This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
People also respect Sarah Palin
That thing should be moved to the Assistant Coach's forum.
The FFA raises its gloves, victorious.
I was never a narcissist before I started looking at mirrors.
Topic is irrelevant. You start threads every time you have a thought about whatever is going on. Instead of starting a brand new topic each time something remotely notable happens on Earth, you just post your would-be OP's in the same thread.Success.
Geez, one emoticon would have been enough
Gotta give you credit for this, it's very funny.
It'd be easy to do, Tim... start a thread, then every time you have a new topic to discuss, just change the title and indicate the post number of the new thought in the subtitle. Done and done.... "Tim's Thread: How the bagel changed the world, discussion begins post 224", "Tim's Thread: Is it now "midafternoon in America"? or 'It's now early evening in America'? Debate starts in post 783", etc.Topic is irrelevant. You start threads every time you have a thought about whatever is going on. Instead of starting a brand new topic each time something remotely notable happens on Earth, you just post your would-be OP's in the same thread.Success.
Needs more Otis.
Post #2 will need to be reserved as a Table of Contents that can be freely edited and updated with new topics. This may put Mr. Ishida's Bookstore to shame.It'd be easy to do, Tim... start a thread, then every time you have a new topic to discuss, just change the title and indicate the post number of the new thought in the subtitle. Done and done.... "Tim's Thread: How the bagel changed the world, discussion begins post 224", "Tim's Thread: Is it now "midafternoon in America"? or 'It's now early evening in America'? Debate starts in post 783", etc.Topic is irrelevant. You start threads every time you have a thought about whatever is going on. Instead of starting a brand new topic each time something remotely notable happens on Earth, you just post your would-be OP's in the same thread.Success.
I'm naked. Just sayin'.
Doesn't make me feel like fightin' much.
Tim>how do you feel about hot skinny supermodels?
I need to start using the word "dude" more often.
I'm naked. Just sayin'.
They please me greatly.
Would have been so many variations we could have used if the last vowel was an i.
I think GM should do this. Then I might actually read his post.It'd be easy to do, Tim... start a thread, then every time you have a new topic to discuss, just change the title and indicate the post number of the new thought in the subtitle. Done and done.... "Tim's Thread: How the bagel changed the world, discussion begins post 224", "Tim's Thread: Is it now "midafternoon in America"? or 'It's now early evening in America'? Debate starts in post 783", etc.Topic is irrelevant. You start threads every time you have a thought about whatever is going on. Instead of starting a brand new topic each time something remotely notable happens on Earth, you just post your would-be OP's in the same thread.Success.
This guy gets it.It'd be easy to do, Tim... start a thread, then every time you have a new topic to discuss, just change the title and indicate the post number of the new thought in the subtitle. Done and done.... "Tim's Thread: How the bagel changed the world, discussion begins post 224", "Tim's Thread: Is it now "midafternoon in America"? or 'It's now early evening in America'? Debate starts in post 783", etc.Topic is irrelevant. You start threads every time you have a thought about whatever is going on. Instead of starting a brand new topic each time something remotely notable happens on Earth, you just post your would-be OP's in the same thread.Success.
I think GM should do this. Then I might actually read his post.It'd be easy to do, Tim... start a thread, then every time you have a new topic to discuss, just change the title and indicate the post number of the new thought in the subtitle. Done and done.... "Tim's Thread: How the bagel changed the world, discussion begins post 224", "Tim's Thread: Is it now "midafternoon in America"? or 'It's now early evening in America'? Debate starts in post 783", etc.Topic is irrelevant. You start threads every time you have a thought about whatever is going on. Instead of starting a brand new topic each time something remotely notable happens on Earth, you just post your would-be OP's in the same thread.Success.
I alway read it as Tim Crochet. I just figured he was into knitting.
Incorrect here as well, but I always read it as "tim-so-shea"
I agree with him. I want to join your mammoth thread, but the thought of reading 4,000 pages to catch up is a buzzkill. But if I knew what the current topic was.....General Malaise said:
But the topics are never the same for very long and usually there's 3-4 differing tangents at the same time. It's essentially a FFA version of chat. Tim could do the same thing, only for serious topics, which is something not often discussed in GM's Thread About Nothing.I agree with him. I want to join your mammoth thread, but the thought of reading 4,000 pages to catch up is a buzzkill. But if I knew what the current topic was.....General Malaise said:
I think if we could establish a new page break feature it might help.But the topics are never the same for very long and usually there's 3-4 differing tangents at the same time. It's essentially a FFA version of chat. Tim could do the same thing, only for serious topics, which is something not often discussed in GM's Thread About Nothing.I agree with him. I want to join your mammoth thread, but the thought of reading 4,000 pages to catch up is a buzzkill. But if I knew what the current topic was.....General Malaise said:
