How a player fits in with LeBron ≠ How good that player isIt's interesting but watching lebron actually weakens bosh's hall of fame credentials. He has two rings, but Tristan thompans is serving the same role next to lebron and he's not going to the hall.
As a note, I'm a big bosh fan
Not that I think Bosh should make the HOF, cause I don't think he should, but wasn't he like a 6-7 time all star in Toronto?It's interesting but watching lebron actually weakens bosh's hall of fame credentials. He has two rings, but Tristan thompans is serving the same role next to lebron and he's not going to the hall.
As a note, I'm a big bosh fan
10-time all-star (5 in Toronto, 5 in Miami) with two rings. His HOF probability on basketball-reference is 98.6%. He's pretty close to a lock.Not that I think Bosh should make the HOF, cause I don't think he should, but wasn't he like a 6-7 time all star in Toronto?
This just isn't true. Not even close to true. There's not anywhere near 15 seconds of back to the basket iso-dribbling.I'm in favor of the college closely-guarded 5-second rule. Cavs are probably playing optimally considering personnel limitations, but Barkley Ball (~15 seconds of back-to-basket dribbling per trip) isn't the most aesthetically pleasing product.
I don't think he gets voted in.Spartans Rule said:10-time all-star (5 in Toronto, 5 in Miami) with two rings. His HOF probability on basketball-reference is 98.6%. He's pretty close to a lock.ghostguy123 said:Not that I think Bosh should make the HOF, cause I don't think he should, but wasn't he like a 6-7 time all star in Toronto?
Bosh is getting in, no doubt.I don't think he gets voted in.Spartans Rule said:10-time all-star (5 in Toronto, 5 in Miami) with two rings. His HOF probability on basketball-reference is 98.6%. He's pretty close to a lock.ghostguy123 said:Not that I think Bosh should make the HOF, cause I don't think he should, but wasn't he like a 6-7 time all star in Toronto?
Not real sure the number of all star appearances matters much anyway.
I was exaggerating the time and considered the "~" to be a sarcastic extension of such. And to be honest, I was more intent on making a derogatory comment about Labron than anything else. I'm a Warriors' mark and am waiting to laugh in everyone's faces when variance flips and the shots fall.Instinctive said:This just isn't true. Not even close to true. There's not anywhere near 15 seconds of back to the basket iso-dribbling.TakiToki said:I'm in favor of the college closely-guarded 5-second rule. Cavs are probably playing optimally considering personnel limitations, but Barkley Ball (~15 seconds of back-to-basket dribbling per trip) isn't the most aesthetically pleasing product.
They bring the ball across at about 17 because they're slowing the game down.
Some kind of entry action, picks, etc - another 2-8 seconds depending on the possession.
15-9 seconds left on the shot clock.
Let's say it only took 3 seconds to enter to LeBron around 20 feet out, where they've been getting it to him. That means we have 14 seconds, which is a pretty quick entry based on their play. He holds the ball for at least 2, up to 5 or 6 seconds at time. College rule gives him 4 to be safe.
Then he starts to dribble and back the guy down, or he's facing up and blowing by. If he blows by, it's not five seconds before he shoots or passes. If he backs down...there's already a 5 second rule for that in the NBA.
No rule change would do anything. Especially since a lot of the other time is spent up top, with LeBron running and re-running his man over a few picks to try and get a matchup he likes for someone.
In any case the 5-second rule would change absolutely nothing.
Making people think he has oneWhat is LeBron's secret motivation?
In his postgame interview with Wade after Game 3, LeBron went out of his way to mention he finished third in MVP voting behind Curry and Harden.What is LeBron's secret motivation?
A gold medal or two as well. No one with his credentials has been left out of the hall.I don't think he gets voted in.Spartans Rule said:10-time all-star (5 in Toronto, 5 in Miami) with two rings. His HOF probability on basketball-reference is 98.6%. He's pretty close to a lock.ghostguy123 said:Not that I think Bosh should make the HOF, cause I don't think he should, but wasn't he like a 6-7 time all star in Toronto?
Not real sure the number of all star appearances matters much anyway.
I know.A gold medal or two as well. No one with his credentials has been left out of the hall.I don't think he gets voted in.
Not real sure the number of all star appearances matters much anyway.
Yep. If you want to talk about high HOF Probability scores that might get left out, talk about Vince Carter, Shawn Marion, or Amare Stoudemire. Bosh is in and still has some career left.Bosh is a total lock. Not even conversation worthy.
New line of products to prevent early male baldnessWhat is LeBron's secret motivation?
He wasn't pissed he finished second he was pissed he was third.It's "secret" because there is no way we could figure it out.
Pissed he finished behind Curry in the MVP voting isn't exactly a secret.
and? doesnt sound real secretiveHe wasn't pissed he finished second he was pissed he was third.It's "secret" because there is no way we could figure it out.
Pissed he finished behind Curry in the MVP voting isn't exactly a secret.
You take it back!!!!!Kev4029 said:I feel like SWC has some good points in there, but I just can't get passed the Studs like spelling and the continuous run on sentences, so I skip over 90% of his posts. I could see how the shtick was funny a year ago, but it has run it's course.
What is the argument for him not to be in?Bosh is a total lock. Not even conversation worthy.
Here's another nice article - this one about how Draymond Green is Killing the Warriors.Great article on SBnation about what the Cavs are doing on defense. It's nothing ground breaking.
http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2015/6/10/8755837/nba-finals-2015-cleveland-cavaliers-defense-golden-state-warriors
I think it's "he was never one of the best five players in the league" which is code for "he followed lebron to Miami."What is the argument for him not to be in?Bosh is a total lock. Not even conversation worthy.
There are tons of players in the Hall who were never one of the five best players in the league.I think it's "he was never one of the best five players in the league" which is code for "he followed lebron to Miami."What is the argument for him not to be in?Bosh is a total lock. Not even conversation worthy.
He was never a top 10 player in the league?There are tons of players in the Hall who were never one of the five best players in the league.I think it's "he was never one of the best five players in the league" which is code for "he followed lebron to Miami."What is the argument for him not to be in?Bosh is a total lock. Not even conversation worthy.
Still don't think Cleveland wins it. There is only so much Delly can do.If Cleveland loses tonight, do they have enough left in the tank to win the series? I feel like the winner tonight likely takes the series.
Good writeup. He's been terrible for both easily explainable reasons (matchup against the Mozgov-Thompson lineup limits his role) and totally baffling reasons (complete loss of confidence from a guy usually overflows with it).Here's another nice article - this one about how Draymond Green is Killing the Warriors.Great article on SBnation about what the Cavs are doing on defense. It's nothing ground breaking.
http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2015/6/10/8755837/nba-finals-2015-cleveland-cavaliers-defense-golden-state-warriors
A win is needed tonight or Sunday, so it ends in 6 in Cleveland. A lot will have to go right for Cleveland, and wrong for Golden State, for the Cavs to take this in 7.If Cleveland loses tonight, do they have enough left in the tank to win the series? I feel like the winner tonight likely takes the series.
The more I think about it the more I like David Lee playing....if Green and Bogut continue to play like crap. Again, Green and Bogut playing at their usual level are worlds better than David Lee but you have to have options.Good writeup. He's been terrible for both easily explainable reasons (matchup against the Mozgov-Thompson lineup limits his role) and totally baffling reasons (complete loss of confidence from a guy usually overflows with it).Here's another nice article - this one about how Draymond Green is Killing the Warriors.Great article on SBnation about what the Cavs are doing on defense. It's nothing ground breaking.
http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2015/6/10/8755837/nba-finals-2015-cleveland-cavaliers-defense-golden-state-warriors
I posted the still of the three he passed up in that possession yesterday. Here it is. Unbelievable to not take that shot down 4 at the 2 minute mark. You're being handed a greater than 40% chance to make it a one point game and you decline. I hadn't considered the fact that his lack of confidence also is probably the reason Curry's behind the back pass later in the possession went out of bounds- its likely that he basically just chickened out of the pick and pop three. Great call by that writer. Also great insight into why the David Lee solution is probably fool's gold.
Can't wait to see how Green responds tonight. I think his play over the next 2-4 games may be what decides the series.
The Lee thing is an interesting wrinkle. The article thought it wouldn't work as more than an occasional changeup. OTOH the Cavs are a good matchup for him b/c they can hide his terrible defense by putting him on Thompson, who doesn't do much offensively until the ball hits the rim. Then there's also the fact that he's not in game shape- I assume that's why they pulled him in the 4th quarter?The more I think about it the more I like David Lee playing....if Green and Bogut continue to play like crap. Again, Green and Bogut playing at their usual level are worlds better than David Lee but you have to have options.Good writeup. He's been terrible for both easily explainable reasons (matchup against the Mozgov-Thompson lineup limits his role) and totally baffling reasons (complete loss of confidence from a guy usually overflows with it).Here's another nice article - this one about how Draymond Green is Killing the Warriors.Great article on SBnation about what the Cavs are doing on defense. It's nothing ground breaking.
http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2015/6/10/8755837/nba-finals-2015-cleveland-cavaliers-defense-golden-state-warriors
I posted the still of the three he passed up in that possession yesterday. Here it is. Unbelievable to not take that shot down 4 at the 2 minute mark. You're being handed a greater than 40% chance to make it a one point game and you decline. I hadn't considered the fact that his lack of confidence also is probably the reason Curry's behind the back pass later in the possession went out of bounds- its likely that he basically just chickened out of the pick and pop three. Great call by that writer. Also great insight into why the David Lee solution is probably fool's gold.
Can't wait to see how Green responds tonight. I think his play over the next 2-4 games may be what decides the series.
Lee is the best offensive big man the Dubs have. He is also the worst on defense. However, the Warriors have been losing grind it out games already...so why not just try to outscore the Cavs? If the Warriors offense is humming, I don't think Cavs ISO ball has enough weapons to keep up.
It's a scary thought of having David Lee trying to stop LeBron from scoring 60 points, but I might be tempted to try it just as long as it gets the pace going in the Dubs favor.
I think Lee is more Fool's gold than anything, but the guys one Lowe's podcast had an interesting point. By having Lee out there, you're basically daring Cleveland to run a pick and roll with LeBron and Lee's man. Yes, it increases Cleveland's likelihood to score, but it also increases the pace of the game (ie the other 4 CLE guys don't get 10 seconds of rest) and may open up some longer rebounds for GS transition offense.The Lee thing is an interesting wrinkle. The article thought it wouldn't work as more than an occasional changeup. OTOH the Cavs are a good matchup for him b/c they can hide his terrible defense by putting him on Thompson, who doesn't do much offensively until the ball hits the rim. Then there's also the fact that he's not in game shape- I assume that's why they pulled him in the 4th quarter?
The Finals are the best. So many twist and turns and strategy decisions we don't see in the regular season, with just enough time between games to discuss and dissect them.
I agree that there's a lot of movement on those "screens." Now, can we see montage of all the extended forearms that Lebron dishes out?Thought this was interesting
http://streamable.com/hvy6
video on the various illegal screens GS has been setting.
You are at least the second and maybe the third person to say that in this thread.My head said Warriors in 6.
My heart wants this win for Cleveland badly.
I think the Cav's have to win tonight to win the series.
If GS trails after the 1st quarter again, like they have all series they may get that here we go again mentality that will help the Cavs.
If that's all they could find then this is a non-issue, and a couple of those weren't even illegal. Bogut's look the worst because he hunches over and leans in on guys and a couple of those should have been called. But as Bob Loblaw points out above, LeBron has dished out a lot of forearms on backdowns.Thought this was interesting
http://streamable.com/hvy6
video on the various illegal screens GS has been setting.
I'd love to see that too...we'd see yellow and blue draped all over him throwing equally as many shots at him.I agree that there's a lot of movement on those "screens." Now, can we see montage of all the extended forearms that Lebron dishes out?Thought this was interesting
http://streamable.com/hvy6
video on the various illegal screens GS has been setting.
Green has tens of millions riding on the next 3-4 games.Good writeup. He's been terrible for both easily explainable reasons (matchup against the Mozgov-Thompson lineup limits his role) and totally baffling reasons (complete loss of confidence from a guy usually overflows with it).Here's another nice article - this one about how Draymond Green is Killing the Warriors.Great article on SBnation about what the Cavs are doing on defense. It's nothing ground breaking.http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2015/6/10/8755837/nba-finals-2015-cleveland-cavaliers-defense-golden-state-warriors
I posted the still of the three he passed up in that possession yesterday. Here it is. Unbelievable to not take that shot down 4 at the 2 minute mark. You're being handed a greater than 40% chance to make it a one point game and you decline. I hadn't considered the fact that his lack of confidence also is probably the reason Curry's behind the back pass later in the possession went out of bounds- its likely that he basically just chickened out of the pick and pop three. Great call by that writer. Also great insight into why the David Lee solution is probably fool's gold.
Can't wait to see how Green responds tonight. I think his play over the next 2-4 games may be what decides the series.
So you think that the Warriors rattle off three in a row? Given that the could be down 3-0 fairly easily at this point i just don't understand this rationale.My head said Warriors in 6.
My heart wants this win for Cleveland badly.
I think the Cav's have to win tonight to win the series.
If GS trails after the 1st quarter again, like they have all series they may get that here we go again mentality that will help the Cavs.
GS could also be up 3-0. All three games have come down to the final few possessions. Admittedly CLE has played better through three quarters each game.So you think that the Warriors rattle off three in a row? Given that the could be down 3-0 fairly easily at this point i just don't understand this rationale.My head said Warriors in 6.
My heart wants this win for Cleveland badly.
I think the Cav's have to win tonight to win the series.
If GS trails after the 1st quarter again, like they have all series they may get that here we go again mentality that will help the Cavs.