1. Pulling Steven Jackson from the game when he’s rumbling for big yards. It happened again yesterday. Jackson had consecutive runs of 13 and 15 yards. He was on the way to gaining 34 yards on four first-quarter carries. But after his best series, Jackson was removed and replaced by rookie Daryl Richardson. And Richardson was ineffective again.
What is the point of this? The Rams were, at least in theory, playing to keep their playoff dreams alive. The season was down to three games. They didn’t have to “save” Jackson for anything. They had to win this football game. Why remove your best player? And make no mistake, SJ is still this team’s top player on offense. He wasn’t tired. He wasn’t worn out. He didn’t need a breather. It was the first half. He certainly didn’t want to come out of the game.
(Much later in the game, Jackson was bothered by a painful foot injury and it made sense to back him off. But that’s completely irrelevant to his usage in the first half.)
I support the concept of a two-halfback rotation, but only to a point. When you have a hot back who is cranking out the yards, then you ride him. You don’t go with some prearranged substitution plan.
Rams head coach Jeff Fisher was questioned by my colleague Bryan Burwell after the game.
Q: “How do you determine how to share carries between Jackson and Richardson?”
Fisher: “Well, it’s plays, the play calls. We’ll tag the back to some plays is what we do and then Steven will come out, catch his breath and Daryl will go in. It’s not necessarily a number of plays, it’s just what’s working, what’s not.”
Q: “Richardson played a lot during the two-minute offense, and does he normally do that?”
Fisher: “Yes, that’s designed and ‘Jack’ was in there at times. He’s featured in our hurry-up and our two-minute package. We didn’t expect to spend the whole quarter in it.”
(I have to pause from typing to scratch my head … thanks. I’m back now.)
Here’s the comment that baffles me: “It’s just what’s working, and what’s not.”
From where we sat, Jackson running the ball was “working.” He averaged 8.4 yards on his first four carries, and 6.6 yards on his first six rushes. He also caught a pass for 11 yards. Jackson was bowling over Vikings players, and the Rams moved the ball in for a 7-7 tie early in the second quarter.
The aggressive, muscular running neutralized the Minnesota defense and kept the Vikes from selling out on the pass rush to attack QB Sam Bradford.
When Jackson was replaced, the Vikings turned their front seven loose and went after Bradford. He was mauled in the second quarter. And have you watched Richardson try to pick up the blitz? I don’t want to be too hard on Richardson. He’s a rookie. He’s still developing. But he can’t block. So putting him in that role is ludicrous.
One more thing:
In his first nine games Richardson averaged 5.7 yards on 66 rushing attempts and had 10 carries of 10+ yards including one run of 53 yards, and another for 44 yards.
In his last five games Richardson has averaged 3.3 yards in 22 carries, with a long run of 11. That’s his only 10+ run over the five games. In the last three games Richardson has 15 yards on five carries and a long run of 3 yards.
It’s just what’s working and what’s not …
I agree, coach.
Using Jackson is working … using Richardson is not working.