I have wondered how much of that is inmate ability versus not having been taught properly.I'm interested to see how the game moves. As he said, it seems ike it used to be more focused this way with the guys like Brady, Manning and Brees where their mental game was the strong point. It's shifted now with more mobile QBs and some of the physical game is their strong point. Obviously, both is best and it's not necessarily and either/or situation.
I have wondered how much of that is inmate ability versus not having been taught properly.I'm interested to see how the game moves. As he said, it seems ike it used to be more focused this way with the guys like Brady, Manning and Brees where their mental game was the strong point. It's shifted now with more mobile QBs and some of the physical game is their strong point. Obviously, both is best and it's not necessarily and either/or situation.
Innate ability: Jalen Hurts, for example, can read man-to-man coverage and exploit that. Any zone reads, especially with sim pressure or exotic blitzes and he seems to take an eztra beat to make the read, ends up scrambling and taking bad sacks. Some people just have didferent levels of spatial awareness and are just freakishly good at it. Some aren’t.
Coaching: look at the resurgence of Baker Mayfield and Sam Darnold. You put them on a team with strong leadership and good coaching and look at the difference it makes.
This is exactly why Sean Payton jettisoned Russell Wilson and drafted Bo Nix.
The "processing speed" gene is also manifested not at the outset of a career, but primarily through continuous improvement game-after-game, year-after-year. Which Nix showed throughout his rookie season, at least.
Jayden Daniels looks like the next guy with these superpowers.Eidetic memory, also known as photographic memory and total recall, is the ability to recall an image from memory with high precision—at least for a brief period of time—after seeing it only once and without using a mnemonic device
I think that if you have this ability in the top x percentile, you are going to manifest it no matter what is being taught, and that most people probably have a ceiling on how well they can do it. Like eyesight, certain freaks have like 20/10 that you can never teach, but you can do exercises to train your eyes to improve depth perception, rapid movement, etc. you can certainly do training to improve spatial recognition and awareness.I have wondered how much of that is inmate ability versus not having been taught properly.I'm interested to see how the game moves. As he said, it seems ike it used to be more focused this way with the guys like Brady, Manning and Brees where their mental game was the strong point. It's shifted now with more mobile QBs and some of the physical game is their strong point. Obviously, both is best and it's not necessarily and either/or situation.
Innate ability: Jalen Hurts, for example, can read man-to-man coverage and exploit that. Any zone reads, especially with sim pressure or exotic blitzes and he seems to take an eztra beat to make the read, ends up scrambling and taking bad sacks. Some people just have didferent levels of spatial awareness and are just freakishly good at it. Some aren’t.
Coaching: look at the resurgence of Baker Mayfield and Sam Darnold. You put them on a team with strong leadership and good coaching and look at the difference it makes.
Not to put too fine of a point on it but this seems like a giant "well duh".
Elite QBs simply process more and faster than everyone else. It can be honed but not coached. You either have it or you don't. It's a type of genius.
In the Sam Darnold example, I believe his deficiencies we're minimized. He wasn't "unshackled" or "unlocked" because he found himself in the right system. When the chips were down, opposing teams forced him back into situations where he had proven repeatedly that he couldn't perform; when the mid/deep throw wasn't open, he couldn't trust his eyes to throw the short pass.
Patrick Mahomes' genius is his nearly clairvoyant ability to reset at multiple times during the same play. When the play goes sideways he diagnoses that in an instant, assess his alternate options, and almost always chooses the proper alternative. If we could see inside his head I think we'd see super computer like if/then/else processing. I don't say that as a joke.
Not to put too fine of a point on it but this seems like a giant "well duh".
Elite QBs simply process more and faster than everyone else. It can be honed but not coached. You either have it or you don't. It's a type of genius.
In the Sam Darnold example, I believe his deficiencies we're minimized. He wasn't "unshackled" or "unlocked" because he found himself in the right system. When the chips were down, opposing teams forced him back into situations where he had proven repeatedly that he couldn't perform; when the mid/deep throw wasn't open, he couldn't trust his eyes to throw the short pass.
Patrick Mahomes' genius is his nearly clairvoyant ability to reset at multiple times during the same play. When the play goes sideways he diagnoses that in an instant, assess his alternate options, and almost always chooses the proper alternative. If we could see inside his head I think we'd see super computer like if/then/else processing. I don't say that as a joke.
I'm not sure about that. I think we all get the mental part is big but it doesn't feel like a "well duh". Especially with a "fine point". At least not to me.
I do find it interesting as well with him talking about how the game, in his opinion, is moving away from this. He's obviously a lot closer to it than I am. But not sure that isn't more a "back in my day..." thing.
I don't now how it could be more self evident.
Unless he wasn't a successful fetus I think you mean "prolific".I think Brady's lack of success at a young age was actually a huge boon to him.
Well yeah he was a great athlete, also drafted to play baseball but he didn't have the success relative to other QBs prior to the NFL, wasn't heavily recruited, started at Michigan 7th on the depth chart, almost transferred after a couple seasons and then wasn't even the full time starter, splitting time with Drew Henson. Then as we all know drafted in 6th round.Unless he wasn't a successful fetus I think you mean "prolific".I think Brady's lack of success at a young age was actually a huge boon to him.
IDK about Pop Warner or HS but he was highly successful as a college starter (20-5), got a national championship as a backup the year before, and won a Super Bowl in his second season in the NFL (first season as a starter).
He was always successful and I attribute a bunch of that to the work ethic that were talking about in here. But the physical attributes necessary to capitalize on that work ethic were always there. Becoming truly prolific as time went on is a byproduct of that work ethic AND physical gifts.
There are far more Rudys in this world than Bradys. People who live and breathe their passion and still, ultimately fail because they lack the necessary physical attributes to achieve their goals.
Sorry Rudy, was not a good football player and I'm not sure why people find inspiration in his story. I personally view his story as one of misplaced priorities that, likely cost him in the long run.
Brady has unique physical attributes, 6'4" ish and 220 ish lbs, that provided the tools necessary to accomplish what his already elite brain was capable of processing. It may have taken him a few more years to physically mature into an elite athlete but, make no mistake he had the physical attributes necessary to become an elite athlete.
The comparison between Drew Henson and Brady is perfect in this context. Henson was BY FAR the more physically gifted and talented QB at Michigan.Well yeah he was a great athlete, also drafted to play baseball but he didn't have the success relative to other QBs prior to the NFL, wasn't heavily recruited, started at Michigan 7th on the depth chart, almost transferred after a couple seasons and then wasn't even the full time starter, splitting time with Drew Henson. Then as we all know drafted in 6th round.Unless he wasn't a successful fetus I think you mean "prolific".I think Brady's lack of success at a young age was actually a huge boon to him.
IDK about Pop Warner or HS but he was highly successful as a college starter (20-5), got a national championship as a backup the year before, and won a Super Bowl in his second season in the NFL (first season as a starter).
He was always successful and I attribute a bunch of that to the work ethic that were talking about in here. But the physical attributes necessary to capitalize on that work ethic were always there. Becoming truly prolific as time went on is a byproduct of that work ethic AND physical gifts.
There are far more Rudys in this world than Bradys. People who live and breathe their passion and still, ultimately fail because they lack the necessary physical attributes to achieve their goals.
Sorry Rudy, was not a good football player and I'm not sure why people find inspiration in his story. I personally view his story as one of misplaced priorities that, likely cost him in the long run.
Brady has unique physical attributes, 6'4" ish and 220 ish lbs, that provided the tools necessary to accomplish what his already elite brain was capable of processing. It may have taken him a few more years to physically mature into an elite athlete but, make no mistake he had the physical attributes necessary to become an elite athlete.
The comparison between Drew Henson and Brady is perfect in this context. Henson was BY FAR the more physically gifted and talented QB at Michigan.Well yeah he was a great athlete, also drafted to play baseball but he didn't have the success relative to other QBs prior to the NFL, wasn't heavily recruited, started at Michigan 7th on the depth chart, almost transferred after a couple seasons and then wasn't even the full time starter, splitting time with Drew Henson. Then as we all know drafted in 6th round.Unless he wasn't a successful fetus I think you mean "prolific".I think Brady's lack of success at a young age was actually a huge boon to him.
IDK about Pop Warner or HS but he was highly successful as a college starter (20-5), got a national championship as a backup the year before, and won a Super Bowl in his second season in the NFL (first season as a starter).
He was always successful and I attribute a bunch of that to the work ethic that were talking about in here. But the physical attributes necessary to capitalize on that work ethic were always there. Becoming truly prolific as time went on is a byproduct of that work ethic AND physical gifts.
There are far more Rudys in this world than Bradys. People who live and breathe their passion and still, ultimately fail because they lack the necessary physical attributes to achieve their goals.
Sorry Rudy, was not a good football player and I'm not sure why people find inspiration in his story. I personally view his story as one of misplaced priorities that, likely cost him in the long run.
Brady has unique physical attributes, 6'4" ish and 220 ish lbs, that provided the tools necessary to accomplish what his already elite brain was capable of processing. It may have taken him a few more years to physically mature into an elite athlete but, make no mistake he had the physical attributes necessary to become an elite athlete.
But their career paths could not have been more divergent due to the mental and work ethic attributes that Brady possessed and Henson didn't, and that required development time and coaching to fully manifest.
Henson threw 45 & 89 passes in two seasons while Brady threw 323 & 295. I didn't do a game by game analysis but I'm guessing a lot of those 134 passes by Henson were in mop up duty.Well yeah he was a great athlete, also drafted to play baseball but he didn't have the success relative to other QBs prior to the NFL, wasn't heavily recruited, started at Michigan 7th on the depth chart, almost transferred after a couple seasons and then wasn't even the full time starter, splitting time with Drew Henson. Then as we all know drafted in 6th round.Unless he wasn't a successful fetus I think you mean "prolific".I think Brady's lack of success at a young age was actually a huge boon to him.
IDK about Pop Warner or HS but he was highly successful as a college starter (20-5), got a national championship as a backup the year before, and won a Super Bowl in his second season in the NFL (first season as a starter).
He was always successful and I attribute a bunch of that to the work ethic that were talking about in here. But the physical attributes necessary to capitalize on that work ethic were always there. Becoming truly prolific as time went on is a byproduct of that work ethic AND physical gifts.
There are far more Rudys in this world than Bradys. People who live and breathe their passion and still, ultimately fail because they lack the necessary physical attributes to achieve their goals.
Sorry Rudy, was not a good football player and I'm not sure why people find inspiration in his story. I personally view his story as one of misplaced priorities that, likely cost him in the long run.
Brady has unique physical attributes, 6'4" ish and 220 ish lbs, that provided the tools necessary to accomplish what his already elite brain was capable of processing. It may have taken him a few more years to physically mature into an elite athlete but, make no mistake he had the physical attributes necessary to become an elite athlete.
that's interesting i was under impression Henson threw a lot more passes. In any case it actually wasn't mop up duty, They would rotate quarters in the first half and then coach decided who would play the 2nd half.Henson threw 45 & 89 passes in two seasons while Brady threw 323 & 295. I didn't do a game by game analysis but I'm guessing a lot of those 134 passes by Henson were in mop up duty.Well yeah he was a great athlete, also drafted to play baseball but he didn't have the success relative to other QBs prior to the NFL, wasn't heavily recruited, started at Michigan 7th on the depth chart, almost transferred after a couple seasons and then wasn't even the full time starter, splitting time with Drew Henson. Then as we all know drafted in 6th round.Unless he wasn't a successful fetus I think you mean "prolific".I think Brady's lack of success at a young age was actually a huge boon to him.
IDK about Pop Warner or HS but he was highly successful as a college starter (20-5), got a national championship as a backup the year before, and won a Super Bowl in his second season in the NFL (first season as a starter).
He was always successful and I attribute a bunch of that to the work ethic that were talking about in here. But the physical attributes necessary to capitalize on that work ethic were always there. Becoming truly prolific as time went on is a byproduct of that work ethic AND physical gifts.
There are far more Rudys in this world than Bradys. People who live and breathe their passion and still, ultimately fail because they lack the necessary physical attributes to achieve their goals.
Sorry Rudy, was not a good football player and I'm not sure why people find inspiration in his story. I personally view his story as one of misplaced priorities that, likely cost him in the long run.
Brady has unique physical attributes, 6'4" ish and 220 ish lbs, that provided the tools necessary to accomplish what his already elite brain was capable of processing. It may have taken him a few more years to physically mature into an elite athlete but, make no mistake he had the physical attributes necessary to become an elite athlete.
Thank you, MitchieGPT.that's interesting i was under impression Henson threw a lot more passes. In any case it actually wasn't mop up duty, They would rotate quarters in the first half and then coach decided who would play the 2nd half.Henson threw 45 & 89 passes in two seasons while Brady threw 323 & 295. I didn't do a game by game analysis but I'm guessing a lot of those 134 passes by Henson were in mop up duty.Well yeah he was a great athlete, also drafted to play baseball but he didn't have the success relative to other QBs prior to the NFL, wasn't heavily recruited, started at Michigan 7th on the depth chart, almost transferred after a couple seasons and then wasn't even the full time starter, splitting time with Drew Henson. Then as we all know drafted in 6th round.Unless he wasn't a successful fetus I think you mean "prolific".I think Brady's lack of success at a young age was actually a huge boon to him.
IDK about Pop Warner or HS but he was highly successful as a college starter (20-5), got a national championship as a backup the year before, and won a Super Bowl in his second season in the NFL (first season as a starter).
He was always successful and I attribute a bunch of that to the work ethic that were talking about in here. But the physical attributes necessary to capitalize on that work ethic were always there. Becoming truly prolific as time went on is a byproduct of that work ethic AND physical gifts.
There are far more Rudys in this world than Bradys. People who live and breathe their passion and still, ultimately fail because they lack the necessary physical attributes to achieve their goals.
Sorry Rudy, was not a good football player and I'm not sure why people find inspiration in his story. I personally view his story as one of misplaced priorities that, likely cost him in the long run.
Brady has unique physical attributes, 6'4" ish and 220 ish lbs, that provided the tools necessary to accomplish what his already elite brain was capable of processing. It may have taken him a few more years to physically mature into an elite athlete but, make no mistake he had the physical attributes necessary to become an elite athlete.
Michigan has had some memorable quarterback competitions over the decades, but not many were as peculiar as the one that transpired in 1999.
Although Tom Brady was Michigan’s starting QB in ‘98, Michigan head coach Lloyd Carr wanted to give sophomore Drew Henson a crack at the gig in 1999. “I know this: there isn’t a coach in the country who has a better situation at quarterback,” Carr said in August ‘99.
Henson was considered the best high school QB to ever come out of the state of Michigan, he was personally recruited by Bo Schembechler, Carr called him the most talented quarterback he had ever been around. All the hype directed towards Henson was something Brady noticed, and the fact he wasn’t named the starter heading into the season had him frustrated. “The hype ends today when the doors close and everyone leaves,” Brady told Detroit News’ Bob Wojnowski. “To be the best, you have to beat out the best. I’ve fought long and hard to be in this position, and I don’t plan to give it up.”
A great QB situation turned into an unconventional decision by Carr. Instead of naming a starting quarterback before the season, Carr had another idea. His plan called for Henson to start the first quarter, Brady the second, and the hot hand getting the nod for the entire second half.
Full article: https://www.maizenbrew.com/football...-football-tom-brady-and-drew-henson-qb-battle
In 1998, Brady was the starter and Henson the freshman backupthat's interesting i was under impression Henson threw a lot more passes. In any case it actually wasn't mop up duty, They would rotate quarters in the first half and then coach decided who would play the 2nd half.Henson threw 45 & 89 passes in two seasons while Brady threw 323 & 295. I didn't do a game by game analysis but I'm guessing a lot of those 134 passes by Henson were in mop up duty.Well yeah he was a great athlete, also drafted to play baseball but he didn't have the success relative to other QBs prior to the NFL, wasn't heavily recruited, started at Michigan 7th on the depth chart, almost transferred after a couple seasons and then wasn't even the full time starter, splitting time with Drew Henson. Then as we all know drafted in 6th round.Unless he wasn't a successful fetus I think you mean "prolific".I think Brady's lack of success at a young age was actually a huge boon to him.
IDK about Pop Warner or HS but he was highly successful as a college starter (20-5), got a national championship as a backup the year before, and won a Super Bowl in his second season in the NFL (first season as a starter).
He was always successful and I attribute a bunch of that to the work ethic that were talking about in here. But the physical attributes necessary to capitalize on that work ethic were always there. Becoming truly prolific as time went on is a byproduct of that work ethic AND physical gifts.
There are far more Rudys in this world than Bradys. People who live and breathe their passion and still, ultimately fail because they lack the necessary physical attributes to achieve their goals.
Sorry Rudy, was not a good football player and I'm not sure why people find inspiration in his story. I personally view his story as one of misplaced priorities that, likely cost him in the long run.
Brady has unique physical attributes, 6'4" ish and 220 ish lbs, that provided the tools necessary to accomplish what his already elite brain was capable of processing. It may have taken him a few more years to physically mature into an elite athlete but, make no mistake he had the physical attributes necessary to become an elite athlete.
Michigan has had some memorable quarterback competitions over the decades, but not many were as peculiar as the one that transpired in 1999.
Although Tom Brady was Michigan’s starting QB in ‘98, Michigan head coach Lloyd Carr wanted to give sophomore Drew Henson a crack at the gig in 1999. “I know this: there isn’t a coach in the country who has a better situation at quarterback,” Carr said in August ‘99.
Henson was considered the best high school QB to ever come out of the state of Michigan, he was personally recruited by Bo Schembechler, Carr called him the most talented quarterback he had ever been around. All the hype directed towards Henson was something Brady noticed, and the fact he wasn’t named the starter heading into the season had him frustrated. “The hype ends today when the doors close and everyone leaves,” Brady told Detroit News’ Bob Wojnowski. “To be the best, you have to beat out the best. I’ve fought long and hard to be in this position, and I don’t plan to give it up.”
A great QB situation turned into an unconventional decision by Carr. Instead of naming a starting quarterback before the season, Carr had another idea. His plan called for Henson to start the first quarter, Brady the second, and the hot hand getting the nod for the entire second half.
Full article: https://www.maizenbrew.com/football...-football-tom-brady-and-drew-henson-qb-battle
Thank you, MitchieGPT.that's interesting i was under impression Henson threw a lot more passes. In any case it actually wasn't mop up duty, They would rotate quarters in the first half and then coach decided who would play the 2nd half.Henson threw 45 & 89 passes in two seasons while Brady threw 323 & 295. I didn't do a game by game analysis but I'm guessing a lot of those 134 passes by Henson were in mop up duty.Well yeah he was a great athlete, also drafted to play baseball but he didn't have the success relative to other QBs prior to the NFL, wasn't heavily recruited, started at Michigan 7th on the depth chart, almost transferred after a couple seasons and then wasn't even the full time starter, splitting time with Drew Henson. Then as we all know drafted in 6th round.Unless he wasn't a successful fetus I think you mean "prolific".I think Brady's lack of success at a young age was actually a huge boon to him.
IDK about Pop Warner or HS but he was highly successful as a college starter (20-5), got a national championship as a backup the year before, and won a Super Bowl in his second season in the NFL (first season as a starter).
He was always successful and I attribute a bunch of that to the work ethic that were talking about in here. But the physical attributes necessary to capitalize on that work ethic were always there. Becoming truly prolific as time went on is a byproduct of that work ethic AND physical gifts.
There are far more Rudys in this world than Bradys. People who live and breathe their passion and still, ultimately fail because they lack the necessary physical attributes to achieve their goals.
Sorry Rudy, was not a good football player and I'm not sure why people find inspiration in his story. I personally view his story as one of misplaced priorities that, likely cost him in the long run.
Brady has unique physical attributes, 6'4" ish and 220 ish lbs, that provided the tools necessary to accomplish what his already elite brain was capable of processing. It may have taken him a few more years to physically mature into an elite athlete but, make no mistake he had the physical attributes necessary to become an elite athlete.
Michigan has had some memorable quarterback competitions over the decades, but not many were as peculiar as the one that transpired in 1999.
Although Tom Brady was Michigan’s starting QB in ‘98, Michigan head coach Lloyd Carr wanted to give sophomore Drew Henson a crack at the gig in 1999. “I know this: there isn’t a coach in the country who has a better situation at quarterback,” Carr said in August ‘99.
Henson was considered the best high school QB to ever come out of the state of Michigan, he was personally recruited by Bo Schembechler, Carr called him the most talented quarterback he had ever been around. All the hype directed towards Henson was something Brady noticed, and the fact he wasn’t named the starter heading into the season had him frustrated. “The hype ends today when the doors close and everyone leaves,” Brady told Detroit News’ Bob Wojnowski. “To be the best, you have to beat out the best. I’ve fought long and hard to be in this position, and I don’t plan to give it up.”
A great QB situation turned into an unconventional decision by Carr. Instead of naming a starting quarterback before the season, Carr had another idea. His plan called for Henson to start the first quarter, Brady the second, and the hot hand getting the nod for the entire second half.
Full article: https://www.maizenbrew.com/football...-football-tom-brady-and-drew-henson-qb-battle
I feel like I'm missing a good joke here.Thank you, MitchieGPT.that's interesting i was under impression Henson threw a lot more passes. In any case it actually wasn't mop up duty, They would rotate quarters in the first half and then coach decided who would play the 2nd half.Henson threw 45 & 89 passes in two seasons while Brady threw 323 & 295. I didn't do a game by game analysis but I'm guessing a lot of those 134 passes by Henson were in mop up duty.Well yeah he was a great athlete, also drafted to play baseball but he didn't have the success relative to other QBs prior to the NFL, wasn't heavily recruited, started at Michigan 7th on the depth chart, almost transferred after a couple seasons and then wasn't even the full time starter, splitting time with Drew Henson. Then as we all know drafted in 6th round.Unless he wasn't a successful fetus I think you mean "prolific".I think Brady's lack of success at a young age was actually a huge boon to him.
IDK about Pop Warner or HS but he was highly successful as a college starter (20-5), got a national championship as a backup the year before, and won a Super Bowl in his second season in the NFL (first season as a starter).
He was always successful and I attribute a bunch of that to the work ethic that were talking about in here. But the physical attributes necessary to capitalize on that work ethic were always there. Becoming truly prolific as time went on is a byproduct of that work ethic AND physical gifts.
There are far more Rudys in this world than Bradys. People who live and breathe their passion and still, ultimately fail because they lack the necessary physical attributes to achieve their goals.
Sorry Rudy, was not a good football player and I'm not sure why people find inspiration in his story. I personally view his story as one of misplaced priorities that, likely cost him in the long run.
Brady has unique physical attributes, 6'4" ish and 220 ish lbs, that provided the tools necessary to accomplish what his already elite brain was capable of processing. It may have taken him a few more years to physically mature into an elite athlete but, make no mistake he had the physical attributes necessary to become an elite athlete.
Michigan has had some memorable quarterback competitions over the decades, but not many were as peculiar as the one that transpired in 1999.
Although Tom Brady was Michigan’s starting QB in ‘98, Michigan head coach Lloyd Carr wanted to give sophomore Drew Henson a crack at the gig in 1999. “I know this: there isn’t a coach in the country who has a better situation at quarterback,” Carr said in August ‘99.
Henson was considered the best high school QB to ever come out of the state of Michigan, he was personally recruited by Bo Schembechler, Carr called him the most talented quarterback he had ever been around. All the hype directed towards Henson was something Brady noticed, and the fact he wasn’t named the starter heading into the season had him frustrated. “The hype ends today when the doors close and everyone leaves,” Brady told Detroit News’ Bob Wojnowski. “To be the best, you have to beat out the best. I’ve fought long and hard to be in this position, and I don’t plan to give it up.”
A great QB situation turned into an unconventional decision by Carr. Instead of naming a starting quarterback before the season, Carr had another idea. His plan called for Henson to start the first quarter, Brady the second, and the hot hand getting the nod for the entire second half.
Full article: https://www.maizenbrew.com/football...-football-tom-brady-and-drew-henson-qb-battle
That's a little mean. I remember that the coaches would do that at Michigan when Brady was there.
I feel like I'm missing a good joke here.Thank you, MitchieGPT.that's interesting i was under impression Henson threw a lot more passes. In any case it actually wasn't mop up duty, They would rotate quarters in the first half and then coach decided who would play the 2nd half.Henson threw 45 & 89 passes in two seasons while Brady threw 323 & 295. I didn't do a game by game analysis but I'm guessing a lot of those 134 passes by Henson were in mop up duty.Well yeah he was a great athlete, also drafted to play baseball but he didn't have the success relative to other QBs prior to the NFL, wasn't heavily recruited, started at Michigan 7th on the depth chart, almost transferred after a couple seasons and then wasn't even the full time starter, splitting time with Drew Henson. Then as we all know drafted in 6th round.Unless he wasn't a successful fetus I think you mean "prolific".I think Brady's lack of success at a young age was actually a huge boon to him.
IDK about Pop Warner or HS but he was highly successful as a college starter (20-5), got a national championship as a backup the year before, and won a Super Bowl in his second season in the NFL (first season as a starter).
He was always successful and I attribute a bunch of that to the work ethic that were talking about in here. But the physical attributes necessary to capitalize on that work ethic were always there. Becoming truly prolific as time went on is a byproduct of that work ethic AND physical gifts.
There are far more Rudys in this world than Bradys. People who live and breathe their passion and still, ultimately fail because they lack the necessary physical attributes to achieve their goals.
Sorry Rudy, was not a good football player and I'm not sure why people find inspiration in his story. I personally view his story as one of misplaced priorities that, likely cost him in the long run.
Brady has unique physical attributes, 6'4" ish and 220 ish lbs, that provided the tools necessary to accomplish what his already elite brain was capable of processing. It may have taken him a few more years to physically mature into an elite athlete but, make no mistake he had the physical attributes necessary to become an elite athlete.
Michigan has had some memorable quarterback competitions over the decades, but not many were as peculiar as the one that transpired in 1999.
Although Tom Brady was Michigan’s starting QB in ‘98, Michigan head coach Lloyd Carr wanted to give sophomore Drew Henson a crack at the gig in 1999. “I know this: there isn’t a coach in the country who has a better situation at quarterback,” Carr said in August ‘99.
Henson was considered the best high school QB to ever come out of the state of Michigan, he was personally recruited by Bo Schembechler, Carr called him the most talented quarterback he had ever been around. All the hype directed towards Henson was something Brady noticed, and the fact he wasn’t named the starter heading into the season had him frustrated. “The hype ends today when the doors close and everyone leaves,” Brady told Detroit News’ Bob Wojnowski. “To be the best, you have to beat out the best. I’ve fought long and hard to be in this position, and I don’t plan to give it up.”
A great QB situation turned into an unconventional decision by Carr. Instead of naming a starting quarterback before the season, Carr had another idea. His plan called for Henson to start the first quarter, Brady the second, and the hot hand getting the nod for the entire second half.
Full article: https://www.maizenbrew.com/football...-football-tom-brady-and-drew-henson-qb-battle
That's a little mean. I remember that the coaches would do that at Michigan when Brady was there.
They platooned over seven games in a twelve game season?I feel like I'm missing a good joke here.Thank you, MitchieGPT.that's interesting i was under impression Henson threw a lot more passes. In any case it actually wasn't mop up duty, They would rotate quarters in the first half and then coach decided who would play the 2nd half.Henson threw 45 & 89 passes in two seasons while Brady threw 323 & 295. I didn't do a game by game analysis but I'm guessing a lot of those 134 passes by Henson were in mop up duty.Well yeah he was a great athlete, also drafted to play baseball but he didn't have the success relative to other QBs prior to the NFL, wasn't heavily recruited, started at Michigan 7th on the depth chart, almost transferred after a couple seasons and then wasn't even the full time starter, splitting time with Drew Henson. Then as we all know drafted in 6th round.Unless he wasn't a successful fetus I think you mean "prolific".I think Brady's lack of success at a young age was actually a huge boon to him.
IDK about Pop Warner or HS but he was highly successful as a college starter (20-5), got a national championship as a backup the year before, and won a Super Bowl in his second season in the NFL (first season as a starter).
He was always successful and I attribute a bunch of that to the work ethic that were talking about in here. But the physical attributes necessary to capitalize on that work ethic were always there. Becoming truly prolific as time went on is a byproduct of that work ethic AND physical gifts.
There are far more Rudys in this world than Bradys. People who live and breathe their passion and still, ultimately fail because they lack the necessary physical attributes to achieve their goals.
Sorry Rudy, was not a good football player and I'm not sure why people find inspiration in his story. I personally view his story as one of misplaced priorities that, likely cost him in the long run.
Brady has unique physical attributes, 6'4" ish and 220 ish lbs, that provided the tools necessary to accomplish what his already elite brain was capable of processing. It may have taken him a few more years to physically mature into an elite athlete but, make no mistake he had the physical attributes necessary to become an elite athlete.
Michigan has had some memorable quarterback competitions over the decades, but not many were as peculiar as the one that transpired in 1999.
Although Tom Brady was Michigan’s starting QB in ‘98, Michigan head coach Lloyd Carr wanted to give sophomore Drew Henson a crack at the gig in 1999. “I know this: there isn’t a coach in the country who has a better situation at quarterback,” Carr said in August ‘99.
Henson was considered the best high school QB to ever come out of the state of Michigan, he was personally recruited by Bo Schembechler, Carr called him the most talented quarterback he had ever been around. All the hype directed towards Henson was something Brady noticed, and the fact he wasn’t named the starter heading into the season had him frustrated. “The hype ends today when the doors close and everyone leaves,” Brady told Detroit News’ Bob Wojnowski. “To be the best, you have to beat out the best. I’ve fought long and hard to be in this position, and I don’t plan to give it up.”
A great QB situation turned into an unconventional decision by Carr. Instead of naming a starting quarterback before the season, Carr had another idea. His plan called for Henson to start the first quarter, Brady the second, and the hot hand getting the nod for the entire second half.
Full article: https://www.maizenbrew.com/football...-football-tom-brady-and-drew-henson-qb-battle
That's a little mean. I remember that the coaches would do that at Michigan when Brady was there.
In the 1999 season, Brady had to once again hold off Henson for the starting job. The two players platooned during the season's first seven games, with Brady playing the first quarter, Henson the second, and Carr then deciding upon a quarterback for the second half. - Wikipedia
Perhaps I'm missing the joke, Chaka. I don't really know.
They platooned over seven games in a twelve game season?I feel like I'm missing a good joke here.Thank you, MitchieGPT.that's interesting i was under impression Henson threw a lot more passes. In any case it actually wasn't mop up duty, They would rotate quarters in the first half and then coach decided who would play the 2nd half.Henson threw 45 & 89 passes in two seasons while Brady threw 323 & 295. I didn't do a game by game analysis but I'm guessing a lot of those 134 passes by Henson were in mop up duty.Well yeah he was a great athlete, also drafted to play baseball but he didn't have the success relative to other QBs prior to the NFL, wasn't heavily recruited, started at Michigan 7th on the depth chart, almost transferred after a couple seasons and then wasn't even the full time starter, splitting time with Drew Henson. Then as we all know drafted in 6th round.Unless he wasn't a successful fetus I think you mean "prolific".I think Brady's lack of success at a young age was actually a huge boon to him.
IDK about Pop Warner or HS but he was highly successful as a college starter (20-5), got a national championship as a backup the year before, and won a Super Bowl in his second season in the NFL (first season as a starter).
He was always successful and I attribute a bunch of that to the work ethic that were talking about in here. But the physical attributes necessary to capitalize on that work ethic were always there. Becoming truly prolific as time went on is a byproduct of that work ethic AND physical gifts.
There are far more Rudys in this world than Bradys. People who live and breathe their passion and still, ultimately fail because they lack the necessary physical attributes to achieve their goals.
Sorry Rudy, was not a good football player and I'm not sure why people find inspiration in his story. I personally view his story as one of misplaced priorities that, likely cost him in the long run.
Brady has unique physical attributes, 6'4" ish and 220 ish lbs, that provided the tools necessary to accomplish what his already elite brain was capable of processing. It may have taken him a few more years to physically mature into an elite athlete but, make no mistake he had the physical attributes necessary to become an elite athlete.
Michigan has had some memorable quarterback competitions over the decades, but not many were as peculiar as the one that transpired in 1999.
Although Tom Brady was Michigan’s starting QB in ‘98, Michigan head coach Lloyd Carr wanted to give sophomore Drew Henson a crack at the gig in 1999. “I know this: there isn’t a coach in the country who has a better situation at quarterback,” Carr said in August ‘99.
Henson was considered the best high school QB to ever come out of the state of Michigan, he was personally recruited by Bo Schembechler, Carr called him the most talented quarterback he had ever been around. All the hype directed towards Henson was something Brady noticed, and the fact he wasn’t named the starter heading into the season had him frustrated. “The hype ends today when the doors close and everyone leaves,” Brady told Detroit News’ Bob Wojnowski. “To be the best, you have to beat out the best. I’ve fought long and hard to be in this position, and I don’t plan to give it up.”
A great QB situation turned into an unconventional decision by Carr. Instead of naming a starting quarterback before the season, Carr had another idea. His plan called for Henson to start the first quarter, Brady the second, and the hot hand getting the nod for the entire second half.
Full article: https://www.maizenbrew.com/football...-football-tom-brady-and-drew-henson-qb-battle
That's a little mean. I remember that the coaches would do that at Michigan when Brady was there.
In the 1999 season, Brady had to once again hold off Henson for the starting job. The two players platooned during the season's first seven games, with Brady playing the first quarter, Henson the second, and Carr then deciding upon a quarterback for the second half. - Wikipedia
Perhaps I'm missing the joke, Chaka. I don't really know.
And Brady ended up with 295 attempts to 89 for Henson.
I'm not going to go over the game logs so from the view from 30,000 feet the Wolverines went from 25 pass attempts per game over the first seven games (split between two QBs) to 41 pass attempts per game over the last five games, exclusively by Brady.
I do remember, vaguely, some platooning during that season (when I was far more in touch with the college game). But how does a platoon narrative pass muster with those year end numbers?
Being given the answers to the questions before taking the test also helps a lot!It often seems it's the mental acuity that separates the GOATS from the greats.
That may have been the plan but Brady was the official starter for every game that year. Henson went many games without even a stat.A great QB situation turned into an unconventional decision by Carr. Instead of naming a starting quarterback before the season, Carr had another idea. His plan called for Henson to start the first quarter, Brady the second, and the hot hand getting the nod for the entire second half.
It is well-documented common knowledge that Brady started over Henson. So what is the point you are trying to make?That may have been the plan but Brady was the official starter for every game that year. Henson went many games without even a stat.A great QB situation turned into an unconventional decision by Carr. Instead of naming a starting quarterback before the season, Carr had another idea. His plan called for Henson to start the first quarter, Brady the second, and the hot hand getting the nod for the entire second half.
Henson had one game, I believe, where he threw more passes than Brady but Brady was the starter and saw, by far, more PT than Henson. He was even a team captain.
Seems pretty clear, sorry if I worded it poorly.It is well-documented common knowledge that Brady started over Henson. So what is the point you are trying to make?That may have been the plan but Brady was the official starter for every game that year. Henson went many games without even a stat.A great QB situation turned into an unconventional decision by Carr. Instead of naming a starting quarterback before the season, Carr had another idea. His plan called for Henson to start the first quarter, Brady the second, and the hot hand getting the nod for the entire second half.
Henson had one game, I believe, where he threw more passes than Brady but Brady was the starter and saw, by far, more PT than Henson. He was even a team captain.
By no means was Henson ever an "afterthought."Seems pretty clear, sorry if I worded it poorly.It is well-documented common knowledge that Brady started over Henson. So what is the point you are trying to make?That may have been the plan but Brady was the official starter for every game that year. Henson went many games without even a stat.A great QB situation turned into an unconventional decision by Carr. Instead of naming a starting quarterback before the season, Carr had another idea. His plan called for Henson to start the first quarter, Brady the second, and the hot hand getting the nod for the entire second half.
Henson had one game, I believe, where he threw more passes than Brady but Brady was the starter and saw, by far, more PT than Henson. He was even a team captain.
Carr's plan to platoon Henson and Brady never materialized on the field. Henson was an afterthought.
I do wonder how the mental tests will play out this year for the Combine. Something to watch.
I do wonder how the mental tests will play out this year for the Combine. Something to watch.
Is this the S2 test that made some headlines a few years ago? One NFL reporter leaked CJ Stroud's test scores which were unusually low, and there was speculation he would drop in the draft because of it. The reported quoted some NFL guys (anonymously) who said they wouldn't draft him because of his poor S2 score. It was reported that Stroud scored 18% and Bryce Young scored 98%. There was some discussion here about it at the time. After their rookie years, some folks speculated that the S2 test got somewhat of a black eye from that real-world experience.
According to my google search: "The S2 test is a cognitive assessment used at the NFL combine to measure how quickly and accurately players process information. It's designed to evaluate a player's ability to make split-second decisions, which is especially important for quarterbacks."