What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Top 5 RBs of all time (1 Viewer)

Top 5 RBs of all time

  • Jim Brown

    Votes: 105 84.7%
  • Walter Payton

    Votes: 108 87.1%
  • LT2

    Votes: 50 40.3%
  • Barry Sanders

    Votes: 107 86.3%
  • Marshall Faulk

    Votes: 51 41.1%
  • OJ Simpson

    Votes: 36 29.0%
  • Eric Dickerson

    Votes: 45 36.3%
  • Emmitt Smith

    Votes: 27 21.8%
  • Gale Sayers

    Votes: 15 12.1%
  • Earl Campbell

    Votes: 8 6.5%
  • Jerome Bettis

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • Jim Taylor

    Votes: 3 2.4%
  • Thurman Thomas

    Votes: 3 2.4%
  • Marcus Allen

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Steve Van Buren

    Votes: 1 0.8%

  • Total voters
    124
The top 5 RBs of all time in my opinion are:

1 - Jim Brown - Only played 9 years and left on top. He would be a beast in any era.

2 - Barry Sanders - Played on awful teams and awful OLs and had he kept playing would have passed Payton and Smith wouldn't have sniffed his record.

3 - Walter Payton - Simply a great football player, let alone a great RB.

4 - Gayle Sayers - See below.

5 - O.J. Simpson - The juice was head and shoulders better than any RB in his prime. He was electrifying.

I was tempted to put Marshall Faulk 5th, but the juice was too far ahead of other RBs for several years. I also liked Earl Campbell and Eric Dickerson.

That's looking beyond the final tallys. Gayle Sayers didn't have a long career because of injury, but a lot of people say he's the best they ever saw in the time he DID play.

Sorry E Smith fans, but he isn't close to being better than the RBs I listed and was a product of the system and great OLs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Smith has to at least be an option... He's the rushing yard record holder. He needs to be in the discussion.

 
1. Jim Brown

2. Barry Sanders

3. Walter Payton

4. O.J. Simpson

5. Eric Dickerson

I do like the Gayle Sayers call, as he's the one RB I wished I could have seen play. The 2 RB's that I wished had a long healthy career were Sayers and Bo Jackson. Jackson's career was very short, but he had it all.

While he's not in my top 7, I do agree that Emmitt Smith should have been listed.

 
I too wouldn't put Emmitt near #1 but he should be listed as an option.

#1 Jim Brown (I can't understand ANYONE not putting him there.)

#2 Walter Peyton (I'll never forget being at a game when there was a moment of silence, because he had just passed. He was, easily, one of the greatest ever.)

#3 Barry Sanders (I am a Lions fan but I think i'm being pretty realistic. If he played for another few years he would have the record that Emmitt now has. I would put him at #2 for sure. He just simply left too soon.)

#4 Marshall Faulk (I think that a lot of people don't give him the respect he deserves. I was a pleasantly surprised that he was listed in this poll because he definitely deserves it.)

#5 Emmitt Smith (He deserves the respect of being on the list. Yes, he played on a great team and behind a great line. But simply saying that he wouldn't do well in another situation is pure speculation.)

 
No love for Franco Harris yet? He was the key to the Pittsburgh offense during their first four SBs.

My top 5 were

Brown

Payton

Dickerson

Harris

OJ

I have a bias against scat-backs, hence my omission of Barry (and part of my hatred of Reggie Bush). Outstanding at what he did, no doubt but I can't put him above these bruisers.

 
The top 5 RBs of all time in my opinion are:1 - Jim Brown - Only played 9 years and left on top. He would be a beast in any era. 2 - Barry Sanders - Played on awful teams and awful OLs and had he kept playing would have passed Payton and Smith wouldn't have sniffed his record.3 - Walter Payton - Simply a great football player, let alone a great RB.4 - Gayle Sayers - See below.5 - O.J. Simpson - The juice was head and shoulders better than any RB in his prime. He was electrifying.I was tempted to put Marshall Faulk 5th, but the juice was too far ahead of other RBs for several years. I also liked Earl Campbell and Eric Dickerson.That's looking beyond the final tallys. Gayle Sayers didn't have a long career because of injury, but a lot of people say he's the best they ever saw in the time he DID play.Sorry E Smith fans, but he isn't close to being better than the RBs I listed and was a product of the system and great OLs.
It's not about being a fan Hoss, it's just fact. He's not a product of just a good O-line and a good system, it's very narrow minded thinking IMO. I'm not going to try and change your mind, but why did you even mention Emmitt Smith in your closing statement? Why wasn't it sorry Riggins fans, or sorry Marcus Allen fans, why did you pick Emmitt Smith?My guess is because you know deep down he is in that company yet you just don't have him there.There's no way Gayle Sayers was a better football player than Emmitt Smith. The guy didn't even come close to the career Emmitt Smith had. Let me also ask you this, if the Juice was head and shoulders above any RB in his prime, why wasn't he your NO. 1 selection, why did you drop him to No. 5 if he was better than all the rest like you stated?
 
No love for Franco Harris yet? He was the key to the Pittsburgh offense during their first four SBs.My top 5 wereBrownPaytonDickersonHarris OJI have a bias against scat-backs, hence my omission of Barry (and part of my hatred of Reggie Bush). Outstanding at what he did, no doubt but I can't put him above these bruisers.
I like your theme, but if you're going with pure bruisers, how do you not put Earl Campbell in there, he should be right behind Jim Brown in that category.
 
No love for Franco Harris yet? He was the key to the Pittsburgh offense during their first four SBs.My top 5 wereBrownPaytonDickersonHarris OJI have a bias against scat-backs, hence my omission of Barry (and part of my hatred of Reggie Bush). Outstanding at what he did, no doubt but I can't put him above these bruisers.
I like your theme, but if you're going with pure bruisers, how do you not put Earl Campbell in there, he should be right behind Jim Brown in that category.
Agreed. I never got to watch Brown , but you could just see the fear in defensive backs when they had to get in front of Campbell. I've never seen that with any other player, & I wonder if Brown was even like that.
 
No love for Franco Harris yet? He was the key to the Pittsburgh offense during their first four SBs.My top 5 wereBrownPaytonDickersonHarris OJI have a bias against scat-backs, hence my omission of Barry (and part of my hatred of Reggie Bush). Outstanding at what he did, no doubt but I can't put him above these bruisers.
I like your theme, but if you're going with pure bruisers, how do you not put Earl Campbell in there, he should be right behind Jim Brown in that category.
Agreed. I never got to watch Brown , but you could just see the fear in defensive backs when they had to get in front of Campbell. I've never seen that with any other player, & I wonder if Brown was even like that.
This is what John Mackey said about Jim Brown:He told me, 'Make sure when anyone tackles you he remembers how much it hurts.' He lived by that philosophy and I always followed that advice. —John Mackey, 1999Something tells me not many DB's wanted to tackle Mr. Brown.
 
The top 5 RBs of all time in my opinion are:1 - Jim Brown - Only played 9 years and left on top. He would be a beast in any era. 2 - Barry Sanders - Played on awful teams and awful OLs and had he kept playing would have passed Payton and Smith wouldn't have sniffed his record.3 - Walter Payton - Simply a great football player, let alone a great RB.4 - Gayle Sayers - See below.5 - O.J. Simpson - The juice was head and shoulders better than any RB in his prime. He was electrifying.I was tempted to put Marshall Faulk 5th, but the juice was too far ahead of other RBs for several years. I also liked Earl Campbell and Eric Dickerson.That's looking beyond the final tallys. Gayle Sayers didn't have a long career because of injury, but a lot of people say he's the best they ever saw in the time he DID play.Sorry E Smith fans, but he isn't close to being better than the RBs I listed and was a product of the system and great OLs.
JIM BROWN number 1??? that's laughable.. Best rb ever was Barry Sanders.. I live in Detroit but Im not a real lions fan and I will admit that guy was sick... 10 straight years of unstoppbale force, then retired early. Never had a great line or a good team and was an ultimate competitor and could have smashed the record. period. 1. B. sanders2. W. payton3. jim brown4. Marshall Faulk5. Ladanian Tomlinson6. Emmit SmithHere is your top 6
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1. Jim Brown

2. Walter Payton

3. Barry Sanders

4. Ladainian Tomlinson

5a. Marshall Faulk

5b. Emmitt Smith

6. Gale Sayers

7. OJ Simpson

8. Eric Dickerson

 
1. Brown

2. Sanders

3. Payton

4. Dickerson

5. Campbell

Franco Harris does belong up there as an option.

Then again, so does Marion Motley:

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/M/MotlMa00.htm

Look, Smith was "Great", definitely belongs in the conversation, but no he is not was not shall never be better than all of those above. He is basically the Joe The Jet Perry of the current generation.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The top 5 RBs of all time in my opinion are:1 - Jim Brown - Only played 9 years and left on top. He would be a beast in any era. 2 - Barry Sanders - Played on awful teams and awful OLs and had he kept playing would have passed Payton and Smith wouldn't have sniffed his record.3 - Walter Payton - Simply a great football player, let alone a great RB.4 - Gayle Sayers - See below.5 - O.J. Simpson - The juice was head and shoulders better than any RB in his prime. He was electrifying.I was tempted to put Marshall Faulk 5th, but the juice was too far ahead of other RBs for several years. I also liked Earl Campbell and Eric Dickerson.That's looking beyond the final tallys. Gayle Sayers didn't have a long career because of injury, but a lot of people say he's the best they ever saw in the time he DID play.Sorry E Smith fans, but he isn't close to being better than the RBs I listed and was a product of the system and great OLs.
JIM BROWN number 1??? that's laughable.. Best rb ever was Barry Sanders.. I live in Detroit but Im not a real lions fan and I will admit that guy was sick... 10 straight years of unstoppbale force, then retired early. Never had a great line or a good team and was an ultimate competitor and could have smashed the record. period. 1. B. sanders2. W. payton3. jim brown4. Marshall Faulk5. Ladanian Tomlinson6. Emmit SmithHere is your top 6
Jim Brown Laughabe?????Let's compare.Rushing Yards Per GameBrown 104.33Sanders 99.79Receiving Yards Per GameBrown 21.17Sanders 19.09Touchdowns per gameBrown 1.07Sanders .71Carrer Rushing Yard Per AttemptBrown 5.2Sanders 5.0Sanders was a great back, he should be in the discussion for #2 all time, but he was tackled at or brhind the line 1/3 of his attempts. If you had 3rd and the The Lions passed, The Browns ran.Best RB of all time:Jim BrownMost exciting RB of all time:Barry SandersBest all around athlete to play RB:Walter PaytonMost exciting athlete to play RBGayle Sayers
 
The top 5 RBs of all time in my opinion are:1 - Jim Brown - Only played 9 years and left on top. He would be a beast in any era. 2 - Barry Sanders - Played on awful teams and awful OLs and had he kept playing would have passed Payton and Smith wouldn't have sniffed his record.3 - Walter Payton - Simply a great football player, let alone a great RB.4 - Gayle Sayers - See below.5 - O.J. Simpson - The juice was head and shoulders better than any RB in his prime. He was electrifying.I was tempted to put Marshall Faulk 5th, but the juice was too far ahead of other RBs for several years. I also liked Earl Campbell and Eric Dickerson.That's looking beyond the final tallys. Gayle Sayers didn't have a long career because of injury, but a lot of people say he's the best they ever saw in the time he DID play.Sorry E Smith fans, but he isn't close to being better than the RBs I listed and was a product of the system and great OLs.
JIM BROWN number 1??? that's laughable.. Best rb ever was Barry Sanders.. I live in Detroit but Im not a real lions fan and I will admit that guy was sick... 10 straight years of unstoppbale force, then retired early. Never had a great line or a good team and was an ultimate competitor and could have smashed the record. period. 1. B. sanders2. W. payton3. jim brown4. Marshall Faulk5. Ladanian Tomlinson6. Emmit SmithHere is your top 6
Jim Brown Laughabe?????Let's compare.Rushing Yards Per GameBrown 104.33Sanders 99.79Receiving Yards Per GameBrown 21.17Sanders 19.09Touchdowns per gameBrown 1.07Sanders .71Carrer Rushing Yard Per AttemptBrown 5.2Sanders 5.0Sanders was a great back, he should be in the discussion for #2 all time, but he was tackled at or brhind the line 1/3 of his attempts. If you had 3rd and the The Lions passed, The Browns ran.Best RB of all time:Jim BrownMost exciting RB of all time:Barry SandersBest all around athlete to play RB:Walter PaytonMost exciting athlete to play RBGayle Sayers
Who cares if 1/3 of his runs went for neg yards the guy led the league in rushing almost all the time and was an ultimate runningback machine. He got taken out at THE GOALLINE for some stupid reason or he would have way more then 115 career tds that he has. Jim Brown played in a totally different era where defensive players were nowhere near the specimens of the 90s defenses Barry went up with inferior line play and half a team compared to what Brown had to work with.. you could argue SANDERS/BROWN all day they are 2 of the top 3 but I think Sanders, put on a good team with a good line could have had 2000 yard seasons on the norm.
 
If only Bo Jackson had had a full career... he may have been on this list.

I never saw Brown but enough people think he was the best ever that I'd probably say him.

 
The top 5 RBs of all time in my opinion are:

1 - Jim Brown - Only played 9 years and left on top. He would be a beast in any era.

2 - Barry Sanders - Played on awful teams and awful OLs and had he kept playing would have passed Payton and Smith wouldn't have sniffed his record.

3 - Walter Payton - Simply a great football player, let alone a great RB.

4 - Gayle Sayers - See below.

5 - O.J. Simpson - The juice was head and shoulders better than any RB in his prime. He was electrifying.

I was tempted to put Marshall Faulk 5th, but the juice was too far ahead of other RBs for several years. I also liked Earl Campbell and Eric Dickerson.

That's looking beyond the final tallys. Gayle Sayers didn't have a long career because of injury, but a lot of people say he's the best they ever saw in the time he DID play.

Sorry E Smith fans, but he isn't close to being better than the RBs I listed and was a product of the system and great OLs.
JIM BROWN number 1??? that's laughable.. Best rb ever was Barry Sanders.. I live in Detroit but Im not a real lions fan and I will admit that guy was sick... 10 straight years of unstoppbale force, then retired early. Never had a great line or a good team and was an ultimate competitor and could have smashed the record. period.

1. B. sanders

2. W. payton

3. jim brown

4. Marshall Faulk

5. Ladanian Tomlinson

6. Emmit Smith

Here is your top 6
Jim Brown Laughable?????Let's compare.

Rushing Yards Per Game

Brown 104.33

Sanders 99.79

Receiving Yards Per Game

Brown 21.17

Sanders 19.09

Touchdowns per game

Brown 1.07

Sanders .71

Carrer Rushing Yard Per Attempt

Brown 5.2

Sanders 5.0

Sanders was a great back, he should be in the discussion for #2 all time, but he was tackled at or brhind the line 1/3 of his attempts. If you had 3rd and the The Lions passed, The Browns ran.

Best RB of all time:

Jim Brown

Most exciting RB of all time:

Barry Sanders

Best all around athlete to play RB:

Walter Payton

Most exciting athlete to play RB

Gayle Sayers
Who cares if 1/3 of his runs went for neg yards the guy led the league in rushing almost all the time and was an ultimate runningback machine. He got taken out at THE GOALLINE for some stupid reason or he would have way more then 115 career tds that he has. Jim Brown played in a totally different era where defensive players were nowhere near the specimens of the 90s defenses Barry went up with inferior line play and half a team compared to what Brown had to work with.. you could argue SANDERS/BROWN all day they are 2 of the top 3 but I think Sanders, put on a good team with a good line could have had 2000 yard seasons on the norm.
When you have to gain ten yards every set of downs, losing yardage 1/3 of the time is huge, especially when talking about the greatest of all time. Do you think Ruth or Aaron would be in the discussion for the great hitter ever if either had struck out 1/3 of the time? Again I think Sanders was a GREAT back, but Brown was the greatest in any era. To say Brown at number one is laughable is ill informed to put it nicely.
 
When you have to gain ten yards every set of downs, losing yardage 1/3 of the time is huge, especially when talking about the greatest of all time. Do you think Ruth or Aaron would be in the discussion for the great hitter ever if either had struck out 1/3 of the time? Again I think Sanders was a GREAT back, but Brown was the greatest in any era. To say Brown at number one is laughable is ill informed to put it nicely.
Horrible comparison, their teammates had very little to do with their batting stats, they had the option to use the same bats as their peers. How do you think they would have done if they had a 250-300lb man running at them while they were batting? :lmao:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
JIM BROWN number 1??? that's laughable..
New to football?I am not old enough to say that I ever saw Jim Brown play a down of football, except for what I have seen on replays. So, in lieu of the fact that I never saw him play, I will go on what most experts who saw Brown, Payton, Barry, Emmitt, and all of the current-day RBs will tell you which is...he is, hands down, easily the #1 RB to ever play the game and one of those rare guys from a completely different era who could have been the best RB in this era (some would even half-kid that he could suit up as an old man today and still rush for 1000 yards). So to suggest that listing Brown #1 is laughable is pretty laughable, in and of itself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When you have to gain ten yards every set of downs, losing yardage 1/3 of the time is huge, especially when talking about the greatest of all time. Do you think Ruth or Aaron would be in the discussion for the great hitter ever if either had struck out 1/3 of the time? Again I think Sanders was a GREAT back, but Brown was the greatest in any era. To say Brown at number one is laughable is ill informed to put it nicely.
Horrible comparison, their teammates had very little to do with their batting stats, they had the option to use the same bats as their peers. How do you think they would have done if they had a 250-300lb man running at them while they were batting? :lmao:
Many of Sanders negitive plays were on him, his dancing style led to those losses. Jim Brown was a straight ahead punishing runner he would had had fewer negitive plays riunning behind worst lines than the Lion's ever had.
 
'fsufan said:
:lmao: at those who do not have smith top 5
Not saying he is not a HOF'er, but he had one of the best O-lines of the day. Just don't think he's top 5 all time. I'd be curious how he would've done running behind the Lions O-line.
 
'fsufan said:
:lmao: at those who do not have smith top 5
Not saying he is not a HOF'er, but he had one of the best O-lines of the day. Just don't think he's top 5 all time. I'd be curious how he would've done running behind the Lions O-line.
do not like the what if agreementswhat if Jerry Rice didn't have 2 HOF QBs throwing him the ball for the bulk of his career. we could do this all day with all players
 
When you have to gain ten yards every set of downs, losing yardage 1/3 of the time is huge, especially when talking about the greatest of all time. Do you think Ruth or Aaron would be in the discussion for the great hitter ever if either had struck out 1/3 of the time? Again I think Sanders was a GREAT back, but Brown was the greatest in any era. To say Brown at number one is laughable is ill informed to put it nicely.
Horrible comparison, their teammates had very little to do with their batting stats, they had the option to use the same bats as their peers. How do you think they would have done if they had a 250-300lb man running at them while they were batting? :lmao:
Many of Sanders negitive plays were on him, his dancing style led to those losses. Jim Brown was a straight ahead punishing runner he would had had fewer negitive plays riunning behind worst lines than the Lion's ever had.
I wasn't arguing that Sanders was better than Brown. ;)
 
'fsufan said:
:lmao: at those who do not have smith top 5
Not saying he is not a HOF'er, but he had one of the best O-lines of the day. Just don't think he's top 5 all time. I'd be curious how he would've done running behind the Lions O-line.
do not like the what if agreementswhat if Jerry Rice didn't have 2 HOF QBs throwing him the ball for the bulk of his career. we could do this all day with all players
i agree my brother because if the indians all had laser guns that we would all be history and there would be no nfl at all and we would all be playing some form of lacross like games and there would be the natinal lacrosse league and since i dont really like the fancy pants ivy league boys that play lacross im glad that didnt happen to clearly jim brown is number one but jim taylor was pretty good too
 
When you have to gain ten yards every set of downs, losing yardage 1/3 of the time is huge, especially when talking about the greatest of all time. Do you think Ruth or Aaron would be in the discussion for the great hitter ever if either had struck out 1/3 of the time? Again I think Sanders was a GREAT back, but Brown was the greatest in any era. To say Brown at number one is laughable is ill informed to put it nicely.
Horrible comparison, their teammates had very little to do with their batting stats, they had the option to use the same bats as their peers. How do you think they would have done if they had a 250-300lb man running at them while they were batting? :lmao:
Many of Sanders negitive plays were on him, his dancing style led to those losses. Jim Brown was a straight ahead punishing runner he would had had fewer negitive plays riunning behind worst lines than the Lion's ever had.
he mostly danced behind the line because there was no hole to run through. How many times was he handed the ball and either had a guy already in the backfield or nothing but the back of his linemen?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top