What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Tea Party is back in business! (1 Viewer)

So here's where we apparently are: the House is working on passing a bill. It may or may not be voted upon tonight. Boehner may decide not to have it voted upon because he can't get enough votes. Or it may get the 217 required. Or he might have it voted on and it will fail. We won't know until tonight.

However, even if the House bill does pass, it doesn't matter because the Senate won't approve it. In fact, I'm a little confused as to why they're even bothering with this charade. If it's to please the Tea Party, to say, "see, we did everything we could", why wouldn't Boehner come up with a bill that was much more conservative? The Tea Party doesn't like this new bill because it doesn't defund Obamacare- that's why Boehner's having so much trouble getting it passed. And he must know that even if it does pass, the Senate will just reject it? So why ar we wasting time?

The prevailing thought seems to be that McConnell and Reid have already come to an agreement, and are just keeping it under tabs as they wait for Boehner to do what he has to do. I have heard this theory suggested in several places. But assuming it's true, they are cutting things really close to the bone by waiting until tomorrow. And what assurance do we have that the House will approve the Senate plan?

p

This will PROBABLY all end up fine. But it worries me that there is this group in the House of Representatives, the Tea Party, which actually wants us to go over the debt limit without raising it. How can we be 100% positive that they won't get their way, with less than 2 days left?
Stop believing everything you read about "where things are at this minute". It's just a show.
I used the word "apparently", because I'm not sure I believe all of it, but it happens to be what we know. I'm not quite as confident as you and other people are that there is an automatic back room deal in play here. I tend to doubt conspiracy theories. If a deal is done in the last second, then that usually means it was actually agreed to in the last second.
No, you don't know anything, I don't know anything, and neither does Politico or the other sites you're getting this stuff from. Like I said earlier, those sites need to write something, so they just make some stuff up, throw it against the wall, and hope something sticks.

Now, if you want to change "happens to be what we know" to "happens to be what some jackass reporter on Politico randomly speculated most recently", then I'm with you.
I don't believe they "just make stuff up."
Right, they couch it in language like "Sources speculate that..."

 
Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other Place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.

ARTICLE I, SECTION 5, CLAUSE 4
Better check to see if the Republicans changed the rules again.

 
Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other Place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.

ARTICLE I, SECTION 5, CLAUSE 4
Better check to see if the Republicans changed the rules again.
That's actually the Constitution.
I wouldn't put trying to changing the Constitution past this group of certifiably insane group of Republicans.

 
What happens to t-bills should we default?

Some coworkers are moving their retirement savings out of the stock market into govt securities.

They know the price will drop, but not as much as the stock market. This is for tsp, fwiw.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What happens to t-bills should we default?

Some coworkers are moving their retirement savings out of the stock market into govt securities.
If really worried I would suggest buying German Bunds for default risk. Of course it probably won't help.

 
What happens to t-bills should we default?

Some coworkers are moving their retirement savings out of the stock market into govt securities.

They know the price will drop, but not as much as the stock market. This is for tsp, fwiw.
Last time we went through this I made a killing on UST/MBS bonds. Of course, we didn't actually default...

 
Not raising the debt limit doesn't cause the US to default on current debt and interest. Tax receipts are high enough to easily cover that and that must be paid first.

Tea Party types believe that it forces a balance budget immediately, which is why they are standing firm.

 
Not raising the debt limit doesn't cause the US to default on current debt and interest. Tax receipts are high enough to easily cover that and that must be paid first.

Tea Party types believe that it forces a balance budget immediately, which is why they are standing firm.
What about the fact that there won't be any new treasury auctions? Where do banks and other users of these instruments turn?

 
Not raising the debt limit doesn't cause the US to default on current debt and interest. Tax receipts are high enough to easily cover that and that must be paid first.

Tea Party types believe that it forces a balance budget immediately, which is why they are standing firm.
Of course. But they have no idea what to cut in order to get that balanced budget immediately, and neither does anyone else. The areas that produce the most Tea Party voters are often the ones who receive the most aid form the federal government. Can you imagine the look on their faces when they are told, "Sorry no Social Security or Medicare check for you; we had to service the debt"?

 
Not raising the debt limit doesn't cause the US to default on current debt and interest. Tax receipts are high enough to easily cover that and that must be paid first.

Tea Party types believe that it forces a balance budget immediately, which is why they are standing firm.
What about the fact that there won't be any new treasury auctions? Where do banks and other users of these instruments turn?
The government will still be able to roll-over debt (issue new debt to pay off maturing debt) and their will be future auctions. Think the big issue no one is thinking about is what investors reception to these new auctions will be if the country is only paying certain bills. That could be an investment folks are not interested in especially big buyers of our debt (China/Japan).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not raising the debt limit doesn't cause the US to default on current debt and interest. Tax receipts are high enough to easily cover that and that must be paid first.

Tea Party types believe that it forces a balance budget immediately, which is why they are standing firm.
What about the fact that there won't be any new treasury auctions? Where do banks and other users of these instruments turn?
I have no idea. I'm sure it wouldn't be good.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fitch Places United States' 'AAA' on Rating Watch Negative

Fitch Ratings-New York/London-15 October 2013: Fitch Ratings has placed the United States of America's (U.S.) 'AAA' Long-term foreign and local currency Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) on Rating Watch Negative (RWN). The ratings of all outstanding U.S. sovereign debt securities have also been placed on RWN, as has the U.S. Short-term foreign currency rating of 'F1+'. The Outlook on the Long-term ratings was previously Negative. The U.S. Country Ceiling has been affirmed at 'AAA'

.

Fitch expects to resolve the RWN by the end of Q114 at the latest, although timing would necessarily reflect developments and events, including the duration of any agreement to raise the debt ceiling.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

In line with Fitch's previous statements, the RWN reflects the following key rating drivers and their relative weights:

High

- The U.S. authorities have not raised the federal debt ceiling in a timely manner before the Treasury exhausts extraordinary measures. The U.S. Treasury Secretary has said that extraordinary measures will be exhausted by 17 October, leaving cash reserves of just USD30bn. Although Fitch continues to believe that the debt ceiling will be raised soon, the political brinkmanship and reduced financing flexibility could increase the risk of a U.S. default.

- Although the Treasury would still have limited capacity to make payments after 17 October it would be exposed to volatile revenue and expenditure flows. The Treasury may be unable to prioritise debt service, and it is unclear whether it even has the legal authority to do so. The U.S. risks being forced to incur widespread delays of payments to suppliers and employees, as well as social security payments to citizens - all of which would damage the perception of U.S. sovereign creditworthiness and the economy.

- The prolonged negotiations over raising the debt ceiling (following the episode in August 2011) risks undermining confidence in the role of the U.S. dollar as the preeminent global reserve currency, by casting doubt over the full faith and credit of the U.S. This "faith" is a key reason why the U.S. 'AAA' rating can tolerate a substantially higher level of public debt than other 'AAA' sovereigns.

Medium
- The repeated brinkmanship over raising the debt ceiling also dents confidence in the effectiveness of the U.S. government and political institutions, and in the coherence and credibility of economic policy. It will also have some detrimental effect on the U.S. economy.

The 'AAA' rating reflects the U.S.'s strong economic and credit fundamentals, including:

- Its highly productive, diversified and wealthy economy; extraordinary monetary and exchange rate flexibility; and the exceptional financing flexibility afforded by the global reserve currency status of the U.S. dollar and the depth and liquidity of domestic capital markets - in particular the U.S. Treasury market. The U.S. sovereign credit profile also benefits from the respect for property rights, the rule of law and a high degree of social stability.

- Fitch continues to judge that the U.S. economy (and hence tax base) remains more dynamic and resilient to shocks than its high-grade rating peers. Fiscal and macroeconomic risks emanating from the financial sector are generally low and diminishing and becoming supportive of, rather than a drag on, economic growth. Fitch forecasts economic growth to pick up from 1.6% in 2013 to 2.6% in in 2014 and to average 3% over 2015-17, before reverting to its assumed long-run trend growth rate of 2.25%. The projected recovery is supported by easing headwinds from private sector debt deleveraging, a pick-up in the housing market and a gradual decline in unemployment.

- The 'AAA' rating also reflects the halving of the federal budget deficit since 2010, which is now approaching a level consistent with debt stabilisation. The Budget Control Act passed in August 2011 implied significant fiscal consolidation and Congress and the Administration have adhered to the automatic spending cuts - the sequester - specified under the Act in the absence of agreement on an alternative and equivalent set of deficit-reduction measures. In addition, the passage of the American Taxpayer Relief Act on 1 January 2013, which implied a tax increase of more than USD600bn, has also contributed to the deficit reduction effort.

- Fitch's medium-term fiscal projections imply federal and general government (which includes states and local governments) gross debt stabilising next year and over the remainder of the decade at around 72% and 104% of GDP, respectively. This is below the 80% and 110% thresholds that Fitch previously identified as being inconsistent with the U.S. retaining its 'AAA' status.

- Nevertheless, public debt stabilisation at such elevated levels still render the US economy and public finances vulnerable to adverse shocks and in the absence of additional spending reform and revenue measures, deficits and debt will begin to rise again at the end of the decade. The U.S. is the most heavily indebted 'AAA' rated sovereign, with a gross debt ratio equivalent to double that of the 'AAA' median.

RATING SENSITIVITIES
The RWN reflects the following risk factors that may individually or collectively result in a downgrade of the ratings:

- Failure by the government to honour interest and/or principal payments on the due date of U.S. Treasury securities would lead Fitch to downgrade the U.S. sovereign IDR to 'Restricted Default' (RD) until the default event was cured. We would also downgrade the rating of the affected issue(s) to 'B+' from 'AAA', the highest rating for securities in default in expectation of full or near-full recovery. Debt securities approaching maturity or those with approaching coupon payments would be vulnerable to a downgrade. The Country Ceiling would likely remain 'AAA'.

In the event of a deal to raise the debt ceiling and to resolve the government shutdown, which Fitch expects, the outcome of a subsequent review of the ratings would take into account the manner and duration of the agreement and the perceived risk of a similar episode occurring in the future. It would also reflect Fitch's assessment of the following main factors:

- The impact of the debt ceiling brinkmanship and government shutdown on our assessment of the effectiveness of government and political institutions, the coherence and credibility of economic policy, the potential long-term impact on the U.S. sovereign's cost of funding and cost of capital for the economy as a whole, and the implications for long-term growth.

- Our assessment of the prospects for further deficit-reduction measures in future years necessary to contain government deficits in the face of long-term spending pressures and place public debt on a downward path over the medium to long term.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch continues to believe that an agreement will be reached to end the current political impasse and raise the U.S. debt ceiling. Even if the debt limit is not raised before or shortly after 17 October, we assume there is sufficient political will and capacity to ensure that Treasury securities will continue to be honoured in full and on time.

Fitch's federal debt projections reflect its economic and fiscal policy assumptions and were detailed in the Special Report, 'U.S. Medium-Term Fiscal Projections - An Update' (dated 28 June 2013; see link below). Subsequent to that analysis, the Bureau of Economic Analysis revised the level of GDP up by around 3.4% due to revisions in the way GDP is calculated, including reclassifying spending on R&D and intellectual property as investment. This has had the statistical effect of lowering debt/GDP ratios, but has not significantly affected the trajectory of debt dynamics or its sensitivity to shocks. Since the June review, Fitch has revised down its forecasts for GDP growth for 2013 to 1.6% from 1.9% and for 2014 to 2.6% from 2.8%.

Fitch's medium-term fiscal projections incorporate assumptions regarding the medium-term growth potential of the US economy and do not incorporate potential upside benefits from shale gas or downside risks emanating from the eurozone and elsewhere. They draw heavily upon Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projections, including CBO assumptions and judgements regarding the take up of various benefits as well as the rate of growth of health care spending.

Financial sector risks are currently judged to be low as reflected by Fitch's stable outlook for the U.S. banking sector.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not raising the debt limit doesn't cause the US to default on current debt and interest. Tax receipts are high enough to easily cover that and that must be paid first.

Tea Party types believe that it forces a balance budget immediately, which is why they are standing firm.
Of course. But they have no idea what to cut in order to get that balanced budget immediately, and neither does anyone else.The areas that produce the most Tea Party voters are often the ones who receive the most aid form the federal government. Can you imagine the look on their faces when they are told, "Sorry no Social Security or Medicare check for you; we had to service the debt"?
The most scary thing about you is you have a family and are actually raising a child. I weep for young America. Of course he/she could also realize what a windbag you are with absolutley no convictions.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tea Party Republicans are standing firm
I voted for Ted Cruz for a reason, I would be majorily dissappointed if he turned into a RINO. Shut the ####er down.
Want to see the market back at 6k don't ya?
You want your children and grandchildren to live in a third world country?
Apparently the Teabaggers want them to live in a third world Nation in 2013/2014.
 
Let me get this straight, Tea Party wants to balance a budget but won't touch the sacred cow of Defence spending. They want all the poor people to suffer because, in their minds, these people are all minorities anyway. Even though food stamps and such are a small portion of the budget. Their bright idea is to F with our credit rating and bring the markets down which will only affect mostly rich white people. Is this about right?

 
Let me get this straight, Tea Party wants to balance a budget but won't touch the sacred cow of Defence spending. They want all the poor people to suffer because, in their minds, these people are all minorities anyway. Even though food stamps and such are a small portion of the budget. Their bright idea is to F with our credit rating and bring the markets down which will only affect mostly rich white people. Is this about right?
They don't want to pay what they owe. Who does that remind you of?

 
The point is that you threw numbers around three years ago to make points with little to no knowledge of what those numbers represented, you still don't know even though it was explained in detail. Now it is just $80 billion a month in cuts this time around. Easy! No difference! The same kind of understanding that drives these budget starting to be constant showdowns.
I like how you didn't consider the new spending of ACA to actually be new spending due to the associated tax increases. Something that you rejected when I brought up the Obama tax cuts here. So really, that doesn't explain how none of this is new spending. We could just call Obamacare the 1.7 trillion itself. There's no question it's going to cost that unless we actually get it changed or repealed before it happens. It's projected to cost 1.3 trillion or so through 2023 by itself and should hit 1.7 by 2025.

These negotiations have happened in the past with the understanding that most of these programs are untouchable despite them and the resulting budget issues continually being labeled as problems during election periods. A certain portion of the base doesn't consider Washington's non answers to be acceptable solutions anymore and aren't willing to accept it. That's why we had the sequester and why we have a standoff today.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wish the US had a system like in Australia where the Prime Minister can dissolve BOTH houses with a double dissolution.

BOTH the FULL house and the FULL senate would be put to a special election.

Where there is so much disfunction between the houses, the President should be given the power to blow it all up, let the people decide and start from scratch.

Australia has had 6 double dissolution elections, none within the last 25 years, but there were 4 in the preceeding 15 years when there was a lot of chaos.

 
I wish the US had a system like in Australia where the Prime Minister can dissolve BOTH houses with a double dissolution.

BOTH the FULL house and the FULL senate would be put to a special election.

Where there is so much disfunction between the houses, the President should be given the power to blow it all up, let the people decide and start from scratch.

Australia has had 6 double dissolution elections, none within the last 25 years, but there were 4 in the preceeding 15 years when there was a lot of chaos.
This would need to be accompanied by some kind of shuffling of the districts for those kicked out.

 
So what this comes down to is that, sometime tomorrow or Thursday, John Boehner is going to be forced to make the decision that he's been trying to avoid for several weeks now- he needs to defy the conservatives in his party and allow the Senate deal up for a vote.

 
I wish the US had a system like in Australia where the Prime Minister can dissolve BOTH houses with a double dissolution.

BOTH the FULL house and the FULL senate would be put to a special election.

Where there is so much disfunction between the houses, the President should be given the power to blow it all up, let the people decide and start from scratch.

Australia has had 6 double dissolution elections, none within the last 25 years, but there were 4 in the preceeding 15 years when there was a lot of chaos.
Yes, we should have a parliament.

 
So what this comes down to is that, sometime tomorrow or Thursday, John Boehner is going to be forced to make the decision that he's been trying to avoid for several weeks now- he needs to defy the conservatives in his party and allow the Senate deal up for a vote.
If you're a Washington business as usual type, I suppose. But the real answer is to shut it down.

 
I wish the US had a system like in Australia where the Prime Minister can dissolve BOTH houses with a double dissolution.

BOTH the FULL house and the FULL senate would be put to a special election.

Where there is so much disfunction between the houses, the President should be given the power to blow it all up, let the people decide and start from scratch.

Australia has had 6 double dissolution elections, none within the last 25 years, but there were 4 in the preceeding 15 years when there was a lot of chaos.
Yes, we should have a parliament.
Parliament, a Queen and emus. Is there anything Australia doesn't have?

 
So what this comes down to is that, sometime tomorrow or Thursday, John Boehner is going to be forced to make the decision that he's been trying to avoid for several weeks now- he needs to defy the conservatives in his party and allow the Senate deal up for a vote.
I think if that's what it comes down to, he'll do it. Why cling to a leadership position over a group of people who can't even agree under such conditions. Do the right thing, bow out with the approval of 80% of sensible americans, and let the loonies run amok.

 
And it starts Fitch has already put US rating under review with a negative out look.

But hey Jojo you don't have to speak with members of the Govt that are impacted by the "slimdown"

So its ok since JoJo is not impacted.

 
Let me get this straight, Tea Party wants to balance a budget but won't touch the sacred cow of Defence spending. They want all the poor people to suffer because, in their minds, these people are all minorities anyway. Even though food stamps and such are a small portion of the budget. Their bright idea is to F with our credit rating and bring the markets down which will only affect mostly rich white people. Is this about right?
They don't want to pay what they owe. Who does that remind you of?
:lmao: :hifive:
 
The Dems always using the "sky is falling" approach is tiring.

Using language like "terrorists" and "kidnappers" is disgusting.

Our political system is corrupt and dysfunctional and for anyone to hang their hats on one party over the other is frustrating.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top