What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Texans RB Jonathan Grimes - "Grime Time Revisited" (1 Viewer)

cstu

Footballguy
Link

Jets backup RBs Powell, McKnight likely out vs. Patriots

By BRIAN COSTELLO
Posted: 5:32 PM, October 15, 2012

The Jets could be woefully thin at running back for Sunday's game against the Patriots.

An MRI exam confirmed Bilal Powell has a separated right shoulder and he will not play this week, according to a source.

The Jets other backup running back could miss the game, too. Joe McKnight also underwent an MRI exam that showed a high left ankle sprain, according to a source. The Jets have not ruled McKnight out yet for Sunday, but high ankle sprains usually cost players several weeks. Center Nick Mangold missed two games last year with the injury.

The Jets got their running game going on Sunday, rushing for 252 yards. Lead running back Shonn Greene rushed for a career-high 161 yards against the Colts. Jonathan Grimes is the only other running back on the Jets roster.

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/jetsblog/jets_backup_rbs_powell_mcknight_q7RdZVRwaISYOS692ILWtM#ixzz29Ph5Klq7
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think he is worth the add. Greene is uninjured and will obviously get the bulk of the carries. We know relatively little about Grimes other than the fact that he was behing Greene, Powell, and McKnight on the depth chart - not the best indication of promise. He is also new to the team and I doubt he has a complete grasp on the play book and will likely not see third down duty with that likely placed on Shonn. Lastly, the Pats have been pretty good against the run and will no doubt be much better than the trash Indy threw out there last week. Nothing to see here.

 
I know nothing about Grimes, but Greene is notoriously brittle. Always getting little nicks that take him out of games.

I'm sure the Jets will try to control the clock with the running game on sunday, so whoever is carrying the ball could have plenty of opportunities.

That being said, I expect the Jets to fall back to earth this week after an easy win against Indy. Unfortunately, I think NE will be up big early, forcing the Jets to throw.

 
grimes looked good in Houston preseason. Don't think Powell (seperated shoulder) or McK (high ankle?) make quick returns to the lineup.

Not saying instant pickup but in a deep 12 team league he's a lottery ticket. also keep in mind greene is not in the team's long term plans. Grimes is a very interesting name indeed.

 
I don't think he is worth the add. Greene is uninjured and will obviously get the bulk of the carries. We know relatively little about Grimes other than the fact that he was behing Greene, Powell, and McKnight on the depth chart - not the best indication of promise. He is also new to the team and I doubt he has a complete grasp on the play book and will likely not see third down duty with that likely placed on Shonn. Lastly, the Pats have been pretty good against the run and will no doubt be much better than the trash Indy threw out there last week. Nothing to see here.
Here's what Bloom wrote about him before the season.I'm not expecting him to be worth starting considering the Pats run defense but if he plays well he could carve out a bigger role.

 
Definitely think he's worth adding in leagues with deep benches or leagues with more than 12 teams. I doubt that Greene will receive every carry and Grimes might outshine him if he gets a decent amount of carries.

 
Opportunity is half of the equation.
This is true.He may be an unknown, but he's now a Greene injury away from being the starting RB on a team that loves to run the ball.
How banged up are Powell / McKnight ? If it's a one week thing grimes likely isn't worth a pickup if it's 2-4 week type things it may be worth taking a flyer.
News coming out is that Powell has a separated shoulder and could be back for week 8. But seems unlikely that if it's really separated that he could come back that quickly.As for McKnight, he's got a high ankle sprain, so who knows on him. And for a guy that relies on shiftiness, that's not a good thing.IMO, if Grimes does show something, he could very well slip into the clear backup spot and stay there. It's not like Powell or McKnight have been world beaters themselves.
 
Opportunity is half of the equation.
This is true.He may be an unknown, but he's now a Greene injury away from being the starting RB on a team that loves to run the ball.
How banged up are Powell / McKnight ? If it's a one week thing grimes likely isn't worth a pickup if it's 2-4 week type things it may be worth taking a flyer.
News coming out is that Powell has a separated shoulder and could be back for week 8. But seems unlikely that if it's really separated that he could come back that quickly.As for McKnight, he's got a high ankle sprain, so who knows on him. And for a guy that relies on shiftiness, that's not a good thing.

IMO, if Grimes does show something, he could very well slip into the clear backup spot and stay there. It's not like Powell or McKnight have been world beaters themselves.
This is my thinking as well. If McKnight and/or Powell are out long enough for Grimes to get a chance at doing anything, he could grab the back-up job as they have done nothing to deserve to keep it when they come back.
 
Opportunity is half of the equation.
This is true.He may be an unknown, but he's now a Greene injury away from being the starting RB on a team that loves to run the ball.
How banged up are Powell / McKnight ? If it's a one week thing grimes likely isn't worth a pickup if it's 2-4 week type things it may be worth taking a flyer.
News coming out is that Powell has a separated shoulder and could be back for week 8. But seems unlikely that if it's really separated that he could come back that quickly.As for McKnight, he's got a high ankle sprain, so who knows on him. And for a guy that relies on shiftiness, that's not a good thing.IMO, if Grimes does show something, he could very well slip into the clear backup spot and stay there. It's not like Powell or McKnight have been world beaters themselves.
I guess the problem I have with the whole situation is that Powell was outplaying Greene all year and yet has barely got a sniff. Now Greene has his best game in maybe his career so that will cement his role for at least 2-3 more weeks, especially with a practice squad rookie behind him. If the backups haven't gotten any play with how Greene was running and how the Jets were playing, I don't see what will change to make them all the sudden give carries to a guy that doesn't even have an NFL carry.
 
Opportunity is half of the equation.
This is true.He may be an unknown, but he's now a Greene injury away from being the starting RB on a team that loves to run the ball.
How banged up are Powell / McKnight ? If it's a one week thing grimes likely isn't worth a pickup if it's 2-4 week type things it may be worth taking a flyer.
News coming out is that Powell has a separated shoulder and could be back for week 8. But seems unlikely that if it's really separated that he could come back that quickly.As for McKnight, he's got a high ankle sprain, so who knows on him. And for a guy that relies on shiftiness, that's not a good thing.IMO, if Grimes does show something, he could very well slip into the clear backup spot and stay there. It's not like Powell or McKnight have been world beaters themselves.
I guess the problem I have with the whole situation is that Powell was outplaying Greene all year and yet has barely got a sniff. Now Greene has his best game in maybe his career so that will cement his role for at least 2-3 more weeks, especially with a practice squad rookie behind him. If the backups haven't gotten any play with how Greene was running and how the Jets were playing, I don't see what will change to make them all the sudden give carries to a guy that doesn't even have an NFL carry.
Agreed - Greene will likely get just about all the carries, with Grimes maybe a handful to give Greene a breather. They also have only two weeks until the bye, so either Powell or McKnight could be back for week 10.Bottom line is that it will probably take a Greene injury to make Grimes valuable, but same could be said for most backups out there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think he is worth the add. Greene is uninjured and will obviously get the bulk of the carries. We know relatively little about Grimes other than the fact that he was behing Greene, Powell, and McKnight on the depth chart - not the best indication of promise. He is also new to the team and I doubt he has a complete grasp on the play book and will likely not see third down duty with that likely placed on Shonn. Lastly, the Pats have been pretty good against the run and will no doubt be much better than the trash Indy threw out there last week. Nothing to see here.
Here's what Bloom wrote about him before the season.I'm not expecting him to be worth starting considering the Pats run defense but if he plays well he could carve out a bigger role.
If he was potentially so good, why wasn't he drafted? Why isn't he still with Houston? A 4.55/40 isn't exactly what you'd want to hang your hat on for a RB.
 
I don't think he is worth the add. Greene is uninjured and will obviously get the bulk of the carries. We know relatively little about Grimes other than the fact that he was behing Greene, Powell, and McKnight on the depth chart - not the best indication of promise. He is also new to the team and I doubt he has a complete grasp on the play book and will likely not see third down duty with that likely placed on Shonn. Lastly, the Pats have been pretty good against the run and will no doubt be much better than the trash Indy threw out there last week. Nothing to see here.
Here's what Bloom wrote about him before the season.I'm not expecting him to be worth starting considering the Pats run defense but if he plays well he could carve out a bigger role.
If he was potentially so good, why wasn't he drafted? Why isn't he still with Houston? A 4.55/40 isn't exactly what you'd want to hang your hat on for a RB.
Draft pedigree means little - especially for RBs. Foster, Fred Jackson, Green-Ellis are among those guys that undrafted, and Bradshaw went in the 6th. There are others that I'm missing as well, I'm sure.Grimes may just be another scrub, but sometimes scouts just miss guys. As for Houston, they already have two quality RBs in Foster and Tate.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not touching Grimes. Rex stuck with Greene even after a terrible start and now that he had a big game coach just proved to himself he made the right call. Only in deep leagues as a Greene handcuff.

 
I don't think he is worth the add. Greene is uninjured and will obviously get the bulk of the carries. We know relatively little about Grimes other than the fact that he was behing Greene, Powell, and McKnight on the depth chart - not the best indication of promise. He is also new to the team and I doubt he has a complete grasp on the play book and will likely not see third down duty with that likely placed on Shonn. Lastly, the Pats have been pretty good against the run and will no doubt be much better than the trash Indy threw out there last week. Nothing to see here.
Here's what Bloom wrote about him before the season.I'm not expecting him to be worth starting considering the Pats run defense but if he plays well he could carve out a bigger role.
If he was potentially so good, why wasn't he drafted? Why isn't he still with Houston? A 4.55/40 isn't exactly what you'd want to hang your hat on for a RB.
Draft pedigree means little - especially for RBs. Foster, Fred Jackson, Green-Ellis are among those guys that undrafted, and Bradshaw went in the 6th. There are others that I'm missing as well, I'm sure.Grimes may just be another scrub, but sometimes scouts just miss guys. As for Houston, they already have two quality RBs in Foster and Tate.
Draft pedigree does mean something. There are expections to every rule, and just because you can name three current players where that is not the case doesn't mean there is "little" value to draft position or the fact that someone was drafted at all. If anything, it would be more accurate to say draft pedigree is "overrated." That I would agree with.Not every running back the Texans scout and give praise to is the second coming of Arian Foster. Foster becoming was he has is a freak event and no one at this point is even sure of how much success he would have outside of the organization. He is obviously a great fit what their system though. It's comparable to the Denver situation when Shannahan (and Kubiak) were there, in which they could plug in any Joe Schmoe like Rueben Droughns and garner themselves a 1,000 yard rusher. The Jets do not have such a system in place, Rex is committed to Greene (as stubborn as it may seem), the offense will be behind often, the kid is new to the offense, Powell's injury does not sound serious, and we just flat out don't know how he would perform at this level. The fact that he was undrafted and then let go by the Texans for Justin Forsett is something of significance. I understand grasping for straws if you're desperate this season, but I don't think he is even worth the roster spot unless you are in a very deep league without small benches and are banking on Shonn getting injured in the next 2-3 weeks. By that point Powell will be back by all indications and the point will be mute.

 
The fact that he was undrafted and then let go by the Texans for Justin Forsett is something of significance.
Part of the reason he went undrafted is that he played in the CAA - the same conference undrafted Victor Cruz was in. The Texans kept Forsett because he was a better returner.
 
I don't think he is worth the add. Greene is uninjured and will obviously get the bulk of the carries. We know relatively little about Grimes other than the fact that he was behing Greene, Powell, and McKnight on the depth chart - not the best indication of promise. He is also new to the team and I doubt he has a complete grasp on the play book and will likely not see third down duty with that likely placed on Shonn. Lastly, the Pats have been pretty good against the run and will no doubt be much better than the trash Indy threw out there last week. Nothing to see here.
Here's what Bloom wrote about him before the season.I'm not expecting him to be worth starting considering the Pats run defense but if he plays well he could carve out a bigger role.
If he was potentially so good, why wasn't he drafted? Why isn't he still with Houston? A 4.55/40 isn't exactly what you'd want to hang your hat on for a RB.
Draft pedigree means little - especially for RBs. Foster, Fred Jackson, Green-Ellis are among those guys that undrafted, and Bradshaw went in the 6th. There are others that I'm missing as well, I'm sure.Grimes may just be another scrub, but sometimes scouts just miss guys. As for Houston, they already have two quality RBs in Foster and Tate.
Draft pedigree does mean something. There are expections to every rule, and just because you can name three current players where that is not the case doesn't mean there is "little" value to draft position or the fact that someone was drafted at all. If anything, it would be more accurate to say draft pedigree is "overrated." That I would agree with.
Then overrated it is. I just named three, but there are plenty of other undrafted or late round picks that are starting now or in recent years.The thing about RBs is that NFL teams generally don't view the position that highly, unless you have unique talents like AP, Richardson, etc. RBs tend to fall and fall in the draft, and sometimes are taken late for depth or not at all.

Again, I don't expect Grimes to do anything outside of a Greene injury the next two weeks. Just not dismissing him because he wasn't drafted or couldn't latch onto a RB-crowded situation in Houston.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
For every Victor Cruz anomaly that slipped past scouts there are plenty of FCS players that are taken in the draft, and some highly. See: Vladimir Ducasse, Andre Roberts, John Skelton, Armanti Edwards, Author Moats, Austen Lane, and many others. Fact is, many of these don't pan out. It's just like those that are taken in the draft, there may be the Tom Bradys taken late that end up being world beaters, but the odds are higher than high round picks have a better chance to succeed. The extent to which this is true is blown of proportion - but it's the truth.

I understand your interest and where you're coming from, but I am just stating my opinion on the situation and I find it interesting you can't even admit the cards are stacked against him in more ways than one. Sure, point out that that Forsett can return punts, but if the coaching staff were incredibly high on him, as in thinking he was NFL starter material-high, they probably wouldn't have risked letting him a.) go through waivers & b.) be signed off the practice squad. Surely when Grimes was being courted by the Jets he made the Texans aware so that they may be able to match or exceed the offer. Why weren't they willing to go through that length to keep him which would likely have meant pennies and dimes in the grand scheme of things.

Opportunity is everything in the NFL, and if this wasn't the Jets and I hadn't seen Rex's relunctance to remove Greene from his starting position I would take the value his opportunity much more. Powell has already shown more than Greene has this season and was on his way to stealing more and more touches. I can't see Rex supplanting Greene with the undrafted rookie that has been on the team for weeks after the possibility of a decent game or two before Powell comes back. Not to mention it is unlikley he gets an amount of carries significant enough to prove anything. Just too far of a longshot for me, and I am all about storing backup RBs with opportunity at this point in the season. Best of luck.

 
If he was so good this and that. We trust our own evaluation skills enough to criticize teams for not playing players we think are talented as well as question whether or not a player is even talented enough based on how a team handles them?

 
I'm only in really deep dynasty leagues, so I grabbed him when the Jets picked him up. Now I'm sitting here with an evil grin tapping my fingers together going "Soon..."

 
For every Victor Cruz anomaly that slipped past scouts there are plenty of FCS players that are taken in the draft, and some highly. See: Vladimir Ducasse, Andre Roberts, John Skelton, Armanti Edwards, Author Moats, Austen Lane, and many others. Fact is, many of these don't pan out. It's just like those that are taken in the draft, there may be the Tom Bradys taken late that end up being world beaters, but the odds are higher than high round picks have a better chance to succeed. The extent to which this is true is blown of proportion - but it's the truth. I understand your interest and where you're coming from, but I am just stating my opinion on the situation and I find it interesting you can't even admit the cards are stacked against him in more ways than one. Sure, point out that that Forsett can return punts, but if the coaching staff were incredibly high on him, as in thinking he was NFL starter material-high, they probably wouldn't have risked letting him a.) go through waivers & b.) be signed off the practice squad. Surely when Grimes was being courted by the Jets he made the Texans aware so that they may be able to match or exceed the offer. Why weren't they willing to go through that length to keep him which would likely have meant pennies and dimes in the grand scheme of things.Opportunity is everything in the NFL, and if this wasn't the Jets and I hadn't seen Rex's relunctance to remove Greene from his starting position I would take the value his opportunity much more. Powell has already shown more than Greene has this season and was on his way to stealing more and more touches. I can't see Rex supplanting Greene with the undrafted rookie that has been on the team for weeks after the possibility of a decent game or two before Powell comes back. Not to mention it is unlikley he gets an amount of carries significant enough to prove anything. Just too far of a longshot for me, and I am all about storing backup RBs with opportunity at this point in the season. Best of luck.
Let's be honest - there's a 90% chance Grimes amounts to nothing. All I'm saying is that it's better to be ahead of the curve and pick him up now rather than try to get him after he does something. As for the Texans not trying to keep him, they probably did but they're also not going to break the bank for someone who is at best the 3rd most talented RB on their team. What I like about Grimes is primarily that I don't like Powell (3.9 YPC this year and longest run of 11 yards) or Greene - who despite what he did against a weak Colts defense is not a special RB. Undrafted or not, there's very little standing in front of Grimes and the worst case is you held onto him for a couple of weeks before dumping him.
 
I liked what I saw out of Grimes in the preseason enough that I picked him up as soon as the Jets signed him from the Texans practice squad. Unfortunately have had to cut him since for bye week fillers at other positions.

But I saw enough of him watching him play in the preseason I think he's a guy worth taking a flier on in a deep league. If your league only has enough bench to carry your own handcuffs and guys who definitely get touches, I don't know that I'd bother.

As CSTU just said, odds are he won't amount to anything. But I'd rather put my gamble down on a guy that drew my notice with his play on an NFL field as Grimes did. I really had hoped the Texans would be able to hang onto him.

 
Actually, I changed my mind and picked him back up with Powell and McKnight both doubtful. Another bad matchup against the Dolphins but he should see more one carry this week.

 
Grimes: "But this was a contest for children!"Lenny: "Yeah, and Homer beat their brains out." I dropped him for Tanner.
And I dropped him again for Dunbar. Both Tanner and Dunbar are good pickups, but I like Dunbar a little more since he's bound to take Felix's job at some point.
 
5 YPC today and caught every pass thrown to him. :thumbup:

1 carry for 5 yards and 1 catch for 4 yards. ;)

 
As expected, Texans claimed Grimes off waivers. With Tate likely out, Grimes will probably be active this week but Forsett should see all the backup work unless there's blowout garbage time.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As expected, Texans claimed Grimes off waivers. With Tate likely out, Grimes will probably be active this week but Forsett should see all the backup work unless there's blowout garbage time.
Do you think Grimes has a chance to take Forsett's job next year? With Tate being a FA in 2014 it would seem like a good idea.
 
As expected, Texans claimed Grimes off waivers. With Tate likely out, Grimes will probably be active this week but Forsett should see all the backup work unless there's blowout garbage time.
Do you think Grimes has a chance to take Forsett's job next year? With Tate being a FA in 2014 it would seem like a good idea.
Forsett is playing on a 1 year contract, which opens up the possibilities. Texans could decide they like Grimes better, or Forsett could try to sign with a different team where he'd slot in as the #2 RB.My view is still similar to what it was on the Jets. I liked what I saw from Grimes in preseason, not a world beater but someone who looked like he could be capable playing behind a decent line. He needs opportunity though and he will need luck to go his way (injuries ahead of him, garbage time, etc) to get that opportunity. So I'd only roster in extremely deep leagues. But I'd keep an eye on him.
 
There are probably worse dynasty flyers for the end of your bench. I'm debating dropping Dennis Johnson for him. Johnson was ahead of grimes and got hurt, but sometimes that's all it takes...

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top