The super "OFFICIAL" Offdee Scale with Photos (1 Viewer)

[Thread Killer]

Ashley Ann Vickers is just about a 10. He legs could be longer but still flawless.

 

[Uwe Blab]

Allright to throw a little diversity into this and mix it up, here's one definitely for the hot bin:

10

Here's a few somewhere for the average bin:

Cute-ish, but has horrendous chompers and likely smells: Avg 1

I know, I know horrendous face, but keep in mind she has an above-tier body (no #### jokes please): Avg 2

Meh: Avg 3

And, unfortunately ugly tier:

Might be tough to pin a number on her: Yikes 1

Appalachia bounty: Yikes 2

 

[Thread Killer]

Might be tough to pin a number on her: Yikes 1

I kinda like Monica Seles. I'd rate her a 4-5.

 

[Football Menace]

3

At least 1 (2 of them) redeeming qualities.

I don't know man. I could work with her. To put her at a 3 with some of the 1's and 2's that have been posted, just doesn't seem right. When I was in college, she's the kind of girl I'd hit up for a late night booty call when nothing else came through. If she'd loss 10-15lbs, she'd be a key role player coming off my bench; working here way into the starting lineup.

That is a solid 9 for Christo.

I'm not saying she's a 9 either. But I think you have to bump her up to at least a 4-5 on TALENTS alone. And if she loses a few, tones up here and there, she's an easy 6. ETA - 1s,2s, and 3s, have problems hooking up with the opposite sex because they are so butt ugly. I gaurantee you this chick has little to no problems in that department. I would almost say she has the pick of the litter for a one-nighter, and has many many repeat customers.

 

[Gianni Verscotchie]

quality 7

8

Easily 8. Closer to 9

 

[Froglova]

Perfect 10....

Marissa Miller 1

Marissa Miller 2

Marissa Miller 3

Marissa Miller 4

 

[Arizona Ron]

quality 7

8

Easily 8. Closer to 9

8

 

[culdeus]

Understandable that the hottest and ugliest get the most play, but for this exercise need some more of those "Average/Cute" types.http://www.paknetzone.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/city-communication.jpghttp://www.sugarslam.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/american-idol-haley-reinhart.jpghttp://1.bp.blogspot.com/_f09YP6bu4Vw/TBTCyXZJ7qI/AAAAAAAAB0s/hXt5cn0XAMs/s400/Cute+Long+Bob+Hairstyles+for+Women+2.jpghttp://www.impactlab.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/redheads-235.jpghttp://grrlplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/tina-fey-tanktop.jpg

4 4 5 6 8

I get the feeling a lot of you don't actually know any women.

The rating scale is horrid and implies a standard distribution. I would apply a gamma distribution due to the obesity factor present in society. Therefore I'd place 90% of all women below or equal to 6. 6% at 7 3% at 8 .9% at 9 and .1% at 10.

 

[offdee]

The rating scale is horrid and implies a standard distribution. I would apply a gamma distribution due to the obesity factor present in society. Therefore I'd place 90% of all women below or equal to 6. 6% at 7 3% at 8 .9% at 9 and .1% at 10.

We've covered this in past discussions. It's a known reality that there are many more 5's/6's/7's in the world than 9's/10's.If you visit the Wiki page it covers the bell curve affect.

 

[sho nuff]

The rating scale is horrid and implies a standard distribution. I would apply a gamma distribution due to the obesity factor present in society. Therefore I'd place 90% of all women below or equal to 6. 6% at 7 3% at 8 .9% at 9 and .1% at 10.

We've covered this in past discussions. It's a known reality that there are many more 5's/6's/7's in the world than 9's/10's.If you visit the Wiki page it covers the bell curve affect.

And even wiki realizes the absurd nature of the scale.

It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern: No indication that this "rating scale" is independently notable.

 

[culdeus]

The rating scale is horrid and implies a standard distribution. I would apply a gamma distribution due to the obesity factor present in society. Therefore I'd place 90% of all women below or equal to 6. 6% at 7 3% at 8 .9% at 9 and .1% at 10.

We've covered this in past discussions. It's a known reality that there are many more 5's/6's/7's in the world than 9's/10's.If you visit the Wiki page it covers the bell curve affect.

Fine, but when people say "you must not know any women" it implies a standard distribution. The bar to just jump the 6/7 gap is very high. Much higher than people are budgeting.

 

[Jayrod]

The rating scale is horrid and implies a standard distribution. I would apply a gamma distribution due to the obesity factor present in society. Therefore I'd place 90% of all women below or equal to 6. 6% at 7 3% at 8 .9% at 9 and .1% at 10.

We've covered this in past discussions. It's a known reality that there are many more 5's/6's/7's in the world than 9's/10's.If you visit the Wiki page it covers the bell curve affect.

And even wiki realizes the absurd nature of the scale.

It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern: No indication that this "rating scale" is independently notable.

We're working on this.

 

[Carver]

Some Celebrity 3's

Link Link Link Link

 

[Carver]

The rating scale is horrid and implies a standard distribution. I would apply a gamma distribution due to the obesity factor present in society. Therefore I'd place 90% of all women below or equal to 6. 6% at 7 3% at 8 .9% at 9 and .1% at 10.

We've covered this in past discussions. It's a known reality that there are many more 5's/6's/7's in the world than 9's/10's.If you visit the Wiki page it covers the bell curve affect.

Fine, but when people say "you must not know any women" it implies a standard distribution. The bar to just jump the 6/7 gap is very high. Much higher than people are budgeting.

Im struggling jumping from 3's to 4's TBH.

 

[Froglova]

http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/02/11/female-beauty-from-1-to-10/

An interesting take on ratings. I find that many rate girls much higher than I do.

 

[Gianni Verscotchie]

Some Celebrity 3's

Link Link Link Link

3 4 4 3

 

[offdee]

I'm more of a fan of using pics of non-celebs (or at least lesser knowns) whenever possible, as with celebs you can always find pics where they look better or worse than the evidence presented.

The problem is when you get up in the 9s and 10s it will be hard not to use a celebrity as when you get up in that rare territory and look that good, odds are they're making career around their exterior.

When I get some time, I plan to put my personal 1 thru 10 with corresponding pics. If they fit for me, Ill use pics already posted in this thread and do all that I can to avoid celeb pics. I think two pics per ranking (maybe with different hair color or ethnicity, or something distinguishable) will be a goal.

Note: this will be just a personal exercise and should not overshadow the work Carver is doing here.

 

[jon_mx]

Allright to throw a little diversity into this and mix it up, here's one definitely for the hot bin:10Here's a few somewhere for the average bin:Cute-ish, but has horrendous chompers and likely smells: Avg 1I know, I know horrendous face, but keep in mind she has an above-tier body (no #### jokes please): Avg 2Meh: Avg 3And, unfortunately ugly tier:Might be tough to pin a number on her: Yikes 1Appalachia bounty: Yikes 2

Your 10 is an 8, and your Yikes are 4's.

 

[Carver]

Note: this will be just a personal exercise and should not overshadow the work Carver WE ALL are doing here.

 

[Gianni Verscotchie]

I'm more of a fan of using pics of non-celebs (or at least lesser knowns) whenever possible, as with celebs you can always find pics where they look better or worse than the evidence presented.The problem is when you get up in the 9s and 10s it will be hard not to use a celebrity as when you get up in that rare territory and look that good, odds are they're making career around their exterior.When I get some time, I plan to put my personal 1 thru 10 with corresponding pics. If they fit for me, Ill use pics already posted in this thread and do all that I can to avoid celeb pics. I think two pics per ranking (maybe with different hair color or ethnicity, or something distinguishable) will be a goal.Note: this will be just a personal exercise and should not overshadow the work Carver is doing here.

If possible, I think the priority should be to establish what a conensus 5 is and use that as a baseline. It will be easier to rank the others if we can agree on what a 5 is.

 

[rodg12]

Understandable that the hottest and ugliest get the most play, but for this exercise need some more of those "Average/Cute" types.http://www.paknetzone.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/city-communication.jpghttp://www.sugarslam.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/american-idol-haley-reinhart.jpghttp://1.bp.blogspot.com/_f09YP6bu4Vw/TBTCyXZJ7qI/AAAAAAAAB0s/hXt5cn0XAMs/s400/Cute+Long+Bob+Hairstyles+for+Women+2.jpghttp://www.impactlab.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/redheads-235.jpghttp://grrlplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/tina-fey-tanktop.jpg

4 4 5 6 8

Haley Reinhart as a 4? GTFO.

 

[rodg12]

How bout this for a 9?

Good lord. That might be a 10 for me. I don't see a flaw.

I'm locking this one in as a 10 as well. Flawless.

 

[iamsmilin]

How bout this for a 9?

Good lord. That might be a 10 for me. I don't see a flaw.

I'm locking this one in as a 10 as well. Flawless.

Gorgeous girl and good body.

 

[rodg12]

Submission for the HOT category.

Linky

8 or 9. Can't decide.

 

[The Future Champs]

Submission for the HOT category.

Linky

8 or 9. Can't decide.

8

 

[Stinkin Ref]

How bout this for a 9?

good god

 

[Oscar]

How bout this for a 9?

Sweet Lincoln's mullet!

 

[Uwe Blab]

Your 10 is an 8,

Your monitor is broken. Difference between a 9 and 10 is minor quibbling, but eight?!!?

Your 10 is an 8,

and your Yikes are 4's.

I was afraid I would get that on that WT picture, but I just had to get the quote in there as well here's another 'glorious' pic..'Nother look...still ugly

Definitely belongs in the ugly bin.

As far as Monica Seles...I was just trying to find some non-obese uglies. Let's face it, anyone 300 is automatically at least a 2, and any hoss over 400 is automatically a 1. I could definitely see the argument as her being a 4 or 5 (in the right light)...but I thought throwing her in as a 3 was a possibility. Again...its tough to find non-obese, non-physically deformed 3 and unders.

Also, for the sake of this exercise I gotta imagine we are trying to get 40 and under. Gray hair submission are dirty pool.

 

[Walton Goggins]

The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.

Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS

 

[derek245583]

Your 10 is an 8,

Your monitor is broken. Difference between a 9 and 10 is minor quibbling, but eight?!!?

Your 10 is an 8,

and your Yikes are 4's.

I was afraid I would get that on that WT picture, but I just had to get the quote in there as well here's another 'glorious' pic..'Nother look...still ugly

Definitely belongs in the ugly bin.

As far as Monica Seles...I was just trying to find some non-obese uglies. Let's face it, anyone 300 is automatically at least a 2, and any hoss over 400 is automatically a 1. I could definitely see the argument as her being a 4 or 5 (in the right light)...but I thought throwing her in as a 3 was a possibility. Again...its tough to find non-obese, non-physically deformed 3 and unders.

Also, for the sake of this exercise I gotta imagine we are trying to get 40 and under. Gray hair submission are dirty pool.

I think I like 400 lbers more than I like the 260-300 range...

 

[iamsmilin]

The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.

Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS

Not gonna happen. I'm ok with not being considered tops on the FBG scale.

 

[Walton Goggins]

The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.

Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS

Not gonna happen. I'm ok with not being considered tops on the FBG scale.

Never implied you were tops but you said you are feeling pretty good about yourself so bring it and we can rank you.

 

[Carver]

How bout this for a 9?

good god

Quality stuff in the comments section too..

Sherry says: November 10, 2010 at 10:17 pm nom nom nom nom

 

[iamsmilin]

The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.

Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS

Not gonna happen. I'm ok with not being considered tops on the FBG scale.

Never implied you were tops but you said you are feeling pretty good about yourself so bring it and we can rank you.

Yeah still not gonna happen. I don't need the FFA to validate myself. But thanks for the offer.

 

[Walton Goggins]

How bout this for a 9?

good god

Quality stuff in the comments section too..

Sherry says: November 10, 2010 at 10:17 pm nom nom nom nom

Wow, looks like she got a boob jobhttp://h-3.abload.de/img/cd1rhlr.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_oebLQI4QEpY/TFFkBAAPeEI/AAAAAAAAMtk/eOdBz4AFQ8M/s1600/Ashley+Ann+Vickers+15.jpg

http://www.google.com/search?q=ashley+ann+vickers&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=Q4b&rls=org.mozilla:en-USfficial&prmd=ivnso&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=yvjKTZfKD9KtgQeo0_XsBQ&ved=0CDMQsAQ&biw=1280&bih=574

She's a 10

 

[Walton Goggins]

The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.

Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS

Not gonna happen. I'm ok with not being considered tops on the FBG scale.

Never implied you were tops but you said you are feeling pretty good about yourself so bring it and we can rank you.

Yeah still not gonna happen. I don't need the FFA to validate myself. But thanks for the offer.

Then why make comments and give opinions on a thread about ranking women?

 

[iamsmilin]

Then why make comments and give opinions on a thread about ranking women?

 

[boubucarow]

The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.

Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS

Not gonna happen. I'm ok with not being considered tops on the FBG scale.

Never implied you were tops but you said you are feeling pretty good about yourself so bring it and we can rank you.

Yeah still not gonna happen. I don't need the FFA to validate myself. But thanks for the offer.

Then why make comments and give opinions on a thread about ranking women?

No one else is being asked to submit a picture of themselves to be judged. Why her?

 

[Arizona Ron]

How bout this for a 9?

good god

10. In this picture, it's a 10

 

[Gianni Verscotchie]

The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.

Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS

Not gonna happen. I'm ok with not being considered tops on the FBG scale.

Tops locally?

 

[Arizona Ron]

The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.

Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS

Not gonna happen. I'm ok with not being considered tops on the FBG scale.

Tops locally?

Major flaw

 

[iamsmilin]

The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.

Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS

Not gonna happen. I'm ok with not being considered tops on the FBG scale.

Tops locally?

I'd say I hover around a 7, depending on what type of hair day I am having. I'd be classified more as cute, since that is how I am usually described.ETA, with FBG standards I maybe a 6.

 

[Arizona Ron]

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

 

[Foosball God]

The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.

Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS

Not gonna happen. I'm ok with not being considered tops on the FBG scale.

Never implied you were tops but you said you are feeling pretty good about yourself so bring it and we can rank you.

I've seen her and she's spectacular

 

[Nick Vermeil]

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

2

2

1

If this is the scale, I'll take 3 5's in Dodd's hypothetical. I'm not sure your choices fall off as they should. at 1.

 

[Wrigley]

1

 

[iamsmilin]

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

2

2

1

If this is the scale, I'll take 3 5's in Dodd's hypothetical. I'm not sure your choices fall off as they should. at 1.

Seriously. With this scale I rerank myself to a 3/4.

 

[Walton Goggins]

The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.

Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS

Not gonna happen. I'm ok with not being considered tops on the FBG scale.

Never implied you were tops but you said you are feeling pretty good about yourself so bring it and we can rank you.

Yeah still not gonna happen. I don't need the FFA to validate myself. But thanks for the offer.

Then why make comments and give opinions on a thread about ranking women?

No one else is being asked to submit a picture of themselves to be judged. Why her?

Ahhhhhh because the rest are men.She commenting about feeling pretty good about how she looks compared to some of these pics and we are looking for regular pics of women so since she claims she's better than some of the submissions back it up and send us a picture.

 

[Walton Goggins]

The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.

Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS

Not gonna happen. I'm ok with not being considered tops on the FBG scale.

Tops locally?

I'd say I hover around a 7, depending on what type of hair day I am having. I'd be classified more as cute, since that is how I am usually described.ETA, with FBG standards I maybe a 6.

I'd bet 3

 

[Thread Killer]

3 comes after 2. HTH