NickyHatton
Footballguy
Matt LaFleur seems to definitely not be a bellcow RB type of coach. Between Henry/Lewis, Jones/Williams, & now Jones/Dillon, doesn't seem like the 1A gets an obscene amount of work for fantasy purposes
But it does add to their career by not wearing them out and cutting years off.Matt LaFleur seems to definitely not be a bellcow RB type of coach. Between Henry/Lewis, Jones/Williams, & now Jones/Dillon, doesn't seem like the 1A gets an obscene amount of work for fantasy purposes
I hate coaches who think of their players instead of my players.But it does add to their career by not wearing them out and cutting years off.
The probability of busting late is greater, but the real killer is busting in the early rounds. We are more likely to keep playing them and the results don’t change. It’s hard to get full value in a trade, nor can you cut them.
agree with you Tigerz, you can win with any strategy,
Another thing I'm learning this year is making a decision and then sticking to it. If you have determined a player is not producing and will not produce going forward based on the data you have, don't wait another 3 weeks hemming and hawing. Pull the trigger on a trade or release and just move on.
Drafted Arob, Sanders and Tonyan. Took me 2 weeks to cut Tonyan. Took me 3 weeks to trade Arob and Sanders. At the time it was a risk because their situations could turn around but if you feel strongly about your analysis just rip the band-aid off. Don't waste time worrying. Just do it and then you can pivot afterwards.
Similarly if you see a matchup you know will be bad but it requires you sitting a good player, trust your analysis and live with the result.
I think this separates the average owner from the great owners. We have to keep in mind that the FF season is essentially a long sprint.....good analogy would be the 400 meter dash. You can get off to a bad start and recover later, but it's tough and you can't sit and wait for a player to produce at the level that you originally thought, while getting subpar production in the process. Sometimes you will cut that player and he comes back to original production on someone else's team, but in my experience, it doesn't happen much.Another thing I'm learning this year is making a decision and then sticking to it. If you have determined a player is not producing and will not produce going forward based on the data you have, don't wait another 3 weeks hemming and hawing. Pull the trigger on a trade or release and just move on.
I should rephrase, early as in early rounds.*. I think a first round RB is more likely to bust than a WR. This is based on buying high from the previous year, and they probably were injury-free. What are the odds that it happens two years in a row? I just avoid RBs after 325 touches the year before. Henry is the exception, but I would have passed also. He would be pick 1.1 in a redraft next year if it were held tomorrow, and I would still pass.
the question is. Probability of not busting in the first round with a running back vs not busting with a wide receiver in first round plus hitting a running back in later round. What is more likely. I go with former. Plenty of wr busting and much harder to hit rb. I think if you believe in later you are going against the grain and probabilities. Plus you can not bust in first round and hit a running back later or bust in first round and hit running back later. Just got much more options.
Hard to say with your comment on still playing them though. I feel like that’s subjective and hard to quantify. If I hit another rb late I would replace.
I should rephrase, early as in early rounds.*. I think a first round RB is more likely to bust than a WR. This is based on buying high from the previous year, and they probably were injury-free. What are the odds that it happens two years in a row? I just avoid RBs after 325 touches the year before. Henry is the exception, but I would have passed also. He would be pick 1.1 in a redraft next year if it were held tomorrow, and I would still pass.
the player I have that has killed me is Hopkins. People always say to start your studs - but when isn’t he a stud anymore? He was a top-5 receiver in most drafts, yet has hit his projection once in my league.
You make a great point about the WR’s, and it stems from the qb and type of offense. Adams is force fed because they run a traditional pro set. Too many teams are going to spread offenses to help the qb who has played it in college. I’m not a Murray fan, really think he’s overrated. Next year, I will not draft a #1 WR from a spread offense.Hopkins is the perfect example of the problem I have with elite WRs today. Back when there was Randy Moss, TO, Ocho Cinco, there were guys who hit 100 yards and 2 TDs every game. The game back then was not spreading defenses it was beating other teams with talent so they would force feed certain WRs. Arizona is a perfect example of how the league has changed. Even with an elite talent they use them as distractions so you get bust games. Davante Adams may be the exception but there's just so few of the force fed high volume WRs so its easier to separate elite RBs who get 20 touches and receptions than elite force-fed WR from high upside WR1s. I mean does Cooper Kupp really look like Randy Moss 2007 even though he scores FPs like him lol. Can never tell anymore.
There were WRs who scored 32 TDs per year?Hopkins is the perfect example of the problem I have with elite WRs today. Back when there was Randy Moss, TO, Ocho Cinco, there were guys who hit 100 yards and 2 TDs every game. The game back then was not spreading defenses it was beating other teams with talent so they would force feed certain WRs. Arizona is a perfect example of how the league has changed. Even with an elite talent they use them as distractions so you get bust games. Davante Adams may be the exception but there's just so few of the force fed high volume WRs so its easier to separate elite RBs who get 20 touches and receptions than elite force-fed WR from high upside WR1s. I mean does Cooper Kupp really look like Randy Moss 2007 even though he scores FPs like him lol. Can never tell anymore.
Winning in fantasy football is like winning a poker tournament. First, you have to get lucky. Second, you have to avoid bad luck. Third, you have to make less mistakes than your opponents. Fourth, you need to enter many tournaments to overcome the variance.It's all luck. Shoot from the hip and draft players you like.
Eat more pizza and tacos.
if I’m in that league I’m stacking quality RB while y’all ignoring the position though, ensuring that the RB you get at 3.4 sucks.I'm just saying guys; try playing in a league where the 12th RB doesn't come off the board until pick 3.4 (12 team).
It's liberating.
I always say if a player is on my bench, then he should be on that team's bench too.I hate coaches who think of their players instead of my players.
What is that format?I'm just saying guys; try playing in a league where the 12th RB doesn't come off the board until pick 3.4 (12 team).
It's liberating.
We have had multiple champions who won based on rolling out three great WRs every week or two great QBs. Usually it's a mix.
It's good stuff.
Of course I agree 100%. But the theory breaks down if you don't also have positional scarcity. No point in going for a QB when Kirk Cousins or Derek Carr may be on the waiver wire in week seven.if I’m in that league I’m stacking quality QB while y’all ignoring the position though, ensuring that the RB you get at 3.4 sucks.
Then when all y’all scrambling to get RBs, I’m stacking value WRs.
any league I’m in where the majority zigs, imma zag.
The basic format is 12 team superflex PPR redraft.What is that format?
Do you still start 2 RB, 2 WR, , 1 TE, one Superflex?The basic format is 12 team superflex PPR redraft.
Ive actually stopped starting players in TNF games. They always seem to turn into duds and ruin my weekend. Im obviously not talking about studs. Im talking more flex types and defenses.Don’t start a player simply because he in a game you get to watch.
Unfortunately it can work both ways. I don’t know how many times a Thursday night guy went off on my bench. I end up feeling sick the rest of the week.Ive actually stopped starting players in TNF games. They always seem to turn into duds and ruin my weekend. Im obviously not talking about studs. Im talking more flex types and defenses.
This has been a great year if you waited on RB. The bust potential for RB’s is much higher than WR’s. In theory and do to scarcity I’d love to go RB/RB but I agree with you. It’s a tough way to go in a three receiver league. It’s also nice to have that stud WR on your squad.The reason I dont like going RB/RB anymore is RBs ALWAYS get hurt and are ALWAYS available on the WW. How many stud WR become available on Waivers during a season? Last year was Jefferson. This year out of the top 36 week 8 WRs I only see Patterson who I would consider an every week starter as being undrafted. Meanwhile, your top 24 RBs have Hubbard, Patterson, DWilliams, Mitchell, Herbert, Booker, and Gainwell all picked up off waivers this season.
Knowing your league well and using this in your draft roster construction is skill.I think the skill aspect comes into play a little when you decide say to pull the trigger on a Mike Williams or a Cooper Kupp or Brady over the 5-6 or more guys ranked ahead of them on your cheat sheet and probably the cheat sheet of others in the room....if you had a gut feeling or did some research and put 2 and 2 together on your own...whatever.....it's not "lucky" that you got Williams....you made the call....when you by definition "reach" and get great value....there is some skill in that.....there is some skill in creating your own "do not draft list"....we all do it....some better than others....there is also some skill in creating your "I will reach for this guy a little list"....and when things like that start showing results consistently, you are on to something that resembles skill...."luck" might be taking Kupp or Williams or Brady "right where you are supposed to in a draft" and then they end up outperforming their ADP....
Our format, some of which I am trying to change is:Do you still start 2 RB, 2 WR, , 1 TE, one Superflex?
This also goes for the bettors out there.Don’t start a player simply because he in a game you get to watch.
I try to watch the best game that has the fewest number of my players involved.Don’t start a player simply because he in a game you get to watch.
Oops - that was a typo. Should have been stacking quality RB, not QB.Of course I agree 100%. But the theory breaks down if you don't also have positional scarcity. No point in going for a QB when Kirk Cousins or Derek Carr may be on the waiver wire in week seven.
For some reason I thought you played in at least one super-flex format.Oops - that was a typo. Should have been stacking quality RB, not QB.
I never take QB early. lol
I won the title two years ago drafting 12th - drafted WR/WR. 10 of the first 11 picked RBs. I don’t need to really draft for value, I just want to know how they will draft.I'm just saying guys; try playing in a league where the 12th RB doesn't come off the board until pick 3.4 (12 team).
It's liberating.
We have had multiple champions who won based on rolling out three great WRs every week or two great QBs. Usually it's a mix.
It's good stuff.
Does anybody have more lol’s and than Leroy? He has to be the leader in per postI hate coaches who think of their players instead of my players.
I do - dynasty. Redraft leagues are 1 QB format.For some reason I thought you played in at least one super-flex format.
Luck definitely has a major role in FF. No one is going to argue that. But the good owners do, in a way, make their own luck. My 10 team league that has been together for 23 years.....me and two others in the league own 13 of the 23 titles. Luck generally isn't the reason for that.This debate reminds me of how good looking men have such an easier time hitting on women who just throw themselves at them. Those "naturals" always think they are so skilled and can't understand the guy who has to work so hard to get even one date because women naturally try to avoid being picked up.
Some people who are born lucky can't acknowledge that they were blessed with luck. I truly believe that some individuals were born luckier than others and others are living under a cursed star.
Whose to say that the guy who consistently loses every year but does analysis and strategizes and works harder than everyone else is less skilled as a FF player because they lose all the time. A bad run can last years...
Whose to say that a guy who wins often in the past 5 years wasn't just lucky? I think many people should just count themselves as very lucky every year they win because that's probably the truth. You can't win without luck. And if you win multiple years, you are beating the odds which can happen if you are lucky...
Luck definitely has a major role in FF. No one is going to argue that. But the good owners do, in a way, make their own luck. My 10 team league that has been together for 23 years.....me and two others in the league own 13 of the 23 titles. Luck generally isn't the reason for that.
Sure, some guys work hard and can't win in FF. But I equate it to working in the real world. I had someone who worked for me in the past....worked hard and a lot of hours, but didn't get much done, and I eventually had to get rid of that person. You can work hard in FF, but if you're focusing on the wrong things, you won't get the right results. If I worked hard at something and not getting the right results, you have to question the methods and change them.
Agree with your last statement......everyone here has more skill than the typical player.Honestly, I've played for over 10 years and I've only won two championships. I don't do anything differently from any of you and the seasons I won were my first two. I've tried every strategy, picked up every sleeper, used all the things you guys learned here and put countless hours in it.
When people ask me who to start I have very detailed answers that have more thought to it than always start your studs. If you judge my skill based on my outcomes you say I'm a terrible fantasy manager because I don't get the right results.
I think that's a disservice to all of us on this forum who do more work than most and just don't have luck. I don't want to discount everyones skill, don't get me wrong.
I'm saying that everyone here has skill because they are putting forth the research / analysis / and effort. There is no difference between you and me other than luck. But I guess I will never win this so I'll stop lol.
Thanks @tigerz, truly. Reminds me a ton of my brother - the first year either of us played fantasy was 2006, we created a league together. He's made the playoffs in 13 of the 16 years, finishing second FOUR times (including getting Kamara'd in the finals last year by me), but he's never won a title. This year he's first place at 7-0. I'm almost rooting for him to win more than I am myself. He's my #1 go-to for start/sit questions (except the week I play him of course), trade analysis/advice, etc and he deserves that elusive crown so bad. Your post reminded me that despite the results-oriented way of thinking of the world in 2021, the process is what matters...that and having luck on your sideHonestly, I've played for over 10 years and I've only won two championships. I don't do anything differently from any of you and the seasons I won were my first two. I've tried every strategy, picked up every sleeper, used all the things you guys learned here and put countless hours in it.
When people ask me who to start I have very detailed answers that have more thought to it than always start your studs. If you judge my skill based on my outcomes you say I'm a terrible fantasy manager because I don't get the right results.
I think that's a disservice to all of us on this forum who do more work than most and just don't have luck. I don't want to discount everyones skill, don't get me wrong.
I'm saying that everyone here has skill because they are putting forth the research / analysis / and effort. There is no difference between you and me other than luck. But I guess I will never win this so I'll stop lol.
Agree with your last statement......everyone here has more skill than the typical player.
Between you and me.......yes, luck is going to be more of a factor, because we are good informed owners. You put 10-12 highly skilled owners in a league, and yes luck will be a bigger factor. But most leagues have a mix of good players, average players, and guppies. I am just pointing out that in my experience, it's the same 3-4 guys that usually make the playoffs. That's because those owners generally outwork and focus on the right things that matter in the long run. They draft well, work the wire, and make well timed trades.
I have had streaks of bad luck. I won my main league 4 times, and they occurred in the 1st 11 years. I haven't won the title since 2009, even though I have had 4 losses in title games since then.
BTW, you won 2 titles in 10 years. That's a good rate, it is well above average. I have won 4 titles in 23 years in one league. It's why I love redraft leagues.....they are very hard, if not impossible, to dominate year in and year out.
Yeah, I really tried to mitigate it through pay structure. I pay less for playoff standings and pay out for weekly highest points scored and high points scoring leader. That way even if you don't win it all you don't end up in the red. All play is another one of those, impossible to get leagues to adopt along with 2 QBs and auction drafts lol. I'm just happy I abolished kickers in year 1 otherwise I would never have done it. FAAB waivers was also a struggle to implement but people finally okay with it now.BTW All Play >>>>>>>>>>>>>> H2H
Luck will always be a factor but we can still work to minimize it's impact.
Yeah, change in longstanding leagues is difficult to come by.Yeah, I really tried to mitigate it through pay structure. I pay less for playoff standings and more for weekly highest points scored and high points scoring leader. That way even if you don't win it all you don't end up in the red. All play is another one of those, impossible to get leagues to adopt along with 2 QBs and auction drafts lol. I'm just happy I abolished kickers in year 1 otherwise I would never have done it. FAAB waivers was also a struggle to implement but people finally okay with it now.
Yeah I hear you. I really like it for guillotine leagues. I think for normal leagues I’d do double headers to mitigate it but I’d have to pay up for mfl for that so it’s a non starter unless it’s out of my own pocket.Yeah, change in longstanding leagues is difficult to come by.
We do a weekly payout for high score but I would love to adopt a season long high score payout too. If you've played long enough you have been or known someone who had the most dominant team by far but, in h2h leagues, end up facing the highest scoring team every week.
10th season of my league, 2005, I drafted Edgerrin, Steven Jackson & Lamont Jordan 1, 2, 3 it was a monster team. 7 times I ended up facing the top scoring team that week, finished as the top scoring team by something like 200 points, went 7-7 and missed the playoffs.
I was livid and I fought a months long campaign almost daily that off-season to switch to all play. I cajoled, badgered, nagged etc until I got the votes to change.
Totally worth it. I don't take magic football so seriously anymore but we still have a couple owners who don't like it and want to switch back, but that always gets me fired up and I rail hard to keep those voices quiet every time they pop up.
Good process gives you opportunities to get lucky. More opportunities than average process. More opportunities than poor process. As has been mentioned, it takes time for variance to play out, and it is very easy to get caught in a cycle of seemingly perpetual bad luck.
The poker analogies are often great but consider that in one long session of poker, say over the course of like 8 hours one long night, you might see variance play itself out over and over again. You can have runs of just really bad luck for long stretches. But with patience, it *does* turn around. And back again. You can actually experience those highs and lows all in the same session. But in fantasy football, you only get paid at the end of the season (ok thinking season long H2H leagues here), and it may take several season to see the same kind of swings of variance play out. If you only play in one or two leagues, then yeah you can be consistently competitive but to win is another matter.
I agree 100% with everyone that has said you have to get lucky to win. We've all had teams that were just stacked get bounced in week 14. That wasn't a lack of skill. But you have to create those opportunities. And you have to get hot to take down the ship (or a bracelet).
That is why, for me, I play in so many different leagues. I am a portfolio owner and I absolutely do not recommend that for most people. But I have teams right now that could be characterized as "unlucky" or "snakebit", others that are just losing (not necessarily because of bad luck but because of my own mistakes - yes that is a category) and I have teams that are marginally underperforming, marginally overperforming, dominating, and some that could certainly be characterized as "lucky" or "blessed" right now. I have a couple teams labeled in my spreadsheet as "possible house of cards?" and a couple others that I am referring to as "zombies" because they may be coming back from the dead.
But on the whole I am outperforming the masses in these leagues and on pace to (predictably) do what I set out to do, which is to win more than I lose and to do it profitably. Again. It isn't because I am luckier than others. It is because I use good process more often than I don't (which is all the time if you follow some of my moves and takes on this board) and create opportunities to get lucky. I do this at the poker table, too. Make more good decisions than bad decisions.
Last thought on this - and you see it in poker all the dang time. People blame bad luck for their losses. But if you are making good decisions more often than your opponents, they will lay bad beats on you more often than you do it to them over the long haul. Which in turn supports the illusion that you are unluckier than they. The truth is that your higher quality play is calibrated to yield more bad beats coming your way than outgoing. But if you don't understand that dynamic and recognize it, you can become emotional and tilted, and blame bad luck. Pro poker players take bad beats as signs that they are playing well.
In FF, this manifests itself out soooo much more slowly than poker. I have one SF dynasty team that I did the startup for this year. I absolutely am convinced my process was solid and that I drafted one of the best teams I ever have. But it got snakebit. 100% bad luck is the explanation. A lost season. Not a pretender. Not me making mistakes. It just got snakebit. It happens. But if this were my *only team*, I'd be pissed.
Ok rant over but skill matters. Luck matters. FF plays out over too slow of a cycle to win (championships) consistently with just one or two teams. Daily is an entirely different beast.