GRIDIRON ASSASSIN
Footballguy
TONS of rumors swirling around that Terrell Owens had dinner with Bears GM Jerry Angelo yesterday....I have zero interest.Just an FYI.
...let alone on my television EVERY night. Don't need to see him locally.please don't bring TO to chicago. The guy has serious problems and I don't want to see him destroy my teams locker room.
Because signing the #1 WR of 2004 worked wonders for that offense.You still need someone that can throw the ball.Who gives a damn about the locker room! The Bears have the defense in place for a Super Bowl run and the need offense asap...
They have someone who can throw the ball, he just happened to play only 10 quarters of football this yearBecause signing the #1 WR of 2004 worked wonders for that offense.You still need someone that can throw the ball.Who gives a damn about the locker room! The Bears have the defense in place for a Super Bowl run and the need offense asap...
sssshhh, they're dating...TONS of rumors swirling around that Terrell Owens had dinner with Bears GM Jerry Angelo yesterday....
I have zero interest.
Just an FYI.
Because signing the #1 WR of 2004 worked wonders for that offense.You still need someone that can throw the ball.Who gives a damn about the locker room! The Bears have the defense in place for a Super Bowl run and the need offense asap...
Your team already gets drunk, fires weapons, and rearranges each other's faces...yeah, add TO to that mix, gently stir, and then stand back.True about Mushin, but he did not help the cause with all the drops he had (please do not make me dig up those stats again). I know I am in the minority, but I think the risk/reward with TO is worth it if they do it right. Owens is a different receiver than Mushin, ie can take a 5 yard slant, break tackles, and get to the house. Hate to see a problem in the locker room with a young OB like Grossman, but do you think the Bears really have enough on O to take it further? I for one would love to see them take a shot with a move like this. Instantly upgrades the O with a D that is locked up for next year. Could be flat out scary.
Yeah, that Playoff performance really "wowed" us. 17/41 isn't going to work with TO.They have someone who can throw the ball, he just happened to play only 10 quarters of football this yearBecause signing the #1 WR of 2004 worked wonders for that offense.You still need someone that can throw the ball.Who gives a damn about the locker room! The Bears have the defense in place for a Super Bowl run and the need offense asap...
As one of the few TO fans, and as one of the few true Seahawk fans, I would LOVE this....Why do you think he will be in Seattle?TO will be a Seahawk in 06
Fixed.The only way to sign TO is a contract with DAILY performance vow of silence objectives...
Or perhaps even hourly...
I'm no Rex Grossman fan. I used to get lots of hate mail from Florida fans when I called him Injury Prone his rookie year. I don't get as much now.But Rex Grossman is not 17/41 in that game if Terrell Owens is on the field. He would help the Bears in a big big way and he'd do it right now. Would he burn out in 12 months? Probably. But with that defense they could be scary with Owens / Moose / Jones / Benson.Yeah, that Playoff performance really "wowed" us. 17/41 isn't going to work with TO.They have someone who can throw the ball, he just happened to play only 10 quarters of football this yearBecause signing the #1 WR of 2004 worked wonders for that offense.You still need someone that can throw the ball.Who gives a damn about the locker room! The Bears have the defense in place for a Super Bowl run and the need offense asap...
I'm no Rex Grossman fan. I used to get lots of hate mail from Florida fans when I called him Injury Prone his rookie year. I don't get as much now.But Rex Grossman is not 17/41 in that game if Terrell Owens is on the field. He would help the Bears in a big big way and he'd do it right now. Would he burn out in 12 months? Probably. But with that defense they could be scary with Owens / Moose / Jones / Benson.Yeah, that Playoff performance really "wowed" us. 17/41 isn't going to work with TO.They have someone who can throw the ball, he just happened to play only 10 quarters of football this yearBecause signing the #1 WR of 2004 worked wonders for that offense.You still need someone that can throw the ball.Who gives a damn about the locker room! The Bears have the defense in place for a Super Bowl run and the need offense asap...
This would be TERRIBLE news for Vikings and Packers fans.
J
Would be burn out in 10 months?Would he burn out in 8 months?He would help the Bears in a big big way and he'd do it right now. Would he burn out in 12 months? Probably. But with that defense they could be scary with Owens / Moose / Jones / Benson.
This would be TERRIBLE news for Vikings and Packers fans.
J
Exactly. TO was already harrassing McNabb on the sidelines midway through the 2004 season. What was that, six months after signing with them? What happened after the Super Bowl was simply the deal breaker. It's funny because there's not a team in the league that can't make a good argument about NOT signing TO.Would be burn out in 10 months?Would he burn out in 8 months?He would help the Bears in a big big way and he'd do it right now. Would he burn out in 12 months? Probably. But with that defense they could be scary with Owens / Moose / Jones / Benson.
This would be TERRIBLE news for Vikings and Packers fans.
J
Those things kill a season and leave a team worse off than if they had never signed him.
Pure conjecture. I mean honestly, aside from what you see on TV what do you really know about it? Nothing. Philly had their most dominant year ever with TO while they were "contending" and running away with a playoff birth and conference title.Exactly. TO was already harrassing McNabb on the sidelines midway through the 2004 season. What was that, six months after signing with them? What happened after the Super Bowl was simply the deal breaker. It's funny because there's not a team in the league that can't make a good argument about NOT signing TO.Would be burn out in 10 months?Would he burn out in 8 months?He would help the Bears in a big big way and he'd do it right now. Would he burn out in 12 months? Probably. But with that defense they could be scary with Owens / Moose / Jones / Benson.
This would be TERRIBLE news for Vikings and Packers fans.
J
Those things kill a season and leave a team worse off than if they had never signed him.
The teams on the bottom of the heap wouldn't want him to hurt the confidence of young players trying to get their footing in the NFL as the team rebuilds.
Teams on top don't want him to destroy the unity and focus of the team while it contends for playoff berths and championships.
I've agree with you on Rex all along, although he has shown a little more potential than I gave him credit for. But, TO only caught 51% of McNabb's passes this year, and IIRC 2004 wasn't much better. TO is a playmaker when he gets the ball, but is far from the most sure-handed WR in the NFL. TO would open up Moose quite a bit, and sure the offense would improve greatly, but do you really think Owens would be happy with Rex? Great news for Lions fans, as the Bears would self-destruct in 07.I'm no Rex Grossman fan. I used to get lots of hate mail from Florida fans when I called him Injury Prone his rookie year. I don't get as much now.But Rex Grossman is not 17/41 in that game if Terrell Owens is on the field. He would help the Bears in a big big way and he'd do it right now. Would he burn out in 12 months? Probably. But with that defense they could be scary with Owens / Moose / Jones / Benson.Yeah, that Playoff performance really "wowed" us. 17/41 isn't going to work with TO.They have someone who can throw the ball, he just happened to play only 10 quarters of football this yearBecause signing the #1 WR of 2004 worked wonders for that offense.You still need someone that can throw the ball.Who gives a damn about the locker room! The Bears have the defense in place for a Super Bowl run and the need offense asap...
This would be TERRIBLE news for Vikings and Packers fans.
J
Conjecture? So I didn't in fact see TO in McNabb's face during the Pittsburgh game in '04 - not coincidentally their first loss of the season - with McNabb clearly trying to calmly walk away? I agree. I don't know anything besides what I see and read. Neither do you.Pure conjecture. I mean honestly, aside from what you see on TV what do you really know about it? Nothing. Philly had their most dominant year ever with TO while they were "contending" and running away with a playoff birth and conference title.Exactly. TO was already harrassing McNabb on the sidelines midway through the 2004 season. What was that, six months after signing with them? What happened after the Super Bowl was simply the deal breaker. It's funny because there's not a team in the league that can't make a good argument about NOT signing TO.Would be burn out in 10 months?Would he burn out in 8 months?He would help the Bears in a big big way and he'd do it right now. Would he burn out in 12 months? Probably. But with that defense they could be scary with Owens / Moose / Jones / Benson.
This would be TERRIBLE news for Vikings and Packers fans.
J
Those things kill a season and leave a team worse off than if they had never signed him.
The teams on the bottom of the heap wouldn't want him to hurt the confidence of young players trying to get their footing in the NFL as the team rebuilds.
Teams on top don't want him to destroy the unity and focus of the team while it contends for playoff berths and championships.
It'd be pretty tough for him to go to the Raiders.TO loves BIG $$$.Ship him to the Raiders. How much worse could it get in Oakland, and we would have 24/7 entertainment!
True.TO's ego makes it imperative that he lands in a large market. Chicago definitely has to be considered one of the frontrunners, IMO.
Completely agreed.If he wants a media market - and keep in mind he and his agent are working the deal right now, why not the Giants? If they could afford him. Imagine TO, Plax and Shockey with Eli - the media would have a field day. Coughlin might kill himself, but it would be fun to watch.Hmm, TO going to a defensive team that loves to run the ball with an inexperienced QB. I dont see anything that could potentially go wrong here.
Chicago had a defense on the field playing last week???I'm no Rex Grossman fan. I used to get lots of hate mail from Florida fans when I called him Injury Prone his rookie year. I don't get as much now.But Rex Grossman is not 17/41 in that game if Terrell Owens is on the field. He would help the Bears in a big big way and he'd do it right now. Would he burn out in 12 months? Probably. But with that defense they could be scary with Owens / Moose / Jones / Benson.Yeah, that Playoff performance really "wowed" us. 17/41 isn't going to work with TO.They have someone who can throw the ball, he just happened to play only 10 quarters of football this yearBecause signing the #1 WR of 2004 worked wonders for that offense.You still need someone that can throw the ball.Who gives a damn about the locker room! The Bears have the defense in place for a Super Bowl run and the need offense asap...
This would be TERRIBLE news for Vikings and Packers fans.
J
Let me get this straight. Are you really a behavioral psychologist?...or did you just stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night?Conjecture? So I didn't in fact see TO in McNabb's face during the Pittsburgh game in '04 - not coincidentally their first loss of the season - with McNabb clearly trying to calmly walk away? I agree. I don't know anything besides what I see and read. Neither do you.Pure conjecture. I mean honestly, aside from what you see on TV what do you really know about it? Nothing. Philly had their most dominant year ever with TO while they were "contending" and running away with a playoff birth and conference title.Exactly. TO was already harrassing McNabb on the sidelines midway through the 2004 season. What was that, six months after signing with them? What happened after the Super Bowl was simply the deal breaker. It's funny because there's not a team in the league that can't make a good argument about NOT signing TO.Would be burn out in 10 months?Would he burn out in 8 months?He would help the Bears in a big big way and he'd do it right now. Would he burn out in 12 months? Probably. But with that defense they could be scary with Owens / Moose / Jones / Benson.
This would be TERRIBLE news for Vikings and Packers fans.
J
Those things kill a season and leave a team worse off than if they had never signed him.
The teams on the bottom of the heap wouldn't want him to hurt the confidence of young players trying to get their footing in the NFL as the team rebuilds.
Teams on top don't want him to destroy the unity and focus of the team while it contends for playoff berths and championships.
What we DO know is that TO has alienated two different franchises for the same set of reasons: 1) open and viciously personal criticism of the QB; 2) yearly complaints about his contract; 3) criticism of the coaching staff; 4) his love of publicity first and foremost over any teammate.
The fact that Philly had their "most dominant year ever" with McNabb misses the point, or at least looks at this only like a fantasy footballer would. I'm not talking about stats or fantasy football. I'm talking about a guy who is such a narcissist that he simply can't help but destroy anyone around him, even if he needs those people to be successful.
That's not conjecture. That's fact.
I agree. Do I think TO is a arrogant jerk, yes. But he is the best WR in the game. If he is able to control himself and play a whole year, pencil him in for 1500 yards and 10+ TDs no matter who is QB. TO is a YAC machine, unlike Mushy who seems content to hopefully catch the ball and fall down. I'd take a TO experiment, as this team needs production from the offense.I'm no Rex Grossman fan. I used to get lots of hate mail from Florida fans when I called him Injury Prone his rookie year. I don't get as much now.But Rex Grossman is not 17/41 in that game if Terrell Owens is on the field. He would help the Bears in a big big way and he'd do it right now. Would he burn out in 12 months? Probably. But with that defense they could be scary with Owens / Moose / Jones / Benson.Yeah, that Playoff performance really "wowed" us. 17/41 isn't going to work with TO.They have someone who can throw the ball, he just happened to play only 10 quarters of football this yearBecause signing the #1 WR of 2004 worked wonders for that offense.You still need someone that can throw the ball.Who gives a damn about the locker room! The Bears have the defense in place for a Super Bowl run and the need offense asap...
This would be TERRIBLE news for Vikings and Packers fans.
J
Hi red,I don't disagree there. Chicago is so new to the "top" lately, I don't really think of them as a team on the top like a New England or Indy.Teams on top don't want him to destroy the unity and focus of the team while it contends for playoff berths and championships.
Agreed DW.One word though. Winrightnow.Interesting. This would give the Bears two W.R.'s both 33 years old.
The response, of course, is that with but little variation, this was exactly what the reasoning (rationalization?) was for Philly two years ago.I think whoever signs TO this time around is going to get a great bargain. His past actions will allow a team to sign him to a 1 or 2 year incentive laden contract that will help keep him in line and keep him motivated to produce.
I'm no more of a behavioral psychologist than you were here on the very same subject.Let me get this straight. Are you really a behavioral psychologist?...or did you just stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night?Conjecture? So I didn't in fact see TO in McNabb's face during the Pittsburgh game in '04 - not coincidentally their first loss of the season - with McNabb clearly trying to calmly walk away? I agree. I don't know anything besides what I see and read. Neither do you.Pure conjecture. I mean honestly, aside from what you see on TV what do you really know about it? Nothing. Philly had their most dominant year ever with TO while they were "contending" and running away with a playoff birth and conference title.Exactly. TO was already harrassing McNabb on the sidelines midway through the 2004 season. What was that, six months after signing with them? What happened after the Super Bowl was simply the deal breaker. It's funny because there's not a team in the league that can't make a good argument about NOT signing TO.Would be burn out in 10 months?Would he burn out in 8 months?He would help the Bears in a big big way and he'd do it right now. Would he burn out in 12 months? Probably. But with that defense they could be scary with Owens / Moose / Jones / Benson.
This would be TERRIBLE news for Vikings and Packers fans.
J
Those things kill a season and leave a team worse off than if they had never signed him.
The teams on the bottom of the heap wouldn't want him to hurt the confidence of young players trying to get their footing in the NFL as the team rebuilds.
Teams on top don't want him to destroy the unity and focus of the team while it contends for playoff berths and championships.
What we DO know is that TO has alienated two different franchises for the same set of reasons: 1) open and viciously personal criticism of the QB; 2) yearly complaints about his contract; 3) criticism of the coaching staff; 4) his love of publicity first and foremost over any teammate.
The fact that Philly had their "most dominant year ever" with McNabb misses the point, or at least looks at this only like a fantasy footballer would. I'm not talking about stats or fantasy football. I'm talking about a guy who is such a narcissist that he simply can't help but destroy anyone around him, even if he needs those people to be successful.
That's not conjecture. That's fact.
So the best WR in the game has missed time over the past two seasons due to injury. Yet some on this board say Moss is greatly indecline? Owens is overrated. He will never justify a high price tag, because IMHO he will not produce like he did at his peak. 2nd tier WR at best.I agree. Do I think TO is a arrogant jerk, yes. But he is the best WR in the game. If he is able to control himself and play a whole year, pencil him in for 1500 yards and 10+ TDs no matter who is QB. TO is a YAC machine, unlike Mushy who seems content to hopefully catch the ball and fall down. I'd take a TO experiment, as this team needs production from the offense.I'm no Rex Grossman fan. I used to get lots of hate mail from Florida fans when I called him Injury Prone his rookie year. I don't get as much now.But Rex Grossman is not 17/41 in that game if Terrell Owens is on the field. He would help the Bears in a big big way and he'd do it right now. Would he burn out in 12 months? Probably. But with that defense they could be scary with Owens / Moose / Jones / Benson.Yeah, that Playoff performance really "wowed" us. 17/41 isn't going to work with TO.They have someone who can throw the ball, he just happened to play only 10 quarters of football this yearBecause signing the #1 WR of 2004 worked wonders for that offense.You still need someone that can throw the ball.Who gives a damn about the locker room! The Bears have the defense in place for a Super Bowl run and the need offense asap...
This would be TERRIBLE news for Vikings and Packers fans.
J
but Philly hadn't happened then. I don't think he's going to do the same thing all over again. It certainly didn't work out the way he thought it would this time.The response, of course, is that with but little variation, this was exactly what the reasoning (rationalization?) was for Philly two years ago.I think whoever signs TO this time around is going to get a great bargain. His past actions will allow a team to sign him to a 1 or 2 year incentive laden contract that will help keep him in line and keep him motivated to produce.
Hadn't he done much the same thing in San Francisco? If you want to take the Philly episode into account, fine, but doesn't that mean he's trending downhill given that he was even more outlandish and bizarre in Philly than he had been in SF? Indeed, the fact that Philly was a dominant team with him undercuts some of his SF complaints about him acting out because he was supposedly sick of playing for a bad team. If I thought he had the common sense and humility to learn from his mistakes I might think like you do, but he's shown me the opposite. Everything is someone else's fault. It'll be no different this time, and in fact the ability of this man-child to get another payday as a FA is just going to reinforce (in his mind) that he's on the right track.but Philly hadn't happened then. I don't think he's going to do the same thing all over again. It certainly didn't work out the way he thought it would this time.The response, of course, is that with but little variation, this was exactly what the reasoning (rationalization?) was for Philly two years ago.I think whoever signs TO this time around is going to get a great bargain. His past actions will allow a team to sign him to a 1 or 2 year incentive laden contract that will help keep him in line and keep him motivated to produce.