What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

To Kill a Mockingbird 2 - Harper Lee sequal (1 Viewer)

rct

Footballguy
Not the real title, which is Go Set a Watchman. Actually written before Mockingbird, but takes place 20 years later in the 50's with many of the same characters.

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/feb/03/harper-lee-new-novel-to-kill-a-mockingbird

Harper Lee to publish new novel, 55 years after To Kill a Mockingbird

Harper Lee, author of To Kill a Mockingbird, is to publish her second novel, Go Set a Watchman this summer, a work which the reclusive writer had believed lost for decades, and in which her beloved character Scout will be seen as an adult.

The shock news will delight the 88-year-olds millions of fans, who have waited for a second novel from Lee since 1960, when she released her debut, To Kill a Mockingbird, the tale of racism in the American south which has captivated readers ever since.

Lee said in an announcement from her publisher, Penguin Random House, that she completed Go Set a Watchman in the mid-1950s, but set it aside after the publication of her debut and never returned to it. It features the character known as Scout as an adult woman and I thought it a pretty decent effort, said the reclusive writer. My editor, who was taken by the flashbacks to Scouts childhood, persuaded me to write a novel from the point of view of the young Scout. I was a first-time writer, so I did as I was told.

Lee said today that she hadnt realised the book had survived, so was surprised and delighted when my dear friend and lawyer Tonja Carter discovered it. Carter found the manuscript, said the publisher, in a secure location where it had been affixed to an original typescript of To Kill a Mockingbird.

"After much thought and hesitation I shared it with a handful of people I trust and was pleased to hear that they considered it worthy of publication. I am humbled and amazed that this will now be published after all these years," she finished.

 
Read about that this morning. I really hope this is legit, and it's the book she wrote. In the literary world, at least for me, this is an earth shattering revelation that this book exists and will be published.

Looking forward to it.

 
After catching part of an interview with the editor last night on NBC Nightly News, something seems fishy about all of this.

 
So strange that she had only written one novel up to this point.
totally.

didn't she help with Capote's In Cold Blood?
Yes she did. There was a rumor that Capote actually wrote To Kill A Mockingbird or heavily edited it. It's not true though.
So what is the legit connection between Lee and Capote?
Lee went with Capote to the Clutter farm in Kansas and helped him research the murders which eventually turned in to Capote's In Cold Blood

 
I think she was upstaging G.R.R Martin, "You think you know how to drag out a series???.....watch this."

Rumors abound that she will announce it will indeed be a seven part series as well, however the projected final book being due 2783.

 
So strange that she had only written one novel up to this point.
totally.

didn't she help with Capote's In Cold Blood?
Yes she did. There was a rumor that Capote actually wrote To Kill A Mockingbird or heavily edited it. It's not true though.
So what is the legit connection between Lee and Capote?
Lee went with Capote to the Clutter farm in Kansas and helped him research the murders which eventually turned in to Capote's In Cold Blood
but before that I think they knew each other from HS or college or something.. oh #### it- googling...

eta:

As a child, Lee was a tomboy, a precocious reader, and best friends with her schoolmate and neighbor, the young Truman Capote.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The irony at having a misspelled word in the thread title is rich.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This Harper Lee matter is sounding shady. Could well be that this poor old woman is being exploited.
I won't buy it. If this story is even partially true, that is some shady stuff. I wouldn't give the lawyer any pleasure or money from her exploits.I'd probably read it somehow but I wouldn't spend money on it. I'd send a check to Harper Lee or her descendents but I don't think she has any.
It was the older version rejected by her editor before she rewrote it as "To Kill a Mocking Bird"... It maybe interesting to see the differences but I do not expect it to be better, or even a sequel.

 
This Harper Lee matter is sounding shady. Could well be that this poor old woman is being exploited.
I won't buy it. If this story is even partially true, that is some shady stuff. I wouldn't give the lawyer any pleasure or money from her exploits.I'd probably read it somehow but I wouldn't spend money on it. I'd send a check to Harper Lee or her descendents but I don't think she has any.
It was the older version rejected by her editor before she rewrote it as "To Kill a Mocking Bird"... It maybe interesting to see the differences but I do not expect it to be better, or even a sequel.
Harper Lee has said over the decades she is not going to publish another book. This book, coming out now, under circumstances in the article above are way too sketchy for me. Until I hear a Harper Lee interview or something from her, not her lawyer or others, I'd reconsider. The lawyer is using her though if that article is true.

 
NYT review

Since some might consider the below spoilers...

Atticus is a racist: "Shockingly, in Ms. Lee’s long-awaited novel “Go Set a Watchman” (due out Tuesday), Atticus is a racist who once attended a Klan meeting, who says things like “the Negroes down here are still in their childhood as a people.” Or asks his daughter: “Do you want Negroes by the carload in our schools and churches and theaters? Do you want them in our world?”... In “Watchman,” set in the 1950s in the era of the Brown v. Board of Education decision, he denounces the Supreme Court, says he wants his home state “to be left alone to keep house without advice from the NAACP” and describes N.A.A.C.P.-paid lawyers as “standing around like buzzards.”"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To Kill a Mockingbird would have been a better novel had Atticus not been a cartoon character. Somewhere between these two books, maybe there's an interesting story to be told.

 
What was To Kill A Mockingbird about?
A farmer has only enough seed left to get his family through one last growing season before they are broke. After planting the seed, he finds birds coming into the field to eat them. As he grows angry with violent rage, he begins to see the birds as mocking his futile attempts to shoo them from his land. It's a very sad tale.

 
What was To Kill A Mockingbird about?
A farmer has only enough seed left to get his family through one last growing season before they are broke. After planting the seed, he finds birds coming into the field to eat them. As he grows angry with violent rage, he begins to see the birds as mocking his futile attempts to shoo them from his land. It's a very sad tale.
Were they black crows? Did the farmer hire a lawyer and sue the crows?

 
I really need someone to explain this to me.

She wrote this Watchman novel first?

The publisher convinced her to write another but from Scout's perspective as a child...which ends up being Mockingbird.

But Watchman depicts Atticus as a racist whereas Mockingbird has him as a champion of equal rights.

So...was this on purpose? Was Harper showing the idealistic view of Atticus from a child's perspective as being a hero when in fact he was something more human and fallible in reality?

Or did the publisher have her change this character for Mockingbird?

Or did Atticus somehow become jaded and take on racist notions as he got older?

Or is this predated sequel some sort of fake?

I'm having a hard time resolving this complete flip in character.

 
I really need someone to explain this to me.

She wrote this Watchman novel first?

The publisher convinced her to write another but from Scout's perspective as a child...which ends up being Mockingbird.

But Watchman depicts Atticus as a racist whereas Mockingbird has him as a champion of equal rights.

So...was this on purpose? Was Harper showing the idealistic view of Atticus from a child's perspective as being a hero when in fact he was something more human and fallible in reality?

Or did the publisher have her change this character for Mockingbird?

Or did Atticus somehow become jaded and take on racist notions as he got older?

Or is this predated sequel some sort of fake?

I'm having a hard time resolving this complete flip in character.
GSAW was the original manuscript Lee submitted to the publisher. As the story goes, he liked Scout's retelling of the early period in her life and the publisher asked Lee to go with that story instead. In one sense, GSAW is basically a first draft of Mockingbird.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top