FIXEDThe NFL draft will obviously change some values depending on teams and situations, but I'd like to get a feel of how most of you currently rank the top 5 rookies for a dynasty league.
1. Colts RB
2. ?
3. ?
4. ?
5. ?
ask me Monday......until then, you'll get 10 different combinations from 10 different people---none of which mean squat!To clarify, I am looking for how you would draft the top 5 in a dynasty rookie draft.
Actually, I have the 1.02 pick, but have been offered 1.05 and a 1st rounder in 2007 for it. Trying to see who most people think will be taken 1 through 4 to make the decision on whether to take it.someone has the 1.5 pick.
you really need to wait till after the draft. if Addai or another RB ends up in Indy or if DEN ends up with a RB they could make a strong case for 1.05.right now for me it looks like this:Actually, I have the 1.02 pick, but have been offered 1.05 and a 1st rounder in 2007 for it. Trying to see who most people think will be taken 1 through 4 to make the decision on whether to take it.someone has the 1.5 pick.
This is as likely as any.1. Bush
2. Williams
3. White
4. Maroney
5. C.Jackson
it's all wasted energy before the NFL draft to try and figure out what a fanasty rookie draft will look like, since where a player goes directly impacts his opportunity and fantasy worth.ask me Monday......until then, you'll get 10 different combinations from 10 different people---none of which mean squat!To clarify, I am looking for how you would draft the top 5 in a dynasty rookie draft.
I often find that I make better picks when I decide my tiers beforehand. The situations can skew things into make bad picks in the mid-late first - I was as guilty as anyone with the Shelton and Arrington hype last year. Really evaluating and ranking the talent before the draft can help temper the expectations no matter how good the situation is. On the flipside, if you really love a guys talent, you should take him where you had him ranked pre-draft because talent eventually finds opportunity.it's all wasted energy before the NFL draft to try and figure out what a fanasty rookie draft will look like, since where a player goes directly impacts his opportunity and fantasy worth.ask me Monday......until then, you'll get 10 different combinations from 10 different people---none of which mean squat!To clarify, I am looking for how you would draft the top 5 in a dynasty rookie draft.
as always. I was burned by Shelton to a degree last year as well.I often find that I make better picks when I decide my tiers beforehand. The situations can skew things into make bad picks in the mid-late first - I was as guilty as anyone with the Shelton and Arrington hype last year. Really evaluating and ranking the talent before the draft can help temper the expectations no matter how good the situation is. On the flipside, if you really love a guys talent, you should take him where you had him ranked pre-draft because talent eventually finds opportunity.it's all wasted energy before the NFL draft to try and figure out what a fanasty rookie draft will look like, since where a player goes directly impacts his opportunity and fantasy worth.ask me Monday......until then, you'll get 10 different combinations from 10 different people---none of which mean squat!To clarify, I am looking for how you would draft the top 5 in a dynasty rookie draft.
I still believe that dynasty teams should be built around QBs, TEs, and WRs, but this is the worst group of WRs that I've seen in a long time. These guys stink. I only see 2-3 of them as potential number one WRs, and none of those guys are locks.EBF, I remember back in January that you were touting the merits of WRs in a dynasty. Have you changed on that or is this year's crop of WRs just not talented enough to crack the top 5 overall?
This is true, but there are some nice values later on... I like the WRs available in the 30s and 40s this year better than last year.I still believe that dynasty teams should be built around QBs, TEs, and WRs, but this is the worst group of WRs that I've seen in a long time. These guys stink. I only see 2-3 of them as potential number one WRs, and none of those guys are locks.EBF, I remember back in January that you were touting the merits of WRs in a dynasty. Have you changed on that or is this year's crop of WRs just not talented enough to crack the top 5 overall?
That could be the case. Then again, Reggie Brown and Mark Bradley were pretty good prospects. Last year also had Chris Henry, who I liked a lot. I just don't see many guys to get excited about this year. Chad Jackson is #1 on my board, but he's certainly no lock for stardom.This is true, but there are some nice values later on... I like the WRs available in the 30s and 40s this year better than last year.I still believe that dynasty teams should be built around QBs, TEs, and WRs, but this is the worst group of WRs that I've seen in a long time. These guys stink. I only see 2-3 of them as potential number one WRs, and none of those guys are locks.EBF, I remember back in January that you were touting the merits of WRs in a dynasty. Have you changed on that or is this year's crop of WRs just not talented enough to crack the top 5 overall?
A few I like include Stovall, Brandon Williams and Jonothan Orr.That could be the case. Then again, Reggie Brown and Mark Bradley were pretty good prospects. Last year also had Chris Henry, who I liked a lot. I just don't see many guys to get excited about this year. Chad Jackson is #1 on my board, but he's certainly no lock for stardom.This is true, but there are some nice values later on... I like the WRs available in the 30s and 40s this year better than last year.I still believe that dynasty teams should be built around QBs, TEs, and WRs, but this is the worst group of WRs that I've seen in a long time. These guys stink. I only see 2-3 of them as potential number one WRs, and none of those guys are locks.EBF, I remember back in January that you were touting the merits of WRs in a dynasty. Have you changed on that or is this year's crop of WRs just not talented enough to crack the top 5 overall?
I see you point. So not totally wasted energy, as a player with talent could blossom down the road with a different supporting cast. aka Michael Clayton in Bal. I passed on him due to Bal. pick, but now he is looking like a better option... especially if McNair comes on board... oops.I often find that I make better picks when I decide my tiers beforehand. The situations can skew things into make bad picks in the mid-late first - I was as guilty as anyone with the Shelton and Arrington hype last year. Really evaluating and ranking the talent before the draft can help temper the expectations no matter how good the situation is. On the flipside, if you really love a guys talent, you should take him where you had him ranked pre-draft because talent eventually finds opportunity.it's all wasted energy before the NFL draft to try and figure out what a fanasty rookie draft will look like, since where a player goes directly impacts his opportunity and fantasy worth.ask me Monday......until then, you'll get 10 different combinations from 10 different people---none of which mean squat!To clarify, I am looking for how you would draft the top 5 in a dynasty rookie draft.