Can't speak for the other guys, but Norwood was not even on my draft list. He may have been if we had more roster spots. Maybe someday down the road he takes over, but IMO he may have gone a bit too early.Sorry for the hold up fellas. Norwood may have been a bit of a reach, but I think he is more likely to replace Dunn in a year or two rather than Duckett.
Yeah, he went in the 12th in Hyperactive and I just missed out on him but that league had 26 rounds, not 20. I don't expect much of anything this year, but he could be huge in '07. Or he could be a complete bust.Can't speak for the other guys, but Norwood was not even on my draft list. He may have been if we had more roster spots. Maybe someday down the road he takes over, but IMO he may have gone a bit too early.Sorry for the hold up fellas. Norwood may have been a bit of a reach, but I think he is more likely to replace Dunn in a year or two rather than Duckett.
Actually we are already back to you Bri for your pick at 11-5 and you have been on the clock for almost 11 hours. I will try and PM wannabee or email or PM me a phone number.yeah, I'm in week 2 of 6 weeks. However this week is 10 days straight so it'll be week 2 +3 technically.
I predrafted 2 rounds. If I can pull off a trade I'd like to "axe" those predrafts.
I'd like to trade up now. I'd like 2 picks in round 11. Anyone want to trade? please contact me soon, with the serpentine corner, my next pick isn't so far away really
thanks
I was all set for either one of those 2 QBs with my next pick. Nice job.Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh I feel MUCH better now
Look out FMI am not handing you the division
That was the exact strategy I had originally gone with. When Bulger was still on the board at 6.12 I decided to make my move and change strategies. Just letting the draft come to me.FWIW-Warner and Plummer are 2 QB sleepers I have for 2006. Plummer's numbers should take a bump for 2 reasonsAhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh I feel MUCH better now
Look out FMI am not handing you the division
Well after translating it into English, I agree that both of them were good picks.While some teams disliked the Norwood pick, I thought it was about right. Drew falls into the same category of a boom / bust player. Most of the known backs are already labeled bust, so at least we still have a shot at the boom.
Did that make sense?
League starter ends up with Larry Johnson and Shaun Alexander.
![]()
![]()
![]()
was wonderring when that comment would come(from somebody)all's cool with me FM, for all we know Radballs will win because of that tradeLeague starter ends up with Larry Johnson and Shaun Alexander.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sonny we all know you can be a jerk from time to time but this a new low even for you. If you've got something useful to say then say it. But if you're looking to stir up trouble then I suggest you find another place. You're accusatory tone is unwelcomed and unwarrented. Don't hide behind your sarcasim as you usually do. Care to ealborate? What exactly are you suggesting with this comment?League starter ends up with Larry Johnson and Shaun Alexander.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Of course the forum jerk would be the one. What a surprise.was wonderring when that comment would come(from somebody)all's cool with me FM, for all we know Radballs will win because of that tradeLeague starter ends up with Larry Johnson and Shaun Alexander.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Relax FM - it's not like somebody in the league made the comment - the guy has no clue as to what had to happen to make that even a remote possibility
1) rad found the polesitter as the best trade partner
2) polesitter tried to trade down and couldn't find a partner
3) TWO different teams had to pass on SA at three AND four
The odds against are astronomical
AND aside from looking good on paper, that team hasn't won diddly yet
Sonny we all know you can be a jerk from time to time but this a new low even for you. If you've got something useful to say then say it. But if you're looking to stir up trouble then I suggest you find another place. You're accusatory tone is unwelcomed and unwarrented. Don't hide behind your sarcasim as you usually do. Care to ealborate? What exactly are you suggesting with this comment?League starter ends up with Larry Johnson and Shaun Alexander.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
That's my point. He has no clue but yet he chose to say it anyway. It tells you a lot about is character.Relax FM - it's not like somebody in the league made the comment - the guy has no clue as to what had to happen to make that even a remote possibility
1) rad found the polesitter as the best trade partner
2) polesitter tried to trade down and couldn't find a partner
3) TWO different teams had to pass on SA at three AND four
The odds against are astronomical
AND aside from looking good on paper, that team hasn't won diddly yet
personally speaking, i never take a kicker that early.sooooo did I beat anyone to the punch with Vinatieri? Too early?
you'd have been pissed if he were gone the next time you were pickin', so nosooooo did I beat anyone to the punch with Vinatieri? Too early?
I agree with both theories and see advantages to both. What I don't like is dinkerring between those two points(early and end)personally speaking, i never take a kicker that early.sooooo did I beat anyone to the punch with Vinatieri? Too early?
I'll elaborate more once the draft is over.
just a change of subjectyou'd have been pissed if he were gone the next time you were pickin', so nosooooo did I beat anyone to the punch with Vinatieri? Too early?
too much late niteSome commentary:
I did a WSL draft a few months back and well this is my first draft in a long while. I've been fooled sometimes and surprised with some developments quite a few times.
Good young WRs have lasted far longer than I expected. Enterring round 16 I'm looking to fill out my roster like most do as a draft winds down. Instead, I'd like to be cherry picking some WRs. My recent Reggie Williams pick was right off the cusp of Jimmy Smith retiring. I wouldn't have taken him but he's likely a starter with Matt Jones now. Ernest Wilford seems to be a good WR too but IMO doesn't seem to be the thoroughbred's that Williams and Jones are. In May and June drafts, there's usually some news and suddenly someone gets a later steal in the draft. IE Some player gets cut June 1st and his backup is the starter by default and a "steal" that wasn't their until that very cut took place. I'm hoping I caught Reggie at the right time. For Jax, they're gonna need some serious production from these young WRs as Jimmy retired with Hall of fame caliber stats.
Oddly enough Jimmy's retirement made me wonder when his buddy Keenan McCardell will retire. The older but productive WRs last so much longer than I expected like Rod Smith, Isaac Bruce, and Keenan. More WR value late that "threw me".
Last year was my first time trying a survivor league. In Survivor leagues, QBs seem to be a high priority with team's scooping them up at points that would be way too early in other drafts. I planned on 4 QBs and I thought I had this coverred with both Warner and Plummer still on board. Cap'n really put a dagger in those plans by drafting both back to back. It was a perfect plan as I'd get good QBs later than most and with Fitz, Boldin, Rod, and Javon they had some solid targets to throw to which makes their success seem like a foregone conclusion in 06. That turn by Cap'n really threw me and I had to regroup. At this point I'm thinking about just rolling with 2 QBs. That's very risky ut with the pickings being so slim it'd be pointless to take a QB for the sake of taking one.
WRs Owens and Holt should carry me most weeks. Of course I wish this was a couple years ago but those two should be pro bowl players in 06 too and still put up fierce stats. New coaches aside, I have little worry about them.
Gado seems to be a sound pick. Since this is a dynasty league, if he's not real useful in 06 he will be in future years as he seems to be Green Bay's runningback of the future. I'm a Najeh fan but the news seems to read like it's going to be a competition between Gado and Green. Pretty good situation for a back KC cut about a year ago.
KC has had the best backups for a few years. Blaylock and LJ would come in for Priest and light it up for about 90-100 yards and 2-3 TDs. Last year, LJ, of course took that to a new level of greatness. No KC backup RB has been taken in the first 15 rounds. That makes me tempted to take a stab at one but upon further thought who? Griffin was cut by them a year ago in favor of Dee Brown. Dee Brown was cut a few months later, then re-signed during the season and he didn't do squat for them in 05. Jonathan McKenzie Smith was a good NFLE runner in 2005 that was a constant on their practice squad and rarely ever active for games. Quite frankly, they all stink. I should be considerring one now but "my gut" tells me the Chiefs are going to hit the June waiver wire for a RB and none of these are truly LJ's backup. If I had to pick it'd be Priest Holmes but is the guy even gonna play this year? So this NFL roster spot that's always been a value(KC's backup RB) is bugging me as I can't pinpoint whom and grab that player.
Vinatieri seems to be a sound pick. Arguably the leagues best kicker going to one of the league's best offenses in Indy.
The Giants D I'm extrewmely high on right now and I was glad to get them. I just don't see how a team can block Osi and Strahan. Most team's don't have the two high quality Tackles necessary to do so. Lavar Arrington should enjoy a ton of freedom to pick his spots to rush the passer. Suppose he lines up outside of Strahan. If the TE has to stay in to block Strahan, who is staying in to help with Lavar? The RB? Well if so then the remaining defenders have such a favorable matchup to cover the WRs. The G-men revamped their secondary which should in turn buy those pass rushers a second which has gotta be scary for opposing Ds. If William Joseph plays half as well as he was expected to when he was drafted ....... Antonio Pierce is one of the best run stuffers today and well I'm just really high on this D for 2006. They have enough weapons that opposing QBs will likely try to be creative and overthink which is usually a precursor to fumbles and INTs.
Jamal Lewis ran for 2k yards a couple years ago. Last year he had as rough an offseason as anybody had and played like a RB not in "football shape" both mentally and physically. While I think he'll be fine in 2006, his numerous knee injuries could limit his long term value in this dynasty league.
Ronnie Brown should have probably gone a couple picks after me. If Ricky Williams stayed and played with the Fins he might have even gone a full round later. Ricky didn't and it is officially Ronnie's job with no competition. A very good young RB is like gold in dynasty leagues so I "had to" draft him.
Nice post Bri. Thanks for giving us your insight.On the Jax WR's , I found your comments interesting because I always felt Wilford would be the guy over Williams. Just based on what we've seen so far. I realize that could change but I'm wondering why you felt that way? You said you liely wouldn't of taken him and now you think he's the starter. I guess I'm wondering if Jax fells the same.Some commentary:
I did a WSL draft a few months back and well this is my first draft in a long while. I've been fooled sometimes and surprised with some developments quite a few times.
Good young WRs have lasted far longer than I expected. Enterring round 16 I'm looking to fill out my roster like most do as a draft winds down. Instead, I'd like to be cherry picking some WRs. My recent Reggie Williams pick was right off the cusp of Jimmy Smith retiring. I wouldn't have taken him but he's likely a starter with Matt Jones now. Ernest Wilford seems to be a good WR too but IMO doesn't seem to be the thoroughbred's that Williams and Jones are. In May and June drafts, there's usually some news and suddenly someone gets a later steal in the draft. IE Some player gets cut June 1st and his backup is the starter by default and a "steal" that wasn't their until that very cut took place. I'm hoping I caught Reggie at the right time. For Jax, they're gonna need some serious production from these young WRs as Jimmy retired with Hall of fame caliber stats.
Oddly enough Jimmy's retirement made me wonder when his buddy Keenan McCardell will retire. The older but productive WRs last so much longer than I expected like Rod Smith, Isaac Bruce, and Keenan. More WR value late that "threw me".
Last year was my first time trying a survivor league. In Survivor leagues, QBs seem to be a high priority with team's scooping them up at points that would be way too early in other drafts. I planned on 4 QBs and I thought I had this coverred with both Warner and Plummer still on board. Cap'n really put a dagger in those plans by drafting both back to back. It was a perfect plan as I'd get good QBs later than most and with Fitz, Boldin, Rod, and Javon they had some solid targets to throw to which makes their success seem like a foregone conclusion in 06. That turn by Cap'n really threw me and I had to regroup. At this point I'm thinking about just rolling with 2 QBs. That's very risky ut with the pickings being so slim it'd be pointless to take a QB for the sake of taking one.
WRs Owens and Holt should carry me most weeks. Of course I wish this was a couple years ago but those two should be pro bowl players in 06 too and still put up fierce stats. New coaches aside, I have little worry about them.
Gado seems to be a sound pick. Since this is a dynasty league, if he's not real useful in 06 he will be in future years as he seems to be Green Bay's runningback of the future. I'm a Najeh fan but the news seems to read like it's going to be a competition between Gado and Green. Pretty good situation for a back KC cut about a year ago.
KC has had the best backups for a few years. Blaylock and LJ would come in for Priest and light it up for about 90-100 yards and 2-3 TDs. Last year, LJ, of course took that to a new level of greatness. No KC backup RB has been taken in the first 15 rounds. That makes me tempted to take a stab at one but upon further thought who? Griffin was cut by them a year ago in favor of Dee Brown. Dee Brown was cut a few months later, then re-signed during the season and he didn't do squat for them in 05. Jonathan McKenzie Smith was a good NFLE runner in 2005 that was a constant on their practice squad and rarely ever active for games. Quite frankly, they all stink. I should be considerring one now but "my gut" tells me the Chiefs are going to hit the June waiver wire for a RB and none of these are truly LJ's backup. If I had to pick it'd be Priest Holmes but is the guy even gonna play this year? So this NFL roster spot that's always been a value(KC's backup RB) is bugging me as I can't pinpoint whom and grab that player.
Vinatieri seems to be a sound pick. Arguably the leagues best kicker going to one of the league's best offenses in Indy.
The Giants D I'm extrewmely high on right now and I was glad to get them. I just don't see how a team can block Osi and Strahan. Most team's don't have the two high quality Tackles necessary to do so. Lavar Arrington should enjoy a ton of freedom to pick his spots to rush the passer. Suppose he lines up outside of Strahan. If the TE has to stay in to block Strahan, who is staying in to help with Lavar? The RB? Well if so then the remaining defenders have such a favorable matchup to cover the WRs. The G-men revamped their secondary which should in turn buy those pass rushers a second which has gotta be scary for opposing Ds. If William Joseph plays half as well as he was expected to when he was drafted ....... Antonio Pierce is one of the best run stuffers today and well I'm just really high on this D for 2006. They have enough weapons that opposing QBs will likely try to be creative and overthink which is usually a precursor to fumbles and INTs.
Jamal Lewis ran for 2k yards a couple years ago. Last year he had as rough an offseason as anybody had and played like a RB not in "football shape" both mentally and physically. While I think he'll be fine in 2006, his numerous knee injuries could limit his long term value in this dynasty league.
Ronnie Brown should have probably gone a couple picks after me. If Ricky Williams stayed and played with the Fins he might have even gone a full round later. Ricky didn't and it is officially Ronnie's job with no competition. A very good young RB is like gold in dynasty leagues so I "had to" draft him.
You may be right. I remember when he came out I thought he was going to replace McCardell. I even drafted him in a survivor league thinking he'd be a great late round WR. But I was wrong. I don't know what happened with him. Just seems he can do better.Just a gut thing FM. Smith gone means it's a wide open race for playing time
DY - we can argue his value if you want (I don't - I though there was some, so I took him) but let's be clear on the facts:46 Betts, Ladell RB 5'10'' 222 08/27/1979 5 IowaI have a lot of reservations about Betts' chances for future success. He will be a 28-year-old unproven back that couldn't emerge in the two years prior to Portis coming to town (back when the Skins really had no one else at RB). Washington gave up on Davis and instead opted for Kenny Watson. The following year they went with Trung Canidate and Rock Cartwright. I'm not sure any team will give him a chance at anything more than a backup role at this point. Not a lot lost on your end if he doesn't pan out, so not great loss if he remains a reserve.
If we get into debates on 18th round picks, we'll be here all day, but I knew Betts would be 28 NEXT year not this (once he was a FA).As for his track record, he's had a couple of nice games in Weeks 16 and 17 over the years, so it's not like he's NEVER done anything.DY - we can argue his value if you want (I don't - I though there was some, so I took him) but let's be clear on the facts:46 Betts, Ladell RB 5'10'' 222 08/27/1979 5 IowaI have a lot of reservations about Betts' chances for future success. He will be a 28-year-old unproven back that couldn't emerge in the two years prior to Portis coming to town (back when the Skins really had no one else at RB). Washington gave up on Davis and instead opted for Kenny Watson. The following year they went with Trung Canidate and Rock Cartwright. I'm not sure any team will give him a chance at anything more than a backup role at this point. Not a lot lost on your end if he doesn't pan out, so not great loss if he remains a reserve.
That makes him 27 at the start of this year - yes he will be 28 next season, but that gives him this year to add to what he has already done, and he has never been given a chance to be the guy. Prior to this winter, you might have said the same of Chester Taylor.
FM - please share the information about the Jets trade!
You said in your draft comment on McCareins that it would be good to see what he could do with a good QB. Unless there was a trade today, they don't have any good quarterbacks :X
Nice. Maybe Pennington is a decent QB but we just don't know it yet. Maybe if he play 16 games we'll see how good he is. ABTW-it must suck to be a JETS fan.FM - please share the information about the Jets trade!
You said in your draft comment on McCareins that it would be good to see what he could do with a good QB. Unless there was a trade today, they don't have any good quarterbacks :X
Tells me I got value with that pick. The way I see it, we don't know the QB situation at this time. But it can't be any worse then last year. As far as I'm concerned, they can only get better and that means Justin should see better days as well.What does it tell you when McCareins was drafted but Pennington and Ramsey have not been through 19 rounds.
absolutely is fair and IMO very good drafting on your part. It threw meBri not copying your entire essay, but turnabout is fair play -