The super "OFFICIAL" Offdee Scale with Photos (1 Viewer)

[Froglova]

5 = average. Someone who is the average around you. Girls you'll likely marry. Nothing spectacular, yet attractive. The everyday woman. A little attention could push them into above average. A little neglect pushes them down to a 4. Just your typical woman. Someone who you wouldn't mind being seen with. Someone who could stand to gain/lose 5-8 pounds. Not chubby, but not tight either.

5

5

5.5

5

5

5

5.5

5

5

5

EDIT:

It's not they are not attractive women...They are. Just the starting point for attractivness. 4's have something that would make you question going out in public too much. Other guys would think "wow, she must give good head". 5's are the standard wife material. If you land a 5, nobody questions it. If you land higher, great, but a 5 is just fine. Your typical woman.

My $.02

 

[Gianni Verscotchie]

http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x207/sxyjoker/beach/girls.jpg

Prototypical 4's?

All slightly overweight/weird body shapes, faces that are below average.

Is that a Battoo? Man, I bet this group is capable of unspeakable acts.

 

[Froglova]

Here you go. Use this for the main visual benchmarks...

5: Average. starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common

http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk161/offdee/offdee%20Scale/TOS5.jpg

im not sure how that Meth Head Mugshot caught on as the token "5". No way in hell is that greasy looking street urchin "average".

Copied from post #177...5: Average. starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common

- Average: Check...she's just there, nothing special about her but nothing overly terrible about her either. If you saw her walking down the street she'd just more or less be invisible.

- Starting to be unattractive: Check...pack on 15lbs and she's down a point. Hand her over to a stylist/salon to give her a makeover with hair and makeup and she's up a point.

- But, certain qualities work in her favor: Check...thin, decent hair, eyebrows manicured, decent complexion

- Nothing major, but minor problems are more common: Check...squarish jaw/chin, ears too large, thin lips

---------------------------

Again, remember what the true meaning of "average" is....it's not meant to be the average of the entire female population. The word is in relation to the "middle point" between a 1 and a 10 (specific to the scale definitions)

Also, keep in mind that a "5" is not truly in the middle of a 1 and 10, which is why a 5 is skewing more towards being ugly than being hot.

- A 5 is four steps away from being a 1 (only 4, 3 and 2 separating)

- A 5 is five steps away from being a 10 (has 6, 7, 8 and 9 separating)

In all reality a 5.5 is truly right in the middle of a 1 and a 10 since there is no "zero"

at best that chick is a 4. She's not starting to be unattractive, she is unattractive. At least by my standards.

A 4 is "Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)" What are those major flaws?Agree that she's not a looker, but she has some good points (nice hair, manicured eybrows, well-proportioned nose, good complexion) and bad points (oversized ears, square chin, thin lips)

Well... The Cross-Eyes would be a good starting point for me.

This chick is unattractive to me as a whole. She looks like the chick at the bar that is alone because she's half drunk and can belch/fart any man under the table. Her face is square. Her nostrils are about to swallow me up. She looks like she's been on drugs for some time. And she used to be a boy named Ralph. Just to name a few.

 

[Fennis]

5 = average. Someone who is the average around you. Girls you'll likely marry. Nothing spectacular, yet attractive. The everyday woman. A little attention could push them into above average. A little neglect pushes them down to a 4. Just your typical woman. Someone who you wouldn't mind being seen with. Someone who could stand to gain/lose 5-8 pounds. Not chubby, but not tight either.

5

5

5.5

5

5

5

5.5

5

5

5

EDIT:

It's not they are not attractive women...They are. Just the starting point for attractivness. 4's have something that would make you question going out in public too much. Other guys would think "wow, she must give good head". 5's are the standard wife material. If you land a 5, nobody questions it. If you land higher, great, but a 5 is just fine. Your typical woman.

My $.02

please don't attempt to redefine the scale. It's madness to try.You've got a bunch of 6s mixed in there.

 

[The Future Champs]

5 = average. Someone who is the average around you. Girls you'll likely marry. Nothing spectacular, yet attractive. The everyday woman. A little attention could push them into above average. A little neglect pushes them down to a 4. Just your typical woman. Someone who you wouldn't mind being seen with. Someone who could stand to gain/lose 5-8 pounds. Not chubby, but not tight either.

5

5

5.5

5

5

5

5.5

5

5

5

EDIT:

It's not they are not attractive women...They are. Just the starting point for attractivness. 4's have something that would make you question going out in public too much. Other guys would think "wow, she must give good head". 5's are the standard wife material. If you land a 5, nobody questions it. If you land higher, great, but a 5 is just fine. Your typical woman.

My $.02

please don't attempt to redefine the scale. It's madness to try.You've got a bunch of 6s mixed in there.

Agreed. It's Offdee's scale. Start a scale called the Froglova if you want to push this standard.

 

[Disco Stu]

5 = average. Someone who is the average around you. Girls you'll likely marry. Nothing spectacular, yet attractive. The everyday woman. A little attention could push them into above average. A little neglect pushes them down to a 4. Just your typical woman. Someone who you wouldn't mind being seen with. Someone who could stand to gain/lose 5-8 pounds. Not chubby, but not tight either. EDIT:It's not they are not attractive women...They are. Just the starting point for attractivness. 4's have something that would make you question going out in public too much. Other guys would think "wow, she must give good head". 5's are the standard wife material. If you land a 5, nobody questions it. If you land higher, great, but a 5 is just fine. Your typical woman.My $.02

This is all based too much on who "you" are. Therefore the 5 mark is going to float too much. Defeats the purpose.

 

[General Malaise]

5.5

ridiculous.

 

[Shutterbug]

5.5

ridiculous.

I would love to see what some of these guys have on their arm...

 

[chet]

5.5

ridiculous.

I would love to see what some of these guys have on their arm...

Same guys who gave a $30k/day model a 7.5. Re-DONK-culous.

 

[offdee]

This chick is unattractive to me as a whole. She looks like the chick at the bar that is alone because she's half drunk and can belch/fart any man under the table. Her face is square. Her nostrils are about to swallow me up. She looks like she's been on drugs for some time. And she used to be a boy named Ralph. Just to name a few.

Here's the thing....getting rated a 5 is not a compliment by any stretch of the imagination. A 5 is more or less not someone you'd gravitate towards (especially for a FBG), so yes your copy above is more or less accurate....but, I believe your number you associate with that description is not. I went to lunch at a crowded Panera today and would say 70% of the women there were worse than this 5, but didn't see any 1's and maybe a couple 2's. There needs to be a distinctive bucket for all the 3's and 4's of the world. It's the American way.

 

[Shutterbug]

5.5

ridiculous.

I would love to see what some of these guys have on their arm...

Same guys who gave a $30k/day model a 7.5. Re-DONK-culous.

I gave her an 8. She is pretty, but needs to eat. However, models feel they have to have 0% body weight. I don't think it is very healthy.

 

[Shutterbug]

This chick is unattractive to me as a whole. She looks like the chick at the bar that is alone because she's half drunk and can belch/fart any man under the table. Her face is square. Her nostrils are about to swallow me up. She looks like she's been on drugs for some time. And she used to be a boy named Ralph. Just to name a few.

Here's the thing....getting rated a 5 is not a compliment by any stretch of the imagination. A 5 is more or less not someone you'd gravitate towards (especially for a FBG), so yes your copy above is more or less accurate....but, I believe your number you associate with that description is not. I went to lunch at a crowded Panera today and would say 70% of the women there were worse than this 5, but didn't see any 1's and maybe a couple 2's. There needs to be a distinctive bucket for all the 3's and 4's of the world. It's the American way.

I rate myself a 5 and am quite satisfied with being average.

 

[offdee]

Same guys who gave a $30k/day model a 7.5. Re-DONK-culous.

Chet, don't want to get in a back and forth over this, because bottom line is that girl was very pretty, but at the end of the day she has a stick figure body.Just because a girl is a successful model doesn't mean a thing, we're basing the rating off of the specific evidence at hand which was the picture you provided. I'm sure if you posted a pic of that same girl on the cover of a magazine the rating would've been higher.And just for some model background, majority are successful because they are pretty, yet non-descript in that they don't have any amazing features that distract from the thing they are trying to sell. The most successful runway models are tall and skinny with no curves....purpose is so the clothes get highlighted (seaming and fabric lay on their body accurately) and that is what the viewer remembers...not the chick's boobs and butt or amazing eyes and lips.The girl you posted was extremely cute in a real world sense, hence the 7.5. In that specific pic she's not overly "hot" which usually means both a fantastic face paired with a bangin' body.

 

[Disco Stu]

So anyway... more girls?

http://i.imgur.com/vnJeJ.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/9LcHY.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/LlgAQ.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/u6lsN.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/cDNFa.jpg

 

[Froglova]

This chick is unattractive to me as a whole. She looks like the chick at the bar that is alone because she's half drunk and can belch/fart any man under the table. Her face is square. Her nostrils are about to swallow me up. She looks like she's been on drugs for some time. And she used to be a boy named Ralph. Just to name a few.

Here's the thing....getting rated a 5 is not a compliment by any stretch of the imagination. A 5 is more or less not someone you'd gravitate towards (especially for a FBG), so yes your copy above is more or less accurate....but, I believe your number you associate with that description is not. I went to lunch at a crowded Panera today and would say 70% of the women there were worse than this 5, but didn't see any 1's and maybe a couple 2's. There needs to be a distinctive bucket for all the 3's and 4's of the world. It's the American way.

yeah, that's where we differ. I see a 5 as the average typical girl/woman. Attractive but nothing special. While you are seeing a 5 as start towards the unattractive side.So basically, the offdee scale is the froglova scale -1. Meaning you 5 is my 4, your 6 my 5, and so on.

 

[Kev4029]

5.5

ridiculous.

I would love to see what some of these guys have on their arm...

Does marrying a 2 make a man any less able to judge what a 5.5 looks like?

 

[Shutterbug]

5.5

ridiculous.

I would love to see what some of these guys have on their arm...

Does marrying a 2 make a man any less able to judge what a 5.5 looks like?

Yes, because beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

 

[General Malaise]

5.5

ridiculous.

I would love to see what some of these guys have on their arm...

Same guys who gave a $30k/day model a 7.5. Re-DONK-culous.

For some reason, I can't open your link.

 

[Nick Vermeil]

So anyway... more girls?http://i.imgur.com/vnJeJ.jpg

If number 2 ate number 4's sandwich for a few weeks (if you know what I'm saying), they would both approach 8 status.

 

[offdee]

This chick is unattractive to me as a whole. She looks like the chick at the bar that is alone because she's half drunk and can belch/fart any man under the table. Her face is square. Her nostrils are about to swallow me up. She looks like she's been on drugs for some time. And she used to be a boy named Ralph. Just to name a few.

Here's the thing....getting rated a 5 is not a compliment by any stretch of the imagination. A 5 is more or less not someone you'd gravitate towards (especially for a FBG), so yes your copy above is more or less accurate....but, I believe your number you associate with that description is not. I went to lunch at a crowded Panera today and would say 70% of the women there were worse than this 5, but didn't see any 1's and maybe a couple 2's. There needs to be a distinctive bucket for all the 3's and 4's of the world. It's the American way.

yeah, that's where we differ. I see a 5 as the average typical girl/woman. Attractive but nothing special. While you are seeing a 5 as start towards the unattractive side.So basically, the offdee scale is the froglova scale -1. Meaning you 5 is my 4, your 6 my 5, and so on.

And you just summed up the whole point of the scale. It's putting us all on the same plane when throwing out numbers...there is reasoning behind it and not just some miscellaneus number that anybody throws out with no meaning behind it. "oh, she's cute...definite 9." Hogwash. Bottom line, get with the program and adjust your scale. TIA.

 

[Pipes]

5 = average. Someone who is the average around you. Girls you'll likely marry. Nothing spectacular, yet attractive. The everyday woman. A little attention could push them into above average. A little neglect pushes them down to a 4. Just your typical woman. Someone who you wouldn't mind being seen with. Someone who could stand to gain/lose 5-8 pounds. Not chubby, but not tight either.

5

EDIT:

It's not they are not attractive women...They are. Just the starting point for attractivness. 4's have something that would make you question going out in public too much. Other guys would think "wow, she must give good head". 5's are the standard wife material. If you land a 5, nobody questions it. If you land higher, great, but a 5 is just fine. Your typical woman.

My $.02

at Zoe being a 5.

 

[Fennis]

So anyway... more girls?http://i.imgur.com/vnJeJ.jpg

If number 2 ate number 4's sandwich for a few weeks (if you know what I'm saying), they would both approach 8 status.

 

[Froglova]

All righty then Rate em boys...

pic1

pic2

Pics 3,4,5,6

Pic7

Pic8

Pic9

Pic10

 

[Froglova]

5 = average. Someone who is the average around you. Girls you'll likely marry. Nothing spectacular, yet attractive. The everyday woman. A little attention could push them into above average. A little neglect pushes them down to a 4. Just your typical woman. Someone who you wouldn't mind being seen with. Someone who could stand to gain/lose 5-8 pounds. Not chubby, but not tight either.

5

EDIT:

It's not they are not attractive women...They are. Just the starting point for attractivness. 4's have something that would make you question going out in public too much. Other guys would think "wow, she must give good head". 5's are the standard wife material. If you land a 5, nobody questions it. If you land higher, great, but a 5 is just fine. Your typical woman.

My $.02

at Zoe being a 5.

That pic is average material. She may be a 8 in another pic, but that pic is average.

 

[chet]

For some reason, I can't open your link.

Just made it public again.

click here

 

[General Malaise]

So anyway... more girls?http://i.imgur.com/vnJeJ.jpg

Gonna give this a shot here, but will fully admit that if I were a college professor, kids would line up to take my class due to my lenient and generous grading standards.From left to right....6.5 - She took the unfortunate position of standing closest to the camera while wearing no sleeves. Her upper arms aren't terrible, but they aren't very attractive and I'm getting a little bit of a ruddy skin tone vibe, which I don't much like. I also think she needs a sandblaster to remove the make-up. But, she has a gorgeous smile, nice teeth and could grade out higher with a body shot.8.5 - Could rate a little higher with a full body shot, but what I see, I like a lot. Eyes are set a little wide, but the rest of her facial features are quite stunning. Love her hair color and I'm betting she has flawless skin? 7.5 - A little gangly looking, but also pretty exotic. Eyes a little too narrow for my tastes, but also has a fantastic smile and must have a great dentist. I think I'm seeing a hint of Native American Indian in her, but would LOVE to give her a little German-Scotch if she ever drank enough to sleep with an Oregon 3.5 - Face is almost too round and a little puffy. That's not a very flattering dress. She should do some french presses in the weight room. She's not bad looking, but I'm not very attracted to her.

 

[Fennis]

For some reason, I can't open your link.

Just made it public again.

click here

2,1

 

[General Malaise]

For some reason, I can't open your link.

Just made it public again.

click here

Uh, yeah...I've got bigger jugs than she does. But a solid 8 for me.

 

[Fennis]

So anyway... more girls?http://i.imgur.com/vnJeJ.jpg

Gonna give this a shot here, but will fully admit that if I were a college professor, kids would line up to take my class due to my lenient and generous grading standards.From left to right....6.5 - She took the unfortunate position of standing closest to the camera while wearing no sleeves. Her upper arms aren't terrible, but they aren't very attractive and I'm getting a little bit of a ruddy skin tone vibe, which I don't much like. I also think she needs a sandblaster to remove the make-up. But, she has a gorgeous smile, nice teeth and could grade out higher with a body shot.8.5 - Could rate a little higher with a full body shot, but what I see, I like a lot. Eyes are set a little wide, but the rest of her facial features are quite stunning. Love her hair color and I'm betting she has flawless skin? 7.5 - A little gangly looking, but also pretty exotic. Eyes a little too narrow for my tastes, but also has a fantastic smile and must have a great dentist. I think I'm seeing a hint of Native American Indian in her, but would LOVE to give her a little German-Scotch if she ever drank enough to sleep with an Oregon 3.5 - Face is almost too round and a little puffy. That's not a very flattering dress. She should do some french presses in the weight room. She's not bad looking, but I'm not very attracted to her.

or 5,7,6,5

 

[General Malaise]

All righty then Rate em boys...

pic1

Dude....

 

[Kev4029]

5.5

ridiculous.

I would love to see what some of these guys have on their arm...

Does marrying a 2 make a man any less able to judge what a 5.5 looks like?

Yes, because beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

So fat slobby guys who married fat slobby women have no place in knowing what a better looking woman should look like?

 

[General Malaise]

So anyway... more girls?http://i.imgur.com/vnJeJ.jpg

Gonna give this a shot here, but will fully admit that if I were a college professor, kids would line up to take my class due to my lenient and generous grading standards.From left to right....6.5 - She took the unfortunate position of standing closest to the camera while wearing no sleeves. Her upper arms aren't terrible, but they aren't very attractive and I'm getting a little bit of a ruddy skin tone vibe, which I don't much like. I also think she needs a sandblaster to remove the make-up. But, she has a gorgeous smile, nice teeth and could grade out higher with a body shot.8.5 - Could rate a little higher with a full body shot, but what I see, I like a lot. Eyes are set a little wide, but the rest of her facial features are quite stunning. Love her hair color and I'm betting she has flawless skin? 7.5 - A little gangly looking, but also pretty exotic. Eyes a little too narrow for my tastes, but also has a fantastic smile and must have a great dentist. I think I'm seeing a hint of Native American Indian in her, but would LOVE to give her a little German-Scotch if she ever drank enough to sleep with an Oregon 3.5 - Face is almost too round and a little puffy. That's not a very flattering dress. She should do some french presses in the weight room. She's not bad looking, but I'm not very attracted to her.

or 5,7,6,5

And now, an example of the #### professor nobody wants to take a class from....

 

[Fennis]

So anyway... more girls?http://i.imgur.com/vnJeJ.jpg

Gonna give this a shot here, but will fully admit that if I were a college professor, kids would line up to take my class due to my lenient and generous grading standards.From left to right....6.5 - She took the unfortunate position of standing closest to the camera while wearing no sleeves. Her upper arms aren't terrible, but they aren't very attractive and I'm getting a little bit of a ruddy skin tone vibe, which I don't much like. I also think she needs a sandblaster to remove the make-up. But, she has a gorgeous smile, nice teeth and could grade out higher with a body shot.8.5 - Could rate a little higher with a full body shot, but what I see, I like a lot. Eyes are set a little wide, but the rest of her facial features are quite stunning. Love her hair color and I'm betting she has flawless skin? 7.5 - A little gangly looking, but also pretty exotic. Eyes a little too narrow for my tastes, but also has a fantastic smile and must have a great dentist. I think I'm seeing a hint of Native American Indian in her, but would LOVE to give her a little German-Scotch if she ever drank enough to sleep with an Oregon 3.5 - Face is almost too round and a little puffy. That's not a very flattering dress. She should do some french presses in the weight room. She's not bad looking, but I'm not very attracted to her.

or 5,7,6,5

And now, an example of the #### professor nobody wants to take a class from....

 

[Shutterbug]

5.5

ridiculous.

I would love to see what some of these guys have on their arm...

Does marrying a 2 make a man any less able to judge what a 5.5 looks like?

Yes, because beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

So fat slobby guys who married fat slobby women have no place in knowing what a better looking woman should look like?

Not if you can't be fair about your rating...

 

[General Malaise]

So anyway... more girls?http://i.imgur.com/u6lsN.jpg

4.5 and 10 because she smokes.

 

[iamsmilin]

All righty then Rate em boys...

Pic10

I can't unsee that. What's hanging out from under her dress?

 

[General Malaise]

All righty then Rate em boys...

Pic10

I can't unsee that. What's hanging out from under her dress?

Neptune.

 

[The Future Champs]

All righty then Rate em boys...

pic1

pic2

Pics 3,4,5,6

Pic7

Pic8

Pic9

Pic10

You're going to get this thread locked if you keep this up.

 

[Carver]

All righty then Rate em boys...

Pic10

I can't unsee that. What's hanging out from under her dress?

She is obviously whelping a piglet.duh.

 

[Froglova]

A 1 on the scale?

 

[Carver]

A 1 on the scale?

Mentally ill. Does not qualify.

 

[Froglova]

A 1 on the scale?

Mentally ill. Does not qualify.

How bout this one?1

 

[lolerskates]

Enough with the ugly chicks....####

 

[iamsmilin]

Enough with the ugly chicks....####

I know I shouldn't, but I just can't stop clicking on those links. It BURNS!!!

 

[offdee]

So anyway... more girls?http://i.imgur.com/vnJeJ.jpg

Gonna give this a shot here, but will fully admit that if I were a college professor, kids would line up to take my class due to my lenient and generous grading standards.From left to right....6.5 - She took the unfortunate position of standing closest to the camera while wearing no sleeves. Her upper arms aren't terrible, but they aren't very attractive and I'm getting a little bit of a ruddy skin tone vibe, which I don't much like. I also think she needs a sandblaster to remove the make-up. But, she has a gorgeous smile, nice teeth and could grade out higher with a body shot.8.5 - Could rate a little higher with a full body shot, but what I see, I like a lot. Eyes are set a little wide, but the rest of her facial features are quite stunning. Love her hair color and I'm betting she has flawless skin? 7.5 - A little gangly looking, but also pretty exotic. Eyes a little too narrow for my tastes, but also has a fantastic smile and must have a great dentist. I think I'm seeing a hint of Native American Indian in her, but would LOVE to give her a little German-Scotch if she ever drank enough to sleep with an Oregon 3.5 - Face is almost too round and a little puffy. That's not a very flattering dress. She should do some french presses in the weight room. She's not bad looking, but I'm not very attracted to her.

or 5,7,6,5

I'm pretty close to you GM..- 6.5- 8 (eyes are a little too far apart, but I'm drawn to her...best of the bunch of Stu's lot of links)- 7- 6 (potential get up to 7.5 if lost 20lbs)

 

[offdee]

OFFICIAL SCALE EDIT ALERT!

It's minor, but important IMO. Because a "5" seems to be such an important barometer, want to eliminate any possible confusions.

Focus group results are showing the word "Average" can be taken in different context (average to the entire female populuation vs. average compared to the women in your area/social circle vs. the average between 1 and 10 on the scale definitions). With this, moving forward, the scale will remove the word "Average" and officially state...

5: Starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common

Please update Wiki Page and original post of thread appropriately. Thank you for your time.

 

[Fennis]

OFFICIAL SCALE EDIT ALERT!

It's minor, but important IMO. Because a "5" seems to be such an important barometer, want to eliminate any possible confusions.

Focus group results are showing the word "Average" can be taken in different context (average to the entire female populuation vs. average compared to the women in your area/social circle vs. the average between 1 and 10 on the scale definitions). With this, moving forward, the scale will remove the word "Average" and officially state...

5: Starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common

Please update Wiki Page and original post of thread appropriately. Thank you for your time.

Great, you might not think its a big deal, but this puts all my rankings into question. I now have to rerank them all.

 

[GreatLakesMike]

A lone wolf 3 and a quadruplet of 7.5's

5 5 6 7 8

On the money.

Shuke is usually good at this, but how is #2 possibly considered only average? Are we assuming she's bald?

No curves, nothing special about her face, looks stupid in that hat.

3, 7.5, 6, 7, 8.75

Number 2 sucks guys. It looks like someone beat her face in with an ugly stick.

Agreed, I think the other three (not the fatty) are all far better looking. She looks a little like a cancer patient with a beat face.

Here's a couple more pics of them- the numbers after the pics refer to their order in the original pic.pic - 3,4,5,2,1

pic 2 - 5,4

pic 3 - 1,2 5,4,3

pic 4 - 3,4

4 might have tourettes

I think the "cancer patient with a beat face" comparison is a little unkind.

Based on those I'd be tempted to switch the ratings on 3 and 4. 2 stays her ugly self.New ratings of:

5, 5(Possibly a 4), 7, 6, 8

Yeah, after looking at the new pics, I'm going to knock 2 down a bit. She's still above average, but not by much. 5.75. Bumping 5 up to a real world 9.

 

[Christo]

OFFICIAL SCALE EDIT ALERT!

It's minor, but important IMO. Because a "5" seems to be such an important barometer, want to eliminate any possible confusions.

Focus group results are showing the word "Average" can be taken in different context (average to the entire female populuation vs. average compared to the women in your area/social circle vs. the average between 1 and 10 on the scale definitions). With this, moving forward, the scale will remove the word "Average" and officially state...

5: Starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common

Please update Wiki Page and original post of thread appropriately. Thank you for your time.

NO, NO, NO!

 

[offdee]

OFFICIAL SCALE EDIT ALERT!

It's minor, but important IMO. Because a "5" seems to be such an important barometer, want to eliminate any possible confusions.

Focus group results are showing the word "Average" can be taken in different context (average to the entire female populuation vs. average compared to the women in your area/social circle vs. the average between 1 and 10 on the scale definitions). With this, moving forward, the scale will remove the word "Average" and officially state...

5: Starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common

Please update Wiki Page and original post of thread appropriately. Thank you for your time.

Great, you might not think its a big deal, but this puts all my rankings into question. I now have to rerank them all.

All I did was remove the first word "Average"...nothing else changed. That was the problem...people would see that one word and stop reading and interpret however that word means in their head which is not accurate. A 5 is not a compliment, and is skewing towards the ugly side of the scale (as mentioned earlier, technically a 5.5 is smack dab in the center of a 1 and a 10). The edited wording is now more accurate for official ranking.

Apologize for any inconveninces.