What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

timschochet's thread - Ranking hemorrhoids (1 Viewer)

BassNBrew said:
Cavs lose by 21. No one on the roster was within +/-5. JR -27, everyone else -15 or less.
JR has a couple good games and all you hear is ex New York knick, one mans trash, how could you give him away, etc. now that's jrs at the other end of his seesaw all that talk has gone away. Typical media.

 
No. 16 said:
SoBeDad said:
Donkey Derp said:
No. 16 said:
Warriors win with Curry and especially Klay not playing well.

Can't wait until Sunday.
AI deserves the series MVP if GS wins
Lebron could win as a player on the losing team.
My money is on LBJ.
Not gonna happen if the Cavs lose.
If LBJ with a couple more 30+ ppg triple doubles, I think LBJ wins even if they lose as long as Curry stays in the 20 ppg range.

 
"His usage rate is ridiculous" :lmao:

Yes, let's have James Jones taking the ball more instead.
I agree 100%.But let's be honest here, if other superstars were shooting 40% from the field over the 1st 3 games, there would be plenty of posters in here claiming that MozGov and Jones should be getting more shots than they are currently getting since they're shooting 50% from the field.
This is a rather atypical performance by LeBron. We know that he is a very willing passer and will definitely get the ball to the open man (unlike your typical chuckers) but he is having to change his game for his team to have a chance.
Is changing his game offensively to take more shots and pass less a good strategy when the results are that he shoots a worse percentage than others he could be passing to?
There is a difference between Kobe going 1 on 2 and shooting a contested 21 foot jumper and Lebron backing his man in and missing a shot in the paint. The Warriors have the best set of defenders in the NBA to cover Lebron, so they aren't helping a whole lot on his isolations so there aren't a lot of open passing lanes.
Statistically, there is no difference. A miss is a miss.

From a strategic standpoint, assuming both shots will be missed, the Kobe shot is a better miss, as it will lead to offensive rebounds on a far higher percentage than LeBron's miss.
:lmao:

 
Whatever trade off CLE is making in offensive efficiency with those isos, they are making it back on the other end with better defense.
I think this hits the heart of the issue, and I'd take it a step further. Not only are the ISO sets Clev is running helpful on the defensive end, they may in fact be the most efficient sets offensively as well. I'm guessing the points per play suggest otherwise - like you point out the PNR involving Curry as the defender seemed successful (with the added bonus of forcing him to use energy on D), but does anyone really believe the Cleveland offense would be more efficient if Mozgov and James were getting more shots? I don't, even enough their eFGs are higher. I think more usage from those guys would hurt their efficiency.

Which begs the question, is Clev really sacrificing offensive efficiency to slow the game down and give their players a bit of a blow to increase defensive efficiency, or are those benefits simply additional benefits of also running the most efficient and effective offensive set (ISO) given the personnel and circumstance?
Why is it nobody knows wtf 'begs the question' means?

 
Waaaaaaaaaaaaarrriiors!
Come out and playayay! And they did.
No room on the 'wagon. Keep walking.
It was a reference to the movie, The Warriors. :whoosh:
I understand that. But you need to stick with your 5 other favorite NBA teams and not get on this bus. Keep. It. Moving. :drive:
Being a Bay Area-lite, this bus in parked in my backyard ready to hop on it if the Spurs go out. :whistle:
nip
wtf is a Bay Area-lite?

####ing instant locals...worse than trannies

 
Curry could get to 100 threes in these playoffs. Klay will probably end up with 2nd most in a single season.

Rank Player 3P Year Tm1. Stephen Curry 88 2015 GSW2. Reggie Miller* 58 2000 IND3. Ray Allen 57 2001 MIL4. Dennis Scott 56 1995 ORL Ray Allen 56 2010 BOS6. Ray Allen 55 2008 BOS Danny Green 55 2013 SAS Klay Thompson 55 2015 GSW9. Dan Majerle 54 1993 PHO Reggie Miller* 54 1995 INDhttp://www.basketball-reference.com/leaders/fg3_season_p.html

 
It baffles me to no end how Joey Crawford is still in the NBA. The fact that he's still chosen for NBA Finals games shows you that the NBA refereeing system is broken. His attitude and "for the camera" act is so ####### annoying and getting worse every year. He's basically the SWC of the NBA.

 
Hoss Style said:
Cleveland seems drained. These 2 days off are going to do them good.
Although I'm sure they're tired, I think it would be a mistake to fall back on this narrative and ignore other factors. Like for example the fact that the Warriors are better at basketball than the Cavaliers.

 
It baffles me to no end how Joey Crawford is still in the NBA. The fact that he's still chosen for NBA Finals games shows you that the NBA refereeing system is broken. His attitude and "for the camera" act is so ####### annoying and getting worse every year. He's basically the SWC of the NBA.
I hate Crawford but last night was the best called game of the Finals so far.

 
No. 16 said:
SoBeDad said:
Donkey Derp said:
No. 16 said:
Warriors win with Curry and especially Klay not playing well.

Can't wait until Sunday.
AI deserves the series MVP if GS wins
Lebron could win as a player on the losing team.
My money is on LBJ.
Not gonna happen if the Cavs lose.
If LBJ with a couple more 30+ ppg triple doubles, I think LBJ wins even if they lose as long as Curry stays in the 20 ppg range.
I know it's theoretically possible. I'm predicting it won't happen.

Only Jerry West in 1969 -- the first year of the award -- was on the losing team.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top