Am I the only one that thinks reaching a little bit for Portis is a good idea, because the WR that you get in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th all seem very similar?I had a draft last weekend with a bunch of dudes from the huddle - 1RB, 2WR, 1Flex and here's how my draft started:1. Parker2. Edge3. Portis4. Walker5. DriverI took Portis in 3 as a bench player over WR's I could start. I'm perfectly ok, however, starting Walker/Driver, though admittedly they were at the ###-end of a tier and if they hadn't fallen, I'd have had a much different looking team. I like Housh (best available WR @ my 3rd round pick) better than Walker/Driver, but Walker/Driver are perfectly good starters, and I've got a potential top 5 RB in the 3rd round. I love options. Also, I can lose any of my RB's and still be absolutely fine. Basically, I have Portis/Driver instead of Housh/Ahman, and I'll take that all day and twice on Sunday when the RB listed is a backup. I don't need slow and steady from that spot.Not that any of you give a crap, but here's how it went after that.6. Shockey7. Calvin8. Hasselbeck9. Foster10. Vikings11. Favre12. Crayton13. Battle14. Tennessee (I'd been drinking tequilia, and I think that kicked in here)15. Graham 16. GotzkowskiQB - Hasselbeck, FavreRB - Parker, Edge, Portis, FosterWR - Walker, Driver, Calvin, Crayton, BattleTE - Shockey, GrahamD - Minnesota, TenneseeK - Gotzkowski