Carver
Footballguy
Double 6's.Do we still need more examples of normal real world "cute" (or not) types? I could just start posting pictures of girls I know. Might be entertaining. http://i.imgur.com/g3mso.jpg
Double 6's.Do we still need more examples of normal real world "cute" (or not) types? I could just start posting pictures of girls I know. Might be entertaining. http://i.imgur.com/g3mso.jpg
4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)Double 6's.Do we still need more examples of normal real world "cute" (or not) types? I could just start posting pictures of girls I know. Might be entertaining. http://i.imgur.com/g3mso.jpg![]()
You're not good at this.4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)Double 6's.Do we still need more examples of normal real world "cute" (or not) types? I could just start posting pictures of girls I know. Might be entertaining. http://i.imgur.com/g3mso.jpg![]()
yeah, I think Arizona Ron's posts/rankings in this thread are really skewing the accuracy. Outside of him, others seem to be more realistic.I didn't realize we were looking for a way to rank models against other models.In the real world, your 4 is a 7. Cute girl. No chance she's any lower than a 6.
Yes, we need way more of these girls like theseDo we still need more examples of normal real world "cute" (or not) types? I could just start posting pictures of girls I know. Might be entertaining. http://i.imgur.com/g3mso.jpg
6,6Yes, we need way more of these girls like theseDo we still need more examples of normal real world "cute" (or not) types? I could just start posting pictures of girls I know. Might be entertaining. http://i.imgur.com/g3mso.jpg![]()
5 is Average. You're saying these women are "above average" by rating them as 6.6,6Yes, we need way more of these girls like theseDo we still need more examples of normal real world "cute" (or not) types? I could just start posting pictures of girls I know. Might be entertaining. http://i.imgur.com/g3mso.jpg![]()
In general it is a bit hard to truly rank a lot of these girls due to questionable body qualities. But that said, I am thinking you all are starting to hit the 4-6 sweet spot pretty good with personal preference accounting for differences (due to mainly weight/general body type I think).Another 5
This is a 5http://ohjails.info/images2/ASHLEY-SMITH-15473349.jpgBoth of those girls are better looking.So, yes, they are a 6: Fairly attractive, no major flaws but maybe minor ones5 is Average. You're saying these women are "above average" by rating them as 6.6,6Yes, we need way more of these girls like theseDo we still need more examples of normal real world "cute" (or not) types? I could just start posting pictures of girls I know. Might be entertaining. http://i.imgur.com/g3mso.jpg![]()
You mean before she started doing meth, got arrested and took this mugshot?'offdee said:This is a 5http://ohjails.info/images2/ASHLEY-SMITH-15473349.jpgBoth of those girls are better looking.So, yes, they are a 6: Fairly attractive, no major flaws but maybe minor ones'Arizona Ron said:5 is Average. You're saying these women are "above average" by rating them as 6.'Gianni Verscotchie said:6,6'Fennis said:Yes, we need way more of these girls like these'Disco Stu said:Do we still need more examples of normal real world "cute" (or not) types? I could just start posting pictures of girls I know. Might be entertaining. http://i.imgur.com/g3mso.jpg![]()
Sorry... But I'd rank that 5 a 4. Looks like a hillbilly.'offdee said:This is a 5http://ohjails.info/images2/ASHLEY-SMITH-15473349.jpgBoth of those girls are better looking.So, yes, they are a 6: Fairly attractive, no major flaws but maybe minor ones'Arizona Ron said:5 is Average. You're saying these women are "above average" by rating them as 6.'Gianni Verscotchie said:6,6'Fennis said:Yes, we need way more of these girls like these'Disco Stu said:Do we still need more examples of normal real world "cute" (or not) types? I could just start posting pictures of girls I know. Might be entertaining. http://i.imgur.com/g3mso.jpg![]()
On point'offdee said:This is a 5http://ohjails.info/images2/ASHLEY-SMITH-15473349.jpgBoth of those girls are better looking.So, yes, they are a 6: Fairly attractive, no major flaws but maybe minor ones'Arizona Ron said:5 is Average. You're saying these women are "above average" by rating them as 6.'Gianni Verscotchie said:6,6'Fennis said:Yes, we need way more of these girls like these'Disco Stu said:Do we still need more examples of normal real world "cute" (or not) types? I could just start posting pictures of girls I know. Might be entertaining. http://i.imgur.com/g3mso.jpg![]()
It's time for me to admit that I have low standards. Based on the pics posted here, I'd gladly hit any chick 5 and up.
No shame in that.Really? White shirt is a 6-7.
Meh.. Man-Jaw is holding her down. You could argue a 6... I suppose.Really? White shirt is a 6-7.
That picture, 10.
Something displeasing to me about the two faces on the left. I would go 5-5-7.
I agree... and I'd say low end 6's... The only thing keeping them out of the 5 bucket is their slim figure. Plus i think they got caught with a funny looking smile (benefit of the doubt).Something displeasing to me about the two faces on the left. I would go 5-5-7.
That picture, 10.
That explains the difference. I like a bit more substance on women. Slim without the right curves is a negative for me and I can't see the curves.I agree... and I'd say low end 6's... The only thing keeping them out of the 5 bucket is their slim figure. Plus i think they got caught with a funny looking smile (benefit of the doubt).Something displeasing to me about the two faces on the left. I would go 5-5-7.
Far left and center are 6's, but agreed rest are 5. On offee's scale, these would all be 2's or 3's.
I'll give you the middle, but the left is too frumpy looking. Slouchy shoulders make her trollish.Far left and center are 6's, but agreed rest are 5. On offee's scale, these would all be 2's or 3's.
I'd go at least 7, 7, 7.5-8. All of these girls are extremely cute/bordering on really pretty to me. Bodies are all good. I guess it's all about context as they'd annihilate anything that walks into Walmart. I'd classify all three as "hot".
Then why post that pic? Based on what you linked, that's a friggin 10. Maybe she looks like Anne B Davis in the morning, but the photo is all we have to go on.That picture, 10.But the possibility of an airbrush touch up keeps her a notch below. cant just go assigning 10's all Willy Nilly.
5,5,5,4,4 ETA: the middle one is probably a 6
I wouldI would
Because she is at least an 8 even if she had a glass eyeball or a missing limb.Then why post that pic?That picture, 10.But the possibility of an airbrush touch up keeps her a notch below. cant just go assigning 10's all Willy Nilly.
Need to see the teeth... something looks like it may be brewing beneath those lips.
This is a lot closer to the 5 group than your other pic.
I've dated a cyclops before - doesn't change how pretty she is or how rocking her body is. Just gotta be careful of the psi going into the fake eye.Because she is at least an 8 even if she had a glass eyeball or a missing limb.Then why post that pic?That picture, 10.But the possibility of an airbrush touch up keeps her a notch below. cant just go assigning 10's all Willy Nilly.
Cant be that far off... The first group was probably closer to a group of 6's though (upon review).This is a lot closer to the 5 group than your other pic.
She's better than a 4, I'd wager. She's trying to look too serious. In fact, she looks eerily similar to a girl I went to school with and, if her bod is anywhere near as kicking as the one I know, she's severely under-valued by that photo.Need to see the teeth... something looks like it may be brewing beneath those lips.
Glasses are not helpingShe's better than a 4, I'd wager. She's trying to look too serious. In fact, she looks eerily similar to a girl I went to school with and, if her bod is anywhere near as kicking as the one I know, she's severely under-valued by that photo.Need to see the teeth... something looks like it may be brewing beneath those lips.
Im just sayin... if she opens up those lips and has a Michael Strahan situation going on, all bets are off. But if she has a good set of chicklets, you can chuck those Bi-Focals and clean her up to a solid 5-6.She's better than a 4, I'd wager. She's trying to look too serious. In fact, she looks eerily similar to a girl I went to school with and, if her bod is anywhere near as kicking as the one I know, she's severely under-valued by that photo.Need to see the teeth... something looks like it may be brewing beneath those lips.