What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Tea Party is back in business! (2 Viewers)

He's right. Government workers are all too poor to afford computers and tablets due to the sacrifices they all make for us. And the mobile version really sucks.
Poor? I make really good money. What are you talking about?
I mean besides the 2% that are rich enough to post here.
Wouldn't that fall in line with the private sector FBGs though? Top 2%?

 
98% of this forum is private sector. :coffee:
LInk?
Try starting a poll genius.
You're the moron who made the statement. I'm just asking where this number came from. Is it safe to say you can't substantiate it?
You don't know how to start a poll then?
You made the bold statement, not me. I'm just asking where you got that number from. I guess you just made it up since you're throwing up smoke screens.

 
There are also a whole lot of people who take jobs in the public sector, not for the security OR the pay, but because they believe in what they are doing. The workers at FEMA, and in the National Institute of Health, and in the Department of Education, and in Veterans Affairs, and in all sorts of other institutions, are dedicated servants of the public. Many of them work long hours and do not receive either the respect or the remuneration they deserve.

They are patriots and I admire them, and it astonishes me that there are actually people here who don't.
Patriots? Are you kidding me? Whether I admire them or no, is not the point.
Yes. Patriots. Not kidding.

 
He's right. Government workers are all too poor to afford computers and tablets due to the sacrifices they all make for us. And the mobile version really sucks.
Poor? I make really good money. What are you talking about?
I thought you took the job for the security and to help your fellow man? So you're getting paid well too? So it's NOT just about the security?

 
He's right. Government workers are all too poor to afford computers and tablets due to the sacrifices they all make for us. And the mobile version really sucks.
I'm a private sector guy but I do agree that the mobile version sucks. That is all.

 
He's right. Government workers are all too poor to afford computers and tablets due to the sacrifices they all make for us. And the mobile version really sucks.
Poor? I make really good money. What are you talking about?
I thought you took the job for the security and to help your fellow man? So you're getting paid well too? So it's NOT just about the security?
Whoa. You're really stupid.

 
98% of this forum is private sector. :coffee:
LInk?
Try starting a poll genius.
You're the moron who made the statement. I'm just asking where this number came from. Is it safe to say you can't substantiate it?
You don't know how to start a poll then?
You made the bold statement, not me. I'm just asking where you got that number from. I guess you just made it up since you're throwing up smoke screens.
Of the top 40 posters here at FBG, I know almost everyone's job or sector affiliation. Of those only me and Rayder are public sector employees, I'm not sure about Bri and maybe one other. I have given advice to folks here before, and gotten advice back on public sector specific things. Based on that I am certain 90% are private sector, but I would guess it is closer to 95% or higher.

And you're right, I made the claim. Sorry for the response.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's right. Government workers are all too poor to afford computers and tablets due to the sacrifices they all make for us. And the mobile version really sucks.
Poor? I make really good money. What are you talking about?
I thought you took the job for the security and to help your fellow man? So you're getting paid well too? So it's NOT just about the security?
Whoa. You're really stupid.
Then I guess we have more in common than you first thought.

 
He's right. Government workers are all too poor to afford computers and tablets due to the sacrifices they all make for us. And the mobile version really sucks.
Poor? I make really good money. What are you talking about?
I mean besides the 2% that are rich enough to post here.
Wouldn't that fall in line with the private sector FBGs though? Top 2%?
Pretty much. So this place isn't very representative of things. The way I envision your typical government worker they have enough trouble turning on a computer. So they probably waste time doing other things, like trying to think and stuff.

 
He's right. Government workers are all too poor to afford computers and tablets due to the sacrifices they all make for us. And the mobile version really sucks.
Poor? I make really good money. What are you talking about?
I thought you took the job for the security and to help your fellow man? So you're getting paid well too? So it's NOT just about the security?
Whoa. You're really stupid.
Then I guess we have more in common than you first thought.
I've never thought anything about you, and I'm quite intelligent.

 
This thread got off track.

I hate all three branches of government, this much I know. It continues to be frustrating for private, public, pubic and portly sector employees and IMO this country is in a bit of trouble. How it can be fixed is people at least talking things out, we probably do more of that here in a night than Congress does in a month. We don't always agree and it gets heated, but at least we talk it out. At some point many of us come to common ground. Isn't that amazing? Might not be about government but jonmx and I both love the Detroit Tigers. There is always a starting point...

 
He's right. Government workers are all too poor to afford computers and tablets due to the sacrifices they all make for us. And the mobile version really sucks.
Poor? I make really good money. What are you talking about?
I mean besides the 2% that are rich enough to post here.
Wouldn't that fall in line with the private sector FBGs though? Top 2%?
Pretty much. So this place isn't very representative of things. The way I envision your typical government worker they have enough trouble turning on a computer. So they probably waste time doing other things, like trying to think and stuff.
I do enjoy a good deep think. ;)

 
98% of this forum is private sector. :coffee:
LInk?
Try starting a poll genius.
You're the moron who made the statement. I'm just asking where this number came from. Is it safe to say you can't substantiate it?
You don't know how to start a poll then?
You made the bold statement, not me. I'm just asking where you got that number from. I guess you just made it up since you're throwing up smoke screens.
Of the top 40 posters here at FBG, I know almost everyone's job or sector affiliation. Of those only me and Rayder are public sector employees, I'm not sure about Bri and maybe one other. I have given advice to folks here before, and gotten advice back on public sector specific things. Based on that I am certain 90% are private sector, but I would guess it is closer to 95% or higher.

And you're right, I made the claim. Sorry for the response.
How does somebody get onto this list. Is it by volume? :oldunsure:

 
98% of this forum is private sector. :coffee:
LInk?
Try starting a poll genius.
You're the moron who made the statement. I'm just asking where this number came from. Is it safe to say you can't substantiate it?
You don't know how to start a poll then?
You made the bold statement, not me. I'm just asking where you got that number from. I guess you just made it up since you're throwing up smoke screens.
Of the top 40 posters here at FBG, I know almost everyone's job or sector affiliation. Of those only me and Rayder are public sector employees, I'm not sure about Bri and maybe one other. I have given advice to folks here before, and gotten advice back on public sector specific things. Based on that I am certain 90% are private sector, but I would guess it is closer to 95% or higher.

And you're right, I made the claim. Sorry for the response.
How does somebody get onto this list. Is it by volume? :oldunsure:
Yes, and you're on pace to obliterate everyone. You're at like 4 or 5 or something, but everyone at the top is bunched together and you have a pace no one can sustain (and still actually get anything done in life).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What would be even more amazing for tim is if this place actually did word count as well. I'm fairly certain he has one of those records that can never be broken here with his sermons.

 
What would be even more amazing for tim is if this place actually did word count as well. I'm fairly certain he has one of those records that can never be broken here with his sermons.
Thanks for taking the time to point that out.

 
What the rest of the world thinks about the US inability to govern:

(It is Huffington post, but before the conservatives dismiss it, most of it is just quotes from world leaders and others around the world. Definitely worth a read regardless of ideology.)

(In a spoiler tag so reduce scrolling on mobile)

Rest Of The World Thinks Congress Is A 'Laughing Stock' For Government Shutdown
WASHINGTON -- In the worlds greatest superpower, with the oldest constitutional democracy on Earth, American exceptionalism has struck again. The government shutdown that began this week has stunned the world. With tea party-aligned Republicans insisting any measure to fund the government be tied to defunding or delaying the Affordable Care Act, and Democrats unwilling to yield to their demands, gridlock and frustration have reached levels that only the American political system seems capable of achieving.

While countries like Belize, Iran, Pakistan and Egypt face coups, revolutions, crippling debt, international sanctions, civil war and default, the threat of a government shutdown for them has never been a real one. As Georgetown University professor Erik Voeten writes in The Washington Post, "I cannot think of a single foreign analogy to what is happening in the U.S. today."

Many of the worlds democracies function with parliamentary systems, and in cases of hopeless budget gridlock, the parliament is dissolved, new elections are held, and whole process starts over, writes Slate's Joshua Keating.

Belgians in 2010 and 2011 went without an elected government for 589 days. But even then, budgets were passed, government workers were paid, and government services continued to be provided," writes Voeten.

Not so in the U.S.

In 1975, Australia faced a similar budget debacle, leading to a short government shutdown. Unlike the vitriolic battle of words that often takes place in the the U.S. political system, however, Australias governor general, Sir John Kerr, simply dismissed the prime minister. He appointed a replacement, who immediately passed the spending bill to fund the government. Three hours later, Kerr dismissed the rest of Parliament. Then Australia held elections to restart from scratch. And they haven't had another shutdown since, writes The Washington Post's Max Fisher.

As the U.S. shutdown continues, national monuments and parks remain closed, hundreds of thousands of American workers go without pay, and federally funded social services for millions of women and children have ceased operating. Abroad, the world is caught between laughter and confusion as a superpower is paralyzed by its inability to overcome a relentless minority of lawmakers who have put the the entire government on the line to defund a health care law passed by Congress, signed by the president and upheld by the Supreme Court. America's political meltdown, an international embarrassment, has compromised the country's global image and credibility:

China

"With no political unity to redress its policy mistake, a dysfunctional Washington is now overspending the confidence in its leadership. -- Xinhua

India

In India, some business executives told VOA they could not understand how a country as developed as the United States could see its government shut down because of a legislative impasse. -- Voice of America

United Kingdom

It is a risk to the world economy if the U.S. cant properly sort out its spending plans. -- Prime Minister David Cameron to BBC Radio 4s Today

For most of the world, a government shutdown is very bad news - the result of revolution, invasion or disaster. Even in the middle of its ongoing civil war, the Syrian government has continued to pay its bills and workers wages. That leaders of one of the most powerful nations on earth willingly provoked a crisis that suspends public services and decreases economic growth is astonishing to many. Now, as the latest shutdown crisis plays out, policymakers in other nations are left to ponder the worldwide impact of the impasse. -- Anthony Zurcher, BBC

The last few weeks of paralysis on Capitol Hill have demonstrated a system apparently quite incapable of rational action and thought. Its not the economy thats the problem, but the government. -- The Telegraph

Middle East

"The whole concept is little surreal for our readers, trying to understand why the No. 1 country in the world cannot pass a budget. I come from Lebanon and our parliament is very ineffective, but ludicrous as it sounds, it is better than U.S. Congress when it comes to passing budgets." -- Joyce Karam, Al-Hayat (via Dylan Scott, TPM report)

Canada

"This is a weird, messed-up feature of the American political system. I suppose the checks and balances obsession made sense 200 years ago. It makes no sense any longer. For a country that fancies itself the greatest democracy on Earth, the fact that a small band of outliers in one party can essentially shut down the federal government over a petty political brawl seems woefully undemocratic." -- Lee-Anne Goodman, Canadian Press (via TPM report)

Canadians can only pray their economy won't be collateral damage. Anything that drags down the American economy drags the Canadian economy down with it." -- John Ibbitson, Globe and Mail (via Washington Times)

Mexico

Instead they [u.S. officials] squabble over the inconsequential accomplishment of a 10-week funding extension. It isnt serious, but it certainly isnt funny. -- The News

France

This Republic was founded on a majority opinion of centrists from both major parties of the country. Over the years, this has stalled. American democracy works worse and worse. The American politicians supposed to lead the most powerful nation in the world are becoming a laughing stock. -- Le Monde (via ThinkProgress)

The idea that on a given date, at a specific time, overnight, the state may be partly disconnected would appear to be unthinkable. Something from science fiction, or simple madness. -- Nicolas Demorand, Libération (via The New York Times )

Australia

The reality that another round of misplaced fiscal brinkmanship in Washington is undermining confidence in America's own economic recovery and that of the global, post-GFC economy that depends so heavily on it neither does it say much for the budgetary processes in the world's largest economy. Using Obamacare as the battering ram in the Republican campaign against the President is both irresponsible and damaging for the U.S. and the global economy. -- The Australian

Germany

A superpower has paralyzed itself. -- Der Spiegel Online

A small group of uncompromising Republican ideologues in the House of Representatives are principally responsive for this disaster. They are not only taking their own party to the brink, but the whole country. Unfortunately the leadership of this party has neither had the courage nor the backbone to put them in their place. --Die Zielt

What America is currently exhibiting is the worst kind of absurd theatrics and the whole world is being held hostage. -- Bild (via ThinkProgress)

"What Washington currently offers up is a spectacle, but one in which the spectators feel more like crying. The public is left wondering how things could have been allowed to get to this point and why there is so much poison in the system" --Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.

Japan

"Personally I think it's an international embarrassment. It's just another sign of the declining U.S. influence around the world and a sign of the very divisive extremist politics that have become prominent here. There's no civilized discourse that I can see." -- Elliot Waldman, Tokyo Broadcasting Co. (via TPM report)

Sweden

"Not being able to fund a law or do such a fundamental thing as a budget is worrying for a nation, and somewhat crazy for a democracy like the U.S." -- Sanna Toren Bjorling, Dagens Nyheter (via TPM report)

Norway

"It's to us Norwegians hard to understand that it can be happening in one of the most influential countries in the world that you can have such a dysfunctional government. It is kind of joke or disbelief. We laugh about it. How is it possible at all? Why would they do that?" -- Anders Tvegard, Norwegian Broadcasting Corp. (via TPM report)

Spain

"It's a bit shocking, and I would say sometimes even embarrassing, coming from the best democracy. -- Lorenzo Mila, Television Espanola (via TPM report)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Matthias said:
People trying to only blame one side are delusional.

Republicans suck.

Democrats suck.

Obama has done nothing to try and help resolve this and we the people are the big losers.

If pointing the finger towards the other side and trying to take credit for a small victory makes you feel better about your party affiliation, so be it. It's an endless cycle where nobody comes out on top.
Saying Peyton Manning is a better quarterback than Christian Ponder is objectively true, whether or not you're a Broncos fan. It's in equivocating and saying, "Well, they both have their strong points" that you become delusional. Same thing here.
Bad comparison. There are no Peyton Mannings in congress and comparing congress to Peyton is delusional.. If you had gone with Christian Ponder vs Mark Sanchez, I would agree.

And in this case, saying they both suck is objectively true.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are also a whole lot of people who take jobs in the public sector, not for the security OR the pay, but because they believe in what they are doing. The workers at FEMA, and in the National Institute of Health, and in the Department of Education, and in Veterans Affairs, and in all sorts of other institutions, are dedicated servants of the public. Many of them work long hours and do not receive either the respect or the remuneration they deserve.

They are patriots and I admire them, and it astonishes me that there are actually people here who don't.
The problem is in the federal government it is not easy to fire someone. You end up with a few people pulling most of the weight. There are a lot of employees milking the system. There are a lot of dedicated employees. Federal government ends up with a lot of dead weight, more so than the private sector. Heros? I would not go that far. They are not putting their life on the line like firemen, police, military. They are doing their jobs. Some of them well, some of them are terrible.

 
So all the people who have been "furloughed" are going to get paid. I wish I could get a furlough or extended vacation knowing I was going to get paid eventually. WooHoo AMERICA!
I can't believe there are people out there who are actually annoyed at the fact that these employees, who were furloughed through no fault of their own, are eventually going to be paid.What the #### is wrong with you people?
If you go back a week, there there was a sympathy sentiment for furloughed workers. That element of the equation has been removed. When I mentioned it, I was reminded how different this regime is and how there is no guarantee. It's business as usual.Lot's of good people have bad things happen. I'm sure there are a few college grads who can't get a job or pay their loans due to the economy. There are millions of workers throughout history that have been laid off, through no fault of their own. Did they receive back pay?

Life's tough. I've already mentioned some ways that these workers could have prepared for this and way they could weather the storm. At least now, we can stop the "poor workers" arguments.
Blah blah blah. A lot of people... A LOT of people take jobs in the public sector for less pay for the security. That's the trade off. Where I work there are literally hundreds of people with masters or doctorates there doing great things for veterans. All of these people could have jobs in the private sector.What's happening to all of these people is total bull####. #### you for being too stupid to not understand that and #### you for your stupid arrogant "I already said what they could have done" as if anybody is looking to your dumb useless ### for advice.
:bs:

Frankly, I'm tired of hearing this. What a bunch of nonsense. Who really believes this line of bull?
You realize that a federal judge makes less than a first year associate at a big law firm? And the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court makes less than most 4th year associates, right?

 
One thing I've been happy about this year is that there haven't been any fly overs at the Bears games. Maybe that's because of the sequester. :) I always felt it was entirely wasteful to celebrate sporting events like this. Heading out to tailgate and enjoy a nice flyover less game. And yes, we very well might lose today.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Republicans see shutdown fight shift away from 'Obamacare'

Washington (AFP) - With their leadership clinging to its strategy of demanding changes to the health care law, some rank-and-file Republicans acknowledged Saturday that ending the US government shutdown requires a new game plan.

Without question, a repeal or delay of the law known as "Obamacare" remains a top priority for Republican lawmakers, who for weeks have insisted on making any bill that funds government contingent on rolling back President Barack Obama's signature domestic achievement.

But a handful of Tea Party-supported conservatives have publicly backed off that fight, one which caused deep rifts within the Republican Party and led to some very public sniping among Republicans on the Senate floor.

With the shutdown battle being subsumed by debate over the need to raise the debt ceiling in the next two weeks, they said the focus needs to shift to strictly fiscal issues.

"I won't be happy with that but I recognize the writing on the wall," congressman Doug Lamborn told reporters during a rare weekend session for the House of Representatives.

"We've tried a lot of things, and maybe used every arrow in our quiver against Obamacare. It has not been successful, so I think we do have to move on to the larger issues of the debt ceiling and the overall budget."

That is no small admission from the man National Journal named in 2010 as the most conservative member of the House.

He was joined by congressman Dennis Ross, another favorite of the anti-tax, pro-small-government Tea Party movement.

"Pride, I think, has got to be swallowed here, probably on both sides," Ross said.

"We're so close to the debt ceiling that I think the two will continue to be combined as we go forward."

The US Treasury says it will run out of money to pay creditors on October 17, triggering a potentially calamitous default unless Congress votes to raise the $16.7 trillion debt ceiling.

Despite the approaching crisis, Republican leadership suggested Saturday that "Obamacare" remained the lynchpin in the party's strategy.

"The Republican position has continued to be, no special treatment under the law, no special treatment under Obamacare," number two House Republican Eric Cantor said.

The White House has held firm that it will accept no changes to the Affordable Care Act, and Ross appeared frustrated with his party's failure to adapt to the political reality that linking Obamacare with the funding of government would be a non-starter.

"I think expectations were built up to a level that could not be delivered," he said.

Some conservatives were refusing to budge.

"We have to get something on Obamacare," congressman Jim Jordan told Bloomberg TV on Friday.

"If you want to get this country on a fiscal path to balance, you can not let an entitlement of this size that will truly bankrupt the country and, more importantly, one that's not going to help Americans with their health care. You can't let this happen."

The Tea Party flank has been criticized by Democrats like Senate Majority Harry Reid as legislative "anarchists" gunning for a shutdown.

"We are not a bunch of hard-headed fools," said Republican congressman Blake Farenthold.

"If we can come up with ways to fix the economy and get the same bang for the buck you would get with Obamacare, let's do it," he added, saying he envisioned negotiations on tax and entitlement reform in the debt limit fight.

"The Obamacare battle I think will live to be fought another day."

Republicans and senior aides say they want to extract some concessions for raising the debt ceiling, such as matching the debt ceiling hike with dollar-for-dollar reductions in federal spending.

"Not a blank check to the president. That's not in the cards," Lamborn warned.

As Americans steam over Congress's inability to keep government open, some Republicans were seeking an escape hatch, to the point of even bucking leadership.

Two-term congressman Scott Rigell told AFP he wanted to see Republican "individual members who perhaps are not in leadership, to identify in advance some solution set" that could draw enough bipartisan support for reopening government and raising the debt ceiling.

"If that comes from leadership, wonderful. If it comes from more grass roots, that may be needed."
This should have been their position a long long time ago. Obamacare is a secondary issue. We need real solutions for the budget. And yes, this is an appropriate time to press the issue. But if this was the focus months ago, some kind of deal would have been reached.

 
TIMMAYS PATH TO NERVOUS BREAKDOWN UPDATE:

timschochet 308

Doctor Detroit 62

Bottomfeeder Sports 61

The Commish 61

dparker713 56

wdcrob 55

jon_mx 50

 
Republicans see shutdown fight shift away from 'Obamacare'

Washington (AFP) - With their leadership clinging to its strategy of demanding changes to the health care law, some rank-and-file Republicans acknowledged Saturday that ending the US government shutdown requires a new game plan.

Without question, a repeal or delay of the law known as "Obamacare" remains a top priority for Republican lawmakers, who for weeks have insisted on making any bill that funds government contingent on rolling back President Barack Obama's signature domestic achievement.

But a handful of Tea Party-supported conservatives have publicly backed off that fight, one which caused deep rifts within the Republican Party and led to some very public sniping among Republicans on the Senate floor.

With the shutdown battle being subsumed by debate over the need to raise the debt ceiling in the next two weeks, they said the focus needs to shift to strictly fiscal issues.

"I won't be happy with that but I recognize the writing on the wall," congressman Doug Lamborn told reporters during a rare weekend session for the House of Representatives.

"We've tried a lot of things, and maybe used every arrow in our quiver against Obamacare. It has not been successful, so I think we do have to move on to the larger issues of the debt ceiling and the overall budget."

That is no small admission from the man National Journal named in 2010 as the most conservative member of the House.

He was joined by congressman Dennis Ross, another favorite of the anti-tax, pro-small-government Tea Party movement.

"Pride, I think, has got to be swallowed here, probably on both sides," Ross said.

"We're so close to the debt ceiling that I think the two will continue to be combined as we go forward."

The US Treasury says it will run out of money to pay creditors on October 17, triggering a potentially calamitous default unless Congress votes to raise the $16.7 trillion debt ceiling.

Despite the approaching crisis, Republican leadership suggested Saturday that "Obamacare" remained the lynchpin in the party's strategy.

"The Republican position has continued to be, no special treatment under the law, no special treatment under Obamacare," number two House Republican Eric Cantor said.

The White House has held firm that it will accept no changes to the Affordable Care Act, and Ross appeared frustrated with his party's failure to adapt to the political reality that linking Obamacare with the funding of government would be a non-starter.

"I think expectations were built up to a level that could not be delivered," he said.

Some conservatives were refusing to budge.

"We have to get something on Obamacare," congressman Jim Jordan told Bloomberg TV on Friday.

"If you want to get this country on a fiscal path to balance, you can not let an entitlement of this size that will truly bankrupt the country and, more importantly, one that's not going to help Americans with their health care. You can't let this happen."

The Tea Party flank has been criticized by Democrats like Senate Majority Harry Reid as legislative "anarchists" gunning for a shutdown.

"We are not a bunch of hard-headed fools," said Republican congressman Blake Farenthold.

"If we can come up with ways to fix the economy and get the same bang for the buck you would get with Obamacare, let's do it," he added, saying he envisioned negotiations on tax and entitlement reform in the debt limit fight.

"The Obamacare battle I think will live to be fought another day."

Republicans and senior aides say they want to extract some concessions for raising the debt ceiling, such as matching the debt ceiling hike with dollar-for-dollar reductions in federal spending.

"Not a blank check to the president. That's not in the cards," Lamborn warned.

As Americans steam over Congress's inability to keep government open, some Republicans were seeking an escape hatch, to the point of even bucking leadership.

Two-term congressman Scott Rigell told AFP he wanted to see Republican "individual members who perhaps are not in leadership, to identify in advance some solution set" that could draw enough bipartisan support for reopening government and raising the debt ceiling.

"If that comes from leadership, wonderful. If it comes from more grass roots, that may be needed."
This should have been their position a long long time ago. Obamacare is a secondary issue. We need real solutions for the budget. And yes, this is an appropriate time to press the issue. But if this was the focus months ago, some kind of deal would have been reached.
Nice--"OK, now that we did this, what reason can we come up with that people will accept?" Now, THAT's leadership.

 
TIMMAYS PATH TO NERVOUS BREAKDOWN UPDATE:

timschochet 308

Doctor Detroit 62

Bottomfeeder Sports 61

The Commish 61

dparker713 56

wdcrob 55

jon_mx 50
Usually I would be happy to see a thread with numbers like this, because it would indicate that tim was so busy with this thread that he was unable to contaminate the rest of the forum, But when you have a force of nature like tim, there's no containing him to just one thread. He can deliver this kind of payload to multiple threads simultaneously.

 
What the rest of the world thinks about the US inability to govern: (It is Huffington post, but before the conservatives dismiss it, most of it is just quotes from world leaders and others around the world. Definitely worth a read regardless of ideology.)(In a spoiler tag so reduce scrolling on mobile)

Rest Of The World Thinks Congress Is A 'Laughing Stock' For Government Shutdown
WASHINGTON -- In the worlds greatest superpower, with the oldest constitutional democracy on Earth, American exceptionalism has struck again. The government shutdown that began this week has stunned the world. With tea party-aligned Republicans insisting any measure to fund the government be tied to defunding or delaying the Affordable Care Act, and Democrats unwilling to yield to their demands, gridlock and frustration have reached levels that only the American political system seems capable of achieving.While countries like Belize, Iran, Pakistan and Egypt face coups, revolutions, crippling debt, international sanctions, civil war and default, the threat of a government shutdown for them has never been a real one. As Georgetown University professor Erik Voeten writes in The Washington Post, "I cannot think of a single foreign analogy to what is happening in the U.S. today."Many of the worlds democracies function with parliamentary systems, and in cases of hopeless budget gridlock, the parliament is dissolved, new elections are held, and whole process starts over, writes Slate's Joshua Keating.Belgians in 2010 and 2011 went without an elected government for 589 days. But even then, budgets were passed, government workers were paid, and government services continued to be provided," writes Voeten.Not so in the U.S.In 1975, Australia faced a similar budget debacle, leading to a short government shutdown. Unlike the vitriolic battle of words that often takes place in the the U.S. political system, however, Australias governor general, Sir John Kerr, simply dismissed the prime minister. He appointed a replacement, who immediately passed the spending bill to fund the government. Three hours later, Kerr dismissed the rest of Parliament. Then Australia held elections to restart from scratch. And they haven't had another shutdown since, writes The Washington Post's Max Fisher.As the U.S. shutdown continues, national monuments and parks remain closed, hundreds of thousands of American workers go without pay, and federally funded social services for millions of women and children have ceased operating. Abroad, the world is caught between laughter and confusion as a superpower is paralyzed by its inability to overcome a relentless minority of lawmakers who have put the the entire government on the line to defund a health care law passed by Congress, signed by the president and upheld by the Supreme Court. America's political meltdown, an international embarrassment, has compromised the country's global image and credibility:China"With no political unity to redress its policy mistake, a dysfunctional Washington is now overspending the confidence in its leadership. -- XinhuaIndiaIn India, some business executives told VOA they could not understand how a country as developed as the United States could see its government shut down because of a legislative impasse. -- Voice of AmericaUnited KingdomIt is a risk to the world economy if the U.S. cant properly sort out its spending plans. -- Prime Minister David Cameron to BBC Radio 4s TodayFor most of the world, a government shutdown is very bad news - the result of revolution, invasion or disaster. Even in the middle of its ongoing civil war, the Syrian government has continued to pay its bills and workers wages. That leaders of one of the most powerful nations on earth willingly provoked a crisis that suspends public services and decreases economic growth is astonishing to many. Now, as the latest shutdown crisis plays out, policymakers in other nations are left to ponder the worldwide impact of the impasse. -- Anthony Zurcher, BBCThe last few weeks of paralysis on Capitol Hill have demonstrated a system apparently quite incapable of rational action and thought. Its not the economy thats the problem, but the government. -- The TelegraphMiddle East"The whole concept is little surreal for our readers, trying to understand why the No. 1 country in the world cannot pass a budget. I come from Lebanon and our parliament is very ineffective, but ludicrous as it sounds, it is better than U.S. Congress when it comes to passing budgets." -- Joyce Karam, Al-Hayat (via Dylan Scott, TPM report)Canada"This is a weird, messed-up feature of the American political system. I suppose the checks and balances obsession made sense 200 years ago. It makes no sense any longer. For a country that fancies itself the greatest democracy on Earth, the fact that a small band of outliers in one party can essentially shut down the federal government over a petty political brawl seems woefully undemocratic." -- Lee-Anne Goodman, Canadian Press (via TPM report)Canadians can only pray their economy won't be collateral damage. Anything that drags down the American economy drags the Canadian economy down with it." -- John Ibbitson, Globe and Mail (via Washington Times)MexicoInstead they [u.S. officials] squabble over the inconsequential accomplishment of a 10-week funding extension. It isnt serious, but it certainly isnt funny. -- The NewsFranceThis Republic was founded on a majority opinion of centrists from both major parties of the country. Over the years, this has stalled. American democracy works worse and worse. The American politicians supposed to lead the most powerful nation in the world are becoming a laughing stock. -- Le Monde (via ThinkProgress)The idea that on a given date, at a specific time, overnight, the state may be partly disconnected would appear to be unthinkable. Something from science fiction, or simple madness. -- Nicolas Demorand, Libération (via The New York Times )AustraliaThe reality that another round of misplaced fiscal brinkmanship in Washington is undermining confidence in America's own economic recovery and that of the global, post-GFC economy that depends so heavily on it neither does it say much for the budgetary processes in the world's largest economy. Using Obamacare as the battering ram in the Republican campaign against the President is both irresponsible and damaging for the U.S. and the global economy. -- The AustralianGermanyA superpower has paralyzed itself. -- Der Spiegel OnlineA small group of uncompromising Republican ideologues in the House of Representatives are principally responsive for this disaster. They are not only taking their own party to the brink, but the whole country. Unfortunately the leadership of this party has neither had the courage nor the backbone to put them in their place. --Die ZieltWhat America is currently exhibiting is the worst kind of absurd theatrics and the whole world is being held hostage. -- Bild (via ThinkProgress)"What Washington currently offers up is a spectacle, but one in which the spectators feel more like crying. The public is left wondering how things could have been allowed to get to this point and why there is so much poison in the system" --Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.Japan"Personally I think it's an international embarrassment. It's just another sign of the declining U.S. influence around the world and a sign of the very divisive extremist politics that have become prominent here. There's no civilized discourse that I can see." -- Elliot Waldman, Tokyo Broadcasting Co. (via TPM report)Sweden"Not being able to fund a law or do such a fundamental thing as a budget is worrying for a nation, and somewhat crazy for a democracy like the U.S." -- Sanna Toren Bjorling, Dagens Nyheter (via TPM report)Norway"It's to us Norwegians hard to understand that it can be happening in one of the most influential countries in the world that you can have such a dysfunctional government. It is kind of joke or disbelief. We laugh about it. How is it possible at all? Why would they do that?" -- Anders Tvegard, Norwegian Broadcasting Corp. (via TPM report)Spain"It's a bit shocking, and I would say sometimes even embarrassing, coming from the best democracy. -- Lorenzo Mila, Television Espanola (via TPM report)
I had read that previously, seems way biased in the quotes they selected by country, not the random selection I was expecting.

 
May have been posted already, sorry if it has:

Is raising the debt ceiling to solve the financial issue kinda like raising the BAC to solve drunk driving?

 
The Commish said:
tommyGunZ said:
Jojo the circus boy said:
tommyGunZ said:
Astute observations Chaz. The problem is that it's not just Ted Cruz and a few looney morons. A large % of Americans are completely clueless as to how the gov't runs, and they liken gov't debt, deficits, and the budget to their own household debt, deficit, and budgets. See icon's thread about "OMG DEBT!!!!!!!"

The tea party morons aren't just a fringe radical group, their ideas are supported by the majority of the base of the party. That's why we're in this debacle, and John Boehner won't call them out.
Didn't you mean the majority of Americans? I know you get off calling everyone else stupid, but if you can't spot the sucker...

My gym trainer was asking me about the government shutdown so I filled him in. Then I asked him if he was familiar with the ACA (aka Obamacare), he said he heard of it. I knew he didn't have health insurance so I asked him, did you know if you don't sign up for it they are going to fine you, starting at about $100 and ramping up to $700 in two years and that his alternative to pay for it would run him about $4k? His response, "#### that", and no he didn't know that. So while the masses may not be as educated as TGunz, the word is not getting out there in terms of just how bad this is going to be for a lot of Americans.
So your trainer is either going to have to get health insurance or he'll be force to contribute to the insurance society is already paying for him that he is currently shirking on.

How is this bad for a lot of Americans again?
See...this is some of the utter bull#### that the left spews....yeah it's just one side that does this crap. How the hell do you know he doesn't pay his bills out of pocket??
Are you really so desperate to make this both sides fault that you want to call tommy out because this individual trainer might be the exception to the rule? Could be the noise in the statistics? And if he happens to be the exception that pays out of pocket he is being greatly harmed by the vast majority of his fellow uninsured peers if he ever has any significant medical bills.

Is it really :bs: that tommy believes that this "calculated risk" is one that places society in too much of harms way to be allowable? (I didn't ask if you agreed with tommy, just whether it was a reasonable position to take?) I
Show me that he's the exception to the rule :shrug: I don't care about sides so no, not desperate at all. All you jackals are out to separate yourselves from the other side rather than focus on the problems. Yes, it's bull#### to sling strawman arguments around while trying to suggest you don't (or at least not as much as the other guy). The dog and pony show in Washington is played out. Until they start curbing costs and working on tort reform, it's all just theatre to keep a job, not do a job.
How the #### does tort reform have anything to do with anything in this thread? And you do realize there are three components of the government ledger right? Spending, growth AND revenue. Somehow you've singled out the only segment that Rush Limbaugh espouses, maybe its the only one that doesn't effect him?
It has a lot to do with medical expenses. This "healthcare" issue is about expense and the threat of being sued more than anything. The availability is a symptom (and for some a choice).

 
There are also a whole lot of people who take jobs in the public sector, not for the security OR the pay, but because they believe in what they are doing. The workers at FEMA, and in the National Institute of Health, and in the Department of Education, and in Veterans Affairs, and in all sorts of other institutions, are dedicated servants of the public. Many of them work long hours and do not receive either the respect or the remuneration they deserve.

They are patriots and I admire them, and it astonishes me that there are actually people here who don't.
The problem is in the federal government it is not easy to fire someone. You end up with a few people pulling most of the weight. There are a lot of employees milking the system. There are a lot of dedicated employees. Federal government ends up with a lot of dead weight, more so than the private sector. Heros? I would not go that far. They are not putting their life on the line like firemen, police, military. They are doing their jobs. Some of them well, some of them are terrible.
I work in government (NYC) and sure there are worthless people. But there were also a lot of worthless people at the consulting firm I came from. Firing people isn't pleasant and most people try to avoid it, so they put up with the deadweight because it's easier and doesn't make them feel bad. The efficiency of the private sector is overstated.

 
May have been posted already, sorry if it has:

Is raising the debt ceiling to solve the financial issue kinda like raising the BAC to solve drunk driving?
It's more like refusing to pay your credit card bill in order to balance your budget.

Actually, it's not "like" that at all -- it is exactly that.

 
The Commish said:
tommyGunZ said:
Jojo the circus boy said:
tommyGunZ said:
Astute observations Chaz. The problem is that it's not just Ted Cruz and a few looney morons. A large % of Americans are completely clueless as to how the gov't runs, and they liken gov't debt, deficits, and the budget to their own household debt, deficit, and budgets. See icon's thread about "OMG DEBT!!!!!!!"

The tea party morons aren't just a fringe radical group, their ideas are supported by the majority of the base of the party. That's why we're in this debacle, and John Boehner won't call them out.
Didn't you mean the majority of Americans? I know you get off calling everyone else stupid, but if you can't spot the sucker...

My gym trainer was asking me about the government shutdown so I filled him in. Then I asked him if he was familiar with the ACA (aka Obamacare), he said he heard of it. I knew he didn't have health insurance so I asked him, did you know if you don't sign up for it they are going to fine you, starting at about $100 and ramping up to $700 in two years and that his alternative to pay for it would run him about $4k? His response, "#### that", and no he didn't know that. So while the masses may not be as educated as TGunz, the word is not getting out there in terms of just how bad this is going to be for a lot of Americans.
So your trainer is either going to have to get health insurance or he'll be force to contribute to the insurance society is already paying for him that he is currently shirking on.

How is this bad for a lot of Americans again?
See...this is some of the utter bull#### that the left spews....yeah it's just one side that does this crap. How the hell do you know he doesn't pay his bills out of pocket??
Are you really so desperate to make this both sides fault that you want to call tommy out because this individual trainer might be the exception to the rule? Could be the noise in the statistics? And if he happens to be the exception that pays out of pocket he is being greatly harmed by the vast majority of his fellow uninsured peers if he ever has any significant medical bills.

Is it really :bs: that tommy believes that this "calculated risk" is one that places society in too much of harms way to be allowable? (I didn't ask if you agreed with tommy, just whether it was a reasonable position to take?) I
Show me that he's the exception to the rule :shrug: I don't care about sides so no, not desperate at all. All you jackals are out to separate yourselves from the other side rather than focus on the problems. Yes, it's bull#### to sling strawman arguments around while trying to suggest you don't (or at least not as much as the other guy). The dog and pony show in Washington is played out. Until they start curbing costs and working on tort reform, it's all just theatre to keep a job, not do a job.
How the #### does tort reform have anything to do with anything in this thread? And you do realize there are three components of the government ledger right? Spending, growth AND revenue. Somehow you've singled out the only segment that Rush Limbaugh espouses, maybe its the only one that doesn't effect him?
It has a lot to do with medical expenses. This "healthcare" issue is about expense and the threat of being sued more than anything. The availability is a symptom (and for some a choice).
Except for the fact that tort reform for med mal does nothing but increase the bottom line of med mal insurance carriers. States that have passed such reforms have not seen a decrease in their med mal insurance costs, nor has it decreased their rate of premium increases, nor has it lowered their general costs.

 
Matthias said:
Jojo the circus boy said:
Matthias said:
matttyl said:
May have been posted already, sorry if it has: Is raising the debt ceiling to solve the financial issue kinda like raising the BAC to solve drunk driving?
No. It's like removing 5,000 pounds of TNT from a 2-alarm fire to keep it from getting any worse.
Bad analogy, removing anything would be spending cuts.
The analogy is fine.Go find some more craptastic #### off the internet to copy/paste.
The BAC analogy was better than your turd offering, you make it sound like repeatedly raising the debt ceiling is a GOOD thing.

 
wdcrob said:
matttyl said:
May have been posted already, sorry if it has:

Is raising the debt ceiling to solve the financial issue kinda like raising the BAC to solve drunk driving?
It's more like refusing to pay your credit card bill in order to balance your budget.

Actually, it's not "like" that at all -- it is exactly that.
Exactly. The debt ceiling isn't the problem -- in fact, the "debt ceiling" shouldn't even exist in the first place. The problem is that government spending exceeds tax revenues. Raising the debt ceiling has no effect on either of those variables.

The only purpose the debt ceiling serves is that in the hands of the wrong people (Congressional Republicans), it can be used as a tool to blow up the world. That's not very helpful for policymaking.

 
Matthias said:
Jojo the circus boy said:
Matthias said:
matttyl said:
May have been posted already, sorry if it has: Is raising the debt ceiling to solve the financial issue kinda like raising the BAC to solve drunk driving?
No. It's like removing 5,000 pounds of TNT from a 2-alarm fire to keep it from getting any worse.
Bad analogy, removing anything would be spending cuts.
The analogy is fine.Go find some more craptastic #### off the internet to copy/paste.
The BAC analogy was better than your turd offering, you make it sound like repeatedly raising the debt ceiling is a GOOD thing.
Raising the debt ceiling repeatedly is a good thing if the alternative is defaulting on the national debt. Raising the debt itself repeatedly is probably a bad thing, but increasing the debt without also increasing the debt ceiling is exponentially worse.

 
jon_mx said:
Republicans see shutdown fight shift away from 'Obamacare'

Washington (AFP) - With their leadership clinging to its strategy of demanding changes to the health care law, some rank-and-file Republicans acknowledged Saturday that ending the US government shutdown requires a new game plan.

Without question, a repeal or delay of the law known as "Obamacare" remains a top priority for Republican lawmakers, who for weeks have insisted on making any bill that funds government contingent on rolling back President Barack Obama's signature domestic achievement.

But a handful of Tea Party-supported conservatives have publicly backed off that fight, one which caused deep rifts within the Republican Party and led to some very public sniping among Republicans on the Senate floor.

With the shutdown battle being subsumed by debate over the need to raise the debt ceiling in the next two weeks, they said the focus needs to shift to strictly fiscal issues.

"I won't be happy with that but I recognize the writing on the wall," congressman Doug Lamborn told reporters during a rare weekend session for the House of Representatives.

"We've tried a lot of things, and maybe used every arrow in our quiver against Obamacare. It has not been successful, so I think we do have to move on to the larger issues of the debt ceiling and the overall budget."

That is no small admission from the man National Journal named in 2010 as the most conservative member of the House.

He was joined by congressman Dennis Ross, another favorite of the anti-tax, pro-small-government Tea Party movement.

"Pride, I think, has got to be swallowed here, probably on both sides," Ross said.

"We're so close to the debt ceiling that I think the two will continue to be combined as we go forward."

The US Treasury says it will run out of money to pay creditors on October 17, triggering a potentially calamitous default unless Congress votes to raise the $16.7 trillion debt ceiling.

Despite the approaching crisis, Republican leadership suggested Saturday that "Obamacare" remained the lynchpin in the party's strategy.

"The Republican position has continued to be, no special treatment under the law, no special treatment under Obamacare," number two House Republican Eric Cantor said.

The White House has held firm that it will accept no changes to the Affordable Care Act, and Ross appeared frustrated with his party's failure to adapt to the political reality that linking Obamacare with the funding of government would be a non-starter.

"I think expectations were built up to a level that could not be delivered," he said.

Some conservatives were refusing to budge.

"We have to get something on Obamacare," congressman Jim Jordan told Bloomberg TV on Friday.

"If you want to get this country on a fiscal path to balance, you can not let an entitlement of this size that will truly bankrupt the country and, more importantly, one that's not going to help Americans with their health care. You can't let this happen."

The Tea Party flank has been criticized by Democrats like Senate Majority Harry Reid as legislative "anarchists" gunning for a shutdown.

"We are not a bunch of hard-headed fools," said Republican congressman Blake Farenthold.

"If we can come up with ways to fix the economy and get the same bang for the buck you would get with Obamacare, let's do it," he added, saying he envisioned negotiations on tax and entitlement reform in the debt limit fight.

"The Obamacare battle I think will live to be fought another day."

Republicans and senior aides say they want to extract some concessions for raising the debt ceiling, such as matching the debt ceiling hike with dollar-for-dollar reductions in federal spending.

"Not a blank check to the president. That's not in the cards," Lamborn warned.

As Americans steam over Congress's inability to keep government open, some Republicans were seeking an escape hatch, to the point of even bucking leadership.

Two-term congressman Scott Rigell told AFP he wanted to see Republican "individual members who perhaps are not in leadership, to identify in advance some solution set" that could draw enough bipartisan support for reopening government and raising the debt ceiling.

"If that comes from leadership, wonderful. If it comes from more grass roots, that may be needed."
This should have been their position a long long time ago. Obamacare is a secondary issue. We need real solutions for the budget. And yes, this is an appropriate time to press the issue. But if this was the focus months ago, some kind of deal would have been reached.
It makes me EXTREMELY nervous that these guys continue to believe they can get concessions over the debt ceiling. If I am reading Obama right, that will not happen this time around. So I don't know how this resolves itself.

 
5 digit know nothing said:
Maelstrom said:
What the rest of the world thinks about the US inability to govern: (It is Huffington post, but before the conservatives dismiss it, most of it is just quotes from world leaders and others around the world. Definitely worth a read regardless of ideology.)(In a spoiler tag so reduce scrolling on mobile)

Rest Of The World Thinks Congress Is A 'Laughing Stock' For Government Shutdown
WASHINGTON -- In the worlds greatest superpower, with the oldest constitutional democracy on Earth, American exceptionalism has struck again. The government shutdown that began this week has stunned the world. With tea party-aligned Republicans insisting any measure to fund the government be tied to defunding or delaying the Affordable Care Act, and Democrats unwilling to yield to their demands, gridlock and frustration have reached levels that only the American political system seems capable of achieving.While countries like Belize, Iran, Pakistan and Egypt face coups, revolutions, crippling debt, international sanctions, civil war and default, the threat of a government shutdown for them has never been a real one. As Georgetown University professor Erik Voeten writes in The Washington Post, "I cannot think of a single foreign analogy to what is happening in the U.S. today."Many of the worlds democracies function with parliamentary systems, and in cases of hopeless budget gridlock, the parliament is dissolved, new elections are held, and whole process starts over, writes Slate's Joshua Keating.Belgians in 2010 and 2011 went without an elected government for 589 days. But even then, budgets were passed, government workers were paid, and government services continued to be provided," writes Voeten.Not so in the U.S.In 1975, Australia faced a similar budget debacle, leading to a short government shutdown. Unlike the vitriolic battle of words that often takes place in the the U.S. political system, however, Australias governor general, Sir John Kerr, simply dismissed the prime minister. He appointed a replacement, who immediately passed the spending bill to fund the government. Three hours later, Kerr dismissed the rest of Parliament. Then Australia held elections to restart from scratch. And they haven't had another shutdown since, writes The Washington Post's Max Fisher.As the U.S. shutdown continues, national monuments and parks remain closed, hundreds of thousands of American workers go without pay, and federally funded social services for millions of women and children have ceased operating. Abroad, the world is caught between laughter and confusion as a superpower is paralyzed by its inability to overcome a relentless minority of lawmakers who have put the the entire government on the line to defund a health care law passed by Congress, signed by the president and upheld by the Supreme Court. America's political meltdown, an international embarrassment, has compromised the country's global image and credibility:China"With no political unity to redress its policy mistake, a dysfunctional Washington is now overspending the confidence in its leadership. -- XinhuaIndiaIn India, some business executives told VOA they could not understand how a country as developed as the United States could see its government shut down because of a legislative impasse. -- Voice of AmericaUnited KingdomIt is a risk to the world economy if the U.S. cant properly sort out its spending plans. -- Prime Minister David Cameron to BBC Radio 4s TodayFor most of the world, a government shutdown is very bad news - the result of revolution, invasion or disaster. Even in the middle of its ongoing civil war, the Syrian government has continued to pay its bills and workers wages. That leaders of one of the most powerful nations on earth willingly provoked a crisis that suspends public services and decreases economic growth is astonishing to many. Now, as the latest shutdown crisis plays out, policymakers in other nations are left to ponder the worldwide impact of the impasse. -- Anthony Zurcher, BBCThe last few weeks of paralysis on Capitol Hill have demonstrated a system apparently quite incapable of rational action and thought. Its not the economy thats the problem, but the government. -- The TelegraphMiddle East"The whole concept is little surreal for our readers, trying to understand why the No. 1 country in the world cannot pass a budget. I come from Lebanon and our parliament is very ineffective, but ludicrous as it sounds, it is better than U.S. Congress when it comes to passing budgets." -- Joyce Karam, Al-Hayat (via Dylan Scott, TPM report)Canada"This is a weird, messed-up feature of the American political system. I suppose the checks and balances obsession made sense 200 years ago. It makes no sense any longer. For a country that fancies itself the greatest democracy on Earth, the fact that a small band of outliers in one party can essentially shut down the federal government over a petty political brawl seems woefully undemocratic." -- Lee-Anne Goodman, Canadian Press (via TPM report)Canadians can only pray their economy won't be collateral damage. Anything that drags down the American economy drags the Canadian economy down with it." -- John Ibbitson, Globe and Mail (via Washington Times)MexicoInstead they [u.S. officials] squabble over the inconsequential accomplishment of a 10-week funding extension. It isnt serious, but it certainly isnt funny. -- The NewsFranceThis Republic was founded on a majority opinion of centrists from both major parties of the country. Over the years, this has stalled. American democracy works worse and worse. The American politicians supposed to lead the most powerful nation in the world are becoming a laughing stock. -- Le Monde (via ThinkProgress)The idea that on a given date, at a specific time, overnight, the state may be partly disconnected would appear to be unthinkable. Something from science fiction, or simple madness. -- Nicolas Demorand, Libération (via The New York Times )AustraliaThe reality that another round of misplaced fiscal brinkmanship in Washington is undermining confidence in America's own economic recovery and that of the global, post-GFC economy that depends so heavily on it neither does it say much for the budgetary processes in the world's largest economy. Using Obamacare as the battering ram in the Republican campaign against the President is both irresponsible and damaging for the U.S. and the global economy. -- The AustralianGermanyA superpower has paralyzed itself. -- Der Spiegel OnlineA small group of uncompromising Republican ideologues in the House of Representatives are principally responsive for this disaster. They are not only taking their own party to the brink, but the whole country. Unfortunately the leadership of this party has neither had the courage nor the backbone to put them in their place. --Die ZieltWhat America is currently exhibiting is the worst kind of absurd theatrics and the whole world is being held hostage. -- Bild (via ThinkProgress)"What Washington currently offers up is a spectacle, but one in which the spectators feel more like crying. The public is left wondering how things could have been allowed to get to this point and why there is so much poison in the system" --Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.Japan"Personally I think it's an international embarrassment. It's just another sign of the declining U.S. influence around the world and a sign of the very divisive extremist politics that have become prominent here. There's no civilized discourse that I can see." -- Elliot Waldman, Tokyo Broadcasting Co. (via TPM report)Sweden"Not being able to fund a law or do such a fundamental thing as a budget is worrying for a nation, and somewhat crazy for a democracy like the U.S." -- Sanna Toren Bjorling, Dagens Nyheter (via TPM report)Norway"It's to us Norwegians hard to understand that it can be happening in one of the most influential countries in the world that you can have such a dysfunctional government. It is kind of joke or disbelief. We laugh about it. How is it possible at all? Why would they do that?" -- Anders Tvegard, Norwegian Broadcasting Corp. (via TPM report)Spain"It's a bit shocking, and I would say sometimes even embarrassing, coming from the best democracy. -- Lorenzo Mila, Television Espanola (via TPM report)
I had read that previously, seems way biased in the quotes they selected by country, not the random selection I was expecting.
Do you think there are many political leaders out there thinking to themselves "Hmmm. It looks like the Americans have figured out a way for one subset of one party in one body of the government to throw a monkey wrench into the system and cause the entire structure to shut down, seriously raising the possibility of default. We should consider working something like that into our own government."

Edit: This is the kind of thing that people used to make fun of Italy for doing, only this time we're Italy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
jon_mx said:
timschochet said:
There are also a whole lot of people who take jobs in the public sector, not for the security OR the pay, but because they believe in what they are doing. The workers at FEMA, and in the National Institute of Health, and in the Department of Education, and in Veterans Affairs, and in all sorts of other institutions, are dedicated servants of the public. Many of them work long hours and do not receive either the respect or the remuneration they deserve.

They are patriots and I admire them, and it astonishes me that there are actually people here who don't.
The problem is in the federal government it is not easy to fire someone. You end up with a few people pulling most of the weight. There are a lot of employees milking the system. There are a lot of dedicated employees. Federal government ends up with a lot of dead weight, more so than the private sector. Heros? I would not go that far. They are not putting their life on the line like firemen, police, military. They are doing their jobs. Some of them well, some of them are terrible.
Well...this is not entirely true. CIA, FBI, Border Control and countless civilians who have deployed to some crazy places have and continue to do so. I would never call any of them heroes, but they do put their lives on the line.

You're right about a lot of the rest, but I've had one terrible employee in my tenure and I fired him. I have a few average employees, a few above average and one exceptional. There's some dead weight but I saw a lot in the private sector also when I worked in it, and I have a lot of friends who tell me stories about established folks in a business or corporation who hide or have enough corporate knowledge to get them by. The private sector isn't about firing people who are somewhat unproductive, firing anyone who isn't completely awful is usually tough. Show up on time, do the minimum and don't cause waves is the majority of the workforce IMO. Private or public.

 
Matthias said:
Matthias said:
Jojo the circus boy said:
Matthias said:
matttyl said:
May have been posted already, sorry if it has: Is raising the debt ceiling to solve the financial issue kinda like raising the BAC to solve drunk driving?
No. It's like removing 5,000 pounds of TNT from a 2-alarm fire to keep it from getting any worse.
Bad analogy, removing anything would be spending cuts.
The analogy is fine.Go find some more craptastic #### off the internet to copy/paste.
The BAC analogy was better than your turd offering, you make it sound like repeatedly raising the debt ceiling is a GOOD thing.
Compared to defaulting on our debt? It is by a country mile.This whole shutdown is unnecessary and childish. But it's ultimately not a huge crisis. The US not increasing its debt ceiling in 2 weeks? Financial chaos. Anyone who doesn't realize that should probably sit this one out.
Move the goal posts much? I never said defaulting was a good thing.
 
jon_mx said:
timschochet said:
There are also a whole lot of people who take jobs in the public sector, not for the security OR the pay, but because they believe in what they are doing. The workers at FEMA, and in the National Institute of Health, and in the Department of Education, and in Veterans Affairs, and in all sorts of other institutions, are dedicated servants of the public. Many of them work long hours and do not receive either the respect or the remuneration they deserve.

They are patriots and I admire them, and it astonishes me that there are actually people here who don't.
The problem is in the federal government it is not easy to fire someone. You end up with a few people pulling most of the weight. There are a lot of employees milking the system. There are a lot of dedicated employees. Federal government ends up with a lot of dead weight, more so than the private sector. Heros? I would not go that far. They are not putting their life on the line like firemen, police, military. They are doing their jobs. Some of them well, some of them are terrible.
Well...this is not entirely true. CIA, FBI, Border Control and countless civilians who have deployed to some crazy places have and continue to do so. I would never call any of them heroes, but they do put their lives on the line. You're right about a lot of the rest, but I've had one terrible employee in my tenure and I fired him. I have a few average employees, a few above average and one exceptional. There's some dead weight but I saw a lot in the private sector also when I worked in it, and I have a lot of friends who tell me stories about established folks in a business or corporation who hide or have enough corporate knowledge to get them by. The private sector isn't about firing people who are somewhat unproductive, firing anyone who isn't completely awful is usually tough. Show up on time, do the minimum and don't cause waves is the majority of the workforce IMO. Private or public.
It's very easy to fire someone in the private sector. Private sector is all about making money and cutting dead weight. Most states offer no protection outside of discrimination when a company decides to fire someone.

 
Deadlock

A must read. IMVHO.

The house may have the power of the purse. But the president holds the power of the Executive.

If you give the legislature both the power of the purse and the power of the Executive, then you’ve ipso facto destroyed the very checks and balances that keep our government from tyranny.

No matter that you be liberal or conservative, that you be a Democrat or a Republican, you do not want what follows if the President allows deadlock to become a precedent.

The President cannot give in.

And if you are truly an American, you don’t want him to.
 
5 digit know nothing said:
Maelstrom said:
What the rest of the world thinks about the US inability to govern: (It is Huffington post, but before the conservatives dismiss it, most of it is just quotes from world leaders and others around the world. Definitely worth a read regardless of ideology.)(In a spoiler tag so reduce scrolling on mobile)

Rest Of The World Thinks Congress Is A 'Laughing Stock' For Government Shutdown
WASHINGTON -- In the worlds greatest superpower, with the oldest constitutional democracy on Earth, American exceptionalism has struck again. The government shutdown that began this week has stunned the world. With tea party-aligned Republicans insisting any measure to fund the government be tied to defunding or delaying the Affordable Care Act, and Democrats unwilling to yield to their demands, gridlock and frustration have reached levels that only the American political system seems capable of achieving.While countries like Belize, Iran, Pakistan and Egypt face coups, revolutions, crippling debt, international sanctions, civil war and default, the threat of a government shutdown for them has never been a real one. As Georgetown University professor Erik Voeten writes in The Washington Post, "I cannot think of a single foreign analogy to what is happening in the U.S. today."Many of the worlds democracies function with parliamentary systems, and in cases of hopeless budget gridlock, the parliament is dissolved, new elections are held, and whole process starts over, writes Slate's Joshua Keating.Belgians in 2010 and 2011 went without an elected government for 589 days. But even then, budgets were passed, government workers were paid, and government services continued to be provided," writes Voeten.Not so in the U.S.In 1975, Australia faced a similar budget debacle, leading to a short government shutdown. Unlike the vitriolic battle of words that often takes place in the the U.S. political system, however, Australias governor general, Sir John Kerr, simply dismissed the prime minister. He appointed a replacement, who immediately passed the spending bill to fund the government. Three hours later, Kerr dismissed the rest of Parliament. Then Australia held elections to restart from scratch. And they haven't had another shutdown since, writes The Washington Post's Max Fisher.As the U.S. shutdown continues, national monuments and parks remain closed, hundreds of thousands of American workers go without pay, and federally funded social services for millions of women and children have ceased operating. Abroad, the world is caught between laughter and confusion as a superpower is paralyzed by its inability to overcome a relentless minority of lawmakers who have put the the entire government on the line to defund a health care law passed by Congress, signed by the president and upheld by the Supreme Court. America's political meltdown, an international embarrassment, has compromised the country's global image and credibility:China"With no political unity to redress its policy mistake, a dysfunctional Washington is now overspending the confidence in its leadership. -- XinhuaIndiaIn India, some business executives told VOA they could not understand how a country as developed as the United States could see its government shut down because of a legislative impasse. -- Voice of AmericaUnited KingdomIt is a risk to the world economy if the U.S. cant properly sort out its spending plans. -- Prime Minister David Cameron to BBC Radio 4s TodayFor most of the world, a government shutdown is very bad news - the result of revolution, invasion or disaster. Even in the middle of its ongoing civil war, the Syrian government has continued to pay its bills and workers wages. That leaders of one of the most powerful nations on earth willingly provoked a crisis that suspends public services and decreases economic growth is astonishing to many. Now, as the latest shutdown crisis plays out, policymakers in other nations are left to ponder the worldwide impact of the impasse. -- Anthony Zurcher, BBCThe last few weeks of paralysis on Capitol Hill have demonstrated a system apparently quite incapable of rational action and thought. Its not the economy thats the problem, but the government. -- The TelegraphMiddle East"The whole concept is little surreal for our readers, trying to understand why the No. 1 country in the world cannot pass a budget. I come from Lebanon and our parliament is very ineffective, but ludicrous as it sounds, it is better than U.S. Congress when it comes to passing budgets." -- Joyce Karam, Al-Hayat (via Dylan Scott, TPM report)Canada"This is a weird, messed-up feature of the American political system. I suppose the checks and balances obsession made sense 200 years ago. It makes no sense any longer. For a country that fancies itself the greatest democracy on Earth, the fact that a small band of outliers in one party can essentially shut down the federal government over a petty political brawl seems woefully undemocratic." -- Lee-Anne Goodman, Canadian Press (via TPM report)Canadians can only pray their economy won't be collateral damage. Anything that drags down the American economy drags the Canadian economy down with it." -- John Ibbitson, Globe and Mail (via Washington Times)MexicoInstead they [u.S. officials] squabble over the inconsequential accomplishment of a 10-week funding extension. It isnt serious, but it certainly isnt funny. -- The NewsFranceThis Republic was founded on a majority opinion of centrists from both major parties of the country. Over the years, this has stalled. American democracy works worse and worse. The American politicians supposed to lead the most powerful nation in the world are becoming a laughing stock. -- Le Monde (via ThinkProgress)The idea that on a given date, at a specific time, overnight, the state may be partly disconnected would appear to be unthinkable. Something from science fiction, or simple madness. -- Nicolas Demorand, Libération (via The New York Times )AustraliaThe reality that another round of misplaced fiscal brinkmanship in Washington is undermining confidence in America's own economic recovery and that of the global, post-GFC economy that depends so heavily on it neither does it say much for the budgetary processes in the world's largest economy. Using Obamacare as the battering ram in the Republican campaign against the President is both irresponsible and damaging for the U.S. and the global economy. -- The AustralianGermanyA superpower has paralyzed itself. -- Der Spiegel OnlineA small group of uncompromising Republican ideologues in the House of Representatives are principally responsive for this disaster. They are not only taking their own party to the brink, but the whole country. Unfortunately the leadership of this party has neither had the courage nor the backbone to put them in their place. --Die ZieltWhat America is currently exhibiting is the worst kind of absurd theatrics and the whole world is being held hostage. -- Bild (via ThinkProgress)"What Washington currently offers up is a spectacle, but one in which the spectators feel more like crying. The public is left wondering how things could have been allowed to get to this point and why there is so much poison in the system" --Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.Japan"Personally I think it's an international embarrassment. It's just another sign of the declining U.S. influence around the world and a sign of the very divisive extremist politics that have become prominent here. There's no civilized discourse that I can see." -- Elliot Waldman, Tokyo Broadcasting Co. (via TPM report)Sweden"Not being able to fund a law or do such a fundamental thing as a budget is worrying for a nation, and somewhat crazy for a democracy like the U.S." -- Sanna Toren Bjorling, Dagens Nyheter (via TPM report)Norway"It's to us Norwegians hard to understand that it can be happening in one of the most influential countries in the world that you can have such a dysfunctional government. It is kind of joke or disbelief. We laugh about it. How is it possible at all? Why would they do that?" -- Anders Tvegard, Norwegian Broadcasting Corp. (via TPM report)Spain"It's a bit shocking, and I would say sometimes even embarrassing, coming from the best democracy. -- Lorenzo Mila, Television Espanola (via TPM report)
I had read that previously, seems way biased in the quotes they selected by country, not the random selection I was expecting.
Do you think there are many political leaders out there thinking to themselves "Hmmm. It looks like the Americans have figured out a way for one subset of one party in one body of the government to throw a monkey wrench into the system and cause the entire structure to shut down, seriously raising the possibility of default. We should consider working something like that into our own government."

Edit: This is the kind of thing that people used to make fun of Italy for doing, only this time we're Italy.

Of course not, they just fire everyone in the Senate and the House when this happens. :thumbup:

 
jon_mx said:
timschochet said:
There are also a whole lot of people who take jobs in the public sector, not for the security OR the pay, but because they believe in what they are doing. The workers at FEMA, and in the National Institute of Health, and in the Department of Education, and in Veterans Affairs, and in all sorts of other institutions, are dedicated servants of the public. Many of them work long hours and do not receive either the respect or the remuneration they deserve.

They are patriots and I admire them, and it astonishes me that there are actually people here who don't.
The problem is in the federal government it is not easy to fire someone. You end up with a few people pulling most of the weight. There are a lot of employees milking the system. There are a lot of dedicated employees. Federal government ends up with a lot of dead weight, more so than the private sector. Heros? I would not go that far. They are not putting their life on the line like firemen, police, military. They are doing their jobs. Some of them well, some of them are terrible.
Well...this is not entirely true. CIA, FBI, Border Control and countless civilians who have deployed to some crazy places have and continue to do so. I would never call any of them heroes, but they do put their lives on the line. You're right about a lot of the rest, but I've had one terrible employee in my tenure and I fired him. I have a few average employees, a few above average and one exceptional. There's some dead weight but I saw a lot in the private sector also when I worked in it, and I have a lot of friends who tell me stories about established folks in a business or corporation who hide or have enough corporate knowledge to get them by. The private sector isn't about firing people who are somewhat unproductive, firing anyone who isn't completely awful is usually tough. Show up on time, do the minimum and don't cause waves is the majority of the workforce IMO. Private or public.
It's very easy to fire someone in the private sector. Private sector is all about making money and cutting dead weight. Most states offer no protection outside of discrimination when a company decides to fire someone.
I'm not talking about the regulations and laws of employment, I'm talking about the people aspect. There are a lot of marginal employees out there, and firing them takes more than just the legal latitude do so.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top