He’s a complete joke.Holy hell that video is crazy - dude is a straight up nut job. It’s comical how horrible he is. He’s even worse than what fiction writers could come up with.
It is hilarious when you stop to think about it. Pelosi got Trump to make his staff publicly vouch for his mental capacity.She really does level a beat down everytime they get together.
And he cant help himself but to respond and look even worse as he validates her words.
timschochet said:
Wow, Trump released a video of Nancy Pelosi stammering. Stable genius at work.
She's made lots of comments. Which ones specifically are you asking about?Whether you agree or disagree with Pelosi, if she was a PSF poster and Trump was a PSF poster, how many days would she get in timeout for her comments?
Aka, propaganda.Wow, Trump released a video of Nancy Pelosi stammering. Stable genius at work.
I don't think there's any downside to an elected official with real power and influence on a national scale, one that Donald can't eliminate just because he wants to, calmly casting shade and inciting an unfit President into nakedly revealing how easy it is to put him on tilt. Losing his mind publicly with ever increasing frequency just cements in voters' mind that the guy is in way over his head.
Pelosi and House Dems need to keep rolling out legislation, though, and making a show of it. "We can walk and chew gum. The man in the White House apparently can't."
They really just need to keep publicizing what they have rolled out and how McConnell has held it all up.I don't think there's any downside to an elected official with real power and influence on a national scale, one that Donald can't eliminate just because he wants to, calmly casting shade and inciting an unfit President into nakedly revealing how easy it is to put him on tilt. Losing his mind publicly with ever increasing frequency just cements in voters' mind that the guy is in way over his head.
Pelosi and House Dems need to keep rolling out legislation, though, and making a show of it. "We can walk and chew gum. The man in the White House apparently can't."
She's made lots of comments. Which ones specifically are you asking about?
Why would she be banned or even given a TO for something like that? It doesn't violate the TOS
The most recent comments about an intervention that was all the buzz yesterday.
Depends how many back and forth posts with someone and if it was messing up a topic. Then a “stop it” followed by a day and a half sounds about what happens.Why would she be banned or even given a TO for something like that? It doesn't violate the TOS
Not many because Trump would have been kicked off the site a long time ago. Though knowing his history of assuming fake identities, he probably would be on alias 30 by now.Whether you agree or disagree with Pelosi, if she was a PSF poster and Trump was a PSF poster, how many days would she get in timeout for her comments?
:whoosh:Why would she be banned or even given a TO for something like that? It doesn't violate the TOS
sorry....I thought you were talking about the comments where she suggested an intervention might do some good....now we are talking about mental stability? Sorry...not following.:whoosh:
As a test, please go ahead and question the mental stability of another poster.
Nothing there is talking about "mental stability"“This time, another temper tantrum, again. I pray for the president of the United States,” Pelosi said. “I wish that his family or his administration or his staff would have an intervention for the good of the country.”
What do you think she is saying?sorry....I thought you were talking about the comments where she suggested an intervention might do some good....now we are talking about mental stability? Sorry...not following.
This is what she said:
Nothing there is talking about "mental stability"
How many times are people going to be repeat this lie?Roll out legislation
That someone needs to talk some sense into him. This kind of behavior is exactly what you get when you surround yourself with yes men/women. You become codependents and anything outside those relationships is attacked. A way to fix that is an intervention. The problem, of course, is she's asking his codependents to do the intervention which isn't particularly bright on her part.What do you think she is saying?
Sure. First you have to post that you are an extremely mentally stable person. Also, call yourself a genius.:whoosh:
As a test, please go ahead and question the mental stability of another poster.
As many times as possible. Along with many others. Because it’s easier than having honest discussion about Trump and the GOP (McConnell).How many times are people going to be repeat this lie?
The House has passed, since January, tons of legislation: on drug pricing. On Obamacare. On energy. On background checks. Mitch McConnell refuses to take up ANY of it.
Also he would probably have to come up with a fun nickname for you first.Sure. First you have to post that you are an extremely mentally stable person. Also, call yourself a genius.
I will then reply to your post and make fun of you. I guarantee you I will not be suspended for doing so.
So it’s kind of like Trump won in 2016 due to him cutting deals with Russians?Its proving that no matter how bs the propaganda, repeating it over and over works and others will repeat it. Doesn’t matter how untrue.
No. It’s like people saying the Mueller report said no collusion and no obstruction.So it’s kind of like Trump won in 2016 due to him cutting deals with Russians?
Why are you suddenly changing the subject now?So it’s kind of like Trump won in 2016 due to him cutting deals with Russians?
because no one was biting with the other bait.Why are you suddenly changing the subject now?
Sho tossed a softball. I had to smash it out of the park.Why are you suddenly changing the subject now?
Yeah, you got all of that one.Sho tossed a softball. I had to smash it out of the park.
I would say the chances are the boys would smash the report button on me for “trolling,” and I would get benched.Sure. First you have to post that you are an extremely mentally stable person. Also, call yourself a genius.
I will then reply to your post and make fun of you. I guarantee you I will not be suspended for doing so.
But what do we hear about? Russia, impeaching Trump, interventions etc. That isn't a good look for the Dems.How many times are people going to be repeat this lie?
The House has passed, since January, tons of legislation: on drug pricing. On Obamacare. On energy. On background checks. Mitch McConnell refuses to take up ANY of it.
More like thisYeah, you got all of that one.
Also you didn’t fully change subject. It was about the reason lies keep getting repeated.
Well now you’re changing your tune.But what do we hear about? Russia, impeaching Trump, interventions etc. That isn't a good look for the Dems.
Maybe because that isn't the message the Dems are sending right now. The message is Trump bad, Russia, and impeachment....oh and the Green New DealWell now you’re changing your tune.
Of course that’s what we hear about. Why would the news report about legislation that’s doomed to go nowhere in the Senate?
Well Trump IS bad.Maybe because that isn't the message the Dems are sending right now. The message is Trump bad, Russia, and impeachment....oh and the Green New Deal
I was there.
I never said they haven't offered legislation. Read it again. My point was I feel the message they are currently getting out isn't helping them and I think will hurt them in the future.Well Trump IS bad.
But again, it’s one thing to criticize messaging, and quite another for you to assert that the Democrats have offered no legislation. The latter is a lie.
meh....your complaint is with the echo chamber you insist on using. There's plenty of coverage of the things passed by the house and being ignored by the senate. Just go out to BBC and/or Reuters. You hear about these things in our national media because that's what drives the most clicks. The sooner you learn this and go elsewhere, the better.But what do we hear about? Russia, impeaching Trump, interventions etc. That isn't a good look for the Dems.
Sorry. Was trying to add some levity after I was told my Sho softball comment was a whiff.I was there.
But what does this have to do with the current discussion?
meh...Based on the echo chamber here the message is what I have been talking about and the usual suspects will continue to push that narrative.meh....your complaint is with the echo chamber you insist on using. There's plenty of coverage of the things passed by the house and being ignored by the senate. Just go out to BBC and/or Reuters. You hear about these things in our national media because that's what drives the most clicks. The sooner you learn this and go elsewhere, the better.
ETA: Let's be honest, the usual suspects will also ignore "we're doing our part but the GOP isn't doing theirs".
This is what you wrote. It’s a lie. Or else (more likely) you were lied to and bought it and repeated it here. Why can’t you just admit it?Roll out legislation, stop with the tax returns and Russia nonsense, and then maybe they can address getting things done to help the country instead of focusing on 2020.
That doesn't say they haven't rolled anything out. Shall I edit it to say continue to roll out legislation?This is what you wrote. It’s a lie. Or else (more likely) you were lied to and bought it and repeated it here. Why can’t you just admit it?
Do what you want. Except that wouldn’t be an edit, it would be a significant change, and it would pretty much destroy your entire point. Because once you concede that they are able to investigate Trump AND roll out legislation at the same time, your complaint becomes meaningless.That doesn't say they haven't rolled anything out. Shall I edit it to say continue to roll out legislation?
Lighten up Tim. Wow. My intent was never to say or imply they haven't rolled out legislation. And my point wasn't they can't investigate and roll out legislation. My point is in my opinion and many others the other message I referred to seems to be hurting them as well as potentially harming them in 2020.Do what you want. Except that wouldn’t be an edit, it would be a significant change, and it would pretty much destroy your entire point. Because once you concede that they are able to investigate Trump AND roll out legislation at the same time, your complaint becomes meaningless.
Yes, that indeed is a mystery...No no..next they will call you an alias...I don't know why that happens so much here, nor why it seems to be so horrible..But there are lot of people wh must have liked that TV show or something
I believe it's been acceptable for some time as long as:Yes, that indeed is a mystery...
The point is moot however because @Maurile Tremblay recently said in another thread (unless I misunderstood him) that alias accounts are now acceptable and you can post under two or more handles simultaneously, provided one of them is not banned or suspended. Bozeman (or whatever he goes by) was posting under two accounts and that was deemed OK since neither was under suspension.
If actually I did misunderstand Maurile, I wish he or another mod would clarify this as IMHO it seems contrary to prior forum policy.
Sarah Sanders said yesterday they haven’t rolled out any legislation. Donald Trump said the same thing. So did Sean Hannity. So did Laura Ingraham. So did Rush. It’s a talking point that had been repeated endlessly in the last 24 hours, so when you write the same thing here and then later claim it was “never your intent”, forgive me if I doubt your sincerity.Lighten up Tim. Wow. My intent was never to say or imply they haven't rolled out legislation. And my point wasn't they can't investigate and roll out legislation. My point is in my opinion and many others the other message I referred to seems to be hurting them as well as potentially harming them in 2020.
Give me a break Tim. Get off your high horse judgemental self. What I wrote was sincere. You are one angry dude today. Seems to me you are using the talking point that Trump will only use money for the immigration problem to build a wall.Sarah Sanders said yesterday they haven’t rolled out any legislation. Donald Trump said the same thing. So did Sean Hannity. So did Laura Ingraham. So did Rush. It’s a talking point that had been repeated endlessly in the last 24 hours, so when you write the same thing here and then later claim it was “never your intent”, forgive me if I doubt your sincerity.