Am I the only one that thinks reaching a little bit for Portis is a good idea, because the WR that you get in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th all seem very similar?I had a draft last weekend with a bunch of dudes from the huddle - 1RB, 2WR, 1Flex and here's how my draft started:1.  Parker2.  Edge3.  Portis4.  Walker5.  DriverI took Portis in 3 as a bench player over WR's I could start.  I'm perfectly ok, however, starting Walker/Driver, though admittedly they were at the ###-end of a tier and if they hadn't fallen, I'd have had a much different looking team.  I like Housh (best available WR @ my 3rd round pick) better than Walker/Driver, but Walker/Driver are perfectly good starters, and I've got a potential top 5 RB in the 3rd round.  I love options.  Also, I can lose any of my RB's and still be absolutely fine.  Basically, I have Portis/Driver instead of Housh/Ahman, and I'll take that all day and twice on Sunday when the RB listed is a backup.  I don't need slow and steady from that spot.Not that any of you give a crap, but here's how it went after that.6.  Shockey7.  Calvin8.  Hasselbeck9.  Foster10.  Vikings11.  Favre12.  Crayton13.  Battle14.  Tennessee (I'd been drinking tequilia, and I think that kicked in here)15.  Graham 16.  GotzkowskiQB - Hasselbeck, FavreRB - Parker, Edge, Portis, FosterWR - Walker, Driver, Calvin, Crayton, BattleTE - Shockey, GrahamD - Minnesota, TenneseeK - Gotzkowski