The super "OFFICIAL" Offdee Scale with Photos (2 Viewers)

[offdee]

OFFICIAL SCALE EDIT ALERT!

It's minor, but important IMO. Because a "5" seems to be such an important barometer, want to eliminate any possible confusions.

Focus group results are showing the word "Average" can be taken in different context (average to the entire female populuation vs. average compared to the women in your area/social circle vs. the average between 1 and 10 on the scale definitions). With this, moving forward, the scale will remove the word "Average" and officially state...

5: Starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common

Please update Wiki Page and original post of thread appropriately. Thank you for your time.

NO, NO, NO!

Copied from last post, just to make sure you don't miss it GB...A 5 is not a compliment, and is skewing towards the ugly side of the scale (as mentioned earlier, technically a 5.5 is smack dab in the center of a 1 and a 10).

 

[Fennis]

Rate Me

 

[offdee]

Rate Me

Based only on evidence at hand: 7.5

 

[Shutterbug]

Rate Me

8.5

 

[offdee]

Rate Me

8.5

I believe it's really hard to go anything 8+ without an idea of body. Hot territory (which is an 8 or above) constitutes having a good/great body to match a good/great face.

 

[Shutterbug]

Rate Me

8.5

I believe it's really hard to go anything 8+ without an idea of body. Hot territory (which is an 8 or above) constitutes having a good/great body to match a good/great face.

Based by the shape of her face, I have to assume that she is not over weight. I appreciate what you are saying though, and go with an 8.

 

[GreatLakesMike]

7 - 6 - 5'er

8, 6, 4

 

[GreatLakesMike]

7 7 8 7 7

5.75, 7, 6, 9, 8.5#4 could drop to a 7 easily.. too much makeup in that picture, but I'm giving her the benefit of the doubt.

 

[Christo]

OFFICIAL SCALE EDIT ALERT!

It's minor, but important IMO. Because a "5" seems to be such an important barometer, want to eliminate any possible confusions.

Focus group results are showing the word "Average" can be taken in different context (average to the entire female populuation vs. average compared to the women in your area/social circle vs. the average between 1 and 10 on the scale definitions). With this, moving forward, the scale will remove the word "Average" and officially state...

5: Starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common

Please update Wiki Page and original post of thread appropriately. Thank you for your time.

NO, NO, NO!

Copied from last post, just to make sure you don't miss it GB...A 5 is not a compliment, and is skewing towards the ugly side of the scale (as mentioned earlier, technically a 5.5 is smack dab in the center of a 1 and a 10).

Again, proving the idiocy of your scale. 5.5 is smack dab in the middle but because there are no decimals you don't allow for anyone to be in the middle. Dumb, dumb, dumb.

 

[offdee]

OFFICIAL SCALE EDIT ALERT!

It's minor, but important IMO. Because a "5" seems to be such an important barometer, want to eliminate any possible confusions.

Focus group results are showing the word "Average" can be taken in different context (average to the entire female populuation vs. average compared to the women in your area/social circle vs. the average between 1 and 10 on the scale definitions). With this, moving forward, the scale will remove the word "Average" and officially state...

5: Starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common

Please update Wiki Page and original post of thread appropriately. Thank you for your time.

NO, NO, NO!

Copied from last post, just to make sure you don't miss it GB...A 5 is not a compliment, and is skewing towards the ugly side of the scale (as mentioned earlier, technically a 5.5 is smack dab in the center of a 1 and a 10).

Again, proving the idiocy of your scale. 5.5 is smack dab in the middle but because there are no decimals you don't allow for anyone to be in the middle. Dumb, dumb, dumb.

Excerpt copied from post #408offdee said:

I agree that the ".5" is a good to have when necessary...basically what you're saying is they are skewing in between the descriptions. That's as far as you should go though...no need for ".25's" or ".75's"

---------

.5's are completely legit, there is just no reason/benefit to give those rankings specific definitions on the official scale.

It would basically be:

7.5: better than 7, but not as good as 8

 

[GreatLakesMike]

Posting additional "normal" girls today...http://i.imgur.com/dJ5vm.jpghttp://i.imgur.com/PzCrJ.jpghttp://i.imgur.com/CRDRE.jpghttp://i.imgur.com/D7MUa.jpg

1st link - 7, 6 I have a feeling that's not a great pic of #2, but have to base my rating on the pic presented. #1 could be an 8, but she has a boxer's nose. 2nd link - Going 5 across the board. Not a fan.3rd link - horrible pic, but I'll go 6.5 and 8.4th link - 8, 8

 

[Shutterbug]

This is obviously very SERIOUS BUSINESS.

 

[GreatLakesMike]

Posting additional "normal" girls today...

http://i.imgur.com/dJ5vm.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/PzCrJ.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/CRDRE.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/D7MUa.jpg

You don't mean 5 by normal do you?Most of these girls are at least cute.

No, I mean normal as in girls you'll see in normal situations. Not models. Not girls hired for their looks (and/or willingness to walk around in small uniforms). Just regular girls.Speaking of, can we agree on a "no modeling pics" rule? If earning a 10 requires a team of stylists, a professional photographer, and airbrushing we're losing touch with reality.

 

[GreatLakesMike]

http://i184.photobuc...beach/girls.jpg

Prototypical 4's?

All slightly overweight/weird body shapes, faces that are below average.

Bat tatt on the gut gets a bonus 1/2 point.

:X Not a fan of tats period, but that one is just plain awful. - 76

 

[Christo]

OFFICIAL SCALE EDIT ALERT!

It's minor, but important IMO. Because a "5" seems to be such an important barometer, want to eliminate any possible confusions.

Focus group results are showing the word "Average" can be taken in different context (average to the entire female populuation vs. average compared to the women in your area/social circle vs. the average between 1 and 10 on the scale definitions). With this, moving forward, the scale will remove the word "Average" and officially state...

5: Starting to be unattractive, but certain qualities work in her favor. Nothing major, but minor problems are more common

Please update Wiki Page and original post of thread appropriately. Thank you for your time.

NO, NO, NO!

Copied from last post, just to make sure you don't miss it GB...A 5 is not a compliment, and is skewing towards the ugly side of the scale (as mentioned earlier, technically a 5.5 is smack dab in the center of a 1 and a 10).

Again, proving the idiocy of your scale. 5.5 is smack dab in the middle but because there are no decimals you don't allow for anyone to be in the middle. Dumb, dumb, dumb.

Excerpt copied from post #408offdee said:

I agree that the ".5" is a good to have when necessary...basically what you're saying is they are skewing in between the descriptions. That's as far as you should go though...no need for ".25's" or ".75's"

---------

.5's are completely legit, there is just no reason/benefit to give those rankings specific definitions on the official scale.

It would basically be:

7.5: better than 7, but not as good as 8

Still dumb. What sort of scale doesn't have a rating for average?

 

[GreatLakesMike]

8?

Seems about right.

 

[GreatLakesMike]

5.5

ridiculous.

She's a 7 at least.

 

[GreatLakesMike]

So anyway... more girls?http://i.imgur.com/vnJeJ.jpghttp://i.imgur.com/9LcHY.jpghttp://i.imgur.com/LlgAQ.jpghttp://i.imgur.com/u6lsN.jpghttp://i.imgur.com/cDNFa.jpg

1st link - 6, 7.5, 7, 52nd link - 6.5, 5, 63rd link - 6.5, 5.5, 5.5, 54th link - 5.25, 75th link - 6.5, 5.25

 

[lolerskates]

5.5

ridiculous.

She's a 7 at least.

She's old.

 

[Shutterbug]

5.5

ridiculous.

She's a 7 at least.

She's old.

???

 

[General Malaise]

5.5

ridiculous.

She's a 7 at least.

She's old.

So are 80% of us. And that makes her even hotter. Do you have any idea how hard it is to remain attractive as you age? From what I see, she's done it. Major points.In fact, an attractive 40 year old should score bonus points over an attractive 20 year old. IMO.

 

[GreatLakesMike]

All righty then Rate em boys...

pic1

pic2

Pics 3,4,5,6

Pic7

Pic8

Pic9

Pic10

Link #1 - 6 - Big girl with cartoonish breasts, but she looks like a night of fun. Link #2 - 5 - cartoonish breasts again, and not liking the face.

Link #3 - 8, 7 - 9.5 - 9 - 7

Link #4 - 8.5 - bad implants.

Link #5 - 5 - Horrible implants, skinny, and buttaface for a model. Can't imagine what she looks like without the air brushing and makeup.

Link #6 - 8 - Nice, but beach blondes don't do a whole lot for me.

Link #7 - 10

 

[lolerskates]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpg

Ratings?

 

[GreatLakesMike]

Rate Me

8.5 to 9. Big fan.

 

[Shutterbug]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpgRatings?

5, 6, 5, 5, 7.5

 

[General Malaise]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpgRatings?

5, 5, 4, 5, 7

 

[GreatLakesMike]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpgRatings?

5.5, 6.25, 5, 5, 7#2 might be a sleeper. I have a feeling that might not be a good photo of her.

 

[General Malaise]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpgRatings?

5, 6, 5.5, 5, 7.5

Hold on...just so we're clear...you are giving the snow beast with horrible blue eye shadow a 5.5? Really? She could cure an erection lasting longer than 4 hours.

 

[General Malaise]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpgRatings?

5.5, 6.25, 5, 5, 7#2 might be a sleeper. I have a feeling that might not be a good photo of her.

We're going with quarter points now? Come on....

 

[Shutterbug]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpgRatings?

5, 6, 5.5, 5, 7.5

Hold on...just so we're clear...you are giving the snow beast with horrible blue eye shadow a 5.5? Really? She could cure an erection lasting longer than 4 hours.

It was an error. I have a hard time rating more than one at a time. I fixed it. Also, I don't really rate makeup. Otherwise, I would have given her a 4.

 

[General Malaise]

Rate Me

8.5 to 9. Big fan.

That's Terminator's daughter, right? Are we sure she's 18?

 

[General Malaise]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpgRatings?

5, 6, 5.5, 5, 7.5

Hold on...just so we're clear...you are giving the snow beast with horrible blue eye shadow a 5.5? Really? She could cure an erection lasting longer than 4 hours.

It was an error. I have a hard time rating more than one at a time. I fixed it. Also, I don't really rate makeup. Otherwise, I would have given her a 4.

Make-up be damned, she could block Ndomakung Suh.

 

[Shutterbug]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpgRatings?

5, 6, 5.5, 5, 7.5

Hold on...just so we're clear...you are giving the snow beast with horrible blue eye shadow a 5.5? Really? She could cure an erection lasting longer than 4 hours.

It was an error. I have a hard time rating more than one at a time. I fixed it. Also, I don't really rate makeup. Otherwise, I would have given her a 4.

Make-up be damned, she could block Ndomakung Suh.

ok... 4.5. I can't give her a 4 based on makeup, otherwise I would have to give the gal to her left a 4 for the dumb expression on her face. lol

 

[GreatLakesMike]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpgRatings?

5.5, 6.25, 5, 5, 7#2 might be a sleeper. I have a feeling that might not be a good photo of her.

We're going with quarter points now? Come on....

Yes. Not sure what the problem is?

 

[Shutterbug]

pretty sure we are not rating in .25 increments.

 

[GreatLakesMike]

Rate Me

8.5 to 9. Big fan.

That's Terminator's daughter, right? Are we sure she's 18?

Have no clue who the girl is, and as far as rating her, it doesn't matter. She's very cute IMO.

 

[GreatLakesMike]

pretty sure we are not rating in .25 increments.

That's because you're not an expert.

 

[lolerskates]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpg

Ratings?

5.5, 6.25, 5, 5, 7#2 might be a sleeper. I have a feeling that might not be a good photo of her.

Another one of 2

 

[Shutterbug]

pretty sure we are not rating in .25 increments.

That's because you're not an expert.

No, it is because I can read instructions.

 

[General Malaise]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpg

Ratings?

5.5, 6.25, 5, 5, 7#2 might be a sleeper. I have a feeling that might not be a good photo of her.

Another one of 2

See, that's why I have a problem with this...all we see in the first pic is her face, which is pretty busted up. Just not a very pretty face, IMO. But now that we see her body, that changes things. Her body is great. I am forced to bump her up to a 6.

 

[Shutterbug]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpg

Ratings?

5.5, 6.25, 5, 5, 7#2 might be a sleeper. I have a feeling that might not be a good photo of her.

Another one of 2

6.5

 

[GreatLakesMike]

pretty sure we are not rating in .25 increments.

That's because you're not an expert.

No, it is because I can read instructions.

I'm a rebel; I make my own rules.

 

[General Malaise]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpgRatings?

5.5, 6.25, 5, 5, 7#2 might be a sleeper. I have a feeling that might not be a good photo of her.

We're going with quarter points now? Come on....

Yes. Not sure what the problem is?

The problem is it's stupid. You probably love the 64-box of Crayons because it contains 4 different names for the color purple. I'm good with half points, but quarter points is silly. Pick a lane, Dorris.

 

[General Malaise]

By the way, I love this thread. This thread reminds me of the good old days of the FFA.

 

[Shutterbug]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpg

Ratings?

5.5, 6.25, 5, 5, 7#2 might be a sleeper. I have a feeling that might not be a good photo of her.

We're going with quarter points now? Come on....

Yes. Not sure what the problem is?

The problem is it's stupid. You probably love the 64-box of Crayons because it contains 4 different names for the color purple. I'm good with half points, but quarter points is silly. Pick a lane, Dorris.

 

[GreatLakesMike]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpg

Ratings?

5.5, 6.25, 5, 5, 7#2 might be a sleeper. I have a feeling that might not be a good photo of her.

Another one of 2

6.5

Agreed. I'm bumping her up based on that pic. She's close to a 7. I like the innocent look though...

 

[Shutterbug]

By the way, I love this thread. This thread reminds me of the good old days of the FFA.

I am entertained, as well. Some people are ridiculous, though.

 

[General Malaise]

Rate Me

8.5 to 9. Big fan.

That's Terminator's daughter, right? Are we sure she's 18?

Have no clue who the girl is, and as far as rating her, it doesn't matter. She's very cute IMO.

No argument from me, she is very cute. I was just making sure she was legal age....because rating girls under the age of 18 seems a little Homery.

 

[GreatLakesMike]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpgRatings?

5.5, 6.25, 5, 5, 7#2 might be a sleeper. I have a feeling that might not be a good photo of her.

We're going with quarter points now? Come on....

Yes. Not sure what the problem is?

The problem is it's stupid. You probably love the 64-box of Crayons because it contains 4 different names for the color purple. I'm good with half points, but quarter points is silly. Pick a lane, Dorris.

I couldn't name 8 colors. OK, OK... I'll rate girls on full points from now on. Lighten up Francis.

 

[Shutterbug]

http://i.imgur.com/c44s1.jpg

Ratings?

5.5, 6.25, 5, 5, 7#2 might be a sleeper. I have a feeling that might not be a good photo of her.

Another one of 2

6.5

Agreed. I'm bumping her up based on that pic. She's close to a 7. I like the innocent look though...

She lost points with me based on the fake smile, tired looking eyes, and holding the weiner dog. Those dogs are annoying, and they don't scream "look at me, I am sexy." Also, I doubt she is even 18...