What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

TE Zach Ertz, WAS (1 Viewer)

Zach Ertz (hamstring) said he was a full-go in Monday's practice.

Ertz sat out Week 9, but he was fully expected to return following the bye week. This practice puts him on track. He will be a must-start against the Cowboys on Sunday night.

Source: Dave Spadaro on Twitter 

Nov 13 - 1:08 PM

 
A couple things..

Byron Jones did a very good job on him tonight.

He may not be fully over his hamstring injury.

This trend of his volume essentially being cut in half started in week 6 and his elite production has been propped up by TDs ever since. 

I would really appreciate it if he didn't turn into a TD dependent TE. I liked him more when he was a PPR beast who struggled to score TDs.

 
OK, what are Ertz owners doing for contingency plans in case he's not cleared by Sunday? The obvious answer is Burton, especially since you can wait to see if Ertz is playing (as opposed to having to commit to someone in the 1:00 game). Other possibilities are Clay (good matchup, but may have Peterman at QB), ASJ (not doing much lately), RSJ (promising, but a dart throw), Njoku (rookies in the playoffs, always risky), and Kroft. You also have to take into consideration that you may be competing with the Gronk owner on the WW.

As of right now, leaning Burton.

 
Burton is a closer to a one to one replacement for Ertz than, for exampe,  Davis is to Reed. I know it's hard to believe that PHI's technical TE3 can just step in for Ertz but he really can. He doesn't have the same chemistry with Wentz as Ertz does but for all intents and purposes you can treat him like Ertz. Especially considering PHI's schedule.

And yeah, I'd be surprised if Ertz missed more than a game but everyone responds to concussions differently. 

 
OK, what are Ertz owners doing for contingency plans in case he's not cleared by Sunday? The obvious answer is Burton, especially since you can wait to see if Ertz is playing (as opposed to having to commit to someone in the 1:00 game). Other possibilities are Clay (good matchup, but may have Peterman at QB), ASJ (not doing much lately), RSJ (promising, but a dart throw), Njoku (rookies in the playoffs, always risky), and Kroft. You also have to take into consideration that you may be competing with the Gronk owner on the WW.

As of right now, leaning Burton.
Should have also added Stephen Anderson, who's the starter now that CJ Fed is on IR

 
Why is everyone assuming he's out?

I've seen players knocked out cold then the next thing you know they clear protocol. Usually players I'm facing of course. 
More about getting a back up plan in place as most waivers run tonight and we won't get more information until tomorrow or Thursday.

 
OK, what are Ertz owners doing for contingency plans in case he's not cleared by Sunday? The obvious answer is Burton, especially since you can wait to see if Ertz is playing (as opposed to having to commit to someone in the 1:00 game). Other possibilities are Clay (good matchup, but may have Peterman at QB), ASJ (not doing much lately), RSJ (promising, but a dart throw), Njoku (rookies in the playoffs, always risky), and Kroft. You also have to take into consideration that you may be competing with the Gronk owner on the WW.

As of right now, leaning Burton.
I’m picking up Burton as insurance. I own Njoku (dynasty) but I don’t feel comfortable using him. 

 
Why is everyone assuming he's out?

I've seen players knocked out cold then the next thing you know they clear protocol. Usually players I'm facing of course. 
Yes, all the science on concussions says that each one is unique. You can't tell anything based on the severity of the hit, and recovery doesn't proceed on any set timetable. There's no possible way we could know at this point how many games Ertz will miss, or if he'll miss any.

 
Is there a risk they play him in a limited role or are concussions all or nothing? Debating Burton vs Seals J or Rudolph type options......would hate to go Burton and they split snaps.

 
Is there a risk they play him in a limited role or are concussions all or nothing? Debating Burton vs Seals J or Rudolph type options......would hate to go Burton and they split snaps.
All or nothing. If he plays it's because he cleared the protocol

 
Is there a risk they play him in a limited role or are concussions all or nothing? Debating Burton vs Seals J or Rudolph type options......would hate to go Burton and they split snaps.
Last game Ertz missed (week 9) Burton and Celek both got 4 targets (Burton scored a TD)

 
Last game Ertz missed (week 9) Burton and Celek both got 4 targets (Burton scored a TD)
As far as if ertz is active though, concussion isn't something he would be eased back from it's a go or no go?

Man was hoping Celek didn't see as much.

 
You guys going after Burton or other options?
I have Burton and Vernon Davis in one league, and if Ertz doesn't go I'll be choosing Burton. (To be fair this is easier since Vernon Davis has really cooled down even without Reed in the lineup--I've read speculation that he has a hand injury keeping him mostly as a decoy, idk)

 
Assuming Ertz doesn't practice later today I'm going after S. Anderson, D. Njuku, J. Thomas in that order.

If all of the above are taken I'll go Burton as a last resort. Can't imagine anyone but me going after Burton.

 
Last game Ertz missed (week 9) Burton and Celek both got 4 targets (Burton scored a TD)
This was probably skewed by the fact that they were beating down the Broncos. I'm assuming they went more run personnel which would mean Celek. Burton should thrive in a game where they likely will have to throw more.

edit- obviously assuming Ertz is out

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Went with Anderson over Burton. Burton does not have the same chemistry and splits reps with celek. Hoping Anderson keeps getting the targets.

 
Went with Anderson over Burton. Burton does not have the same chemistry and splits reps with celek. Hoping Anderson keeps getting the targets.
Same. I picked up both but just sent Burton back for Kearse. Anderson, at the very least, will be out on the field most all of the snaps and has a better matchup.

 
I'm trying to wait it out, but the gronk owner hasn't picked up a replacement yet. If I wait too long I'll be giving him first choice. But I'd rather not make a move unless I have to. 

Of the options available, I'm leaning ASJ based on matchup. I feel more comfortable with him than with chasing WW wonders like RSJ or Anderson.

 
cockroach said:
Last game Ertz missed (week 9) Burton and Celek both got 4 targets (Burton scored a TD)
I would paint a better picture for Burton and look at it in terms of he got 7 targets in one quarter without Ertz last week and last season, oddly enough with Ertz active, Burton got 9 and 10 targets in back to back weeks.

I own Ertz a lot and I got some leagues where waivers ended last week and I picked up Burton last week in several of those leagues because I knew if Ertz went down I'd trust him and be able to start him with confidence.

 
I'm trying to wait it out, but the gronk owner hasn't picked up a replacement yet. If I wait too long I'll be giving him first choice. But I'd rather not make a move unless I have to. 

Of the options available, I'm leaning ASJ based on matchup. I feel more comfortable with him than with chasing WW wonders like RSJ or Anderson.
Was curious to hear why ASJ is a better option...then I checked snap counts.  RSJ isn't even on the field for 25% of the plays.  So, I guess I see the risk.  However, Anderson saw the field +85% of the time last week.  Those odds aren't bad to chase after

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would paint a better picture for Burton and look at it in terms of he got 7 targets in one quarter without Ertz last week and last season, oddly enough with Ertz active, Burton got 9 and 10 targets in back to back weeks.

I own Ertz a lot and I got some leagues where waivers ended last week and I picked up Burton last week in several of those leagues because I knew if Ertz went down I'd trust him and be able to start him with confidence.
The bolded says to me that they like to target two TEs.  So I wouldn't expect Burton to have a monopoly on targets.  When Ertz was out week 9 they split targets 50/50.   I don't know what the snap count was.   Burton saved his day with a TD, but only had 2 rec for 40 yds.   That's not a "start him with confidence" kind of line for me.

 
Re: ASJ, Denver is 31st against TE. Hard to trust him but reason to start him.

Local news is Ertz says he will play. I picked up Burton anyway.

 
The bolded says to me that they like to target two TEs.  So I wouldn't expect Burton to have a monopoly on targets.  When Ertz was out week 9 they split targets 50/50.   I don't know what the snap count was.   Burton saved his day with a TD, but only had 2 rec for 40 yds.   That's not a "start him with confidence" kind of line for me.
I guess the 7 targets he got in a quarter don't equate to anything for you either, just going cling to a game where he was actually productive on limited targets as a reason to not have confidence in him? Ok. You do you, I'll be starting with confidence thanks.

 
I guess the 7 targets he got in a quarter don't equate to anything for you either, just going cling to a game where he was actually productive on limited targets as a reason to not have confidence in him? Ok. You do you, I'll be starting with confidence thanks.
It does equate to something, but do you think that was the game plan?  We have an example of how Philly game plans when Ertz is out.  Someone  please dig up the snap count between Burton and Celek so we can get a little more insight on this.  I watched that game, and if I'm not mistaken, Celek actually started.  They might've been on the field together, but I remember Celek being the more targeted guy early on.... it wasn't like they threw him in the game when they already had a big lead and wanted to run more.

So if it seems like I'm clinging to one game it's because it makes sense to me that the blueprint for that game would be similar to what they do this week, regarding the TE position. 

 
I have Ertz but passed on Burton this week because I also have K. Rudolph.  The last time Ertz missed time I played Burton (I think Rudolph was on bye) but this time I probably wouldn't consider him a plug and play replacement.  I play DFS as well as season-long and I might be too bogged down on the match up - but LAR are very good against TE this year and poor against the run.  I could see the Eagles attacking them with their running backs this week rather than peppering Burton with targets.  Ertz is plug and play for me when healthy, but not Burton.

 
Re: ASJ, Denver is 31st against TE. Hard to trust him but reason to start him.

Local news is Ertz says he will play. I picked up Burton anyway.
Any link to this?

I'm limited to two pickups per week and would love to bypass the need for S.Anderson/Njuku/J. Thomas/Burton.

 
Tim McManusESPN Staff Writer 

Eagles tight end Zach Ertz remains in concussion protocol but is doing well and attending meetings, according to Doug Pederson, who believes Ertz is experienced enough to play even if he's not cleared until later in the week and has to miss most of practice.

 
Was curious to hear why ASJ is a better option...then I checked snap counts.  RSJ isn't even on the field for 25% of the plays.  So, I guess I see the risk.  However, Anderson saw the field +85% of the time last week.  Those odds aren't bad to chase after
I mean, I can't tell you Anderson is a bad option, but at this time a week ago I had never heard of the guy. That's the kind of thing that makes my spidey sense tingle. 

As for ASJ, as @thriftyrocker points out, it's a great match-up. Yes, the recent cold streak is scary, but consider this: in Week 10 he put up a decent line (6/67/0), and then has crapped the bed the past two games. Imagine those results were reversed, and he was coming of a 6/67 game. Don't you think everyone would be touting him as this week's can't-miss streamer?

My point is that TEs are inherently volatile, and you have to make a conscious effort not to fall victim to recency bias. That doesn't mean ASJ is definitely the play this week, but IMO he has a better track record than most of the other options.

 
I mean, I can't tell you Anderson is a bad option, but at this time a week ago I had never heard of the guy. That's the kind of thing that makes my spidey sense tingle.
That's because there's been a revolving door between Griffin, Anderson and Fiedo in HOU with each missing different weeks due to concussions. I think he's the only one out of the three who hasn't suffered multiple concussions this year.

 
I mean, I can't tell you Anderson is a bad option, but at this time a week ago I had never heard of the guy. That's the kind of thing that makes my spidey sense tingle. 

As for ASJ, as @thriftyrocker points out, it's a great match-up. Yes, the recent cold streak is scary, but consider this: in Week 10 he put up a decent line (6/67/0), and then has crapped the bed the past two games. Imagine those results were reversed, and he was coming of a 6/67 game. Don't you think everyone would be touting him as this week's can't-miss streamer?

My point is that TEs are inherently volatile, and you have to make a conscious effort not to fall victim to recency bias. That doesn't mean ASJ is definitely the play this week, but IMO he has a better track record than most of the other options.
True.  I've never heard of Anderson before now either.  Difference for me is Houston has a track record of the TE being a part of their game script.  Couple that with the piling injuries to Houston's WR core, and he is just gonna get targets by being the last man standing.  **Anderson is not a prototypical TE either.  Only 6'3" 230. 

On the other hand, NYJ have never been a team to utilize the TE position and Anderson and Kearse doing very well.  I see all having similar floors, but Anderson (and even RSJ) have a higher ceiling IMO.  Pick you poison, but for me, I'm playing the role of the underdog and need the high ceiling.

 
 I play DFS as well as season-long and I might be too bogged down on the match up - but LAR are very good against TE this year and poor against the run.
I think that could be mostly a product of them not facing many teams that feature the TE.  Jimmy Graham and Engram had alright games against them, but playing AZ and SF twice along with Hou and Jax and NO and I can see how the totals are down.  Not saying they're not good, but they're probably closer to average than they're ranked.

 
Found this from Howard Eskin (who appears to be affiliated with the Eagles broadcast team):

Although #eagles TE Zack Ertz has not been cleared from concussion protocol and thus did not practice Wednesday, I get strong sense Ertz will be cleared this week and will play against #Rams on Sunday. @SportsRadioWIP

9:48 PM - Dec 6, 2017

So that is encouraging I guess. Even if he plays, looks (on paper) like a tough matchup though that could be (as cockroach says above) a little misleading. Hoping that is the case.

ETA: we should know before sunday if he's cleared and (if he is) I see no reason to think he wont play. So this is likely to be moot but an obvious additional challenge to this situation is the fact the PHI vs LAR game is not only a late game but a 3:25pm start time. If something weird happens that causes Ertz to be a very late health-related scratch, might be SOL if not also holding Burton or a TE in the SNF or MNF game ahead of time. Same could be said for any player but this is a player coming off a tricky injury and TE a position owners typically don't have as many fall-back options...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Found this from Howard Eskin (who appears to be affiliated with the Eagles broadcast team):

Although #eagles TE Zack Ertz has not been cleared from concussion protocol and thus did not practice Wednesday, I get strong sense Ertz will be cleared this week and will play against #Rams on Sunday. @SportsRadioWIP

9:48 PM - Dec 6, 2017

So that is encouraging I guess. Even if he plays, looks (on paper) like a tough matchup though that could be (as cockroach says above) a little misleading. Hoping that is the case.

ETA: we should know before sunday if he's cleared and (if he is) I see no reason to think he wont play. So this is likely to be moot but an obvious additional challenge to this situation is the fact the PHI vs LAR game is not only a late game but a 3:25pm start time. If something weird happens that causes Ertz to be a very late health-related scratch, might be SOL if not also holding Burton or a TE in the SNF or MNF game ahead of time. Same could be said for any player but this is a player coming off a tricky injury and TE a position owners typically don't have as many fall-back options...
My sense is that concussions aren't generally a "test it out in warmups" kind of injury, which is how you usually get those last-minute scratches. I suspect we'll know by Friday or Saturday if he's cleared the protocol.

Side note: Is Eskin still around? I remember him from when I lived in Philly some 25 years ago. As I recall, he was universally hated.

 
https://www.fantasypros.com/2017/12/week-14-primer-analyzing-all-16-games-fantasy-football/4/

Someone mentioned this before, but the Rams are not a scary matchup for elite TEs - fire up Ertz if you have him!

Zach Ertz:  The Rams have allowed the sixth-fewest points to tight ends this year, but that doesn’t begin to tell the whole story. The only athletic tight ends they played were Evan Engram (4/70/1), Jimmy Graham (6/37/1), Kyle Rudolph (5/58/0), and Jordan Reed (6/48/0). They are also the only tight ends to see more than three targets against them. If Ertz plays, he’s an elite TE1 and one that I’d be happy to use in DFS.

 
Found this from Howard Eskin (who appears to be affiliated with the Eagles broadcast team):

Although #eagles TE Zack Ertz has not been cleared from concussion protocol and thus did not practice Wednesday, I get strong sense Ertz will be cleared this week and will play against #Rams on Sunday. @SportsRadioWIP

9:48 PM - Dec 6, 2017

So that is encouraging I guess. Even if he plays, looks (on paper) like a tough matchup though that could be (as cockroach says above) a little misleading. Hoping that is the case.

ETA: we should know before sunday if he's cleared and (if he is) I see no reason to think he wont play. So this is likely to be moot but an obvious additional challenge to this situation is the fact the PHI vs LAR game is not only a late game but a 3:25pm start time. If something weird happens that causes Ertz to be a very late health-related scratch, might be SOL if not also holding Burton or a TE in the SNF or MNF game ahead of time. Same could be said for any player but this is a player coming off a tricky injury and TE a position owners typically don't have as many fall-back options...
Eskin is a joke.

(sorry, obligatory)

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top