What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Trivia Question: Who was the last Raiders WR that was drafted (1 Viewer)

LHUCKS

Footballguy
:popcorn:

subquestion, who was the last Raider drafted(in fantasy) that finished as a WR#1?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last time each team had a 1,000 yard receiver:

2010: ARI, ATL, BUF, DAL, DEN, DET, GB, HOU, IND, KC, MIA, NO, NYG, PHI, PIT, WAS

2009: BAL, CIN, MIN, NE, SD

2008: CAR, TB

2007: CLE, NYJ, SEA, STL

2005: JAX, OAK

2004: TEN

2003: SF

2002: CHI

 
Last time each team had a 1,000 yard receiver:2010: ARI, ATL, BUF, DAL, DEN, DET, GB, HOU, IND, KC, MIA, NO, NYG, PHI, PIT, WAS2009: BAL, CIN, MIN, NE, SD 2008: CAR, TB2007: CLE, NYJ, SEA, STL 2005: JAX, OAK 2004: TEN 2003: SF 2002: CHI
love this post, thanks david
 
Last time each team had a 1,000 yard receiver:2010: ARI, ATL, BUF, DAL, DEN, DET, GB, HOU, IND, KC, MIA, NO, NYG, PHI, PIT, WAS2009: BAL, CIN, MIN, NE, SD 2008: CAR, TB2007: CLE, NYJ, SEA, STL 2005: JAX, OAK 2004: TEN 2003: SF 2002: CHI
Oof...makes me wonder if I'm overvaluing Britt, Holmes, or Mike Williams.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last time each team had a 1,000 yard receiver:2010: ARI, ATL, BUF, DAL, DEN, DET, GB, HOU, IND, KC, MIA, NO, NYG, PHI, PIT, WAS2009: BAL, CIN, MIN, NE, SD 2008: CAR, TB2007: CLE, NYJ, SEA, STL 2005: JAX, OAK 2004: TEN 2003: SF 2002: CHI
David,What would this have looked like last year; from 2001 - 2009? I'm curious which teams made the list for 2010 that were previously in the "CHI, SF, TEN" category.
 
Last time each team had a 1,000 yard receiver:2010: ARI, ATL, BUF, DAL, DEN, DET, GB, HOU, IND, KC, MIA, NO, NYG, PHI, PIT, WAS2009: BAL, CIN, MIN, NE, SD 2008: CAR, TB2007: CLE, NYJ, SEA, STL 2005: JAX, OAK 2004: TEN 2003: SF 2002: CHI
David,What would this have looked like last year; from 2001 - 2009? I'm curious which teams made the list for 2010 that were previously in the "CHI, SF, TEN" category.
2009: ARI, ATL, BAL, CIN, DAL, DEN, GB, HOU, IND, MIN, NE, NO, NYG, PHI, PIT, SD 2008: BUF, CAR, DET, KC, TB, WAS2007: CLE, NYJ, SEA, STL 2005: JAX, MIA, OAK 2004: TEN 2003: SF 2002: CHI
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last time each team had a 1,000 yard receiver:2010: ARI, ATL, BUF, DAL, DEN, DET, GB, HOU, IND, KC, MIA, NO, NYG, PHI, PIT, WAS2009: BAL, CIN, MIN, NE, SD 2008: CAR, TB2007: CLE, NYJ, SEA, STL 2005: JAX, OAK 2004: TEN 2003: SF 2002: CHI
Oof...makes me wonder if I'm overvaluing Britt, Holmes, or Mike Williams.
I think there's a danger in looking a trend like this and thinking it too strongly predicts the future. Take the case of the players you named.Britt has somewhat of an upgrade at QB. Last year he was WR15 in per game scoring in my .5 PPR league, but he missed 4 games. He was on pace for 1000 yards otherwise. With those things in mind I'd say he's a fair bet to get 1000 yards if he doesn't get injured or suspended.Santonio Holmes was WR26 by ppg. He also missed 4 games and was otherwise right on pace for 1000 yards. Myself personally, I expect Sanchez's completion rate to increase and for the Jets to continue to let him throw more, so I could see his numbers going up slightly.Mike Williams it is hard to say he's seen an improvement at QB. It might be easier to say we expect him to see worse QB'ing. He also has a pair of TEs capable of taking targets away from him. He was 52nd in WR scoring. There isn't much about the situation in Seattle to think it won't be the same as in the past.So for me, 2 players out of 3 that you named have improved situations. Now I don't know how high you are projecting them to say if it's too high, but if you're talking about WR2 numbers, I don't think that 1000 yard receiver thing would sway me. There are legitimate reasons to think this could be the year for those teams.
 
If your question is essentially whether or not this Raider team is capable of having a fantasy relevant WR, I think Jacoby Ford already answered that during the second half of last season.

Jerry Porter has as much to do with this as Emmit Smith does for Mark Ingram's prospects this year.

 
'Greg Russell said:
'rascal said:
Last time each team had a 1,000 yard receiver:2010: ARI, ATL, BUF, DAL, DEN, DET, GB, HOU, IND, KC, MIA, NO, NYG, PHI, PIT, WAS2009: BAL, CIN, MIN, NE, SD 2008: CAR, TB2007: CLE, NYJ, SEA, STL 2005: JAX, OAK 2004: TEN 2003: SF 2002: CHI
Oof...makes me wonder if I'm overvaluing Britt, Holmes, or Mike Williams.
Mike Williams it is hard to say he's seen an improvement at QB. It might be easier to say we expect him to see worse QB'ing. He also has a pair of TEs capable of taking targets away from him. He was 52nd in WR scoring. There isn't much about the situation in Seattle to think it won't be the same as in the past.
I thought he meant Tampa Mike.
 
'LawFitz said:
If your question is essentially whether or not this Raider team is capable of having a fantasy relevant WR, I think Jacoby Ford already answered that during the second half of last season.
:goodposting: :yes:
 
Last time each team had a 1,000 yard receiver:2010: ARI, ATL, BUF, DAL, DEN, DET, GB, HOU, IND, KC, MIA, NO, NYG, PHI, PIT, WAS2009: BAL, CIN, MIN, NE, SD 2008: CAR, TB2007: CLE, NYJ, SEA, STL 2005: JAX, OAK 2004: TEN 2003: SF 2002: CHI
love this post, thanks david
HUCKS, isn't Britt one of your go-to guys as far as breakout stars? Tennessee has a longer dry spell than Oakland. Ditto for for your Beanie Wells selection, I'm pretty sure Arizona has statistically been a wasteland for 1,000 yard rushers.I agree with you on both picks, I think they're great values; I just think it's cherrypicking to call out people for 'overvaluing' Oakland WRs for situation but make an exception for the other guys. Especially when Moore is getting Mike Williams-ish buzz, Ford flashed breakout skills last year, and Oakland's top guy in terms of targets (Zach Miller) is long gone, replaced by largely a non-receiver (Boss). It seems to me there's a lot of opportunity in Oakland this season; those 2 wrs and McFadden seem like the 'it guys' in their passing game, one that'll probably be leaned upon more with a shaky defense.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top