stevegamer
Footballguy
In.
I like this change. While we've had some awesome judges, there were far more "I'll get to it... I'll get to it... I have to bail".I will do all of the judging, and not participate in the draft itself. I'll set the guidelines later but let me say that my own opinions on greatness (such as the recent rankings in my thread) will play very little part- I will be looking for good argument on behalf of the drafters.We currently have 9 people in. That's enough for a draft, but I would like at least 12. 15-20 would be perfect. We'll start sometime next week so hopefully we can get some more people before we do.Another suggestion is to agree as much as possible on a judging scheme in advance. I know that for many, just the draft and reading the selections is the real fun, but some of us (i.e., me) enjoy the judging as well. That seemed to fall apart a bit (no one's fault) in recent timdrafts.
YesBefore I pick, let me confirm that these are living people, right Tim?
YesBefore I pick, let me confirm that these are living people, right Tim?
They have to be alive and the more recently relevant the better. But it could be somebody retired. In sports they need to be current but their best days could be behind them.The sports categories are all "current" players, correct?
What about the other categories? Talk show host, politicians, business mogul, etc. Do they have to be current?
I can't be bribed with picks designed to curry my favor. Cash on the other hand, is different. Donations can be made to the timschochet foundation...Tim - please read and respond - put in spoilers tags for spotlighting
So, since you are judging if I just go Dylan, Kobe, Hillary, Big Ben with my first 4 picks, I win, right?
Can frosty take my place?I'll play. Put me on a 15 minute clock.
anyone I don't ask "Who?" automatically should be last.The "underrated or forgotten" category![]()
Good luck judging that.
Yesall these categories take someone's entire lifetime in affect yes?
If you insist. We keep losing drafters dammit.Can frosty take my place?I'll play. Put me on a 15 minute clock.
More recently relevant - who are you saying we should take - an inferior actress who is in the prime of her career or an older actress who was superior but hasn't done much recently? In trying to understand how you plan to judge.They have to be alive and the more recently relevant the better. But it could be somebody retired. In sports they need to be current but their best days could be behind them.The sports categories are all "current" players, correct?
What about the other categories? Talk show host, politicians, business mogul, etc. Do they have to be current?
Exactly.anyone I don't ask "Who?" automatically should be last.The "underrated or forgotten" category![]()
Good luck judging that.
Only works if tim has not forgotten them tooThe "underrated or forgotten" category![]()
Good luck judging that.
Not for nothing - I didn't have time to explain earlier today - but I mostly dropped out because in previous timdrafts, half or more of my fun was in the judging; it gave me a chance to do some (non-legal) writing, which is fun for me. So when you indicated you would judge all categories, that removed a lot of the impetus for me to join. Not a knock against you or anything; I just knew I wouldn't enjoy it as much and didn't want to dampen anyone else's fun.If you insist. We keep losing drafters dammit.Can frosty take my place?I'll play. Put me on a 15 minute clock.
You can always do your own "non-official" judging. We've done that before.Not for nothing - I didn't have time to explain earlier today - but I mostly dropped out because in previous timdrafts, half or more of my fun was in the judging; it gave me a chance to do some (non-legal) writing, which is fun for me. So when you indicated you would judge all categories, that removed a lot of the impetus for me to join. Not a knock against you or anything; I just knew I wouldn't enjoy it as much and didn't want to dampen anyone else's fun.If you insist. We keep losing drafters dammit.Can frosty take my place?I'll play. Put me on a 15 minute clock.
I only offered to judge because of late people who promised to do it flaked out. You are absolutely welcome to judge any categories you'd like to, and that goes for anybody else whom I trust.Not for nothing - I didn't have time to explain earlier today - but I mostly dropped out because in previous timdrafts, half or more of my fun was in the judging; it gave me a chance to do some (non-legal) writing, which is fun for me. So when you indicated you would judge all categories, that removed a lot of the impetus for me to join. Not a knock against you or anything; I just knew I wouldn't enjoy it as much and didn't want to dampen anyone else's fun.If you insist. We keep losing drafters dammit.Can frosty take my place?I'll play. Put me on a 15 minute clock.
Sure.Category 23 ... that's strictly talk shows, or is it any television host? Sports, competition programs, game shows, special events, etc. ... is that fair game?
I will look at the totality of their career. Recent relevancy is important, all things being equal, but totality of career is MORE important- so long as they are alive.More recently relevant - who are you saying we should take - an inferior actress who is in the prime of her career or an older actress who was superior but hasn't done much recently? In trying to understand how you plan to judge.They have to be alive and the more recently relevant the better. But it could be somebody retired. In sports they need to be current but their best days could be behind them.The sports categories are all "current" players, correct?
What about the other categories? Talk show host, politicians, business mogul, etc. Do they have to be current?
Not too late for you or anyone else. You're #11.I'll play if it's not too late. I promise short writeups, and I won't volunteer to judge anything. And I may disappear for a day or two. But I will do my best to throw a few curve balls with my selections. However, no promises my sentences won't begin with conjunctions.
I go up to 11!Not too late for you or anyone else. You're #11.I'll play if it's not too late. I promise short writeups, and I won't volunteer to judge anything. And I may disappear for a day or two. But I will do my best to throw a few curve balls with my selections. However, no promises my sentences won't begin with conjunctions.
Within the category. The wildcard category allows you to choose an "all-time" great if you'd like.By greatest, do you just mean within their respective category or some kind of larger sense?
Now that's a category I'd like to read.timschochet said:I only offered to judge because of late people who promised to do it flaked out. You are absolutely welcome to judge any categories you'd like to, and that goes for anybody else whom I trust.Aerial Assault said:Not for nothing - I didn't have time to explain earlier today - but I mostly dropped out because in previous timdrafts, half or more of my fun was in the judging; it gave me a chance to do some (non-legal) writing, which is fun for me. So when you indicated you would judge all categories, that removed a lot of the impetus for me to join. Not a knock against you or anything; I just knew I wouldn't enjoy it as much and didn't want to dampen anyone else's fun.timschochet said:If you insist. We keep losing drafters dammit.higgins said:Can frosty take my place?Frostillicus said:I'll play. Put me on a 15 minute clock.
it's all about the curve balls.I'll play if it's not too late. I promise short writeups, and I won't volunteer to judge anything. And I may disappear for a day or two. But I will do my best to throw a few curve balls with my selections. However, no promises my sentences won't begin with conjunctions.
Ok, just wanted to make sure being a degenerate criminal wouldn't take away from sports or artistic accomplishments.Within the category. The wildcard category allows you to choose an "all-time" great if you'd like.By greatest, do you just mean within their respective category or some kind of larger sense?