sihaokills
Footballguy
If you any other guys please write it down
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree that he deserves to be an option.Smith has to at least be an option... He's the rushing yard record holder. He needs to be in the discussion.
Obviously we value talent over longevity.at those who do not have smith top 5
5th c'mon. Just because you never had Brown on your fantasy team?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Brownhttp://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BrowJi00.htmRead up1. Barry Sanders2. Walter Payton3. Emmitt Smith4. Marshall Faulk5. Jim Brown
It's not about being a fan Hoss, it's just fact. He's not a product of just a good O-line and a good system, it's very narrow minded thinking IMO. I'm not going to try and change your mind, but why did you even mention Emmitt Smith in your closing statement? Why wasn't it sorry Riggins fans, or sorry Marcus Allen fans, why did you pick Emmitt Smith?My guess is because you know deep down he is in that company yet you just don't have him there.There's no way Gayle Sayers was a better football player than Emmitt Smith. The guy didn't even come close to the career Emmitt Smith had. Let me also ask you this, if the Juice was head and shoulders above any RB in his prime, why wasn't he your NO. 1 selection, why did you drop him to No. 5 if he was better than all the rest like you stated?The top 5 RBs of all time in my opinion are:1 - Jim Brown - Only played 9 years and left on top. He would be a beast in any era. 2 - Barry Sanders - Played on awful teams and awful OLs and had he kept playing would have passed Payton and Smith wouldn't have sniffed his record.3 - Walter Payton - Simply a great football player, let alone a great RB.4 - Gayle Sayers - See below.5 - O.J. Simpson - The juice was head and shoulders better than any RB in his prime. He was electrifying.I was tempted to put Marshall Faulk 5th, but the juice was too far ahead of other RBs for several years. I also liked Earl Campbell and Eric Dickerson.That's looking beyond the final tallys. Gayle Sayers didn't have a long career because of injury, but a lot of people say he's the best they ever saw in the time he DID play.Sorry E Smith fans, but he isn't close to being better than the RBs I listed and was a product of the system and great OLs.
I like your theme, but if you're going with pure bruisers, how do you not put Earl Campbell in there, he should be right behind Jim Brown in that category.No love for Franco Harris yet? He was the key to the Pittsburgh offense during their first four SBs.My top 5 wereBrownPaytonDickersonHarris OJI have a bias against scat-backs, hence my omission of Barry (and part of my hatred of Reggie Bush). Outstanding at what he did, no doubt but I can't put him above these bruisers.
Fixed!at those who do not have smith top 5
Agreed. I never got to watch Brown , but you could just see the fear in defensive backs when they had to get in front of Campbell. I've never seen that with any other player, & I wonder if Brown was even like that.I like your theme, but if you're going with pure bruisers, how do you not put Earl Campbell in there, he should be right behind Jim Brown in that category.No love for Franco Harris yet? He was the key to the Pittsburgh offense during their first four SBs.My top 5 wereBrownPaytonDickersonHarris OJI have a bias against scat-backs, hence my omission of Barry (and part of my hatred of Reggie Bush). Outstanding at what he did, no doubt but I can't put him above these bruisers.
This is what John Mackey said about Jim Brown:He told me, 'Make sure when anyone tackles you he remembers how much it hurts.' He lived by that philosophy and I always followed that advice. —John Mackey, 1999Something tells me not many DB's wanted to tackle Mr. Brown.Agreed. I never got to watch Brown , but you could just see the fear in defensive backs when they had to get in front of Campbell. I've never seen that with any other player, & I wonder if Brown was even like that.I like your theme, but if you're going with pure bruisers, how do you not put Earl Campbell in there, he should be right behind Jim Brown in that category.No love for Franco Harris yet? He was the key to the Pittsburgh offense during their first four SBs.My top 5 wereBrownPaytonDickersonHarris OJI have a bias against scat-backs, hence my omission of Barry (and part of my hatred of Reggie Bush). Outstanding at what he did, no doubt but I can't put him above these bruisers.
JIM BROWN number 1??? that's laughable.. Best rb ever was Barry Sanders.. I live in Detroit but Im not a real lions fan and I will admit that guy was sick... 10 straight years of unstoppbale force, then retired early. Never had a great line or a good team and was an ultimate competitor and could have smashed the record. period. 1. B. sanders2. W. payton3. jim brown4. Marshall Faulk5. Ladanian Tomlinson6. Emmit SmithHere is your top 6The top 5 RBs of all time in my opinion are:1 - Jim Brown - Only played 9 years and left on top. He would be a beast in any era. 2 - Barry Sanders - Played on awful teams and awful OLs and had he kept playing would have passed Payton and Smith wouldn't have sniffed his record.3 - Walter Payton - Simply a great football player, let alone a great RB.4 - Gayle Sayers - See below.5 - O.J. Simpson - The juice was head and shoulders better than any RB in his prime. He was electrifying.I was tempted to put Marshall Faulk 5th, but the juice was too far ahead of other RBs for several years. I also liked Earl Campbell and Eric Dickerson.That's looking beyond the final tallys. Gayle Sayers didn't have a long career because of injury, but a lot of people say he's the best they ever saw in the time he DID play.Sorry E Smith fans, but he isn't close to being better than the RBs I listed and was a product of the system and great OLs.
Jim Brown Laughabe?????Let's compare.Rushing Yards Per GameBrown 104.33Sanders 99.79Receiving Yards Per GameBrown 21.17Sanders 19.09Touchdowns per gameBrown 1.07Sanders .71Carrer Rushing Yard Per AttemptBrown 5.2Sanders 5.0Sanders was a great back, he should be in the discussion for #2 all time, but he was tackled at or brhind the line 1/3 of his attempts. If you had 3rd and the The Lions passed, The Browns ran.Best RB of all time:Jim BrownMost exciting RB of all time:Barry SandersBest all around athlete to play RB:Walter PaytonMost exciting athlete to play RBGayle SayersJIM BROWN number 1??? that's laughable.. Best rb ever was Barry Sanders.. I live in Detroit but Im not a real lions fan and I will admit that guy was sick... 10 straight years of unstoppbale force, then retired early. Never had a great line or a good team and was an ultimate competitor and could have smashed the record. period. 1. B. sanders2. W. payton3. jim brown4. Marshall Faulk5. Ladanian Tomlinson6. Emmit SmithHere is your top 6The top 5 RBs of all time in my opinion are:1 - Jim Brown - Only played 9 years and left on top. He would be a beast in any era. 2 - Barry Sanders - Played on awful teams and awful OLs and had he kept playing would have passed Payton and Smith wouldn't have sniffed his record.3 - Walter Payton - Simply a great football player, let alone a great RB.4 - Gayle Sayers - See below.5 - O.J. Simpson - The juice was head and shoulders better than any RB in his prime. He was electrifying.I was tempted to put Marshall Faulk 5th, but the juice was too far ahead of other RBs for several years. I also liked Earl Campbell and Eric Dickerson.That's looking beyond the final tallys. Gayle Sayers didn't have a long career because of injury, but a lot of people say he's the best they ever saw in the time he DID play.Sorry E Smith fans, but he isn't close to being better than the RBs I listed and was a product of the system and great OLs.
Who cares if 1/3 of his runs went for neg yards the guy led the league in rushing almost all the time and was an ultimate runningback machine. He got taken out at THE GOALLINE for some stupid reason or he would have way more then 115 career tds that he has. Jim Brown played in a totally different era where defensive players were nowhere near the specimens of the 90s defenses Barry went up with inferior line play and half a team compared to what Brown had to work with.. you could argue SANDERS/BROWN all day they are 2 of the top 3 but I think Sanders, put on a good team with a good line could have had 2000 yard seasons on the norm.Jim Brown Laughabe?????Let's compare.Rushing Yards Per GameBrown 104.33Sanders 99.79Receiving Yards Per GameBrown 21.17Sanders 19.09Touchdowns per gameBrown 1.07Sanders .71Carrer Rushing Yard Per AttemptBrown 5.2Sanders 5.0Sanders was a great back, he should be in the discussion for #2 all time, but he was tackled at or brhind the line 1/3 of his attempts. If you had 3rd and the The Lions passed, The Browns ran.Best RB of all time:Jim BrownMost exciting RB of all time:Barry SandersBest all around athlete to play RB:Walter PaytonMost exciting athlete to play RBGayle SayersJIM BROWN number 1??? that's laughable.. Best rb ever was Barry Sanders.. I live in Detroit but Im not a real lions fan and I will admit that guy was sick... 10 straight years of unstoppbale force, then retired early. Never had a great line or a good team and was an ultimate competitor and could have smashed the record. period. 1. B. sanders2. W. payton3. jim brown4. Marshall Faulk5. Ladanian Tomlinson6. Emmit SmithHere is your top 6The top 5 RBs of all time in my opinion are:1 - Jim Brown - Only played 9 years and left on top. He would be a beast in any era. 2 - Barry Sanders - Played on awful teams and awful OLs and had he kept playing would have passed Payton and Smith wouldn't have sniffed his record.3 - Walter Payton - Simply a great football player, let alone a great RB.4 - Gayle Sayers - See below.5 - O.J. Simpson - The juice was head and shoulders better than any RB in his prime. He was electrifying.I was tempted to put Marshall Faulk 5th, but the juice was too far ahead of other RBs for several years. I also liked Earl Campbell and Eric Dickerson.That's looking beyond the final tallys. Gayle Sayers didn't have a long career because of injury, but a lot of people say he's the best they ever saw in the time he DID play.Sorry E Smith fans, but he isn't close to being better than the RBs I listed and was a product of the system and great OLs.
If only I could run a 4.3, I may have been on this list.If only Bo Jackson had had a full career... he may have been on this list.I never saw Brown but enough people think he was the best ever that I'd probably say him.
When you have to gain ten yards every set of downs, losing yardage 1/3 of the time is huge, especially when talking about the greatest of all time. Do you think Ruth or Aaron would be in the discussion for the great hitter ever if either had struck out 1/3 of the time? Again I think Sanders was a GREAT back, but Brown was the greatest in any era. To say Brown at number one is laughable is ill informed to put it nicely.Who cares if 1/3 of his runs went for neg yards the guy led the league in rushing almost all the time and was an ultimate runningback machine. He got taken out at THE GOALLINE for some stupid reason or he would have way more then 115 career tds that he has. Jim Brown played in a totally different era where defensive players were nowhere near the specimens of the 90s defenses Barry went up with inferior line play and half a team compared to what Brown had to work with.. you could argue SANDERS/BROWN all day they are 2 of the top 3 but I think Sanders, put on a good team with a good line could have had 2000 yard seasons on the norm.Jim Brown Laughable?????Let's compare.JIM BROWN number 1??? that's laughable.. Best rb ever was Barry Sanders.. I live in Detroit but Im not a real lions fan and I will admit that guy was sick... 10 straight years of unstoppbale force, then retired early. Never had a great line or a good team and was an ultimate competitor and could have smashed the record. period.The top 5 RBs of all time in my opinion are:
1 - Jim Brown - Only played 9 years and left on top. He would be a beast in any era.
2 - Barry Sanders - Played on awful teams and awful OLs and had he kept playing would have passed Payton and Smith wouldn't have sniffed his record.
3 - Walter Payton - Simply a great football player, let alone a great RB.
4 - Gayle Sayers - See below.
5 - O.J. Simpson - The juice was head and shoulders better than any RB in his prime. He was electrifying.
I was tempted to put Marshall Faulk 5th, but the juice was too far ahead of other RBs for several years. I also liked Earl Campbell and Eric Dickerson.
That's looking beyond the final tallys. Gayle Sayers didn't have a long career because of injury, but a lot of people say he's the best they ever saw in the time he DID play.
Sorry E Smith fans, but he isn't close to being better than the RBs I listed and was a product of the system and great OLs.
1. B. sanders
2. W. payton
3. jim brown
4. Marshall Faulk
5. Ladanian Tomlinson
6. Emmit Smith
Here is your top 6
Rushing Yards Per Game
Brown 104.33
Sanders 99.79
Receiving Yards Per Game
Brown 21.17
Sanders 19.09
Touchdowns per game
Brown 1.07
Sanders .71
Carrer Rushing Yard Per Attempt
Brown 5.2
Sanders 5.0
Sanders was a great back, he should be in the discussion for #2 all time, but he was tackled at or brhind the line 1/3 of his attempts. If you had 3rd and the The Lions passed, The Browns ran.
Best RB of all time:
Jim Brown
Most exciting RB of all time:
Barry Sanders
Best all around athlete to play RB:
Walter Payton
Most exciting athlete to play RB
Gayle Sayers
Horrible comparison, their teammates had very little to do with their batting stats, they had the option to use the same bats as their peers. How do you think they would have done if they had a 250-300lb man running at them while they were batting?When you have to gain ten yards every set of downs, losing yardage 1/3 of the time is huge, especially when talking about the greatest of all time. Do you think Ruth or Aaron would be in the discussion for the great hitter ever if either had struck out 1/3 of the time? Again I think Sanders was a GREAT back, but Brown was the greatest in any era. To say Brown at number one is laughable is ill informed to put it nicely.
New to football?I am not old enough to say that I ever saw Jim Brown play a down of football, except for what I have seen on replays. So, in lieu of the fact that I never saw him play, I will go on what most experts who saw Brown, Payton, Barry, Emmitt, and all of the current-day RBs will tell you which is...he is, hands down, easily the #1 RB to ever play the game and one of those rare guys from a completely different era who could have been the best RB in this era (some would even half-kid that he could suit up as an old man today and still rush for 1000 yards). So to suggest that listing Brown #1 is laughable is pretty laughable, in and of itself.JIM BROWN number 1??? that's laughable..
Many of Sanders negitive plays were on him, his dancing style led to those losses. Jim Brown was a straight ahead punishing runner he would had had fewer negitive plays riunning behind worst lines than the Lion's ever had.Horrible comparison, their teammates had very little to do with their batting stats, they had the option to use the same bats as their peers. How do you think they would have done if they had a 250-300lb man running at them while they were batting?When you have to gain ten yards every set of downs, losing yardage 1/3 of the time is huge, especially when talking about the greatest of all time. Do you think Ruth or Aaron would be in the discussion for the great hitter ever if either had struck out 1/3 of the time? Again I think Sanders was a GREAT back, but Brown was the greatest in any era. To say Brown at number one is laughable is ill informed to put it nicely.![]()
Not saying he is not a HOF'er, but he had one of the best O-lines of the day. Just don't think he's top 5 all time. I'd be curious how he would've done running behind the Lions O-line.'fsufan said:at those who do not have smith top 5
do not like the what if agreementswhat if Jerry Rice didn't have 2 HOF QBs throwing him the ball for the bulk of his career. we could do this all day with all playersNot saying he is not a HOF'er, but he had one of the best O-lines of the day. Just don't think he's top 5 all time. I'd be curious how he would've done running behind the Lions O-line.'fsufan said:at those who do not have smith top 5
I wasn't arguing that Sanders was better than Brown.Many of Sanders negitive plays were on him, his dancing style led to those losses. Jim Brown was a straight ahead punishing runner he would had had fewer negitive plays riunning behind worst lines than the Lion's ever had.Horrible comparison, their teammates had very little to do with their batting stats, they had the option to use the same bats as their peers. How do you think they would have done if they had a 250-300lb man running at them while they were batting?When you have to gain ten yards every set of downs, losing yardage 1/3 of the time is huge, especially when talking about the greatest of all time. Do you think Ruth or Aaron would be in the discussion for the great hitter ever if either had struck out 1/3 of the time? Again I think Sanders was a GREAT back, but Brown was the greatest in any era. To say Brown at number one is laughable is ill informed to put it nicely.![]()
i agree my brother because if the indians all had laser guns that we would all be history and there would be no nfl at all and we would all be playing some form of lacross like games and there would be the natinal lacrosse league and since i dont really like the fancy pants ivy league boys that play lacross im glad that didnt happen to clearly jim brown is number one but jim taylor was pretty good toodo not like the what if agreementswhat if Jerry Rice didn't have 2 HOF QBs throwing him the ball for the bulk of his career. we could do this all day with all playersNot saying he is not a HOF'er, but he had one of the best O-lines of the day. Just don't think he's top 5 all time. I'd be curious how he would've done running behind the Lions O-line.'fsufan said:at those who do not have smith top 5
he mostly danced behind the line because there was no hole to run through. How many times was he handed the ball and either had a guy already in the backfield or nothing but the back of his linemen?Many of Sanders negitive plays were on him, his dancing style led to those losses. Jim Brown was a straight ahead punishing runner he would had had fewer negitive plays riunning behind worst lines than the Lion's ever had.Horrible comparison, their teammates had very little to do with their batting stats, they had the option to use the same bats as their peers. How do you think they would have done if they had a 250-300lb man running at them while they were batting?When you have to gain ten yards every set of downs, losing yardage 1/3 of the time is huge, especially when talking about the greatest of all time. Do you think Ruth or Aaron would be in the discussion for the great hitter ever if either had struck out 1/3 of the time? Again I think Sanders was a GREAT back, but Brown was the greatest in any era. To say Brown at number one is laughable is ill informed to put it nicely.![]()
I wouldn't laugh at Smith being in or out of the top 5. I would put him at the 4-6 range.'JuSt CuZ said:Fixed!'fsufan said:at those who do not have smith top 5
noBo Jackson should be on the list. Discuss
'fsufan said:at those who do not have smith top 5