ICON211
Footballguy
Can not look at it this way as the entire game plays out differently. Not saying Denver would have won but its not as simple as saying take 7 points ofrom the Pats and add 7 to Denver.No, you are right. He was terrible. Let me ask you this though - on 26 attempts, 60% is 16 completions. Had Tebow completed 7 more throws than he did, would it have made a difference? I think at best, he may have put up one more TD and taken one TD off of the Pats, so at best Broncos loose 38-17. Still a blowout.Tebow was horrible yesterday. Absolutely horrendous. Is the loss all on him? Of course not but his play was completely prohibitive of the Broncos being competitive. It's okay to own that, it was the end of his rookie season (even though we all know that is not entirely true but I will grant it to avoid that debate) and he shouldn't be expected to put the team on his back and carry it at this stage of his development. But that doesn't change the fact that he was absolutely turrible yesterday. Everything that is wrong with his game was clearly demonstrated and he couldn't muster his strong suits to compensate for his shortcomings either.The worst part is that McGahee was running strong early in the game and if Tebow could muster a 60% completion rate he might have been able to help sustain some drives and keep the NE offense off the field. But he couldn't even complete 40% of his passes a fact which helped kill multiple Denver drives (and demonstrates why completion % isn't the overrated stat that some in here try to make it seem).The guy has talent, there is no denying that, but he has massive flaws to work on in the off season. And it is fun to watch and makes for great copy.Did that D look like the 31st ranked D to anyone? They looked awesome to me...best D Broncos have faced all season. I've never seen so many negative plays, esp in the running game.Tebow did not play well, but I didn't think it was terrible...certainly not the worrst QB of all time as some would have you think. He played like you might expect a QB playing on the road in his 16th ever start against a belichick defense.If I were to place blame for this game, our lack of depth @safety would be #1, having a MLB who can't cover #2, an offensive line allowing massive penetration #3, coaches failing to adapt #4, depth @ WR #5, and Tebows play #6.See what I did here? I'm not absolving Tebow from blame and I'm not makimg excuses, just pointing out the larger issues. Remember - this team was 4 -12 last year, there's only so much patching up that can be done, especially w/o an offesason.I think it's funny that the Tebow haters are quick to pin wins on the team, or injured opponenets, or whatever, but pin losses on Tebow. I suppose the Tebowites do the opposite, so maybe it evens out.