Denver724
Footballguy
I own him in 75% of my leagues. There is no way I am selling him.Are people holding or selling high in dynasty?
I own him in 75% of my leagues. There is no way I am selling him.Are people holding or selling high in dynasty?
Rawls has bested Lynch's career high single game rushing mark (154) twice this year (169, 209). For as bad as SF is it's hard to take anything away from Rawls.Looks awsome, what he done today. Nice balance spd vision and hands. It was 49ers but still.
yeah,they held AD in check wk,one too. Not taking anything away from him. Like I said he looks great.Same 49er team that held Freeman too like 10 yards two weeks ago
Same thing here my brotha!!Single handedly saving my season right now. Still may lose buy he gave me a chance.
~42 I'm both my standard leagues. One league I won by 5 and the other by 20 and that owner has Lynch LOL. Saved me from Carr clapping bed and eagles D ;-)Ended up with 54.5 from him in my league. With my QB, DST, K, TE and 2 of my WRs combining for 11 pts, this was a god send.
Who would be better? Martin?If Marshawn is out for the season, ROS ranking for Rawls is what, top 10 RB?
Lynch's "I am going to run you over" style has such a limited shelf life in the NFL these days. I prefer for longevity Rawls "Emmit Smith not taking a clean shot" style any day.Yeah, I think he's actually better than Lynch.
I own both and I hate to say it but I would like to see Rawls get the starting job for good.
Not sure that is really Rawls style. He finishes his runs with a demanding physical style. He peeled himself off the ground 3-4 times really slowly yesterday. His burst and quickness are undeniable though.Lynch's "I am going to run you over" style has such a limited shelf life in the NFL these days. I prefer for longevity Rawls "Emmit Smith not taking a clean shot" style any day.Yeah, I think he's actually better than Lynch.
I own both and I hate to say it but I would like to see Rawls get the starting job for good.
And when a guy listed as Probable sits the league launches a formal investigation and thepretty sure if you look at players listed as questionable throughout the year they play closer to 75% of the timeQuestionable is 50/50.listed as questionable instead of what should have been doubtful! Should fine teams when they do this.Thoughts on Rawls going forward? I grabbed him this week but with Lynch looking like he was a go and all my options 1:00 starts left Rawls on the bench. If Lynch can go next week will Rawls be back to same limited touches?
Easily. Probably top 5 given the team he's on.If Marshawn is out for the season, ROS ranking for Rawls is what, top 10 RB?
Not sure that is really Rawls style. He finishes his runs with a demanding physical style. He peeled himself off the ground 3-4 times really slowly yesterday. His burst and quickness are undeniable though.Lynch's "I am going to run you over" style has such a limited shelf life in the NFL these days. I prefer for longevity Rawls "Emmit Smith not taking a clean shot" style any day.Yeah, I think he's actually better than Lynch.
I own both and I hate to say it but I would like to see Rawls get the starting job for good.
Rawls is on record saying he looks looks for contact on principle, doesn't run out of bounds. LOLpantherclub said:Lynch's "I am going to run you over" style has such a limited shelf life in the NFL these days. I prefer for longevity Rawls "Emmit Smith not taking a clean shot" style any day.eoMMan said:Yeah, I think he's actually better than Lynch.
I own both and I hate to say it but I would like to see Rawls get the starting job for good.
They like him, but Im not sure he is the long term solution. I think they will look to replace Lynch with a RB in the 2016 draft or 2017 draft. The best hope is you get the end of this year and 2016 out of Rawls.in terms of future draft picks in a dynasty league, what's he worth? a top 4 pick in 2016? more? less?
Maybe but thats not what he did yesterdayRawls is on record saying he looks looks for contact on principle, doesn't run out of bounds. LOLpantherclub said:Lynch's "I am going to run you over" style has such a limited shelf life in the NFL these days. I prefer for longevity Rawls "Emmit Smith not taking a clean shot" style any day.eoMMan said:Yeah, I think he's actually better than Lynch.
I own both and I hate to say it but I would like to see Rawls get the starting job for good.
Also remember they could bring back Christine for 2016 camp if it doesn't work out with Washington. Prolly got more talent than Rawls. It would definitely be a camp battle.They like him, but Im not sure he is the long term solution. I think they will look to replace Lynch with a RB in the 2016 draft or 2017 draft. The best hope is you get the end of this year and 2016 out of Rawls.in terms of future draft picks in a dynasty league, what's he worth? a top 4 pick in 2016? more? less?
You didn't watch the game.Maybe but thats not what he did yesterdayRawls is on record saying he looks looks for contact on principle, doesn't run out of bounds. LOLpantherclub said:Lynch's "I am going to run you over" style has such a limited shelf life in the NFL these days. I prefer for longevity Rawls "Emmit Smith not taking a clean shot" style any day.eoMMan said:Yeah, I think he's actually better than Lynch.
I own both and I hate to say it but I would like to see Rawls get the starting job for good.
Quit trying to save face. He absolutely sought out contact yesterday on multiple runs. So much so that he was asked about it in the post game press conference.Maybe but thats not what he did yesterdayRawls is on record saying he looks looks for contact on principle, doesn't run out of bounds. LOLpantherclub said:Lynch's "I am going to run you over" style has such a limited shelf life in the NFL these days. I prefer for longevity Rawls "Emmit Smith not taking a clean shot" style any day.eoMMan said:Yeah, I think he's actually better than Lynch.
I own both and I hate to say it but I would like to see Rawls get the starting job for good.
Or sell him when it looks like Lynch is out of the way. He's shown enough that people will simply assume he'll be a workhorse RB1 (discounting the potential for competition to be brought in, a potential RBBC, etc.), and at least a few will be willing to pay you accordingly. Think about what Hill could have netted you last offseason.They like him, but Im not sure he is the long term solution. I think they will look to replace Lynch with a RB in the 2016 draft or 2017 draft. The best hope is you get the end of this year and 2016 out of Rawls.in terms of future draft picks in a dynasty league, what's he worth? a top 4 pick in 2016? more? less?
Boy, that is some stinky bait.Also remember they could bring back Christine for 2016 camp if it doesn't work out with Washington. Prolly got more talent than Rawls. It would definitely be a camp battle.They like him, but Im not sure he is the long term solution. I think they will look to replace Lynch with a RB in the 2016 draft or 2017 draft. The best hope is you get the end of this year and 2016 out of Rawls.in terms of future draft picks in a dynasty league, what's he worth? a top 4 pick in 2016? more? less?
Well I was the buyer. I paid what's currently the #7 rookie pick in the upcoming rookie draft for him. If news comes out that Lynch is shutting it down, I will likely be able to sell for more - but in the meantime I'm using him till I know what the deal is with Forte and Lacy.Or sell him when it looks like Lynch is out of the way. He's shown enough that people will simply assume he'll be a workhorse RB1 (discounting the potential for competition to be brought in, a potential RBBC, etc.), and at least a few will be willing to pay you accordingly. The about what Hill could have netted you last offseason.They like him, but Im not sure he is the long term solution. I think they will look to replace Lynch with a RB in the 2016 draft or 2017 draft. The best hope is you get the end of this year and 2016 out of Rawls.in terms of future draft picks in a dynasty league, what's he worth? a top 4 pick in 2016? more? less?
Cash in on that assumption and convert that value into a more established/stable commodity.
You can't be serious about CM? The guy can't hold down a job. My god turbin beat him out for god sakeAlso remember they could bring back Christine for 2016 camp if it doesn't work out with Washington. Prolly got more talent than Rawls. It would definitely be a camp battle.They like him, but Im not sure he is the long term solution. I think they will look to replace Lynch with a RB in the 2016 draft or 2017 draft. The best hope is you get the end of this year and 2016 out of Rawls.in terms of future draft picks in a dynasty league, what's he worth? a top 4 pick in 2016? more? less?
Trading him away for a 7th round pick implies value. I think its obvious that Cowboy's didn't have what it took to leverage that value. Washington is next man up to try and harness this Beasts talent and I am not convinced their coaches have what it takes either. When it comes to talent like Christine, it takes years to cultivate and try to harness the wild horse that he is. Seattle is really the only team that has a chance since they have been trying for years and came close, but barely missed. My logic goes like this.You can't be serious about CM? The guy can't hold down a job. My god turbin beat him out for god sakeAlso remember they could bring back Christine for 2016 camp if it doesn't work out with Washington. Prolly got more talent than Rawls. It would definitely be a camp battle.They like him, but Im not sure he is the long term solution. I think they will look to replace Lynch with a RB in the 2016 draft or 2017 draft. The best hope is you get the end of this year and 2016 out of Rawls.in terms of future draft picks in a dynasty league, what's he worth? a top 4 pick in 2016? more? less?
- Fred Jackson, Joe Perry, Marion Motley"Ain't no undrafted running back ever gonna amount to anything long term in this league." - Priest Holmes
"That's right, Priest, everyone knows a blind squirrel can find and acorn from time to time but no way does he keep getting fed." - Arian Foster
He has to be trolling, no? The guy can't hold a job. No one wants him after they see him.mnmplayer should have his membership banned. Rawls has been more productive in 2 career starts than CM has been in his entire career. He has more talent than him too.
WTH? Give it up people.As much as you're kind of the laughing stock of the board, at least you were a Seahawks fan, so you seemed to know a thing or two about them, at least.They like him, but Im not sure he is the long term solution. I think they will look to replace Lynch with a RB in the 2016 draft or 2017 draft. The best hope is you get the end of this year and 2016 out of Rawls.in terms of future draft picks in a dynasty league, what's he worth? a top 4 pick in 2016? more? less?
I beg to differ. Lynch is breaking down and can't do what he used to do, whereas Rawls IS doing what Lynch USED to do and doing it well.Win some you lose some. I won the West FAAB when Charles got hurt but missed out on Rawls, and I own Lynch. Can't get 'em all, and I thought once Lynch got healthy Rawls wouldn't see the light of day. That being said, Rawls has had good games and looked more pedestrian in others. He had the 49rs at home people in a game they quit. Before you anoint him the second coming from this game read the reviews of Cousins after he blistered the Saints. They were talking like he was a $25M/year QB or something that Gruden urgently needed to sign. Uhhhh - no.
Rawls is making the most of his opportunity, and in the right set up he can succeed. Similar to Ware from KC yesterday though. For those that have Rawls, ride him as far as you can but temper expectations a bit. For those of us who have Lynch, pray that it's not a hernia and that he returns. If he returns 90% healthy and does surgery after the season a la Hurns there is no RB controversy. Rawls is not the better back.
I agree. And won't cost $12M next year.I beg to differ. Lynch is breaking down and can't do what he used to do, whereas Rawls IS doing what Lynch USED to do and doing it well.Win some you lose some. I won the West FAAB when Charles got hurt but missed out on Rawls, and I own Lynch. Can't get 'em all, and I thought once Lynch got healthy Rawls wouldn't see the light of day. That being said, Rawls has had good games and looked more pedestrian in others. He had the 49rs at home people in a game they quit. Before you anoint him the second coming from this game read the reviews of Cousins after he blistered the Saints. They were talking like he was a $25M/year QB or something that Gruden urgently needed to sign. Uhhhh - no.
Rawls is making the most of his opportunity, and in the right set up he can succeed. Similar to Ware from KC yesterday though. For those that have Rawls, ride him as far as you can but temper expectations a bit. For those of us who have Lynch, pray that it's not a hernia and that he returns. If he returns 90% healthy and does surgery after the season a la Hurns there is no RB controversy. Rawls is not the better back.