i've been on quite a tear as of late with my soccer wagers ... up a ton of bux since the start of the Euro tourney - enough disposable winnings to plunk down on juicier odds in the backyard lower tier leagues the book offers ... seriously, i think most of these matches from Kazakhstan/Estonia/Belarus, etc. are being played on some vacant lot with a stuffed cabbage serving as the official game ball.
but, hey ... #### it, the bets won as a result yield green US of A currency, so i got that going for me.
i've noticed a very disturbing trend, though, in the past 24 or so hours ... the juice is now ridiculous, as if the book has some sorta algorithm on my wagering habits and has crunched way the #### back to curtail the damage on their end.
that couldn't possibly be happening, amirite? (that's an extremely snarky rhetorical for those not keeping score at home).
not gonna be discussed with any resolve in the reg soccer thread(s) that permeate the FFA ... there may be a coupla chaps who are betting the matches with frequency, but, for the most part, those threads are populated with folks who simply love the game (the "beautiful game", as it were).
the adulation for the simple competition is more so than any other sport that's discussed on this forearm, and i suspect that is more often the rule outside these 5 walls, as well.
which got me to thinking that the reason the sport never gained any kinda legit traction here, despite it being the largest in numbets across the board in participation, is that the wagering cabal never gravitated to it.
but i can tell ya, as a punter who has been known to toss a shekel or two on an event, the betting on soccer is not only the most challenging, but also the most diverse, and rewarding - the great European books are built on it's back, and i'd dare say it takes a ton more money than our beloved NFL, which is the undisputed heavyweight Champeen of our leagues, and that's due in great favor to the action it takes on the gambling front.
the USNMT faring better in the int'l comps certainly won't hurt, but they are staggered a bit too much ... drawing the casual fans into the bullring action that is more the norm is the key ... but we love fireworks and offense - the game itself is excruciating to abide from a viewpoint devoid of passion for the pure competition ... there's gotta be more of a hook ... and as i said earlier, the betting table(s) are so diverse that each minute holds meaning - if it ever caught on here with the books, it would be gargantuan. take my word on that.
- Jimmy Pursey
i dug out some of my vinyl while tidying up the basement ... ran across my Sham 69 platters from roughly 35 years ago - gave them some attention, and was reminded why i was such a yuuuuge fan.
much like Stiv & the Dead Boys over here, they were a kinda b-list act, never achieving the notoriety or fame of their more celebrated cousins, but well known and loved in those circles that craved them some genre gymnastics.
i recall seeing a blaoted and miserable Marco Pirroni (known mostly as Adam & the Ants guitarist) blagging on about how the English scene was so pure in the beginning, he described it as something very intelligent and exclusionary, rife with flamethrower politics and explosive fashion ... citing it as a movement "not for the masses" (ELITIST MUCH, YA DUMB ####?")
he sat there waxing poetic about this ####, all the while looking like Colonel Kurtz after a month long Wendy's binge.
he bemoaned Pursey & Sham specifically, saying (again) how "intelligent" the scene was, and that "YOBS like Jimmy Pursey came about dragging it to the gutter with their lowbrow approach"
hey, ya pretentious ####wad ... it was SUPPOSED to give rise to anybody who dared, the D.I.Y. ethos was the blueprint - it was intended to put the power back in the hands of rhe street kids, and to give them a voice ... the polish was tossed, and acts like Sham rose up.
hey, Marco ... GFY