HarryManback
Hot Pead
Roger Clemens reincarnation.
Wells pitches Wednesday as the #5.Is Papelbon closing a temp assignment? That is, until a 5th starter is needed which would coincide with Foulke rounding into form.
The obvious answer here is Stern. The guy's bat has been on fire this spring and by all accounts he's a solid option (though not on Coco's level) defensively in center. Factor in that he's the fastest guy on the team and I'm not too concerned about a big dropoff there. Certainly they're not equivalent but Stern should look good out there. I personally don't think Wily Mo has made enough headway with his patience at the plate to be considered an everyday option at this point... but we'll see.looks like coco crisp has a broken bone in his hand. Willy Mo or Stern to CF. ouch
Really? I had heard somewhere that after getting lit up in AAA that he was looking to hold back a bit longer to get his #### together? I know he gets paid per start with a bonus after a certain number of starts... but I think he's even aware that he's just not ready yet.Wells pitches Wednesday as the #5.Is Papelbon closing a temp assignment? That is, until a 5th starter is needed which would coincide with Foulke rounding into form.
Oh geez. How could I forget. So I guess its all or nothing to pick up Papelbon as a free agent now??Wells pitches Wednesday as the #5.Is Papelbon closing a temp assignment? That is, until a 5th starter is needed which would coincide with Foulke rounding into form.
Willy Mo is a young Red Sox that frightens me. He good.]The obvious answer here is Stern. The guy's bat has been on fire this spring and by all accounts he's a solid option (though not on Coco's level) defensively in center. Factor in that he's the fastest guy on the team and I'm not too concerned about a big dropoff there. Certainly they're not equivalent but Stern should look good out there. I personally don't think Wily Mo has made enough headway with his patience at the plate to be considered an everyday option at this point... but we'll see.looks like coco crisp has a broken bone in his hand. Willy Mo or Stern to CF. ouch
Put Wily Mo between Manny and Trots and that's one hell of a beer-league softball team OF!! Is OF defense really THAT important?looks like coco crisp has a broken bone in his hand. Willy Mo or Stern to CF. ouch
The Sox had planned to send Stern down as soon as he was elligible (without getting plucked off waivers) so he could be an everyday player and get some at-bats. I suppose that plan may have changed with Coco's injury (although I hadn't heard that he broke a bone in his hand; I heard he just jammed his fingers).]The obvious answer here is Stern. The guy's bat has been on fire this spring and by all accounts he's a solid option (though not on Coco's level) defensively in center. Factor in that he's the fastest guy on the team and I'm not too concerned about a big dropoff there. Certainly they're not equivalent but Stern should look good out there. I personally don't think Wily Mo has made enough headway with his patience at the plate to be considered an everyday option at this point... but we'll see.looks like coco crisp has a broken bone in his hand. Willy Mo or Stern to CF. ouch
I hope you're right; I'm going to the game, and I'd rather see just about anyone else pitch than Wells.]Really? I had heard somewhere that after getting lit up in AAA that he was looking to hold back a bit longer to get his #### together? I know he gets paid per start with a bonus after a certain number of starts... but I think he's even aware that he's just not ready yet.Wells pitches Wednesday as the #5.Is Papelbon closing a temp assignment? That is, until a 5th starter is needed which would coincide with Foulke rounding into form.
It definitely wouldn't be the best OF in the league defensively... though Manny has shown to be much improved this year in Left. He apparently worked on his leatherwork in the offseason. It's always an adventure with him out there but he did lead all MLB outffielders in throw-outs last year. Some of this has to do with people (mistakenly) trying to run on him because of his defensive rep. He's no Jim Edmonds, but I'll take him out there.Put Wily Mo between Manny and Trots and that's one hell of a beer-league softball team OF!! Is OF defense really THAT important?looks like coco crisp has a broken bone in his hand. Willy Mo or Stern to CF. ouch
he's good but has very polarized splits at the plate and I'm not sure he's good enough with the glove to anchor our OF in Center. He needs some seasoning to improve his batting eye and platooning is IMHO the best way to work him in. He's got the potential to be a monster though... no doubt.Willy Mo is a young Red Sox that frightens me. He good.,Apr 10 2006, 08:32 AM]
The obvious answer here is Stern. The guy's bat has been on fire this spring and by all accounts he's a solid option (though not on Coco's level) defensively in center. Factor in that he's the fastest guy on the team and I'm not too concerned about a big dropoff there. Certainly they're not equivalent but Stern should look good out there. I personally don't think Wily Mo has made enough headway with his patience at the plate to be considered an everyday option at this point... but we'll see.looks like coco crisp has a broken bone in his hand. Willy Mo or Stern to CF. ouch
I heard he could be out 6-8 weeks on the radio this morning.Is Crisp's broken finger confirmed? Rototimes is saying "unsure" at this point. gdb missing the lineup submission for this week
All but confirmedWaiting on 2nd opinion but I'd definitley not play him this week.Is Crisp's broken finger confirmed? Rototimes is saying "unsure" at this point. gdb missing the lineup submission for this week
thanks JTC. Voicemail to change lineup left. He's a strong source of stolen bases for me too.I heard he could be out 6-8 weeks on the radio this morning.Is Crisp's broken finger confirmed? Rototimes is saying "unsure" at this point. gdb missing the lineup submission for this week
BOSTON -- The sting Coco Crisp felt from going on the disabled list earlier this week subsided a little on Wednesday when the center fielder agreed with the Red Sox on a three-year extension that includes a club option for the 2010 season.
The Red Sox had contractual control over Crisp for the next three years anyway, but now arbitration and/or yearly negotiations will no longer be necessary.
Once the deal expires -- unless the Red Sox exercise the option for 2010 -- Crisp will be eligible for free agency.
Crisp suffered a non-displaced fracture at the base of his left index finger when he was thrown out trying to steal third base last Saturday in Baltimore.
He got off to a good start before the injury, hitting .333 with a double, a triple and six runs scored in his first five games with the Red Sox.
The 26-year-old Crisp is a career .288 hitter with 35 homers and 176 RBIs in 420 Major League games.
It has been a good week for the Red Sox on the contract front, as superstar slugger David Ortiz signed a four-year extension on Monday.
The Red Sox are off to a 6-1 start entering Wednesday night's game against the Blue Jays.
Why?I'm surprised the Sox would lock up Crisp through 2010.
He's average?Why?I'm surprised the Sox would lock up Crisp through 2010.
They're reluctant to extend long term deals to a whole bunch of guys, and after he's played a whopping 5 or so games for the Sox, they sign up a guy with his stats for 3 more years with an option for a 4th?Crisp might end up being really, really good, but similar batters at 25 are:Why?I'm surprised the Sox would lock up Crisp through 2010.
He was arbitration elligible through 2009 anyway, so all this does is avoid all that hassle. His annual salaries are $3.5M, $4.75M, and $5.75M, with a team option at $8M. That doesn't seem like much of a risk to me for a team with the second highest payroll in baseball.They're reluctant to extend long term deals to a whole bunch of guys, and after he's played a whopping 5 or so games for the Sox, they sign up a guy with his stats for 3 more years with an option for a 4th?Crisp might end up being really, really good, but similar batters at 25 are:Why?I'm surprised the Sox would lock up Crisp through 2010.
Dom DiMaggio
Steve Garvey
Lou Brock
Roy Weatherly
Amos Otis
Garret Anderson
Tito Francona
Don Mueller
Lenny Dykstra
Ron Northey
and I think it's obvious that he's no Lou Brock. There's some great players on that list, but it is a bit hit or miss.
They're locking him in for his peak power years is all I can think of, but it's a bigger risk than I'm used to seeing the Sox make.
Very few people are confident in Martinez's ability to remain healthy and effective over the length of his Mets contract. That's not the case with Crisp.Johnny Damon simply wanted too much money. That's not the case with Crisp.Sure but this is the team with the second highest salary in baseball that let Pedro Martinez, Johnny Damon, Bill Mueller, and Orlando Cabrera all go pretty easily.
What did you expect them to do? Just go to arbitration for the next three years in a row? No, he's not Chavez. Few are. That doesn't mean you don't sign anyone who's not a superstar.The big difference is age, and while I understand the value of youth, there is also the uncertainty of Crisp's career. He's not Eric Chavez.
This is analagous to when they locked up Nomar years ago before he reached his prime. At the time people thought the Sox were crazy, but he ended up being underpaid for years. Different management, but the closest case I can think of.That he was eligible for arbitration for the next three years answers my question, and I believe is why he got a contract extension where so many others haven't.
You really can't compare Crisp's contract to any of those guys.It was going to cost the Sox 48 million to lock up Damon and probably 60 million to lock up Pedro.Sure but this is the team with the second highest salary in baseball that let Pedro Martinez, Johnny Damon, Bill Mueller, and Orlando Cabrera all go pretty easily.
The big difference is age, and while I understand the value of youth, there is also the uncertainty of Crisp's career. He's not Eric Chavez.
Maybe he'll #### and stop acting like he's doing the Sox a favor by being here....prolly not.Wells looked good tonight.
What word is "####"?Good thing Arroyo was traded for a platoon OF.Maybe he'll #### and stop acting like he's doing the Sox a favor by being here....prolly not.Wells looked good tonight.
Right around the time he faces the Yankees]Schilling off to first 3-0 start since 2002.
Papelbon shuts door for 5th straight save.
Sox win a close one 2-1 on the back of some great pitching.
ETA: At what point does Schilling's season move from "lucky/hot start" to "The guy is officially back"?
I knew he would have a great season. Nice job]Schilling off to first 3-0 start since 2002.
Papelbon shuts door for 5th straight save.
Sox win a close one 2-1 on the back of some great pitching.
ETA: At what point does Schilling's season move from "lucky/hot start" to "The guy is officially back"?
S T E U?What word is "####"?Good thing Arroyo was traded for a platoon OF.Maybe he'll #### and stop acting like he's doing the Sox a favor by being here....prolly not.Wells looked good tonight.
It's already happened, unfortunately. I have to admit, I didn't think Schilling would turn in the year he has. But once I saw him opening day against Texas, I was sold that he was back. His start wasn't like someone along the lines of a Miguel Batista or a Kenny Rogers having a hot start - meaning Schil's was legit.He and Beckett should combine for around 35-40 wins, and Wakefield will be Wakefield.]Schilling off to first 3-0 start since 2002.
Papelbon shuts door for 5th straight save.
Sox win a close one 2-1 on the back of some great pitching.
ETA: At what point does Schilling's season move from "lucky/hot start" to "The guy is officially back"?
Wells and Clement sure are trying so far aren't they The biggest problem with Wells is he's paid per start with nice incentives that kick in after a certain number of starts (I want to say 20 but I'm not sure)... so unfortunately he's not going to be happy about stepping down to AAA to figure out WTF is wrong with him.It's already happened, unfortunately. I have to admit, I didn't think Schilling would turn in the year he has. But once I saw him opening day against Texas, I was sold that he was back. His start wasn't like someone along the lines of a Miguel Batista or a Kenny Rogers having a hot start - meaning Schil's was legit.He and Beckett should combine for around 35-40 wins, and Wakefield will be Wakefield.,Apr 15 2006, 02:03 AM]Schilling off to first 3-0 start since 2002.
Papelbon shuts door for 5th straight save.
Sox win a close one 2-1 on the back of some great pitching.
ETA: At what point does Schilling's season move from "lucky/hot start" to "The guy is officially back"?
Here's hoping Wells and Clement bring the team ERA over 5.00 by themselves!
Actually what are the chances Papelbon is moved into the rotation and Hansen closes at some point? I know you don't mess with a good thing, but if Clement/Wells are pretty much losses every fifth day, how long can/will that go on you think?
Manny's fine. IIRC he has a similar start last year. Looking at him in the box he's just needing to tweak his mechanics just a bit. If you watch him you can see him performing little drills to adjust his swing plane, etc. Sometime in the next couple of weeks he'll explode and have a .600/5HR/12RBI week and he'll be back to being "manny"Any specific reason for Manny's slow start or is it just a ... slow start?
Cmon dude. Wells has had exactly one start so far. Its really too early to be writing him off. He got off to a bad start last year too, in fact his first two were terrible. The guy knows how to pitch, I bet he comes around.The one person that is doing the Red Sox nothing is David Wells. Why are they keeping him.