What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The TidesofWar Top 25 College Football Programs (1 Viewer)

:lmao: at everyone agreeing with this poll until their team isn't #1 and then they start questioning the rankings basis.

Michigan fans in particular are some of the most myopic uneducated national college football fans there are.

There's a lot more to this world than trouncing Purdue 6-3, as I am sure you have come to appreciate your last few trips to Pasadena.
To my knowledge, the only UM fan that's posted to this point has been whoknew, until me of course and you won't get an argument out of me other than to say there is way too much emphasis put on "championships" here, IMO. That shouldn't be news to anyone though. You are kinda falling flat on your face here. I don't think anyone is questioning UM being down and performing poorly in Pasedena....especially against USC. USC's has had UM's number out there the last few times. The only team that can say that out of the Pac-10 though. They are 4-6 against USC and 0-1 against ASU. Five of those losses have come in the last 6 games they'v played. It's funny that you have the 6-3 comment in there given that most of the games between the two have been within a touchdown except for the last two years and the early years.
No you're right. I was too broad. I was just extremely entertained by some of the above posts. Its not like Michigan was ranked #23. They were ranked 5th and all of a sudden a clock had 13 hands.

:lmao:
:lmao: All I know is that I'm going to be looking for the 14th if USC is ahead of OU.
 
yes, the big 10 has not been anything close to the SEC. but we are talking about Michigan. so if you want to use the SEC as the gauge, why not include Michigan's W/L versus the SEC? not one SEC team has a winning record against them. with their second win over Florida in a recent Bowl Game, i believe Michigan improved to 12-4 against historical members of the SEC and 20-5-1 against current members.

Outside of losing (getting smoked I should say) to Tenn, Michigan has had a great run in the Citrus/Capital One Bowl. SEC fan is quick to hate on this game, but the fact is besides being a New Year's Day Bowl, the SEC/Big 10 teams are the top teams not in a BCS game. Also, do not forget the 2000 BCS Orange Bowl when Michigan beat Bama in an amazing game.

Michigan has won 5 of 6 in Bowl Game versus the SEC and is 70% lifetime I believe. One of the few losses was the infamous Griese INT toward the end returned by Bama that kept Michigan's lifetime record in Bowls against Alabama from going to 3-0.

SEC is king no doubt, but outside of the ####ty ### in bowl Ohio State Buckeyes (0 for forever versus the SEC), both Michigan and Penn State are 70%+ when playing the southern boys in bowl games.

TidesofWar said:
ConstruxBoy said:
Just because the Big Ten hasn't been as good as the SEC the last 10-15 years doesn't mean it wasn't good for the 80 years or whatever before that. 5th is silly for UM and sounds like you're just trying to get Alabama higher.
This may, hopefully, change your viewpoint a bit.........................Top 25 winning percentages

The Big Ten, has historically, never been as good as the SEC, as the data above reveals.

Only Michigan and Ohio State represent the Big Ten in the first 34 positions of all time winning percentage. Tough to really count Penn State in there as they are a relative newcomer.

The SEC has SIX Programs in the Top 17 - Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, LSU, Florida, and Auburn.

That number speaks volumes about the quality of SEC Football, and the toughness of winning in the League on a weekly basis.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
by the way, i also do not think Michigan should be #1. Closer to 3-5 sounds right.

can assume bama will be close to #1 due to the SEC references and the fact bama has a winning record against the whole conference. even though they should be ahead of michigan, just calling out now a #1 is not feasible when only having the 7th most wins in college football. toss in a fairly recent run of no bowl games and ####ty records, well.....

 
:lmao: at everyone agreeing with this poll until their team isn't #1 and then they start questioning the rankings basis.

Michigan fans in particular are some of the most myopic uneducated national college football fans there are.

There's a lot more to this world than trouncing Purdue 6-3, as I am sure you have come to appreciate your last few trips to Pasadena.
To my knowledge, the only UM fan that's posted to this point has been whoknew, until me of course and you won't get an argument out of me other than to say there is way too much emphasis put on "championships" here, IMO. That shouldn't be news to anyone though. You are kinda falling flat on your face here. I don't think anyone is questioning UM being down and performing poorly in Pasedena....especially against USC. USC's has had UM's number out there the last few times. The only team that can say that out of the Pac-10 though. They are 4-6 against USC and 0-1 against ASU. Five of those losses have come in the last 6 games they'v played. It's funny that you have the 6-3 comment in there given that most of the games between the two have been within a touchdown except for the last two years and the early years.
No you're right. I was too broad. I was just extremely entertained by some of the above posts. Its not like Michigan was ranked #23. They were ranked 5th and all of a sudden a clock had 13 hands.

:lmao:
:lmao: All I know is that I'm going to be looking for the 14th if USC is ahead of OU.
Lol Honestly you could easily justify any of the schools 1-8 as the top.

The great thing about college football is how close all the top teams from the various conferences are and how based on local bias it is so easy to justify beliefs.

Regardless, its a good conversation.

 
michigan is right where they should be.............two NCS in 6 decades says it all.......the singlemost most important criterion in this analysis is NCs and they simply don't have the hardware.....their losing record in bowl games also says a lot as well........

i am predicting notre dame and alabama to be #1 #2 respectively

 
michigan is right where they should be.............two NCS in 6 decades says it all.......the singlemost most important criterion in this analysis is NCs and they simply don't have the hardware.....their losing record in bowl games also says a lot as well........
Serious Question: Why are we using 6 decades as our criteria? Why not 30 years, 90 years, 45 years, or I dont know every year EVER??If we choose 30 years, they have one national title.....same as AlabamaIf we choose 60 years, they have one national title.....terribleIf we choose 90 years, they have six national titles.....pretty damn goodIf we choose the EVER option, they have 11 national titles....One of the top programs everI guess my thought is this: If you are going to start a thread ranking the top college football programs of ALL TIME, you need to use just that.....ALL TIME....Otherwise your list should be titles....The Top 25 College Football Programs of the last 60 years....seems pretty simple to me.
 
michigan is right where they should be.............two NCS in 6 decades says it all.......the singlemost most important criterion in this analysis is NCs and they simply don't have the hardware.....their losing record in bowl games also says a lot as well........
Serious Question: Why are we using 6 decades as our criteria? Why not 30 years, 90 years, 45 years, or I dont know every year EVER??If we choose 30 years, they have one national title.....same as AlabamaIf we choose 60 years, they have one national title.....terribleIf we choose 90 years, they have six national titles.....pretty damn goodIf we choose the EVER option, they have 11 national titles....One of the top programs everI guess my thought is this: If you are going to start a thread ranking the top college football programs of ALL TIME, you need to use just that.....ALL TIME....Otherwise your list should be titles....The Top 25 College Football Programs of the last 60 years....seems pretty simple to me.
These discussion always turn into this though, don't they? It's part of the "what have you done for me lately" attitude mixed with scope creep. That's why these topics rarely go anywhere, but it's July 14 and there is nothing else to talk about so we argue for the sake of passing the time. In the end, I think we can all agree that any "All Time" list is virtually impossible to come up with given the nature of sports and how quickly they change.
 
michigan is right where they should be.............two NCS in 6 decades says it all.......the singlemost most important criterion in this analysis is NCs and they simply don't have the hardware.....their losing record in bowl games also says a lot as well........
Serious Question: Why are we using 6 decades as our criteria? Why not 30 years, 90 years, 45 years, or I dont know every year EVER??If we choose 30 years, they have one national title.....same as Alabama

If we choose 60 years, they have one national title.....terrible

If we choose 90 years, they have six national titles.....pretty damn good

If we choose the EVER option, they have 11 national titles....One of the top programs ever

I guess my thought is this: If you are going to start a thread ranking the top college football programs of ALL TIME, you need to use just that.....ALL TIME....

Otherwise your list should be titles....The Top 25 College Football Programs of the last 60 years....seems pretty simple to me.
No one's disputing thatHell, as an OU fan I'll take anything in the Top 10 as long as they're ahead of Texas & Nebraska.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
michigan is right where they should be.............two NCS in 6 decades says it all.......the singlemost most important criterion in this analysis is NCs and they simply don't have the hardware.....their losing record in bowl games also says a lot as well........
Serious Question: Why are we using 6 decades as our criteria? Why not 30 years, 90 years, 45 years, or I dont know every year EVER??If we choose 30 years, they have one national title.....same as AlabamaIf we choose 60 years, they have one national title.....terribleIf we choose 90 years, they have six national titles.....pretty damn goodIf we choose the EVER option, they have 11 national titles....One of the top programs everI guess my thought is this: If you are going to start a thread ranking the top college football programs of ALL TIME, you need to use just that.....ALL TIME....Otherwise your list should be titles....The Top 25 College Football Programs of the last 60 years....seems pretty simple to me.
These discussion always turn into this though, don't they? It's part of the "what have you done for me lately" attitude mixed with scope creep. That's why these topics rarely go anywhere, but it's July 14 and there is nothing else to talk about so we argue for the sake of passing the time. In the end, I think we can all agree that any "All Time" list is virtually impossible to come up with given the nature of sports and how quickly they change.
Not so much what have you done for me lately, but as noted in the OP, I place a lot of value on a demonstrated ability to win in different eras.If I just looked at total numbers, I would need to rank Ivy League teams based on the high number of NCs they have in the earliest days of College football.But, no Ivy League team has won a NC since the 1920s, and they have not been relevant on a National Scale in the last 60 years or more, and I think that has to be accounted for.
 
Not so much what have you done for me lately, but as noted in the OP, I place a lot of value on a demonstrated ability to win in different eras.If I just looked at total numbers, I would need to rank Ivy League teams based on the high number of NCs they have in the earliest days of College football.But, no Ivy League team has won a NC since the 1920s, and they have not been relevant on a National Scale in the last 60 years or more, and I think that has to be accounted for.
"Win" what?? Just games? "Championships"? There isn't a single team in the country that has consistantly won "championships" over all the eras. They all have a hole somewhere. Not sure what you are going by here if not the "what have you done for me lately" theory. It can't be just winning in general because they you wouldn't be practicing what you preach. And that's all fine....just be upfront with what you're doing....it's not a big deal :shrug: It's one man's opinion.I guess we also need to know how you break down the eras. Personally, I think there are four in general. That from the start into the 1950s. The second being from the 60s into the 70s. The third the 80s and 90s. The fourth the BCS crap we have now.ETA: I take back my statement about a single team winning in all the eras....Oklahoma's done it. One in each (as I have them defined above)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't find my copy...but I had a Street n Smith "All-Time Ranking" mag from 2 years ago. They had around 10 different catagories to make up their ranking.

If I remember right, they had ND, USC, Oklahoma, Alabama, and Nebraska as their top 5 in order.

 
Not so much what have you done for me lately, but as noted in the OP, I place a lot of value on a demonstrated ability to win in different eras.

If I just looked at total numbers, I would need to rank Ivy League teams based on the high number of NCs they have in the earliest days of College football.

But, no Ivy League team has won a NC since the 1920s, and they have not been relevant on a National Scale in the last 60 years or more, and I think that has to be accounted for.
"Win" what?? Just games? "Championships"? There isn't a single team in the country that has consistantly won "championships" over all the eras. They all have a hole somewhere. Not sure what you are going by here if not the "what have you done for me lately" theory. It can't be just winning in general because they you wouldn't be practicing what you preach. And that's all fine....just be upfront with what you're doing....it's not a big deal :shrug: It's one man's opinion.I guess we also need to know how you break down the eras. Personally, I think there are four in general. That from the start into the 1950s. The second being from the 60s into the 70s. The third the 80s and 90s. The fourth the BCS crap we have now.

ETA: I take back my statement about a single team winning in all the eras....Oklahoma's done it. One in each (as I have them defined above)
:confused: I thought you liked the BCS?
 
As noted, it is very difficult to separate many of these Programs. They all can make cases to be ranked higher, but in the end, a call has to be made. So.........................

#4 - THE OKLAHOMA SOONERS

The Oklahoma Sooners began playing the game of College Football in 1895, and have a 788-300-53 record in that time. That is good for a .714 winning percentage, currently 5th all time, and the 788 wins are the 8th most in NCAA history.

OU has won a total of 41 Conference titles.....

2 Southwest Conference Titles in 1915 and 1918

1 Missouri Valley in 1920

32 Big 8 Crowns between 1938 and 1987

6 Big 12 Titles between 2000 and 2008

Oklahoma also officially claims seven National Titles...........................

1950 10-1 Bud Wilkinson

1955 11-0 Bud Wilkinson

1956 11-0 Bud Wilkinson

1974 11-0 Barry Switzer

1975 11-1 Barry Switzer

1985 11-1 Barry switzer

2000 13-0 Bob Stoops

Oklahoma also was named national Champion by at least one non-AP or UPI selector in the following years.............

1949 11-0

1953 9-1-1

1957 10-1

1967 10-1

1973 10-0-1

1978 11-1

1980 10-2

1986 11-1

After examing these 8 "Others", I feel the only claim with real merit is 1949, where an 11-0 Oklahoma team was passed over to name a 10-0 Notre Dame wire service Champions.

Oklahoma has been blessed with many great players, some of which include..................

Kurt Burris, Greg Pruitt, Josh Heupel, Adrian Peterson, JC Watts, The Boz, Tommy McDonald, Jason White, Steve Owens, Tinker Owens, The Selmon Brothers, Greg Roberts, Rocky Calmus, Tony Casillas, and many, many others.

Oklahoma has produced 5 Heisman Trophy winners - Billy Vessels, Steve Owens, Billy Sims, Jason White, and Sam Bradford. OU also has produced 5 runners up in Kurt Burris, Greg Pruitt, Billy Sims, Josh Heupel, and Adrian Peterson.

Many feel that Billy Sims should have joined Archie Griffin as two-time winners, but Sims bid to repeat fell just short as he was second in 1979.

Coaching Greats..............

Bennie Owen 1905-1926 122-54-16 .677

Snorter Luster 1941-1945 27-18-3 .594

Bud Wilkinson 1947-1963 145-29-4 .826

Chuck Fairbanks 1967-1972 52-15-1 .772

Barry Switzer 1973-1988 157-29-4 .837

Bob Stoops Current (10th year) 109-24-0 .820

Some noteworthy Oklahoma facts ...................................

Most weeks ranked #1 in the BCS with 18 weeks

Most weeks ranked in top 5 in the BCS with 38

Oklahoma holds the NCAA record for most consecutive victories with 47.

Oklahoma also has the most points scored in the history of NCAA football with 30,474 through the 2008 regular season (Michigan is second with 29,590)

Oklahoma has the most rushing yards in a season with 5,635 in 1971, which is 470 yards per game (12 games)

Oklahoma holds the NCAA record for the most points scored in a single season with 702 points through 12 games in the 2008–2009 season.

Oklahoma holds the record for scoring 60 or more points for 5 consecutive games

Some Oklahoma History, traditions, and facts............................



Crimson and Cream

The official school colors of crimson and cream became official about a century ago and you can still see those colors worn proudly by Sooner athletes and fans alike on gamedays or when they want to show their love for the university.

In the fall of 1895, Miss May Overstreet, the only woman on the faculty, was asked to chair a committee to select the colors of the university. The committee decided the colors should be crimson and cream and an elaborate display of the colors was draped above a platform before the student body. The student body approved with great enthusiasm and immediately pennants, banners, badges and decorations of every description appeared on the streets, in the windows, at chapel, in classrooms, and all public places; however, local merchants could not supply the demand.

Even though the school colors have evolved to red and white over the years, you can ask any self-respecting Sooner what the colors are and they will proudly announce “Crimson and Cream.”

On gamedays, a sea of crimson rolls through OU’s home arenas and all Sooners are urged to wear the official colors to show the rest of the country what school spirit and Sooner Pride is all about.



OU Mascot

The University of Oklahoma mascot has evolved through the years and the mascots involved just adds to the lore of Soonerdom. Though the different mascots were completely different from each other, make no mistake: They were all Sooners.

Mex ... OU’s First Mascot

During OU football and baseball games from 1915-1928, Mex the Dog wore a red sweater with a big red letter “O” on the side. One of his main jobs was to keep stray dogs from roaming the field during a game in the days when the football field was more accessible to non-ticketholders. Before his career as a mascot, Mex was just a helpless “dog waif.” Then, a U.S. Army field hospital medic found him in Mexico in 1914 during the Mexican Revolution unrest. Mott Keys was stationed along the Mexican border near Laredo, Texas, and found the dog among a litter of abandoned pups one night on the Mexican side.

Mex was adopted by Keys’ company, and when Keys finished his duty and moved to Hollis, Oklahoma, he took Mex. He later attended OU and Mex followed him again. At OU, Mex’s experience as an Army medic company mascot landed him the job with the football team and a home in the Kappa Sigma fraternity house. He quickly became Oklahoma’s most famous dog. “A joyous staccato bark cheered Sooner touchdowns” at football games and a “victory woof” punctuated home runs at baseball games. But Mex began to gain national attention in October of 1924 after OU lost a game to Drake University 28-0. The Sooners also lost Mex.

Mex did not board the train heading home in Arkansas City, Kansas. Rumors spread across the Missouri Valley, the conference OU played in at the time, that Mex was returning to attack the Drake Bulldogs and avenge the loss. A 50-cent reward was offered, and Mex was found by upset OU graduates J.D. Hull, Hughes B. Davis and J.C. Henley. Mex was discovered pacing in the train station platform in Arkansas City. The men drove Mex to the next Saturday game at Stillwater. After Mex was once poisoned by non-Sooner fans, the dog learned to eat only from the hands of his caretakers. Mex died of old age on April 30, 1928 and he was so popular among students and faculty that the university closed for his funeral and procession on May 2, 1928. He was buried in a small casket somewhere under the existing stadium.

Little Red

On April 17, 1970, President Hollomon banished Little Red, the unofficial mascot who danced on the sidelines of Owen Field. Although he was never the official OU mascot, the Indian dancer had become a traditional part of the games since the 1940s.

Sooner Schooner

The Sooner Schooner is a Conestoga, or covered wagon, reminiscent of the mode of travel of the pioneers who settled in Oklahoma. The Schooner is powered by matching white ponies named Boomer and Sooner and ventures onto Owen Field as a triumphant victory ride after OU scores. Although the Schooner was introduced in 1964, it did not become the official mascot until 1980. Besides being a constant part of gamedays, the Schooner is well-recognized by college football fans across the country and it also makes regular appearances at university functions.

What is a "Sooner"?

College sports fans are hard-pressed to find a nickname that is as unique and as tied-in to a state's history as a Sooner. The University of Oklahoma is the only school known as Sooners and those who claim that they are Sooners say it with pride.

The Oklahoma territory opened with the Land Run of 1889. Settlers from across the globe, seeking free land, made their way to the prairies of the plains to stake their claim to a new life. One of the few rules to claiming a lot of land was that all participants were to start at the same time, on the boom of a cannon. All settlers who started then were labeled as "Boomers" and the ones who went too soon were called "Sooners."

OU athletic teams were called either Rough Riders or Boomers for 10 years before the current Sooner nickname emerged in 1908. The university actually derived their name from a pep club called “The Sooner Rooters.”

The success of University of Oklahoma athletic teams over the years have made the nickname synonymous with winning.

Fight Song "Boomer Sooner"

It is clear to see that the last line of the yell was used to make the first verse of “Boomer Sooner,” and is one of the most recognizable college fight songs in the country. It is performed by The Pride of Oklahoma (the OU marching band) at most Sooner athletic events and immediately evokes enthusiasm from OU fans and sends chills down the spines of those who dare to oppose them.

In 1905, Arthur M. Alden, a student in history and physiology whose father was a Norman jeweler, wrote the lyrics to the fight song, borrowing the tune from Yale University’s “Boola Boola” but improvising the words. A year later, an addition was made to it from North Carolina’s “I’m a Tarheel Born” and the two combined from the university’s fight song today.

Though the tune was first made known by Yale, the everlasting success of Sooner squads have taken the melody of “Boomer Sooner” to national popularity.

Boomer Sooner, Boomer Sooner

Boomer Sooner, Boomer Sooner

Boomer Sooner, Boomer Sooner

Boomer Sooner, OK U!

Oklahoma, Oklahoma

Oklahoma, Oklahoma

Oklahoma, Oklahoma

Oklahoma, OK U!

I’m a Sooner-born and Sooner-bred

and when I die, I’ll be Sooner-dead

Rah Oklahoma, Rah Oklahoma

Rah Oklahoma, OK U!

Mascots, per Wikki..........................

Oklahoma has had several mascots. The first was a Boston terrier named Mex. Mex was a stray dog found in Mexico during the Mexican Revolution by Mott Keys, an army hospital medic.[51] Keys' company adopted the dog and Keys took the dog back to Hollis, Oklahoma when he completed his duty. When Keys was enrolled in the University, he took Mex with him to Norman. With his experience as an army medic, Keys landed a job with the football team and a residence at the Kappa Sigma fraternity house.[51] Mex's main duty during games was to keep stray dogs from roaming the field. He wore a red sweater with a big "O" letter on the side. Mex received national attention in October 1924 when the Oklahoma football team lost a game against Drake University. Mex was lost when the team boarded a train in Arkansas City, Kansas. The media blamed the loss on the field on the loss of their mascot.[52] Mex was found later by two Oklahoma graduates. Mex died of old age on April 30, 1928. The campus was closed and classes were canceled on the day of his funeral. He was buried in a casket somewhere under the stadium.[51]

The Sooner Schooner on the field during a football game.Never an official mascot, Little Red began appearing at games in 1953. He was an Indian who wore red tights, breech cloth and a war bonnet and was portrayed by Randy Palmer.[51] In April 1970, Little Red was banished by Oklahoma president J. Herbet Hollomon. The student court issued a temporary restraining order to keep Little Red from appearing at Sooner games.[51] Despite this order, Palmer showed up as Little Red for the 1970 season opener where he was met with cheers from the crowd. When Palmer was drafted after the 1971 season, no one showed up for try-outs to replace him.[51]

The current mascot for Oklahoma is the Sooner Schooner, a conestoga wagon similar to the primary method of transportation used by early settlers in Oklahoma.[52] The Schooner is driven by two white ponies named Boomer and Sooner. In 2005, the university also introduced two costumed mascots also named Boomer and Sooner to serve as mascots for football games and events that do not permit a covered wagon.[52]
Some Oklahoma Photos............................Bud Wilkinson

Wilkinson victory ride

The Bootleggers Boy

Switzer and Jack Mildren

An emphatic Stoops

Greg Pruitt on SI cover

The Boz

Billy Sims SI cover

The Sooner Schooner

Schooner x2

The Boston Terrier Mex

OU Blonde

OU Cheerleaders

OU flexibility

Hubba Hubba

Another Blonde

Nice Pair

Oklahoma, like all the Top 10, has an outstanding tradition, and could make a case to be ranked even higher. Suffice to say another National Championship in the near future will be enough to bump them up one or more spots - but that holds true for several teams recently listed.

Still, a #4 rating, just a hair from #3, is one to be proud of, so.........................

BOOMER SOONER TO YA

 
Last edited by a moderator:
michigan is right where they should be.............two NCS in 6 decades says it all.......the singlemost most important criterion in this analysis is NCs and they simply don't have the hardware.....their losing record in bowl games also says a lot as well........
Serious Question: Why are we using 6 decades as our criteria? Why not 30 years, 90 years, 45 years, or I dont know every year EVER??If we choose 30 years, they have one national title.....same as Alabama

If we choose 60 years, they have one national title.....terrible

If we choose 90 years, they have six national titles.....pretty damn good

If we choose the EVER option, they have 11 national titles....One of the top programs ever

I guess my thought is this: If you are going to start a thread ranking the top college football programs of ALL TIME, you need to use just that.....ALL TIME....

Otherwise your list should be titles....The Top 25 College Football Programs of the last 60 years....seems pretty simple to me.
No one's disputing thatHell, as an OU fan I'll take anything in the Top 10 as long as they're ahead of Texas & Nebraska.
What about one out of two?? ;) ETA: Holy crap...NM...I missed Texas at #7 :bag:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
OU = number 4. :popcorn:
I expected them to be #1 or #2 given they are the only ones to win "championships" in all the different eras and given how much value TOW puts on "championships"I have no idea what the order is for the rest. Actions and words are not meeting here.
 
OU = number 4. :popcorn:
I expected them to be #1 or #2 given they are the only ones to win "championships" in all the different eras and given how much value TOW puts on "championships"I have no idea what the order is for the rest. Actions and words are not meeting here.
Well, USC's and ND's championships span a longer period than OU's I think.When was the last time Bama won one?
Alabama first won in 1925Last in 1992
 
OU = number 4. :popcorn:
I expected them to be #1 or #2 given they are the only ones to win "championships" in all the different eras and given how much value TOW puts on "championships"I have no idea what the order is for the rest. Actions and words are not meeting here.
Well, USC's and ND's championships span a longer period than OU's I think.When was the last time Bama won one?
1992...then back to 1979
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oklahoma got hosed. Considering Alabama is .500 or worse 4 times (also a 7-6 in 2007, and 10-2 2005 season was voided due to penalties) since 2000, guess the Y2K bug hit his tabulator machine :)

 
OU = number 4. :popcorn:
I expected them to be #1 or #2 given they are the only ones to win "championships" in all the different eras and given how much value TOW puts on "championships"I have no idea what the order is for the rest. Actions and words are not meeting here.
Maybe instead of "era" I should have said decades?Nevertheless, one small flaw in OU's resume is they had nothing on a National Scale prior to 1950, kinda like Michigan in reverse.The three Programs rated ahead all do.
 
from late 40's to almost 1960, Oklahoma had a better record BY FAR than Alabama. not even close. so to try and go back further to drop Oklahoma you kind of contradict the reasoning for hating on Michigan. great info and time reading this, but not sure how you skip that.

OU = number 4. :popcorn:
I expected them to be #1 or #2 given they are the only ones to win "championships" in all the different eras and given how much value TOW puts on "championships"I have no idea what the order is for the rest. Actions and words are not meeting here.
Maybe instead of "era" I should have said decades?Nevertheless, one small flaw in OU's resume is they had nothing on a National Scale prior to 1950, kinda like Michigan in reverse.The three Programs rated ahead all do.
 
from late 40's to almost 1960, Oklahoma had a better record BY FAR than Alabama. not even close. so to try and go back further to drop Oklahoma you kind of contradict the reasoning for hating on Michigan. great info and time reading this, but not sure how you skip that.

OU = number 4. :popcorn:
I expected them to be #1 or #2 given they are the only ones to win "championships" in all the different eras and given how much value TOW puts on "championships"I have no idea what the order is for the rest. Actions and words are not meeting here.
Maybe instead of "era" I should have said decades?Nevertheless, one small flaw in OU's resume is they had nothing on a National Scale prior to 1950, kinda like Michigan in reverse.The three Programs rated ahead all do.
Maybe I should state that the three Programs ahead of OU all have more National Championships, and they were won in a more diverse time frame.
 
Oklahoma at #4, and the wheels came off the TidesofWar Bus. I am still laughing, but good try.
Maybe when you quit laughing you will bring some tangible reasons as to why OU should replace any of the Top 3?And for the Top 3, I have decided to work on them during this week and upcoming weekend, and release all together next Monday.
 
Oklahoma at #4, and the wheels came off the TidesofWar Bus. I am still laughing, but good try.
Chill. OU, USC & Bama are going to blow the doors off ND going forward. And I have a feeling they are going to have several opportunities to sort things out in the near future.
 
Hell, as an OU fan I'll take anything in the Top 10 as long as they're ahead of Texas & Nebraska.
What about one out of two?? ;) ETA: Holy crap...NM...I missed Texas at #7 :bag:
bump for bentley
Commish, you probably just didn't expect to see Texas there...It seems to have all fallen apart a bit here in the top 10, but I realize one could make good arguments for all kinds of different orders. Splitting hairs & all.

However, leaving off Princeton & Yale, which seemingly will happen, seems kinda crazy, imho.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If anyone wants to see it, here's the order of the remaining 3 teams:

mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("

3. Vanderbilt

2. Ghostbusters

1. Alabama

Take that Fighting Trojans!*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***");document.close();

 
LOL at everyone that enjoys the discussion until their team is "disrespected" with a lower rank than the homer believes they should have.

 
If anyone wants to see it, here's the order of the remaining 3 teams:

mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("

3. Vanderbilt

2. Ghostbusters

1. Alabama

Take that Fighting Trojans!*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***");document.close();
:lmao: No way. Texas aTm is #2.

The Bear coached there, too.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
LOL at everyone that enjoys the discussion until their team is "disrespected" with a lower rank than the homer believes they should have.
:goodposting: It's quite entertaining, actually. Tides has put more work into this list than most of us ever would, and these dopes just have to come out and slam it with no real reason behind it. :scared: <_< BOO!!! :unsure: :scared:
 
OU = number 4. :popcorn:
I expected them to be #1 or #2 given they are the only ones to win "championships" in all the different eras and given how much value TOW puts on "championships"I have no idea what the order is for the rest. Actions and words are not meeting here.
Well, USC's and ND's championships span a longer period than OU's I think.When was the last time Bama won one?
Yes....they do. Wasn't the criteria we were given...or at least as I understood. That criteria being winning in the different eras. OU has "championships" in all the eras...no other team does...at least teams that are left. Bama is missing from the current era and USC from the 80s-90s era. That's why I am not really understanding.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top