker and a somewhat creaky Branch the Pats have zero in the WR department for the future...Price could really have helped this unit going forward (as Tate could have)...it will be interesting to see how they address this in the offseason...One other thing about this release...my guess it leads to a rumor or two of TO or Moss heading to Foxboro...probably won't happen but my guess it will be talked about by the media...
Also, just because they pick sooner doesn't automatically mean that the player would be a better fit for their scheme.This is right on. It's not the moving that's inherently bad but the subsequent picks. They moved to get Gronkowski; that looks like a pretty good pick. They have flailed badly on WRs and DBs.They can swing and miss just as badly by trading up.The Pats have been swinging and missing on a lot of high picks (first three rounds) the last five years or so...Maroney, Jackson, Wheatley, Butler, Brace, O'Connell, Cunningham, Merriweather, Thomas, Tate and now Price are among the MIA...it's a freakin' miracle they're still contenders...I think it's time the Pats abandon the trade down philosophy with their 75 picks a year and start trading up...maybe that one or two stud instead of dud could mean the difference between just making the playoffs and winning another title...The Price release hurts more for the future than right now...outside of Welker and a somewhat creaky Branch the Pats have zero in the WR department for the future...Price could really have helped this unit going forward (as Tate could have)...it will be interesting to see how they address this in the offseason...One other thing about this release...my guess it leads to a rumor or two of TO or Moss heading to Foxboro...probably won't happen but my guess it will be talked about by the media...
These "lotto tickets" are also a heck of a lot cheaper than if they moved up like others keep suggesting.They can swing and miss just as badly by trading up.The Pats have been swinging and missing on a lot of high picks (first three rounds) the last five years or so...Maroney, Jackson, Wheatley, Butler, Brace, O'Connell, Cunningham, Merriweather, Thomas, Tate and now Price are among the MIA...it's a freakin' miracle they're still contenders...I think it's time the Pats abandon the trade down philosophy with their 75 picks a year and start trading up...maybe that one or two stud instead of dud could mean the difference between just making the playoffs and winning another title...The Price release hurts more for the future than right now...outside of Welker and a somewhat creaky Branch the Pats have zero in the WR department for the future...Price could really have helped this unit going forward (as Tate could have)...it will be interesting to see how they address this in the offseason...One other thing about this release...my guess it leads to a rumor or two of TO or Moss heading to Foxboro...probably won't happen but my guess it will be talked about by the media...
Not really...if you look at BB's first round picks they have been pretty solid...the worst ones have been Maroney who had a few decent seasons and Merriweather who while he wasn't that good still found his way onto two Pro Bowls...Graham and Watson weren't what they thought they were but were still pretty productive...over the years they have snagged Mankins, Seymour, Warren, Wilfork, Mayo and McCourty who are all high quality players...the early returns on Solder are very promising...I'd much rather see the Pats trade-up or turn some of these twos and threes into another one...one of the Pats biggest issues is a lack of playmakers on D and I'm willing to bet they have a better chance of acquiring one moving up in the draft...They can swing and miss just as badly by trading up.The Pats have been swinging and missing on a lot of high picks (first three rounds) the last five years or so...Maroney, Jackson, Wheatley, Butler, Brace, O'Connell, Cunningham, Merriweather, Thomas, Tate and now Price are among the MIA...it's a freakin' miracle they're still contenders...I think it's time the Pats abandon the trade down philosophy with their 75 picks a year and start trading up...maybe that one or two stud instead of dud could mean the difference between just making the playoffs and winning another title...The Price release hurts more for the future than right now...outside of Welker and a somewhat creaky Branch the Pats have zero in the WR department for the future...Price could really have helped this unit going forward (as Tate could have)...it will be interesting to see how they address this in the offseason...One other thing about this release...my guess it leads to a rumor or two of TO or Moss heading to Foxboro...probably won't happen but my guess it will be talked about by the media...
I agree to a point...the value they are getting pick-wise is good...the issue is the actual picks have either been subpar in many cases or they flip it again for future picks so they don't actually get a player that helps them on the field...I would much rather see them be aggressive in acquiring higher picks while the Brady window is still open...This is right on. It's not the moving that's inherently bad but the subsequent picks. They moved to get Gronkowski; that looks like a pretty good pick. They have flailed badly on WRs and DBs.They can swing and miss just as badly by trading up.The Pats have been swinging and missing on a lot of high picks (first three rounds) the last five years or so...Maroney, Jackson, Wheatley, Butler, Brace, O'Connell, Cunningham, Merriweather, Thomas, Tate and now Price are among the MIA...it's a freakin' miracle they're still contenders...I think it's time the Pats abandon the trade down philosophy with their 75 picks a year and start trading up...maybe that one or two stud instead of dud could mean the difference between just making the playoffs and winning another title...The Price release hurts more for the future than right now...outside of Welker and a somewhat creaky Branch the Pats have zero in the WR department for the future...Price could really have helped this unit going forward (as Tate could have)...it will be interesting to see how they address this in the offseason...One other thing about this release...my guess it leads to a rumor or two of TO or Moss heading to Foxboro...probably won't happen but my guess it will be talked about by the media...
It's also worth noting that the next pick in the 2009 draft after Brandon Tate was some dude named Mike Wallace.Brandon Tate 3rd 2009 - cut after last season, now with CIN but no catches, only special teams
I believe 24 hours for other teams to put a claim on him or waive the right to do so. If no claim during this period, he becomes a free agent and is free to sign with any team.Does anyone know when a player is waived. How long a player stays on Waivers? Is it 48hrs? I'm just curious how long we have till we here who has put in a claim for Taylor Price is all.
Didn't you post earlier that he could be claimed on Monday? I'm not sure, but it seems like 4:30 PM Eastern the following business day is what I've been seeing the last few big cuts (Haynesworth, McNabb were signed and a FA after the next day IIRC).Does anyone know when a player is waived. How long a player stays on Waivers? Is it 48hrs? I'm just curious how long we have till we here who has put in a claim for Taylor Price is all.
I think some people aren't fully aware as to how the Pats operate in regards to "trading down" picks. They compile a list of which players they want and when they get to the point of having to make a pick, they will "trade down" if they are reasonably assured that "the guy they want" will be there. So they trade out of their pick and stockpile picks.The point being, if they used all their picks they would end up with the same players (but fewer stockpiled picks). The issue has been the talent level of the guys on their list, not the trading down part.My fear is if they "traded up," they would strike out just as badly. If the Pats moved up to snag Vernon Gholston from the Jets, people at the time would have appluaded that move and said they made a great pick . . . until he bombed and then folks would whine about how they shouldn't have moved up.ANy draft pick is great if that player turns out to be very productive . . . and he would be considered a bust if he didn't meet expectations. I HATE when people say that TEAM X could have had PLAYER Y, because it's really easy to tell 5 years AFTER a draft which players should have been drafted where. It's not quite that easy when all the college kids have 0 NFL experience. It's not like the Pats have been the only team to swing and miss on top draft picks. And they have had some success with some of the players they drafted. Given that they made so many picks and whiffed on a bunch of them makes them seem more incompetent than they really are. But I do agree that their talent evaluation needs to improve.I agree to a point...the value they are getting pick-wise is good...the issue is the actual picks have either been subpar in many cases or they flip it again for future picks so they don't actually get a player that helps them on the field...I would much rather see them be aggressive in acquiring higher picks while the Brady window is still open...This is right on. It's not the moving that's inherently bad but the subsequent picks. They moved to get Gronkowski; that looks like a pretty good pick. They have flailed badly on WRs and DBs.They can swing and miss just as badly by trading up.The Pats have been swinging and missing on a lot of high picks (first three rounds) the last five years or so...Maroney, Jackson, Wheatley, Butler, Brace, O'Connell, Cunningham, Merriweather, Thomas, Tate and now Price are among the MIA...it's a freakin' miracle they're still contenders...I think it's time the Pats abandon the trade down philosophy with their 75 picks a year and start trading up...maybe that one or two stud instead of dud could mean the difference between just making the playoffs and winning another title...The Price release hurts more for the future than right now...outside of Welker and a somewhat creaky Branch the Pats have zero in the WR department for the future...Price could really have helped this unit going forward (as Tate could have)...it will be interesting to see how they address this in the offseason...One other thing about this release...my guess it leads to a rumor or two of TO or Moss heading to Foxboro...probably won't happen but my guess it will be talked about by the media...
I guess in the end we agree that their talent evaluation has to improve...if the trade-down philosophy was working and they were getting a haul of studs in the second and third round I wouldn't say a peep...especially since their trades are good when you look purely at draft-pick value...yet, right now they are missing a lot more than they are hitting in this part of the draft and with the Brady window closing it's a big negative...overall I feel this team has been much better in the first round of the draft during the BB era which is why I'd rather see them concentrate more of their resources to this area and try to get some potential playmakers that can help put them over the top...a case in point is I'd like to see them turn their two #2's into another #1 giving them three #1's going into 2012...at the end-of-the-day Brady isn't getting any younger and this team needs to surround him with better talent (especially on the defensive-side of the ball) if they are going to get over the hump and win another title or two...I think some people aren't fully aware as to how the Pats operate in regards to "trading down" picks. They compile a list of which players they want and when they get to the point of having to make a pick, they will "trade down" if they are reasonably assured that "the guy they want" will be there. So they trade out of their pick and stockpile picks.The point being, if they used all their picks they would end up with the same players (but fewer stockpiled picks). The issue has been the talent level of the guys on their list, not the trading down part.My fear is if they "traded up," they would strike out just as badly. If the Pats moved up to snag Vernon Gholston from the Jets, people at the time would have appluaded that move and said they made a great pick . . . until he bombed and then folks would whine about how they shouldn't have moved up.ANy draft pick is great if that player turns out to be very productive . . . and he would be considered a bust if he didn't meet expectations. I HATE when people say that TEAM X could have had PLAYER Y, because it's really easy to tell 5 years AFTER a draft which players should have been drafted where. It's not quite that easy when all the college kids have 0 NFL experience. It's not like the Pats have been the only team to swing and miss on top draft picks. And they have had some success with some of the players they drafted. Given that they made so many picks and whiffed on a bunch of them makes them seem more incompetent than they really are. But I do agree that their talent evaluation needs to improve.I agree to a point...the value they are getting pick-wise is good...the issue is the actual picks have either been subpar in many cases or they flip it again for future picks so they don't actually get a player that helps them on the field...I would much rather see them be aggressive in acquiring higher picks while the Brady window is still open...This is right on. It's not the moving that's inherently bad but the subsequent picks. They moved to get Gronkowski; that looks like a pretty good pick. They have flailed badly on WRs and DBs.They can swing and miss just as badly by trading up.The Pats have been swinging and missing on a lot of high picks (first three rounds) the last five years or so...Maroney, Jackson, Wheatley, Butler, Brace, O'Connell, Cunningham, Merriweather, Thomas, Tate and now Price are among the MIA...it's a freakin' miracle they're still contenders...I think it's time the Pats abandon the trade down philosophy with their 75 picks a year and start trading up...maybe that one or two stud instead of dud could mean the difference between just making the playoffs and winning another title...The Price release hurts more for the future than right now...outside of Welker and a somewhat creaky Branch the Pats have zero in the WR department for the future...Price could really have helped this unit going forward (as Tate could have)...it will be interesting to see how they address this in the offseason...One other thing about this release...my guess it leads to a rumor or two of TO or Moss heading to Foxboro...probably won't happen but my guess it will be talked about by the media...
Looks like the system doesnt work for any WR drafted by the PatsI think you guys are forgetting how Ochocinco was pretty good WR2 or WR1 on the Bengals most seasons. And now he is not even a WR3 for fantasy with the Pats. The Pats have a certain system that is very specific and disciplined. Either you work into this system and stick or you just don't. I really don't think that Taylor Price is a bust because he didn't work in New England. Couch Potato has a good list going and makes a good point. But I think we are forgetting that the Pats system doesn't work for every WR. Doesn't make them a bust. Seems shortsighted to me.
He could end up anywhere from never seeing the field to being the most targeted WR on the field. Remember, regardless of his new home, we don't know that he can play in the NFL. Belichick didn't seem to think so. Opportunity? Yes. JAX just cut a guy (Hill) who had been a starter all year. Robiskie is on IR but most people have concluded he sucks, so he's no big thrill for next year. They also just cut Sims-Walker from IR (injury settlement) so he's out of the picture -- again. Now starting is a former 5th rounder (Dillard) who was on IR all last year and has never had more than 33 yards in a game. Other options are a 4th round rookie (Shorts) with 2 catches on 11 targets, a 2nd year UDFA (C West) who has 6 career catches. And of course, their "best" guy (?!?!) is former 4th rounder Thomas, who hasn't had more than 3-24-0 in a game since week 6. Hell, in terms of draft pedigree, Price is their most highly regarded WR! (except for the stud 2nd rounder Robiskie - blech)Right now, even if a guy was a stud you probably wouldn't know it because their QB plays like Jimmy Clausen out there most of the time, and we all know what Clausen did to Steve Smith's stats. So, although there's ostensibly opportunity in terms of WR competition, it's still a bad situation for any WR there unless Gabbert improves significantly in his 2nd year. And then there's free agency and the draft next year to consider and the strong likelihood they'll address their need in one of those places to one degree or another.Of course Price has to start (or stop) doing whatever he wasn't (or was) doing in NE that got him cut in the first place or none of the above matters anyway. All we have to hang a hat on is that he was a 3rd round draft pick (lots of those bust over the years, as do lots of 2nds and 1sts) and had a few preseason catches against scrubs. He's still a pretty long shot I'd say.Lets try and keep this to Taylor Price and any fantasy relevancy he has. So with the Jaguars. Where could Price end up. Maybe be the WR2 behind Mike Thomas or Dillard??
I'll sum it up in one word: worthless.'jacobo_moses said:Lets try and keep this to Taylor Price and any fantasy relevancy he has. So with the Jaguars. Where could Price end up. Maybe be the WR2 behind Mike Thomas or Dillard??