What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The super "OFFICIAL" Offdee Scale with Photos (1 Viewer)

8.5, 7.5, 8.5 9I think the one in red is the best example I have seen of a normal girl 9, which is very rare and elusive. the first one may be, too, but her goofy face and limited body shot makes it difficult to give her that hi a rating. Most would proably think the third one is hotter than the first, but she is just not my type.

I bet the second one, whose face is a bit flawed, would be the most fun of the bunch.

 
8.5, 7.5, 8.5 9I think the one in red is the best example I have seen of a normal girl 9, which is very rare and elusive. the first one may be, too, but her goofy face and limited body shot makes it difficult to give her that hi a rating. Most would proably think the third one is hotter than the first, but she is just not my type.

I bet the second one, whose face is a bit flawed, would be the most fun of the bunch.
Kinda feel bad for the second one. She may rate higher if she wasn't surrounded by such spectacular looking girls. Agree about number 4.
 
8.5, 7.5, 8.5 9I think the one in red is the best example I have seen of a normal girl 9, which is very rare and elusive. the first one may be, too, but her goofy face and limited body shot makes it difficult to give her that hi a rating. Most would proably think the third one is hotter than the first, but she is just not my type.

I bet the second one, whose face is a bit flawed, would be the most fun of the bunch.
Kinda feel bad for the second one. She may rate higher if she wasn't surrounded by such spectacular looking girls. Agree about number 4.
Her own choice of bottoms are not helping here there.
 
8.5, 7.5, 8.5 9I think the one in red is the best example I have seen of a normal girl 9, which is very rare and elusive. the first one may be, too, but her goofy face and limited body shot makes it difficult to give her that hi a rating. Most would proably think the third one is hotter than the first, but she is just not my type.

I bet the second one, whose face is a bit flawed, would be the most fun of the bunch.
Kinda feel bad for the second one. She may rate higher if she wasn't surrounded by such spectacular looking girls. Agree about number 4.
Her own choice of bottoms are not helping here there.
I'm sure they look great from behind. She has a better body (or more FBG standard) than 3.
 
Three would be a 9.5-10 for me if not for the little-league-baseball-player hips. 2 doesn't have any apparent hippage either and the other two are in the wrong position.

Just on face:

3

1

4

2

If I was in a draft at a bar and ended up with 2, I'd be as happy as a pig in ####.

 
8.5, 7.5, 8.5 9I think the one in red is the best example I have seen of a normal girl 9, which is very rare and elusive. the first one may be, too, but her goofy face and limited body shot makes it difficult to give her that hi a rating. Most would proably think the third one is hotter than the first, but she is just not my type.

I bet the second one, whose face is a bit flawed, would be the most fun of the bunch.
Kinda feel bad for the second one. She may rate higher if she wasn't surrounded by such spectacular looking girls. Agree about number 4.
:goodposting:
 
I can't view it at work, but apparently there is some facebook video going around of a hot girl having an orgasm while on a roller coaster.

 
Which

One

Doesn't

Belong

Warning: <4 included in this posting.
You tell me...Pic 1

Pic 2

Pic 3

Pic 4

Pic 5
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that #5 might be photoshopped.#3 could be a genuine 1 but it's hard to say without a full body shot.

#1 - lotsa skanks, none of them are as hot as

#2 - YES

#4 - yes yes

1

2

3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
all YESHow about...

1-8

9-11

12-17

18-22

23

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top