The super "OFFICIAL" Offdee Scale with Photos (2 Viewers)

[Arizona Ron]

3 comes after 2. HTH

Thanks

 

[offdee]

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

2

2

1

Tough scorer.I'd say you'd be more on track if you moved all your pics up one ranking...so, both your 9 and 10 would be 10's. Your 8 would be a 9. 7 would be an 8, etc.

St. Louis Bob is easily a 2.

 

[Nick Vermeil]

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

2

2

1

If this is the scale, I'll take 3 5's in Dodd's hypothetical. I'm not sure your choices fall off as they should. at 1.

Seriously. With this scale I rerank myself to a 3/4.

I do appreciate the effort of posting the full scale though. Those of us too lazy to post pictures need more of this in here.

 

[boubucarow]

The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.

Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS

Not gonna happen. I'm ok with not being considered tops on the FBG scale.

Never implied you were tops but you said you are feeling pretty good about yourself so bring it and we can rank you.

Yeah still not gonna happen. I don't need the FFA to validate myself. But thanks for the offer.

Then why make comments and give opinions on a thread about ranking women?

No one else is being asked to submit a picture of themselves to be judged. Why her?

Ahhhhhh because the rest are men.She commenting about feeling pretty good about how she looks compared to some of these pics and we are looking for regular pics of women so since she claims she's better than some of the submissions back it up and send us a picture.

So we get to judge all of these women without being judged ourselves but as soon as a women is commenting, she must allow us to judge her appearance. She doesn't have to justify her thoughts by proving her beauty to us.

 

[offdee]

I'd say I hover around a 7, depending on what type of hair day I am having. I'd be classified more as cute, since that is how I am usually described.ETA, with FBG standards I maybe a 6.

I'd bet 3

Dude, chill. Not necessary.

 

[Arizona Ron]

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

2

2

1

Tough scorer.I'd say you'd be more on track if you moved all your pics up one ranking...so, both your 9 and 10 would be 10's. Your 8 would be a 9. 7 would be an 8, etc.

St. Louis Bob is easily a 2.

I go by just the picture. Nothing else. That's my point, Jenn Sterger is a 8-10 but depending on the picture. I think we need to just have one image that becomes the mental picutre for 1-10

 

[iamsmilin]

So we get to judge all of these women without being judged ourselves but as soon as a women is commenting, she must allow us to judge her appearance. She doesn't have to justify her thoughts by proving her beauty to us.

Dude, chill. Not necessary.

Thanks for defending me guys but it's Goggins, so he'll find some weird rationalization for it and insist that he's right. I'm not offended by it and I don't care what he says or thinks. Now, let's get back to the task at hand. Everyone please post more pics, I would google them but I am at work and I am already worried what the IT guys would think about all the bikini pics in my browser history. I'm a little more worried about them finding all the 1s, 2s, and 3s I've been clicking on.

 

[Tom in Albany]

7.5 Subway Girl

 

[offdee]

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

2

2

1

Tough scorer.I'd say you'd be more on track if you moved all your pics up one ranking...so, both your 9 and 10 would be 10's. Your 8 would be a 9. 7 would be an 8, etc.

St. Louis Bob is easily a 2.

I go by just the picture. Nothing else. That's my point, Jenn Sterger is a 8-10 but depending on the picture. I think we need to just have one image that becomes the mental picutre for 1-10

I agree, it's about the picture presented only. I don't care who the people are in your pics, but they are under-ranked IMO. No way that 5 is only a 5, no way that 7 is only a 7, etc. Move all up one ranking and I think it's pretty accurate.

 

[Football Menace]

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

FLAWED!!!How could this and this be in the same universe. While this is ranked higher than both. Did I mention that this has the same ranking as this. WTF?!?!?!?

The best way to handle this would be to set up a poll for each girl and come to a consensus on the rating.

 

[Arizona Ron]

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

FLAWED!!!How could this and this be in the same universe.

Ask the guy that looked at those two and needed to decide exactly where they fit from 1-10. Seriously, who's giving this a ranking?

 

[Stinkin Ref]

I agree that deciding on a 5 is the way to go......average....and then go from there....

a pic that makes you think....ahhhhhh....I could go either way here........

 

[offdee]

Ask the guy that looked at those two and needed to decide exactly where they fit from 1-10. Seriously, who's giving this a ranking?

This is where I think your pic to rankings are a bit flawed.EVERY pic gets a ranking between 1-10. There are no zeros and there are no negatives. If a 10 is the hottest of the hot, than a 1 is the ugliest of the ugly.

 

[The Future Champs]

10- 10, but only cause it's adriana - not a good pic of her imo

9 - 9, maybe 9.5

8 - 6.5

7 - 7-8

6- 7-8

5- you've got her as a 5? Really?

4- 5

3- 3

2- 3

1-lol

 

[Christo]

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

FLAWED!!!How could this and this be in the same universe.

Ask the guy that looked at those two and needed to decide exactly where they fit from 1-10. Seriously, who's giving this a ranking?

 

[Thread Killer]

(blows out) This is wher it get crazy.

 

[Fullback Fro]

Need some rulings:

Link 1

Link 2

Link 3

Link 4

Link 5

Link 6

Link 7

Link 8

Link 9

Link 10

Bonus Link 11

 

[Fennis]

Need some rulings:

Link 1 7

Link 2 4

Link 3 3

Link 4 4

Link 5 5

Link 6 4

Link 7 5

Link 8 4

Link 9 6

Link 10 the rack makes her a 7

Bonus Link 11 6

Link 9 was my favorite of the bunch. shes cute

 

[offdee]

Link 7

Prototype 5 right here.

 

[The Future Champs]

Need some rulings:

Link 1 7

Link 2 4

Link 3 3

Link 4 4

Link 5 5

Link 6 4

Link 7 5

Link 8 4

Link 9 6

Link 10 the rack makes her a 7

Bonus Link 11 6

Link 9 was my favorite of the bunch. shes cute

oof

 

[offdee]

Link 2

Link 4

IT'S A TRICK!Are these the same girl, just different hair color/length? If so, brunette and long moves her up a point.

 

[Fennis]

oof

all my rankings or just 9?

 

[The Future Champs]

Link 7

Prototype 5 right here.

no, she's at least a "6" This is a "5" Pic

 

[The Future Champs]

oof

all my rankings or just 9?

I think all- I think a "5" has to be the definition of average- not cute, not ugly. Just plain.

 

[Fennis]

Link 7

Prototype 5 right here.

 

[Fennis]

Link 7

Prototype 5 right here.

no, she's at least a "6" This is a "5" Pic

thats a 4

 

[offdee]

Link 7

Prototype 5 right here.

no, she's at least a "6" This is a "5" Pic

Check my quoted pic again...5: Average. starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common

- Average: Check...she's just there, nothing special about her but nothing overly terrible about her either. If you saw her walking down the street she'd just more or less be invisible.

- Starting to be unattractive: Check...pack on 15lbs and she's down a point. Hand her over to a stylist/salon to give her a makeover with hair and makeup and she's up a point.

- But, certain qualities work in her favor: Check...thin, decent hair, eyebrows manicured, decent complexion

- Nothing major, but minor problems are more common: Check...squarish jaw/chin, ears too large, thin lips

 

[Christo]

Link 7

Prototype 5 right here.

no, she's at least a "6" This is a "5" Pic

thats a 4

6 bid, 5 bid, now I have a 4.Do I hear a 3?

3? 3? 3?

C'mon FBGs one of you has to rate her a 3!

 

[Christo]

Link 7

Prototype 5 right here.

no, she's at least a "6" This is a "5" Pic

Check my quoted pic again...5: Average. starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common

- Average: Check...she's just there, nothing special about her but nothing overly terrible about her either. If you saw her walking down the street she'd just more or less be invisible.

- Starting to be unattractive: Check...pack on 15lbs and she's down a point. Hand her over to a stylist/salon to give her a makeover with hair and makeup and she's up a point.

- But, certain qualities work in her favor: Check...thin, decent hair, eyebrows manicured, decent complexion

- Nothing major, but minor problems are more common: Check...squarish jaw/chin, ears too large, thin lips

5 is average. By definition, not unattractive.

 

[offdee]

5 is average. By definition, not unattractive.

Agree, a 5 is not unattractive...she's STARTING TO BE unattractive, BUT CERTAIN QUALITIES WORK IN HER FAVOR to keep her holding steady at meh.

 

[The Future Champs]

Link 7

Prototype 5 right here.

no, she's at least a "6" This is a "5" Pic

thats a 4

6 bid, 5 bid, now I have a 4.Do I hear a 3?

3? 3? 3?

C'mon FBGs one of you has to rate her a 3!

Starting at 3:40

 

[Christo]

5 is average. By definition, not unattractive.

Agree, a 5 is not unattractive...she's STARTING TO BE unattractive, BUT CERTAIN QUALITIES WORK IN HER FAVOR to keep her holding steady at meh.

 

[Christo]

Link 7

Prototype 5 right here.

no, she's at least a "6" This is a "5" Pic

thats a 4

6 bid, 5 bid, now I have a 4.Do I hear a 3?

3? 3? 3?

C'mon FBGs one of you has to rate her a 3!

Starting at 3:40

Love that movie

 

[Clayton Gray]

.

 

[Flying V]

Need some Average/Cute submissions…http://afreeimages.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/cute-girl-wallpapers-3.jpghttp://www.kclegal.net/photos/3/37Cute%20Girl.JPG

No way these two are in the same category.

 

[Carver]

Could Bristol Palin be our baseline 5??

Link 1

Link 2

http://www.rightcelebrity.com/wp-content/photos/Bristol_Palin_1.jpg'>Link 3

Link 4

 

[The Future Champs]

Could Bristol Palin be our baseline 5??

Link 1 - 6

Link 2- 4

http://www.rightcelebrity.com/wp-content/photos/Bristol_Palin_1.jpg'>Link 3 - 5

Link 4-5?

that's baseline alright

 

[AcerFC]

The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.

Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS

Not gonna happen. I'm ok with not being considered tops on the FBG scale.

Never implied you were tops but you said you are feeling pretty good about yourself so bring it and we can rank you.

Im pretty sure I have seen a pic of Smilin. It was a small pic but I would say between a 6.5 and 7

 

[AcerFC]

The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.

Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS

Not gonna happen. I'm ok with not being considered tops on the FBG scale.

Tops locally?

I'd say I hover around a 7, depending on what type of hair day I am having. I'd be classified more as cute, since that is how I am usually described.ETA, with FBG standards I maybe a 6.

I'd bet 3

not even close

 

[AcerFC]

Sweet Dreams and I would say at least a 9

 

[Thread Killer]

Need some rulings:

Link 1

Link 2

Link 3

Link 4

Link 5

Link 6

Link 7

Link 8

Link 9

Link 10

Bonus Link 11

You are one strange dude.

 

[Thread Killer]

Bristol is a 6 pre-surgery and a solid 7 post-surgery

 

[mr roboto]

Need some rulings:

Link 1

Link 2

Link 3

Link 4

Link 5

Link 6

Link 7

Link 8

Link 9

Link 10

Bonus Link 11

Did you just Google image search 'Ashley Smith'?

 

[shuke]

http://www.impactlab.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/redheads-235.jpg

This is why your scale sucks balls. This chick is "average"? Do you know what the definition of average is? This chick has to be in the top 20 percent of all women. That is not average. Your scale is way too skewed for hot chicks. Basically, take the world's hottest 20% of all women and they would fall in your 4 to 10 range. This is why no one likes your scale and why this thread is an absolute trainwreck, because no one really comprehends what you are trying to do.Carry on, morons.

 

[shuke]

The 2 you'd be getting all the secks from....

Ummm....

WTMF

 

[shuke]

The problem with this thread is that I can't unsee these things. It's like a car accident I don't want to click on the 1s but I can't help it, esp that wedding pic. Side note, I'm feeling pretty good about myself.

Post your pic since you want to get involved so we can see where you rank on TOS

Not gonna happen. I'm ok with not being considered tops on the FBG scale.

Never implied you were tops but you said you are feeling pretty good about yourself so bring it and we can rank you.

Yeah still not gonna happen. I don't need the FFA to validate myself. But thanks for the offer.

Then why make comments and give opinions on a thread about ranking women?

You're something else.

 

[bentley]

http://www.impactlab.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/redheads-235.jpg

This is why your scale sucks balls. This chick is "average"? Do you know what the definition of average is? This chick has to be in the top 20 percent of all women. That is not average. Your scale is way too skewed for hot chicks. Basically, take the world's hottest 20% of all women and they would fall in your 4 to 10 range. This is why no one likes your scale and why this thread is an absolute trainwreck, because no one really comprehends what you are trying to do.Carry on, morons.

The decimal system already exists. Thus the 1-10 scale. There's no point in redefining.

 

[shuke]

5 is average. By definition, not unattractive.

Agree, a 5 is not unattractive...she's STARTING TO BE unattractive, BUT CERTAIN QUALITIES WORK IN HER FAVOR to keep her holding steady at meh.

What does "starting to be unattractive" mean? How do you know her look are regressing by looking at a single point in time?YOUR RANKINGS SUCK

 

[mr roboto]

http://www.impactlab.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/redheads-235.jpg

This is why your scale sucks balls. This chick is "average"? Do you know what the definition of average is? This chick has to be in the top 20 percent of all women. That is not average. Your scale is way too skewed for hot chicks. Basically, take the world's hottest 20% of all women and they would fall in your 4 to 10 range. This is why no one likes your scale and why this thread is an absolute trainwreck, because no one really comprehends what you are trying to do.Carry on, morons.

Best post in here.

 

[Thread Killer]

Tops locally?