Like what? Saw the creepy guy in the background of a few scenes.Make sure to watch the "normal" stuff again at the beginning to see what you missed.
That's not it...chet said:I watched the first couple of minutes last night and closed it once I realized they weren't going to stop the intro. I still don't know why it's funny or it they're trying to spoof another show. Maybe I missed something not having grown up in the US. If anyone cares to enlighten me, TIA.WhatDoIKnow said:This is one you can't watch without sound.I'll watch it today without the sound on.Dude, this entire thing is amazing.Got through about 50 seconds and bailed.
In one scene a painting had the murderer. Think it's the first Dallas scene.Like what? Saw the creepy guy in the background of a few scenes.Make sure to watch the "normal" stuff again at the beginning to see what you missed.
These guys did an AMA yesterday for anyone who is curious to know more.
https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/2lm9se/we_are_the_gobsmacked_creators_behind_too_many/
[–]pdpainterPaul Painter 289 points
18 hours ago "And now there are no Cooks. Thanks a lot, hobo serial killer Terry Gilliam" — Gonzo http://disq.us/8ku3ec
Just this, as far as I know. He's in 9 or 10 scenes before it turns into a cartoon.Like what? Saw the creepy guy in the background of a few scenes.Make sure to watch the "normal" stuff again at the beginning to see what you missed.
"Too many cooks, too many cookssssss, ...." I can't get it out if my head.I've watched this approximately 10 times since yesterday and have been singing the song all day. Already changed my Facebook picture to one of Bill. This is a ####### classic.
The funny is in all of those bottles under the sink. Feel free to try them all.i've watched it twice, weird. Not sure where the funny is but its definitely interesting and whoever put it together was high as ####.
The doctor scene was hilarious.i've watched it twice, weird. Not sure where the funny is but its definitely interesting and whoever put it together was high as ####.
The funny is in all of those bottles under the sink. Feel free to try them all.i've watched it twice, weird. Not sure where the funny is but its definitely interesting and whoever put it together was high as ####.
Standing right behind Morgan Burch at about 0:20. This gets less funny but creepier every time I watch it.Just this, as far as I know. He's in 9 or 10 scenes before it turns into a cartoon.Like what? Saw the creepy guy in the background of a few scenes.Make sure to watch the "normal" stuff again at the beginning to see what you missed.
Now my FB cover photo.
The David Foster Wallace list-serv is doing a good job diagnosing its creepiness, and while not claiming that it's influenced by Wallace, they're coming very close to saying that. They're claiming it is very Lynchian and Wallace-esque. Zizek (who the hell is that? Oh, that's who.) came up. It's horror mixed with banality and bourgeois tropes which are turned on their head to show you that the horror is actually lurking in the tropes themselves, in a way.Standing right behind Morgan Burch at about 0:20. This gets less funny but creepier every time I watch it.Just this, as far as I know. He's in 9 or 10 scenes before it turns into a cartoon.Like what? Saw the creepy guy in the background of a few scenes.Make sure to watch the "normal" stuff again at the beginning to see what you missed.
To make up for your complete lack of try hardinger.Rockaction why do you try so hard?
Interesting.The David Foster Wallace list-serv is doing a good job diagnosing its creepiness, and while not claiming that it's influenced by Wallace, they're coming very close to saying that. They're claiming it is very Lynchian and Wallace-esque. Zizek (who the hell is that? Oh, that's who.) came up. It's horror mixed with banality and bourgeois tropes which are turned on their head to show you that the horror is actually lurking in the tropes themselves, in a way.Standing right behind Morgan Burch at about 0:20. This gets less funny but creepier every time I watch it.Just this, as far as I know. He's in 9 or 10 scenes before it turns into a cartoon.Like what? Saw the creepy guy in the background of a few scenes.Make sure to watch the "normal" stuff again at the beginning to see what you missed.
Anyway, it creeped me out as soon as I saw the cannibalism. I just stopped watching it. I think I knew from reading critiques of Lynch by Wallace exactly what the dudes were going for. It's John Wayne Gacy. It's the dude that cut up people and just saran wrapped them in the freezer along with the Eggo waffles. It's what Wallace said Lynch was excellent at, which was to take the banality of middle class life and show the evil lurkingjust underneath italong side of it.
No, it doesn't make me cool nor literate. (I've only seen Lynch's Blue Velvet and Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me. Oh, and Mulholland Drive, too. But I don't think I find that stuff interesting anymore.) It just means I didn't find Too Many Cooks funny in any way, because I had two lenses through which to view it. One is the sincerity lens, where irony is shunned. The other is surreal and abstract horror, where the horror itself is hiding in the facade of happy and middle-class tropes.
Sorry, OPM. tommyboy has a point.
eta* Interesting take here. http://biblioklept.org/2014/11/08/a-too-many-cooks-riff-focusing-on-the-killer-who-is-there-right-from-the-beginning/ It seems like the author is claiming that our own humorous appreciation of irony actually obscures the horror lurking within the film, which is REALLY a DFW-influenced thesis, for sure. And it doesn't seem too far off.
Rockaction why do you try so hard?
Yep, and probably the correct explanation about the authorial intent. I read part of the AMA with those guys, and it seemed like that's what they were going for. Said they liked irony (which was not my original point) and that Andy Kaufman Great Gatsby joke (until everyone left the theater). So the answer is probably simpler (or somewhere in-between) than the one I offered. Plus in-references, too, like the Married With Children set you pointed out.Interesting.The David Foster Wallace list-serv is doing a good job diagnosing its creepiness, and while not claiming that it's influenced by Wallace, they're coming very close to saying that. They're claiming it is very Lynchian and Wallace-esque. Zizek (who the hell is that? Oh, that's who.) came up. It's horror mixed with banality and bourgeois tropes which are turned on their head to show you that the horror is actually lurking in the tropes themselves, in a way.Standing right behind Morgan Burch at about 0:20. This gets less funny but creepier every time I watch it.Just this, as far as I know. He's in 9 or 10 scenes before it turns into a cartoon.Like what? Saw the creepy guy in the background of a few scenes.Make sure to watch the "normal" stuff again at the beginning to see what you missed.
Anyway, it creeped me out as soon as I saw the cannibalism. I just stopped watching it. I think I knew from reading critiques of Lynch by Wallace exactly what the dudes were going for. It's John Wayne Gacy. It's the dude that cut up people and just saran wrapped them in the freezer along with the Eggo waffles. It's what Wallace said Lynch was excellent at, which was to take the banality of middle class life and show the evil lurkingjust underneath italong side of it.
No, it doesn't make me cool nor literate. (I've only seen Lynch's Blue Velvet and Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me. Oh, and Mulholland Drive, too. But I don't think I find that stuff interesting anymore.) It just means I didn't find Too Many Cooks funny in any way, because I had two lenses through which to view it. One is the sincerity lens, where irony is shunned. The other is surreal and abstract horror, where the horror itself is hiding in the facade of happy and middle-class tropes.
Sorry, OPM. tommyboy has a point.
eta* Interesting take here. http://biblioklept.org/2014/11/08/a-too-many-cooks-riff-focusing-on-the-killer-who-is-there-right-from-the-beginning/ It seems like the author is claiming that our own humorous appreciation of irony actually obscures the horror lurking within the film, which is REALLY a DFW-influenced thesis, for sure. And it doesn't seem too far off.
Or an easier explanation is that the creators were paying homage (or poking fun at?) as many old shows as possible, and that included Twin Peaks, where the dad = killer.
Reminded me of Funny Games.No, it doesn't make me cool nor literate. (I've only seen Lynch's Blue Velvet and Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me. Oh, and Mulholland Drive, too. But I don't think I find that stuff interesting anymore.) It just means I didn't find Too Many Cooks funny in any way, because I had two lenses through which to view it. One is the sincerity lens, where irony is shunned. The other is surreal and abstract horror, where the horror itself is hiding in the facade of happy and middle-class tropes.
Watched that movie until the golf clubs, paused it, and read a review. Did the same thing I did with Too Many Cooks. Just stopped watching.Reminded me of Funny Games.No, it doesn't make me cool nor literate. (I've only seen Lynch's Blue Velvet and Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me. Oh, and Mulholland Drive, too. But I don't think I find that stuff interesting anymore.) It just means I didn't find Too Many Cooks funny in any way, because I had two lenses through which to view it. One is the sincerity lens, where irony is shunned. The other is surreal and abstract horror, where the horror itself is hiding in the facade of happy and middle-class tropes.
Yes. Somehow more exciting watching it on TV.The same video that was posted here?On at midnight eastern
Makes sense.Yes. Somehow more exciting watching it on TV.The same video that was posted here?On at midnight eastern
Don't act like you're not going to tune in.Makes sense.Yes. Somehow more exciting watching it on TV.The same video that was posted here?On at midnight eastern
The Smarf one is brilliant.Was just about to come in here saying I'm disappointed in the lack of apparel available by now. I'll hold out for something better.
Anyone get to the bottom of this yet?On an unrelated note, what is that button Smarf has to push?
PM ShukeAnyone get to the bottom of this yet?On an unrelated note, what is that button Smarf has to push?