This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
That's exactly what I've been saying. He's played against terrible run defenses. The only good run defense he's faced was Cinci which he only had 65 yards. I think Jackson will will finish in the 14-18 range in backs, for the rest of the season.
Sorry I mean from here on out my bad
I don't think there's any way a back getting 15-20 carries and 5 catches a game slips that low in PPR.
Don't see how you can take McCoy out of the top 5. Jackson Rice McFadden McCoy Forte in no order.
14-18 huh... Keep telling yourself that.
Even splitting carries almost 50/50 with tate that is the only problem I see with foster
um, not worth it really but how did you get Rice, McCoy, McFadden, Nicks, Fitzgerald, and Romo?Rice, McCoy, McFadden, Matthews, McGahee(actually those are my RBs)
Rice - 1st roundMcCoy - trade involving Finley McFadden - trade involving Marshall Nicks - 2nd roundFitz - trade involving Harvin, Starks, BurlesonRomo - 3rd roundum, not worth it really but how did you get Rice, McCoy, McFadden, Nicks, Fitzgerald, and Romo?Rice, McCoy, McFadden, Matthews, McGahee(actually those are my RBs)
Bingo.
you reached on Romo.Rice - 1st roundMcCoy - trade involving Finley McFadden - trade involving Marshall Nicks - 2nd roundFitz - trade involving Harvin, Starks, BurlesonRomo - 3rd roundum, not worth it really but how did you get Rice, McCoy, McFadden, Nicks, Fitzgerald, and Romo?Rice, McCoy, McFadden, Matthews, McGahee(actually those are my RBs)
He will also be reaching for the SB trophy when they hand it him.you reached on Romo.Rice - 1st roundMcCoy - trade involving Finley McFadden - trade involving Marshall Nicks - 2nd roundFitz - trade involving Harvin, Starks, BurlesonRomo - 3rd roundum, not worth it really but how did you get Rice, McCoy, McFadden, Nicks, Fitzgerald, and Romo?Rice, McCoy, McFadden, Matthews, McGahee(actually those are my RBs)
I prefer Jackie "Moon" Battle
This post doesn't make sense. How does the #1 RB right now finish top 5 if he doesn't produce top 5 numbers for the rest of the year?
That's hard to see with the amount of work and the effectiveness of Hunter.
Rice, McCoy, McFadden, Matthews, McGahee
(actually those are my RBs)
[/quote
lol league size? 4?
Start warming up a nice big bowl of crow
lol @ no ADP
Don't do that man I spit coffee on my computer.
Since week 4 Foster's been scoring about 25 ppg. I'd go with (in no particular order):Foster
Plenty of Foster hate in this forum.Non owners are furious. Or those that passed, thinking he was a fluke. Or they own tate.Plenty of reasons
Fjax still not getting credit, oh well cant wait to hear all the i told you so's come seasons end.
I admittedly did not put a lot of thought into that and I've never had FJackson in any league so I may underestimate him. I know he's been exceptional so far this year, I just have a hard time leaving any of the other 5 off. But you're right, I probably don't give him enough credit.
Ya, exactly. It's like who do you take off in favour of him really?? Should just be a top 6 list.
Yup, and houston will likely be needing those wins (for either the div, or to try for a bye)
got him 6th only cuz he plays for the worst offense of the five ahead of him. this is a top 5 list. honestly its splitting hairs
Agreed. The top tier basically consists of 6 guys right now, so one of Forte and FJax is likely to be the odd man out if we're only allowed to choose 5. One would argue that FJax is more deserving of a top 5 spot than not only Forte, but perhaps a few others in the top 5, but it's really splitting hairs. I don't think you can go wrong with any of the top 6, and I think any one of them could easily finish the season as RB1.That's why I just expanded my list to 6...
