What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Tom Brady is fertile (1 Viewer)

That'll be kind of different having two children about three to four months apart. Would say it doesn't happen too often, but I've heard a lot of this type of thing on Jerry Springer.

 
I can't wait for Brady vrs Brady in 2032!

With different moms it will have a lot more appeal than Manning vrs Manning last year.

 
Peter King already has Bray's kids ranked as the 2nd and 3rd best QBs in the league (behind Brady of course)

 
It should be virile, not fertile, unless Brady himself is actually pregnant.
If anyone could do it it would be Brady! I'll bet he could win games based on his own strength of will clear into the third trimester!Peter King already has him rated as the #1 father ever.
 
Good job Tom. Here's an idea. Pick one and marry her! The candy store isn't free dude. :yes:
Obviously you are a married guy. The candy store is there and is free for Tom...he just hasn't been smart and has avoided safety precautions. For those reasons...the candy store will now exact fees for 18 years.
 
He's taken the offensive system used in New England to a whole new level. I know he likes to spread it around on the field to different WR's, but lets keep it on the Field Tom. On the field.

 
Good job Tom. Here's an idea. Pick one and marry her! The candy store isn't free dude. :excited:
Obviously you are a married guy. The candy store is there and is free for Tom...he just hasn't been smart and has avoided safety precautions. For those reasons...the candy store will now exact fees for 18 years.
He has thrived in the NE system that likes to spread it around around. Maybe he's taken that lasson to heart? I'm just saying. If things weren't working out with Bridget for you, and Gisele came along, would you turn it down? I'm a realist, and that's a pretty tough no to utter.
 
I wonder what the record is for # of children born to the same father in the course of one year. I think he could make a run at that.

 
He's always spread his balls accross the field to many different recievers. heheh (bevis voice) He likes to score.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good job Tom. Here's an idea. Pick one and marry her! The candy store isn't free dude. :goodposting:
Obviously you are a married guy. The candy store is there and is free for Tom...he just hasn't been smart and has avoided safety precautions. For those reasons...the candy store will now exact fees for 18 years.
Ah, I see. The installment plan. Maybe he didn't get married to avoid alimony payments. Sneaky! :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My wife is pregnant... she came home late from the Pats/Texans game... she's due on... oh my God! You Bastage!

 
I can overlook the non use of safety. They were super models...not like he is out knocking down hood rats or anything.

 
Sure some guys can always claim to have nailed both Bundchen and Moynahan, Tom is leaving proof.... assuring his legend. It's not like he can't afford child support.

and wtf with suggesting condoms? If I had the chance to bed either one of these snappers, the last thing on my mind would be, Nah babe, not tonight, I got no condom.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gisele's Family Shoots Down Rumors She's Pregnant With Brady's Baby

Boston Herald | Gayle Fee, Laura Raposa | Posted March 9, 2007 12:55 PM

Tom Brady's seemingly endless baby-mama drama took a timeout yesterday when Gisele Bundchen's family shot down reports that the New England Patriots super-stud had another completion - this time with the Brazilian supermodel.

The $30 million catwalker's father as well as her sister, Raquel, told the media that the Brady baby buzz was bogus - Gisele is not pregnant with No. 12's No. 2. (Last month, Tom's ex, Bridget Moynahan, announced she is carrying the first heir to the Brady throne.)

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top