What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Travis Henry waiting Game (1 Viewer)

The Moz

Footballguy
:2cents:
Travis Henry, RB DENNews: According to the Denver Post, Broncos RB Travis Henry thought his season was over following a right ankle injury Sunday against the Colts. "I was worried," Henry said as he walked with a pronounced limp from the visitors locker room at the RCA Dome to the team bus. "I felt sharp pain in my knee, first. Then my knee and my ankle. But the X-ray came back negative, so that's a blessing." Henry left the game but returned and finished with 131 yards on 26 carries. It was the third time in four games Henry rushed for at least 128 yards.Analysis: While Henry's injury isn't serious, his hobble indicated he will likely miss the week of practice and may be questionable for the game Sunday against San Diego at Invesco Field at Mile High. "I think I'll play," Henry said. "I know my body, and I think things will settle down in a couple days and I'll be able to get back in there."
this is all I got so far -- but not looking great that he plays next week ( even if he said he would - only cause he knows if he doesn't and S. Young blows up he is in full blown RBBC ) -- Also there has gotta be a pending MRI - sharp pain in knee - pronounced Limp ?Damn -- in one league I own Henry , Caddy , Harrison !
 
I wouldn't worry about Henry too much.

Played through broken ribs before.

Heck, Henry even played a few games on a broken leg in Buffalo, before the Docs there finally caught it.

Dude's a Timex.

 
I wouldn't worry about Henry too much. Played through broken ribs before. Heck, Henry even played a few games on a broken leg in Buffalo, before the Docs there finally caught it.Dude's a Timex.
Granted the guy is maybe the toughest RB out there and as long as it's just a pain issue no doubt he plays - I don't think he has had a MRI yet to rule out MCL/ACL issues . Also haven't heard a dreaded "high ankle " sprain ruled out.
 
:goodposting:

Travis Henry, RB DENNews: According to the Denver Post, Broncos RB Travis Henry thought his season was over following a right ankle injury Sunday against the Colts. "I was worried," Henry said as he walked with a pronounced limp from the visitors locker room at the RCA Dome to the team bus. "I felt sharp pain in my knee, first. Then my knee and my ankle. But the X-ray came back negative, so that's a blessing." Henry left the game but returned and finished with 131 yards on 26 carries. It was the third time in four games Henry rushed for at least 128 yards.Analysis: While Henry's injury isn't serious, his hobble indicated he will likely miss the week of practice and may be questionable for the game Sunday against San Diego at Invesco Field at Mile High. "I think I'll play," Henry said. "I know my body, and I think things will settle down in a couple days and I'll be able to get back in there."
this is all I got so far -- but not looking great that he plays next week ( even if he said he would - only cause he knows if he doesn't and S. Young blows up he is in full blown RBBC ) -- Also there has gotta be a pending MRI - sharp pain in knee - pronounced Limp ?Damn -- in one league I own Henry , Caddy , Harrison !
Henry's the leagues leading rusher...What gives you the impression he would be in a RBBC by missing one week? YTD carries: Henry=86. Young=15 ---->not even close to a RBBC
 
Why is everyone so quick to say, "not gonna happen". Of course it can happen. This is Shannahan we are talking about. It's ludicrous to say it cant happen. If he has a ankle sprain why rush it? Young is clearly good.

 
Why is everyone so quick to say, "not gonna happen". Of course it can happen. This is Shannahan we are talking about. It's ludicrous to say it cant happen. If he has a ankle sprain why rush it? Young is clearly good.
Speculate much?Lets face it, none of us will have any idea until Friday or Saturday, AT THE EARLIESTFWIW, I just posted the Denver Post article to the blogger, and it doesn't give any other info...
 
Why is everyone so quick to say, "not gonna happen". Of course it can happen. This is Shannahan we are talking about.
Exactly. Shanahan screws around with starters/backups/depth charts preseason. Then, he sticks with them through the year.He doesn't really do RBBC.
 
The Moz said:
- only cause he knows if he doesn't and S. Young blows up he is in full blown RBBC )
:mellow:Not going to happen.
worst.sig.ever.paging Capella.
Sure you can. People LOVE to do that on these boards. :ptts: But I agree with you.
I have to say, you've got stones for keeping that signature up.
:thumbup: 2 pages of signature for 1 line of content?
:mellow:I've had this up for two hours now, and nobody's gotten the joke.Amazing that this place has its collective heads so far up its ###, that NOBODY got that I was mocking people.Wow.
 
Henry is ALWAYS banged up... this is one of the reasons I stayed away from him (and Westbrook)

 
Why is everyone so quick to say, "not gonna happen". Of course it can happen. This is Shannahan we are talking about. It's ludicrous to say it cant happen. If he has a ankle sprain why rush it? Young is clearly good.
not gonna happen!
Do you have insider info or something?? If Henry is sprained or something similar then Young would benefit. If Young came out gang busters as he appears to be able to do, then it would be stupid to say he doesn't have a chance to play.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Moz said:
- only cause he knows if he doesn't and S. Young blows up he is in full blown RBBC )
:yawn:Not going to happen.
worst.sig.ever.paging Capella.
Sure you can. People LOVE to do that on these boards. :unsure: But I agree with you.
I have to say, you've got stones for keeping that signature up.
:goodposting: 2 pages of signature for 1 line of content?
:lol:I've had this up for two hours now, and nobody's gotten the joke.Amazing that this place has its collective heads so far up its ###, that NOBODY got that I was mocking people.Wow.
what would make us "get" that?
 
Why is everyone so quick to say, "not gonna happen". Of course it can happen. This is Shannahan we are talking about. It's ludicrous to say it cant happen. If he has a ankle sprain why rush it? Young is clearly good.
not gonna happen!
Do you have insider info or something?? If Henry is sprained or something similar then Young would benefit. If Young came out gang busters as he appears to be able to do, then it would be stupid to say he doesn't have a chance to play.
No one said he doesn't have a chance to play, just that it won't be a RBBC or time-share situation. Expecting more than what you have seen to date is going to lead to frustration on your part.
 
Why is everyone so quick to say, "not gonna happen". Of course it can happen. This is Shannahan we are talking about. It's ludicrous to say it cant happen. If he has a ankle sprain why rush it? Young is clearly good.
not gonna happen!
Do you have insider info or something?? If Henry is sprained or something similar then Young would benefit. If Young came out gang busters as he appears to be able to do, then it would be stupid to say he doesn't have a chance to play.
No one said he doesn't have a chance to play, just that it won't be a RBBC or time-share situation. Expecting more than what you have seen to date is going to lead to frustration on your part.
Well, I do expect it. Mind your own business and leave it to me to be happy or dissappointed. You are not my mood police. So there.
 
Why is everyone so quick to say, "not gonna happen". Of course it can happen. This is Shannahan we are talking about. It's ludicrous to say it cant happen. If he has a ankle sprain why rush it? Young is clearly good.
not gonna happen!
Do you have insider info or something?? If Henry is sprained or something similar then Young would benefit. If Young came out gang busters as he appears to be able to do, then it would be stupid to say he doesn't have a chance to play.
No one said he doesn't have a chance to play, just that it won't be a RBBC or time-share situation. Expecting more than what you have seen to date is going to lead to frustration on your part.
Thanks for answering for me. I didn't get a chance to get back to this sooner. I don't have insider information, but I do have common sense. Common sense tells me that if Henry misses time then Young will get more opportunities. Common sense also tells me that when Henry is healthy that there will be no RBBC! It aint gonna happen!
My sources tell me he's pretty banged up. He should only conceive one or two kids this week.
Now that is funny!
 
Henry plays .... I dont thnk Travis wants to have to spend a Sunday with Travis Jr , Travis II , Travina, and the rest of his 9 kids..... having a bye week off is enough...!!!

 
Thanks for answering for me. I didn't get a chance to get back to this sooner. I don't have insider information, but I do have common sense. Common sense tells me that if Henry misses time then Young will get more opportunities. Common sense also tells me that when Henry is healthy that there will be no RBBC! It aint gonna happen!
hahaha... yeah Denver has never taken a backup you havent heard of and played them with the starter or in place of the starter. Nope, never happened.... wait it has happened a lot in the past 3 years. Oh yeah. So, I guess they could do it again. It is gonna happen! (see my saying it is gonna happen holds as much as weight as you saying it aint gonna happen, its your opinion and not a fact)
 
I guess I don't get all the hand-wringing going on with the OP.

check the injury report on sunday morning. If Henry is playing, start him unless you have another great option. If Henry is not playing, then bench him.

:lmao:

 
Henry is ALWAYS banged up... this is one of the reasons I stayed away from him (and Westbrook)
Who did you draft RB-wise?I always see you post on people you're low on, and I guess I missed the ones you are high on/drafted.Would like to see that, if you have the time.
 
Why is everyone so quick to say, "not gonna happen". Of course it can happen. This is Shannahan we are talking about. It's ludicrous to say it cant happen. If he has a ankle sprain why rush it? Young is clearly good.
not gonna happen!
Do you have insider info or something?? If Henry is sprained or something similar then Young would benefit. If Young came out gang busters as he appears to be able to do, then it would be stupid to say he doesn't have a chance to play.
No one said he doesn't have a chance to play, just that it won't be a RBBC or time-share situation. Expecting more than what you have seen to date is going to lead to frustration on your part.
Well, I do expect it. Mind your own business and leave it to me to be happy or dissappointed. You are not my mood police. So there.
:lmao:Wow.
 
Why is everyone so quick to say, "not gonna happen". Of course it can happen. This is Shannahan we are talking about. It's ludicrous to say it cant happen. If he has a ankle sprain why rush it? Young is clearly good.
not gonna happen!
Do you have insider info or something?? If Henry is sprained or something similar then Young would benefit. If Young came out gang busters as he appears to be able to do, then it would be stupid to say he doesn't have a chance to play.
No one said he doesn't have a chance to play, just that it won't be a RBBC or time-share situation. Expecting more than what you have seen to date is going to lead to frustration on your part.
Well, I do expect it. Mind your own business and leave it to me to be happy or dissappointed. You are not my mood police. So there.
Mrs. Young?
 
hahaha... yeah Denver has never taken a backup you havent heard of and played them with the starter or in place of the starter. Nope, never happened.... wait it has happened a lot in the past 3 years. Oh yeah. So, I guess they could do it again. It is gonna happen! (see my saying it is gonna happen holds as much as weight as you saying it aint gonna happen, its your opinion and not a fact)
My opinion is that Shanny has never run a RBBC when he has a healthy #1 every down back! The difference is that my opinion happens to be fact and your opinion is based on idiots on a message board that unfairly criticise Shanny for using more than one RB during the years when he didn't have an every down back.
 
hahaha... yeah Denver has never taken a backup you havent heard of and played them with the starter or in place of the starter. Nope, never happened.... wait it has happened a lot in the past 3 years. Oh yeah. So, I guess they could do it again. It is gonna happen! (see my saying it is gonna happen holds as much as weight as you saying it aint gonna happen, its your opinion and not a fact)
My opinion is that Shanny has never run a RBBC when he has a healthy #1 every down back! The difference is that my opinion happens to be fact and your opinion is based on idiots on a message board that unfairly criticise Shanny for using more than one RB during the years when he didn't have an every down back.
Hey we had Henry for a year. And Buffalo had him before we did. He gets dinged up and hurt. Is he tough, yes. But, he does get hurt. He IS hurt NOW. So, I question your liberal use of the term every down back when you speak of Henry. Shannahan may decide to spell him some to avoid him breaking down. Unless you are Mike S. posting under a ghost writer name then I don't understand you saying Henry is an every down back for the rest of the year...
 
hahaha... yeah Denver has never taken a backup you havent heard of and played them with the starter or in place of the starter. Nope, never happened.... wait it has happened a lot in the past 3 years. Oh yeah. So, I guess they could do it again. It is gonna happen! (see my saying it is gonna happen holds as much as weight as you saying it aint gonna happen, its your opinion and not a fact)
My opinion is that Shanny has never run a RBBC when he has a healthy #1 every down back! The difference is that my opinion happens to be fact and your opinion is based on idiots on a message board that unfairly criticise Shanny for using more than one RB during the years when he didn't have an every down back.
Hmmm, was last year too long ago to remember.... here are some games with both Bells in there:(Mike to Tatum carries)Week#1 10 - 15#2 13 - 16#7 10 - 24#8 15 - 13#14 10 - 17#15 16 - 18#16 16 - 12#17 11 - 12"My opinion is that Shanny has run a RBBC at times, inluding just recent as last year... when he has two healthy equal every down backs! "
 
hahaha... yeah Denver has never taken a backup you havent heard of and played them with the starter or in place of the starter. Nope, never happened.... wait it has happened a lot in the past 3 years. Oh yeah. So, I guess they could do it again. It is gonna happen! (see my saying it is gonna happen holds as much as weight as you saying it aint gonna happen, its your opinion and not a fact)
My opinion is that Shanny has never run a RBBC when he has a healthy #1 every down back! The difference is that my opinion happens to be fact and your opinion is based on idiots on a message board that unfairly criticise Shanny for using more than one RB during the years when he didn't have an every down back.
Hey we had Henry for a year. And Buffalo had him before we did. He gets dinged up and hurt. Is he tough, yes. But, he does get hurt. He IS hurt NOW. So, I question your liberal use of the term every down back when you speak of Henry. Shannahan may decide to spell him some to avoid him breaking down. Unless you are Mike S. posting under a ghost writer name then I don't understand you saying Henry is an every down back for the rest of the year...
I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night. We'll just have to agree to disagree on this one. I don't think it will become a RBBC in Denver. Yes, Young may come in and spell Travis at times, but not to the extent that it becomes a RBBC. I could actually see Selvin and Travis in the backfield at the same time in some situations. Even then i think Travis gets the Lion's share of the carries and young getting some screen passes out in the flat. They need to do something like that because the TE play has been nonexistant.
 
hahaha... yeah Denver has never taken a backup you havent heard of and played them with the starter or in place of the starter. Nope, never happened.... wait it has happened a lot in the past 3 years. Oh yeah. So, I guess they could do it again. It is gonna happen! (see my saying it is gonna happen holds as much as weight as you saying it aint gonna happen, its your opinion and not a fact)
My opinion is that Shanny has never run a RBBC when he has a healthy #1 every down back! The difference is that my opinion happens to be fact and your opinion is based on idiots on a message board that unfairly criticise Shanny for using more than one RB during the years when he didn't have an every down back.
Hmmm, was last year too long ago to remember.... here are some games with both Bells in there:(Mike to Tatum carries)

Week

#1 10 - 15

#2 13 - 16

#7 10 - 24

#8 15 - 13

#14 10 - 17

#15 16 - 18

#16 16 - 12

#17 11 - 12

"My opinion is that Shanny has run a RBBC at times, inluding just recent as last year... when he has two healthy equal not-good-enough-to-be-every down backs! "
fixed.
 
hahaha... yeah Denver has never taken a backup you havent heard of and played them with the starter or in place of the starter. Nope, never happened.... wait it has happened a lot in the past 3 years. Oh yeah. So, I guess they could do it again. It is gonna happen! (see my saying it is gonna happen holds as much as weight as you saying it aint gonna happen, its your opinion and not a fact)
My opinion is that Shanny has never run a RBBC when he has a healthy #1 every down back! The difference is that my opinion happens to be fact and your opinion is based on idiots on a message board that unfairly criticise Shanny for using more than one RB during the years when he didn't have an every down back.
Hey we had Henry for a year. And Buffalo had him before we did. He gets dinged up and hurt. Is he tough, yes. But, he does get hurt. He IS hurt NOW. So, I question your liberal use of the term every down back when you speak of Henry. Shannahan may decide to spell him some to avoid him breaking down. Unless you are Mike S. posting under a ghost writer name then I don't understand you saying Henry is an every down back for the rest of the year...
I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night. We'll just have to agree to disagree on this one. I don't think it will become a RBBC in Denver. Yes, Young may come in and spell Travis at times, but not to the extent that it becomes a RBBC. I could actually see Selvin and Travis in the backfield at the same time in some situations. Even then i think Travis gets the Lion's share of the carries and young getting some screen passes out in the flat. They need to do something like that because the TE play has been nonexistant.
lol ok to disagree on this. nice holiday inn referance.One parting shot. If Young were to play the way he did yesterday during the first half of the game, there is no way Mike wouldn't use him more than 5 carries a game. Would they run Henry 20 times and Young 10 to 15? Who knows. But, lions share of the acarries seems much to broad of a statement to use in this case. I don't see how you can't be open to the idea of it happening.... It has before.
 
hahaha... yeah Denver has never taken a backup you havent heard of and played them with the starter or in place of the starter. Nope, never happened.... wait it has happened a lot in the past 3 years. Oh yeah. So, I guess they could do it again. It is gonna happen! (see my saying it is gonna happen holds as much as weight as you saying it aint gonna happen, its your opinion and not a fact)
My opinion is that Shanny has never run a RBBC when he has a healthy #1 every down back! The difference is that my opinion happens to be fact and your opinion is based on idiots on a message board that unfairly criticise Shanny for using more than one RB during the years when he didn't have an every down back.
Hey we had Henry for a year. And Buffalo had him before we did. He gets dinged up and hurt. Is he tough, yes. But, he does get hurt. He IS hurt NOW. So, I question your liberal use of the term every down back when you speak of Henry. Shannahan may decide to spell him some to avoid him breaking down. Unless you are Mike S. posting under a ghost writer name then I don't understand you saying Henry is an every down back for the rest of the year...
I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night. We'll just have to agree to disagree on this one. I don't think it will become a RBBC in Denver. Yes, Young may come in and spell Travis at times, but not to the extent that it becomes a RBBC. I could actually see Selvin and Travis in the backfield at the same time in some situations. Even then i think Travis gets the Lion's share of the carries and young getting some screen passes out in the flat. They need to do something like that because the TE play has been nonexistant.
lol ok to disagree on this. nice holiday inn referance.One parting shot. If Young were to play the way he did yesterday during the first half of the game, there is no way Mike wouldn't use him more than 5 carries a game. Would they run Henry 20 times and Young 10 to 15? Who knows. But, lions share of the acarries seems much to broad of a statement to use in this case. I don't see how you can't be open to the idea of it happening.... It has before.
I hear what you're saying, that if Selvin proves he is too good to not be on the field then Shanahan will have to put him on the field. That's why I think they might try to incorporate him into the passing game and as a change of pace back. Travis has never caught a lot of passes in his career, so I think it makes sense. That is probably why I am wrong and it won't happen that way LOL! If only Shanny would return my calls......
 
Henry is ALWAYS banged up... this is one of the reasons I stayed away from him (and Westbrook)
Who did you draft RB-wise?I always see you post on people you're low on, and I guess I missed the ones you are high on/drafted.Would like to see that, if you have the time.
AddaiBush (bad pick :excited: so far )FosterMorency (bad pick :( so far )Edited to add:I was also high on Portis, Peterson (MIN), Gore, LT (he will be better)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for answering for me. I didn't get a chance to get back to this sooner. I don't have insider information, but I do have common sense. Common sense tells me that if Henry misses time then Young will get more opportunities. Common sense also tells me that when Henry is healthy that there will be no RBBC! It aint gonna happen!
hahaha... yeah Denver has never taken a backup you havent heard of and played them with the starter or in place of the starter. Nope, never happened.... wait it has happened a lot in the past 3 years. Oh yeah. So, I guess they could do it again. It is gonna happen! (see my saying it is gonna happen holds as much as weight as you saying it aint gonna happen, its your opinion and not a fact)
It's happened ONCE in the last three years, and that was with Tatum Bell. The guys who know what they are talking about here are the ones that know Shanny is NOT a RBBC guy as a regular rule. There are exceptions to every rule. I think what we have here are a few people banking that Selvin Young is going to save their fantasy season.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hahaha... yeah Denver has never taken a backup you havent heard of and played them with the starter or in place of the starter. Nope, never happened.... wait it has happened a lot in the past 3 years. Oh yeah. So, I guess they could do it again. It is gonna happen! (see my saying it is gonna happen holds as much as weight as you saying it aint gonna happen, its your opinion and not a fact)
My opinion is that Shanny has never run a RBBC when he has a healthy #1 every down back! The difference is that my opinion happens to be fact and your opinion is based on idiots on a message board that unfairly criticise Shanny for using more than one RB during the years when he didn't have an every down back.
Hmmm, was last year too long ago to remember.... here are some games with both Bells in there:(Mike to Tatum carries)Week#1 10 - 15#2 13 - 16#7 10 - 24#8 15 - 13#14 10 - 17#15 16 - 18#16 16 - 12#17 11 - 12"My opinion is that Shanny has run a RBBC at times, inluding just recent as last year... when he has two healthy equal every down backs! "
What about Tatum in Detriot makes you think he is an every down back? What about Mike coming out as 3rd string this year makes him an every down back. Last year was the low point of the Shannahan rushing era in Denver.
 
One parting shot. If Young were to play the way he did yesterday during the first half of the game, there is no way Mike wouldn't use him more than 5 carries a game. Would they run Henry 20 times and Young 10 to 15? Who knows. But, lions share of the acarries seems much to broad of a statement to use in this case. I don't see how you can't be open to the idea of it happening.... It has before.
No it has not happened before. When did Shanny do this with Terrell Davis? Olandis Gary and Mike Anderson (both of whom had good years in this system AFTER TD) were on the team with TD, who got the carries?You are either uninformed, :fishing: , or being willfully ignorant.I am going to go with... :fishing:
 
RB Henry Hurting; Status For Week 5 Unknown

Mike Klis, Denver Post - http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_7049052

Denver Broncos RB Travis Henry thought his season was over Sunday when he injured his ankle against the Colts. "I was worried," Henry said as he walked with a pronounced limp from the visitors locker room at the RCA Dome to the team bus. "I felt sharp pain in my knee, first. Then my knee and my ankle. But the X-ray came back negative, so that's a blessing." We will know more Monday,and as the week goes on, but it is a good bet that Henry misses some practice time this week in preparations for the game against San Diego. "I think I'll play," Henry said. "I know my body, and I think things will settle down in a couple days and I'll be able to get back in there."

update for you.... but this is available on footballguys blog... we are arguing here if you don't mind.

 
One parting shot. If Young were to play the way he did yesterday during the first half of the game, there is no way Mike wouldn't use him more than 5 carries a game. Would they run Henry 20 times and Young 10 to 15? Who knows. But, lions share of the acarries seems much to broad of a statement to use in this case. I don't see how you can't be open to the idea of it happening.... It has before.
No it has not happened before. When did Shanny do this with Terrell Davis? Olandis Gary and Mike Anderson (both of whom had good years in this system AFTER TD) were on the team with TD, who got the carries?You are either uninformed, :fishing: , or being willfully ignorant.I am going to go with... :fishing:
You are sick in the head if you think Henry is the same as TD.
 
The wise thing to do would be for Henry owners to get Selvin Young on their rosters. The ankle injury seems to be lingering for Henry and Young, especially this weekend, looked great in relief. I was really impressed with the way Young was hitting holes and finishing off runs. That being said, Henry also looked great until the team fell behind for good/he got dinged.

I think barring some sort of deus ex machina, Henry will play this week. Probably be spelled a little more than usual by Young. But even 20% less production on the ground would still be respectable totals by Henry. Now if the offense could just move close enough to the goal line for Henry to punch it in once a game.

Meh...at least he's better than Maroney.

 
One parting shot. If Young were to play the way he did yesterday during the first half of the game, there is no way Mike wouldn't use him more than 5 carries a game. Would they run Henry 20 times and Young 10 to 15? Who knows. But, lions share of the acarries seems much to broad of a statement to use in this case. I don't see how you can't be open to the idea of it happening.... It has before.
No it has not happened before. When did Shanny do this with Terrell Davis? Olandis Gary and Mike Anderson (both of whom had good years in this system AFTER TD) were on the team with TD, who got the carries?You are either uninformed, :fishing: , or being willfully ignorant.I am going to go with... :fishy:
You are sick in the head if you think Henry is the same as TD.
And that is exactly why the Shanny lovers believe in the single back and Shanny detractors believe in the RBBC. Is Henry TD or isn't he? I say not.
 
One parting shot. If Young were to play the way he did yesterday during the first half of the game, there is no way Mike wouldn't use him more than 5 carries a game. Would they run Henry 20 times and Young 10 to 15? Who knows. But, lions share of the acarries seems much to broad of a statement to use in this case. I don't see how you can't be open to the idea of it happening.... It has before.
No it has not happened before. When did Shanny do this with Terrell Davis? Olandis Gary and Mike Anderson (both of whom had good years in this system AFTER TD) were on the team with TD, who got the carries?You are either uninformed, :fishing: , or being willfully ignorant.I am going to go with... :fishing:
You are sick in the head if you think Henry is the same as TD.
:fishy:
 
One parting shot. If Young were to play the way he did yesterday during the first half of the game, there is no way Mike wouldn't use him more than 5 carries a game. Would they run Henry 20 times and Young 10 to 15? Who knows. But, lions share of the acarries seems much to broad of a statement to use in this case. I don't see how you can't be open to the idea of it happening.... It has before.
No it has not happened before. When did Shanny do this with Terrell Davis? Olandis Gary and Mike Anderson (both of whom had good years in this system AFTER TD) were on the team with TD, who got the carries?You are either uninformed, :fishing: , or being willfully ignorant.I am going to go with... :fishing:
You are sick in the head if you think Henry is the same as TD.
:fishy:
I am not fishing. You made a rediculous statement when you equated T. Henry to Terrel Davis. You can not back that up and you are copping out with wimpy little icons instead of admitting your mistake. lol
 
One parting shot. If Young were to play the way he did yesterday during the first half of the game, there is no way Mike wouldn't use him more than 5 carries a game. Would they run Henry 20 times and Young 10 to 15? Who knows. But, lions share of the acarries seems much to broad of a statement to use in this case. I don't see how you can't be open to the idea of it happening.... It has before.
No it has not happened before. When did Shanny do this with Terrell Davis? Olandis Gary and Mike Anderson (both of whom had good years in this system AFTER TD) were on the team with TD, who got the carries?You are either uninformed and, :fishing: , or being willfully ignorant.

I am going to go with... :fishing:
You are sick in the head if you think Henry is the same as TD.
:fishy:
I am not fishing. You made a rediculous statement when you equated T. Henry to Terrel Davis. You can not back that up and you are copping out with wimpy little icons instead of admitting your mistake. lol
:fishy:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top